Research Article

“Can the living ever speak for the dead”: The White Hotel and Fictionalizing the Holocaust

Number: 33 October 25, 2018
TR

“Can the living ever speak for the dead”: The White Hotel and Fictionalizing the Holocaust

Abstract

This article explores the possibility of representing collective violence such as the Holocaust within the context of D. M. Thomas’s novel The White Hotel (1981). It argues that The White Hotel lays bare the complicated relationship both between history and fiction and the burden of traumatic representation. By giving us a fictionalized story of a Holocaust victim, Thomas, offers the immediacy of the personal experiences one sees in eyewitness accounts; but, at the same time, by resisting a realist mode of narrative, the novel offers the possibility of remaining faithful to the resistance of collective trauma to representation. Ultimately, The White Hotel urges the reader to ask some fundamental ethical, narratological, and political questions about the representation of collective trauma. By representing the Holocaust in fiction, D.M. Thomas challenges the wildly-held belief both in Holocaust survivors and the intellectuals studying the Holocaust that Holocaust is considered beyond representability.

Keywords

References

  1. 1 Alexander, M. (1990). Flights from Realism. Themes and Strategies in Postmodernist British and American Fiction, Edward Arnold, London.2 Amis, M. (1983). “The D.M. Thomas Phenomenon”, Atlantic Monthly, April, 124-26.3 Arendt, H. (2006). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, Penguin, New York.4 Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. 5 Clowes, E.W. (June 2005). “Constructing the Memory of the Holocaust: The AmbigiousTreatment of Babii Yar in Soviet Literature”, Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, 3/2, June 2005, 153-182.6 Felder, L. (1982). “D.M. Thomas: The Plagiarism Controversy”, Dictionary of Literary Yearbook, 79-82. Gale Group, Detroit.7 Felman, S. (1992). “Education and Crisis, or the Vicissitudes of Teaching”, Testimony. Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History, Routledge, New York, 1-56.8 Hutcheon, L. (1999). A Poetics of Postmodernism, Routledge, New York.9 Kenrick, D.A. (1982). “Letter to the Editor”, Times Literary Supplement, 26 March.10 Kuznetsov, A. (1970). Babi Yar: A Document in the Form of a Novel, Trans. David Floyd. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.11 LaCapra, D. (1998). History and Memory after Auschwitz, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.12 ---. (2014). Writing History, Writing Trauma, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.13 Laub, D. (1992). “Bearing Witness or the Vicissitudes of Listening”, Testimony. Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History, Routledge, New York, 57- 74.14 ---. (1995). “Truth and Testimony. The Process and the Struggle”, Trauma. Explorations in Memory, (Ed. with introductions by C. Caruth), The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 61-75.15 Langer, L. (1991). Holocaust Testimonies: The Ruins of Memory, Yale University Press, New Haven.16 Lanzmann, C. (1990). “Hier ist kein Warum”, Au sujet de Shoah, (Ed. B. Cuau), (Paris, 1990), 279. As translated by Dominick LaCapra, History and Memory after Auschwitz (1998). Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 100.17 ---. (1995). “The Obscenity of Understanding: An Evening with Claude Lanzmann”, Trauma. Explorations in Memory (Ed. with introductions by C. Caruth),The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 200-220.18 Levi, P. (1988). The Drowned and the Saved, Summit, New York.19 Lewis, S. (1984). “D.M. Thomas”, Art out of Agony: The Holocaust Theme in Literature, Sculpture, and Film, Canadian Broadcasting Corp., Toronto, 71-88.20 Marcus, S. (1984). Freud and the Culture of Psychoanalysis, Boston: Allen & Unwin.21 Morrison, T. (1987). Beloved, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.22 Sauerberg, L. O. (1991). “Communicating the Incommunicable”, Fact into Fiction. Documentary Realism in the Contemporary Novel, MacMillan, London, 99-140.23 Shoah. (1985). Directed by Claude Lanzmann.24 Tanner, L. E. (Summer 1991). “Sweet Pain and Charred Bodies: Figuring Violence in The White Hotel”, Boundary 2, 18/2, 130-149.25 Tennant, E. (1982). “The White Hotel”, Times Literary Supplement, 9 April.26 Thomas, D.M. (1981). The White Hotel, Penguin, New York.27 --. (1982). “Letter to the Editor”, Times Literary Supplement, 2 April.28 ---. (1989). Memories and Hallucinations, London: Abacus.29 Waugh, P. (1984). Metafiction. The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction, Methuen, London.30 Wiesel, E. (1978). “A Plea for the Survivors”, A Jew Today, (trans. Marion Wiesel), Random House, New York.31 Young, J. E. (1988). Writing and Rewriting the Holocaust: Narrative and the Consequences of Interpretation, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Creative Arts and Writing

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Hülya Yıldız Bağçe *
Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi
0000-0001-6625-575X
Türkiye

Publication Date

October 25, 2018

Submission Date

March 2, 2018

Acceptance Date

May 14, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Number: 33

APA
Yıldız Bağçe, H. (2018). “Can the living ever speak for the dead”: The White Hotel and Fictionalizing the Holocaust. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 33, 181-187. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.400190
AMA
1.Yıldız Bağçe H. “Can the living ever speak for the dead”: The White Hotel and Fictionalizing the Holocaust. PAUSBED. 2018;(33):181-187. doi:10.30794/pausbed.400190
Chicago
Yıldız Bağçe, Hülya. 2018. “‘Can the Living Ever Speak for the Dead’: The White Hotel and Fictionalizing the Holocaust”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, nos. 33: 181-87. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.400190.
EndNote
Yıldız Bağçe H (October 1, 2018) “Can the living ever speak for the dead”: The White Hotel and Fictionalizing the Holocaust. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 33 181–187.
IEEE
[1]H. Yıldız Bağçe, “‘Can the living ever speak for the dead’: The White Hotel and Fictionalizing the Holocaust”, PAUSBED, no. 33, pp. 181–187, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.30794/pausbed.400190.
ISNAD
Yıldız Bağçe, Hülya. “‘Can the Living Ever Speak for the Dead’: The White Hotel and Fictionalizing the Holocaust”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 33 (October 1, 2018): 181-187. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.400190.
JAMA
1.Yıldız Bağçe H. “Can the living ever speak for the dead”: The White Hotel and Fictionalizing the Holocaust. PAUSBED. 2018;:181–187.
MLA
Yıldız Bağçe, Hülya. “‘Can the Living Ever Speak for the Dead’: The White Hotel and Fictionalizing the Holocaust”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, no. 33, Oct. 2018, pp. 181-7, doi:10.30794/pausbed.400190.
Vancouver
1.Hülya Yıldız Bağçe. “Can the living ever speak for the dead”: The White Hotel and Fictionalizing the Holocaust. PAUSBED. 2018 Oct. 1;(33):181-7. doi:10.30794/pausbed.400190
by-nc-nd.eu.svg  The articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.