Okul Farkındalığı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Hilal Büyükgöze; Murat Özdemir

doi:10.9779/pauefd.454945

EN TR

Turkish Adaptation of the School Mindfulness Scale (M-Scale): A Construct Validity and Reliability Study

Abstract

This study aimed to adapt the School Mindfulness Scale (M-Scale), developed by Hoy, Gage and Tarter (2004), into Turkish culture. A total of 215 teachers from 17 primary and middle schools located in Ankara participated in the study. First, some statistical assumptions were checked in the M-Scale data set, then validity and reliability studies were conducted. The construct validity of the scale was tested by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The CFA model validated the two-factor construct of the M-Scale. Within the reliability and item-analysis measures, item-total correlations, split-half test reliability, Cronbach’s alpha, Guttman lambda, stratified alpha, Armor’s theta, McDonald’s omega coefficients were calculated, and upper 27%-lower 27% group mean differences were examined by independent groups t test. The M-Scale was found to have a moderate level of item discrimination among its 14 items. The Crobach’s alpha value was calculated to be .88 for the overall M-Scale, .83 for the teacher mindfulness factor, and .78 for the principal mindfulness factor. The construct validation and reliability analyses indicated that the M-Scale appears to have adequate psychometric properties, and a valid and reliable data collection tool in measuring school mindfulness construct within Turkish culture.

Keywords

school mindfulness,teacher mindfulness,principal mindfulness,validity,reliability,scale adaptation

Okul Farkındalığı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, Hoy, Gage ve Tarter’ın (2004) geliştirdiği ‘Okul Farkındalığı Ölçeği-OFÖ’nün Türk kültürüne uyarlanması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmaya, Ankara’da bulunan 17 ilkokul ve ortaokulda görev yapmakta olan 215 öğretmen katılmıştır. OFÖ’ye ait veri seti çeşitli varsayımlar açısından incelendikten sonra geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliği doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) ile test edilmiştir. DFA ile OFÖ’nün öğretmen farkındalığı ve müdür farkındalığından oluşan iki faktörlü yapısı doğrulanmıştır. Ölçeğin güvenirlik ve madde analizi çalışmaları kapsamında madde-toplam korelasyonları, iki-yarı test güvenirliği, Cronbach alfa, Guttman lambda, tabakalı alfa, Armor teta, McDonald omega ve alt %27-üst %27lik grup ortalama farkları incelenmiştir. OFÖ’de yer alan 14 maddenin madde ayırtediciliklerinin iyi düzeyde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ölçeğin tamamına ilişkin iç tutarlık katsayısının .88 olduğu ve boyutlarına ilişkin katsayıların ise sırasıyla .83 ve .78 olduğu saptanmıştır. Gerçekleştirilen geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri, OFÖ’nün okul farkındalığı yapısının Türk kültüründe ölçülmesi için yeterli psikometrik özelliklere sahip, geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermiştir.

Keywords

okul farkındalığı,öğretmen farkındalığı,müdür farkındalığı,geçerlik,güvenirlik,ölçek uyarlama

References

Armor, D. J. (1973). Theta reliability and factor scaling. Sociological Methodology, 5, 17-50.
Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(1), 139-161. doi: 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0
Bellibas, M. S., & Liu, Y. (2018). The effects of principals’ perceived instructional and distributed leadership practices on their perceptions of school climate. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(2), 226-244. doi: 10.1080/13603124.2016.1147608
Benton, T. (Temmuz, 2013). An empirical assessment of Guttman’s Lambda 4 reliability coefficient. Paper presented at the International Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Arnhem.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equations models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Cronbach, L. J., Schönemann, P., & McKie, D. (1965). Alpha coefficients for stratified-parallel tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25(2), 291-312. doi: 10.1177/001316446502500201
Easton, G. S., & McCulloch, R. E. (1990). A multivariate generalization of quantile-quantile plots. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85(410), 376-386.
Fiol, C. M., & O’Connor, E. J. (2003). Waking up! Mindfulness in the face of bandwagons. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 54-70. doi: 10.2307/30040689
Gage, C. Q. (2003). The meaning and measure of school mindfulness: An exploratory analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA.
Gagné, P., & Hancock, G. R. (2006). Measurement model quality, sample size, and solution propriety in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(1), 65-83. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4101_5

George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson
Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2000). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing, Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44. doi: 10.1177/0013161X96032001002
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011). Exploring the journey of school improvement: Classifying and analyzing patterns of change in school improvement processes and learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22, 1-27. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2010.536322
Hallinger, P., & Huber, S. (2012). School leadership that makes a difference: International perspectives. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 359-367. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2012.681508
Hallinger, P., & Leithwood, K. (1996). Culture and educational administration: A case of finding out what you don’t know you don’t know. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(5), 98-116. doi: 10.1108/09578239610148296
Ham, S., Duyar, I., & Gumus, S. (2015). Agreement of self-other perceptions matters: Analyzing the effectiveness of principal leadership through multi-source assessment. Australian Journal of Education, 59(3), 225-246. doi: 10.1177/0004944115603373
Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., O’Brien, D. M., & Rivkin, S. G. (2005). The market for teacher quality (Working Paper No. 11154). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research website: http://www.nber.org/papers/w11154
Heck, R. H. (2007). Examining the relationship between teacher quality as an organizational property of schools and students’ achievement and growth rates. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 399-432. doi: 10.1177/0013161X07306452
Hopkins, D., Stringfield, S., Harris, A., Stoll, L., & Mackay, T. (2014). School and system improvement: A narrative state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 257-281. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2014.885452
Hoy, W. K. (2003). An analysis of enabling and mindful school structures: Some theoretical, research and practical considerations. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(1), 87-109. doi: 10.1108/09578230310457457
Hoy, W. K. (2010). Organizational climate and culture: A conceptual analysis of the school workplace. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1(2), 149-168. doi: 10.1207/s1532768xjepc0102_4
Hoy, W. K., Gage, C. Q., & Tarter, C. J. (2004). Theoretical and empirical foundations of mindful schools. In W. K. Hoy and C. Miskel (Eds.), Educational administration, policy, and reform: Research and measurement. Greenwich, CN; Information Age.
Hoy, W. K., Gage, C. Q., & Tarter, C. J. (2006). School mindfulness and faculty trust: Necessary conditions for each other? Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 236-255. doi: 10.1177/0013161X04273844
Hoy, W. K., & Hannum, J. W. (1997). Middle school climate: An empirical assessment of organizational health and student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(3), 290-311.
Hoy, W. K., Hannum, J., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998). Organizational climate and student achievement: A parsimonious and longitudinal view. Journal of School Leadership, 8(4), 336-359.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2008). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (8th ed.). Boston, NY: McGraw Hill.
Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Bliss, J. R. (1990). Organizational climate, school health, and effectiveness: A comparative analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(3), 260-279. doi: 10.1177/0013161X90026003004
Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 355-372.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modelling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). London, UK: SAGE.
Kearney, W. S., Kelsey, C., & Herrington, D. (2013). Mindful leaders in highly effective schools: A mixed-method application of Hoy’s M-scale. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 41(3), 316-335. doi: 10.1177/1741143212474802
Kline, R. B. (2013). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In Y. Petscher & C. Schatsschneider (Eds.), Applied quantitative analysis in the social sciences (pp. 171-207). NY: Routledge.
Ko, J. Y. C., Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. D. (2012). Exploring school improvement in Hong Kong secondary schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(2), 216-234. doi: 10.1080/0161956X.2012.664474
Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M., & Sugawara, H. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193-210. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84-99. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J. L. (2006). OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311-360. doi: 10.1207/s15327574ijt0604_1
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(2), 181-220. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1
McCowan, R. J., & McCowan, S. C. (1999). Item analysis for criterion-referenced tests. Buffalo, NY: CDHS, SUNY.
Myers, N. D., Ahn, S., & Jin, Y. (2011). Sample size and power estimates for a confirmatory factor analytic model in exercise and sport: A Monte Carlo approach. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(3), 412-423.
Ægisdóttir, S., Gerstein, L. H., & Cinarbas, D. C. (2008). Methodological issues in cross-cultural counseling research: Equivalence, bias, and translations. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(2), 188-219. doi: 10.1177/0011000007305384
Peurach, D. J., & Glazer, J. L. (2012). Reconsidering replication: New perspectives on large-scale school improvement. Journal of Educational Change, 13, 155-190. doi: 10.1007/s10833-011-9177-7
Pinck, A. S., & Sonnentag, S. (2017). Leader mindfulness and employee well-being: The mediating role of transformational leadership. Mindfulness. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0828-5
Pituch, K. A., & Stevens, J. P. (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Quintana, S. M., & Maxwell, S. E. (1999). Implications of recent developments in structural equation modeling for counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 27(4), 485-527. doi: 10.1177/0011000099274002
Rae, G. (2007). A note on using stratified alpha to estimate the composite reliability of a test composed of interrelated nonhomogeneous items. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 177-184. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.177
R Core Team (2018). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org.
Sapnas, K. G. (2004). Determining adequate sample size. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 36(1), 3-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004.t01-4-04003.x
Scarbrough, C. S. (2005). Aspects of organizational mindfulness and dimensions of faculty trust: Social processes in elementary schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonia, Texas, USA.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350-353. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.350
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. NY: Falmer Press.
Thomas, T. S. (2017). Pupil control ideology and mindfulness: A high school study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA.
Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2006). The research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Cinninnati, OH: Atomic Dog.
Uline, C. L., Miller, D. M., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998). School effectiveness: The underlying dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(4), 462-483.
Watts, D. M. (2009). Enabling school structure, mindfulness, and teacher empowerment: Test of a theory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA.
Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2006). Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organizational Science, 17(4), 514-525. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0196
Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1990). Educational measurement and testing (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Zijlmans, E. A. O., Tijmstra, J., van der Ark, L. A., & Sijtsma, K. (2017). Item-score reliability in empirical-data sets and its relationship with other item indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1-23. doi: 10.1177/0013164417728358
Zinbarg, R., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ωH: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123-133. doi: 10.1007/s11336-0974-7

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Hilal Büyükgöze ^*
0000-0002-7563-4740
Türkiye

Murat Özdemir
0000-0002-1166-6831
Türkiye

Publication Date

May 22, 2019

Submission Date

August 23, 2018

Acceptance Date

January 24, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 46 Number: 46

DOI

https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.454945

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA28UL69XT

APA

Büyükgöze, H., & Özdemir, M. (2019). Okul Farkındalığı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(46), 250-270. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.454945

AMA

1.Büyükgöze H, Özdemir M. Okul Farkındalığı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. PUJE. 2019;46(46):250-270. doi:10.9779/pauefd.454945

Chicago

Büyükgöze, Hilal, and Murat Özdemir. 2019. “Okul Farkındalığı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 46 (46): 250-70. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.454945.

EndNote

Büyükgöze H, Özdemir M (May 1, 2019) Okul Farkındalığı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 46 46 250–270.

IEEE

[1]H. Büyükgöze and M. Özdemir, “Okul Farkındalığı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması”, PUJE, vol. 46, no. 46, pp. 250–270, May 2019, doi: 10.9779/pauefd.454945.

ISNAD

Büyükgöze, Hilal - Özdemir, Murat. “Okul Farkındalığı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 46/46 (May 1, 2019): 250-270. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.454945.

JAMA

1.Büyükgöze H, Özdemir M. Okul Farkındalığı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. PUJE. 2019;46:250–270.

MLA

Büyükgöze, Hilal, and Murat Özdemir. “Okul Farkındalığı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 46, no. 46, May 2019, pp. 250-7, doi:10.9779/pauefd.454945.

Vancouver

1.Hilal Büyükgöze, Murat Özdemir. Okul Farkındalığı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. PUJE. 2019 May 1;46(46):250-7. doi:10.9779/pauefd.454945

Cited By

Okul Müdürlerinin Yönetim Yaklaşımları ile Okul Farkındalığı Arasındaki İlişki

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.1014939

Bir Başarı Testi Geliştirme Çalışması: 7. Sınıf Elektrik Devreleri

Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1443431

The impact of school administrators’ influence tactics on teachers’ organizational commitment: the role of learning agility

Frontiers in Psychology

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1549328

Achieving Organisational Agility in K‐12 Schools Through School Mindfulness: The Role of School Social Capital as a Mediator

European Journal of Education

https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70170

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiY2MgYnkgNC4wLnBuZyIsInBhdGgiOiI4ZmFhL2ZmZWIvMDRjNC82YTQzYWM1NjIwMmQwOS4xODc5MTc1My5wbmciLCJleHAiOjE3ODI4MjM1MjYsIm5vbmNlIjoiNDE4MjdhYTViOTgxNWQ5OTc0OTAxNTc0NDU0OTIwYzcifQ.44RBEN5DRefUr-QnIkl_RL2lUATuOU-FUL4hTXnJjcw https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/