Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

OTOSANSÜR EĞİLİMİ ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONU: YAPI GEÇERLİLİĞİNE İLİŞKİN İLK BULGULAR

Year 2019, , 243 - 255, 21.01.2019

Özlü Dolma

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.446145
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu araştırmada Hayes ve arkadaşları (2005a) tarafından geliştirilmiş olan Otosansür
Eğilimi Ölçeğinin (OSE) (Willingness to Self-Censor– WTSC) Türkçe versiyonunun psikometrik
özellikleri incelenmiştir. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliliğini test etmek amacıyla
bireylerin otosansür eğilimleri ile ilişkili ancak ondan bağımsız bir özellik
olduğu düşünülen benlik saygısı kavramı da çalışmaya dâhil edilmiştir. Ölçekler
566 üniversite öğrencisine uygulanmıştır. Öncelikle sadece OSE ölçeğinin faktör
yapısı teyit edici faktör analizi ile test edilmiştir. Sonuçlar ölçeğin tek
faktörlü yapısını desteklemiştir. Ölçekte yer alan ters yönlü iki madde
arasındaki korelasyonun çok yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Otosansür eğilimi
kavramının benlik saygısı kavramı ile farkını ve ilişkisini incelemek üzere iki
ölçeği birden içeren ölçüm modeli teyit edici faktör analizi ile test
edilmiştir. Otosansür eğilimi ile benlik saygısı arasında ters yönlü ve
istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Ölçekte yer alan ters
yönlü maddelerin ölçeğin yapı geçerliliği ve güvenilirliği üzerindeki olumsuz
etkileri tartışılmış ve ileride yapılacak çalışmalara yönelik önerilerde
bulunulmuştur.

Keywords

Otosansür Eğilimi Benlik Saygısı Çift-faktör Modeli Geçerlilik Psikometrik Değerlendirme Teyit Edici Faktör Analizi Güvenilirlik

References

  • Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Eisenberg, N. ve Łaguna, M. (2015). “On the Factor Structure of the Rosenberg (1965) General Self-Esteem Scale”, Psychological Assessment, 27, 621-635.
  • Bar‐Tal, D. (2017). “Self‐Censorship as a Socio‐Political‐Psychological Phenomenon: Conception and Research”, Political Psychology, 38, 37-65.
  • Bovaird, J.A. ve Koziol, N.A. (2012). “Measurement Models for Ordered-Categorical Indicators”, Handbook of Structural Equation Modelling, (Ed: R.H. Hoyle), Guilford Press, New York.
  • Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, 2. Baskı, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Filak, V. F. (2012). “A Concurrent Examination of Self-Versus-Others Perceptual Bias and the Willingness to Self-Censor: A Study of College Newspaper Editors and Advisers”, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 299-314.
  • Filak, V. F. ve Reinardy, S. (2009). “College Newspaper Advisers, Controversial Topics and Willingness to Self-Censor”, College Media Review, 46(2), 15-23.
  • Filak, V. F., Reinardy, S. ve Maksl, A. (2009). “Expanding and Validating Applications of the Willingness to Self-Censor Scale: Self-Censorship and Media Advisers' Comfort Level with Controversial Topics”, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 368-382.
  • Finney, S. J. ve C. Distefano (2006). “Non-Normal and Categorical Data in Structural Equation Modeling”, Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, (Ed: G. R. Hancock ve R. O. Mueller), Information Age Publishing, USA.
  • Glynn, C. J., Hayes, A. F. ve Shanahan, J. (1997). “Perceived Support for One's Opinions and Willingness to Speak Out: A Meta-Analysis of Survey Studies on the "Spiral of Silence"”, Public Opinion Quarterly, 452-463.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2007). “Exploring the Forms of Self-Censorship: On the Spiral of Silence and the Use of Opinion Expression Avoidance Strategies”, Journal of Communication, 57(4), 785-802.
  • Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J. ve Shanahan, J. (2005a). “Willingness to Self-Censor: A Construct and Measurement Tool for Public Opinion Research”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 298-323.
  • Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J. ve Shanahan, J. (2005b). “Validating the Willingness to Self-Censor Scale: Individual Differences in the Effect of the Climate of Opinion On Opinion Expression”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 443-455.
  • Hayes, A. F., Scheufele, D. A. ve Huge, M. E. (2006). “Nonparticipation as Self-Censorship: Publicly Observable Political Activity in A Polarized Opinion Climate”, Political Behavior, 28, 259-283.
  • Hyland, P., Boduszek, D., Dhingra, K., Shevlin, M. ve Egan, A. (2014). “A Bifactor Approach to Modelling the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale”, Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 188-192.
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4. Baskı, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Landis, R. S., Edwards, B. D. ve Cortina, J. M. (2009). “On the Practice of Allowing Correlated Residuals Among Indicators in Structural Equation Models”, Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity and Fable in the Organizational and Social Sciences, (Ed: C. E. Lance ve R. J. Vandenberg), Routledge, East Sussex, UK.
  • Lennox, R. D. ve Wolfe, R. N. (1984). “Revision of the Self-Monitoring Scale”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1349-1364.
  • Matthes, J., Hayes, A. F., Rojas, H., Shen, F., Min, S. J. ve Dylko, I. B. (2012). “Exemplifying A Dispositional Approach to Cross-Cultural Spiral of Silence Research: Fear of Social Isolation and The Inclination to Self-Censor”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(3), 287-305.
  • McArdle, J. J., & McDonald, R. P. (1984). “Some Algebraic Properties of the Reticular Action Model for Moment Structures”, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 234-251.
  • McKay, M. T., Boduszek, D. ve Harvey, S. A. (2014). “The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: A Bifactor Answer to the Two-Factor Question?” Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(6), 654-660.
  • Mellenbergh, G. J. (2011). A Conceptual Introduction to Psychometrics: Development, Analysis, and Application of Psychological and Educational Tests, Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, Netherlands.
  • Muthén, L.K. ve Muthén, B.O. (1998-2015). Mplus User’s Guide, 4. Baskı, Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). “The Spiral of Silence: A Theory of Public Opinion”, Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43-51.
  • Raykov, T. (2018). Scale Construction and Development. Course Booklet. Statistical Horizons, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Raykov, T. ve Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Introduction to Psychometric Theory, Routledge: New York.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Satorra, A. ve Bentler, P. M. (1994). “Corrections to Test Statistics and Standard Errors on Covariance Structure Analysis”, Latent Variables Analysis, (Ed: A. Von Eye ve C. C. Clogg), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Williams, S. D. (2002). “Self-Esteem and The Self-Censorship of Creative Ideas”, Personnel Review, 31(4), 495-503.

Year 2019, , 243 - 255, 21.01.2019

Özlü Dolma

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.446145
Cited By: 1

Abstract

References

  • Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Eisenberg, N. ve Łaguna, M. (2015). “On the Factor Structure of the Rosenberg (1965) General Self-Esteem Scale”, Psychological Assessment, 27, 621-635.
  • Bar‐Tal, D. (2017). “Self‐Censorship as a Socio‐Political‐Psychological Phenomenon: Conception and Research”, Political Psychology, 38, 37-65.
  • Bovaird, J.A. ve Koziol, N.A. (2012). “Measurement Models for Ordered-Categorical Indicators”, Handbook of Structural Equation Modelling, (Ed: R.H. Hoyle), Guilford Press, New York.
  • Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, 2. Baskı, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Filak, V. F. (2012). “A Concurrent Examination of Self-Versus-Others Perceptual Bias and the Willingness to Self-Censor: A Study of College Newspaper Editors and Advisers”, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 299-314.
  • Filak, V. F. ve Reinardy, S. (2009). “College Newspaper Advisers, Controversial Topics and Willingness to Self-Censor”, College Media Review, 46(2), 15-23.
  • Filak, V. F., Reinardy, S. ve Maksl, A. (2009). “Expanding and Validating Applications of the Willingness to Self-Censor Scale: Self-Censorship and Media Advisers' Comfort Level with Controversial Topics”, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 368-382.
  • Finney, S. J. ve C. Distefano (2006). “Non-Normal and Categorical Data in Structural Equation Modeling”, Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, (Ed: G. R. Hancock ve R. O. Mueller), Information Age Publishing, USA.
  • Glynn, C. J., Hayes, A. F. ve Shanahan, J. (1997). “Perceived Support for One's Opinions and Willingness to Speak Out: A Meta-Analysis of Survey Studies on the "Spiral of Silence"”, Public Opinion Quarterly, 452-463.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2007). “Exploring the Forms of Self-Censorship: On the Spiral of Silence and the Use of Opinion Expression Avoidance Strategies”, Journal of Communication, 57(4), 785-802.
  • Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J. ve Shanahan, J. (2005a). “Willingness to Self-Censor: A Construct and Measurement Tool for Public Opinion Research”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 298-323.
  • Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J. ve Shanahan, J. (2005b). “Validating the Willingness to Self-Censor Scale: Individual Differences in the Effect of the Climate of Opinion On Opinion Expression”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 443-455.
  • Hayes, A. F., Scheufele, D. A. ve Huge, M. E. (2006). “Nonparticipation as Self-Censorship: Publicly Observable Political Activity in A Polarized Opinion Climate”, Political Behavior, 28, 259-283.
  • Hyland, P., Boduszek, D., Dhingra, K., Shevlin, M. ve Egan, A. (2014). “A Bifactor Approach to Modelling the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale”, Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 188-192.
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4. Baskı, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Landis, R. S., Edwards, B. D. ve Cortina, J. M. (2009). “On the Practice of Allowing Correlated Residuals Among Indicators in Structural Equation Models”, Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity and Fable in the Organizational and Social Sciences, (Ed: C. E. Lance ve R. J. Vandenberg), Routledge, East Sussex, UK.
  • Lennox, R. D. ve Wolfe, R. N. (1984). “Revision of the Self-Monitoring Scale”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1349-1364.
  • Matthes, J., Hayes, A. F., Rojas, H., Shen, F., Min, S. J. ve Dylko, I. B. (2012). “Exemplifying A Dispositional Approach to Cross-Cultural Spiral of Silence Research: Fear of Social Isolation and The Inclination to Self-Censor”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(3), 287-305.
  • McArdle, J. J., & McDonald, R. P. (1984). “Some Algebraic Properties of the Reticular Action Model for Moment Structures”, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 234-251.
  • McKay, M. T., Boduszek, D. ve Harvey, S. A. (2014). “The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: A Bifactor Answer to the Two-Factor Question?” Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(6), 654-660.
  • Mellenbergh, G. J. (2011). A Conceptual Introduction to Psychometrics: Development, Analysis, and Application of Psychological and Educational Tests, Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, Netherlands.
  • Muthén, L.K. ve Muthén, B.O. (1998-2015). Mplus User’s Guide, 4. Baskı, Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). “The Spiral of Silence: A Theory of Public Opinion”, Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43-51.
  • Raykov, T. (2018). Scale Construction and Development. Course Booklet. Statistical Horizons, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Raykov, T. ve Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Introduction to Psychometric Theory, Routledge: New York.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Satorra, A. ve Bentler, P. M. (1994). “Corrections to Test Statistics and Standard Errors on Covariance Structure Analysis”, Latent Variables Analysis, (Ed: A. Von Eye ve C. C. Clogg), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Williams, S. D. (2002). “Self-Esteem and The Self-Censorship of Creative Ideas”, Personnel Review, 31(4), 495-503.
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Özlü Dolma

Publication Date January 21, 2019
Acceptance Date August 10, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Dolma, Ö. (2019). OTOSANSÜR EĞİLİMİ ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONU: YAPI GEÇERLİLİĞİNE İLİŞKİN İLK BULGULAR. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(34), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.446145
AMA Dolma Ö. OTOSANSÜR EĞİLİMİ ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONU: YAPI GEÇERLİLİĞİNE İLİŞKİN İLK BULGULAR. PAUSBED. January 2019;(34):243-255. doi:10.30794/pausbed.446145
Chicago Dolma, Özlü. “OTOSANSÜR EĞİLİMİ ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONU: YAPI GEÇERLİLİĞİNE İLİŞKİN İLK BULGULAR”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, no. 34 (January 2019): 243-55. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.446145.
EndNote Dolma Ö (January 1, 2019) OTOSANSÜR EĞİLİMİ ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONU: YAPI GEÇERLİLİĞİNE İLİŞKİN İLK BULGULAR. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 34 243–255.
IEEE Ö. Dolma, “OTOSANSÜR EĞİLİMİ ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONU: YAPI GEÇERLİLİĞİNE İLİŞKİN İLK BULGULAR”, PAUSBED, no. 34, pp. 243–255, January 2019, doi: 10.30794/pausbed.446145.
ISNAD Dolma, Özlü. “OTOSANSÜR EĞİLİMİ ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONU: YAPI GEÇERLİLİĞİNE İLİŞKİN İLK BULGULAR”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 34 (January 2019), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.446145.
JAMA Dolma Ö. OTOSANSÜR EĞİLİMİ ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONU: YAPI GEÇERLİLİĞİNE İLİŞKİN İLK BULGULAR. PAUSBED. 2019;:243–255.
MLA Dolma, Özlü. “OTOSANSÜR EĞİLİMİ ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONU: YAPI GEÇERLİLİĞİNE İLİŞKİN İLK BULGULAR”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, no. 34, 2019, pp. 243-55, doi:10.30794/pausbed.446145.
Vancouver Dolma Ö. OTOSANSÜR EĞİLİMİ ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONU: YAPI GEÇERLİLİĞİNE İLİŞKİN İLK BULGULAR. PAUSBED. 2019(34):243-55.

Cited By

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Çocukluk Çağı Olumsuz Yaşantıları ve Kendini Sansürleme İsteğinde Ego Durumlarının Aracılık Rolü
Humanistic Perspective
Onur Emre KAYABAŞI
https://doi.org/10.47793/hp.927176