Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE MAKALE YAZIMI ÜZERİNE

Year 2021, , 169 - 180, 16.02.2021
https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.808843

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Sosyal Bilimlerde akademik makalenin nasıl yazılması gerektiğine dair yeni araştırmacılara ipuçları vermektir. Özellikle, Sosyal Bilimler alanında Türkçe literatürde makale yazımı üzerine büyük bir açık bulunmaktadır. Dolayısıyla çalışma, Türkçe literatürde halihazırdaki bu önemli açığın kapatılmasına katkı sağlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, çalışma öncelikle bir araştırma makalesinde olmazsa olmaz üç unsur; 1-araştırma sorusu, 2-literatür taraması ve 3-akademik katkı üzerine detaylı bir tartışma yürütecek ve Türk akademisindeki güncel çalışmalardan örneklerle tartışmayı zenginleştirecektir. Sonraki bölümde çalışma, makaledeki şekilsel konuları ele alacaktır. Makalenin başlığı, makale özeti ve anahtar kelimeler gibi teknik konular hakkında izlenmesi gereken stratejilere odaklanacaktır. Ayrıca çalışma, makalenin yapısı konusunda son dönemde yayınlanan çalışmalardan örneklerle okuyucuya önemli ipuçları verecektir. Sonuç bölümünde, çalışma makale yazımı konusunda yeni araştırmacılara dört temel reçete sunacaktır.

Thanks

Didem Buhari Gülmez ve iki anonim hakeme yorumları ve tavsiyeleri için çok teşekkür ederim.

References

  • Aydın, M. (2004). “Uluslararası İlişkilerin “Gerçekçi” Teorisi: Kökeni, Kapsamı, Kritiği”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 1/1, 33-60.
  • Aydınlı, E. ve Mathews, J. (2008). “Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory out of Anatolia”, Review of International Studies, 34/4, 693-712.
  • Aydın-Düzgit, S., Rumelili, B. ve Gülmez, S. B. (2020). “Turkey as a Model for the Mediterranean? Revealing Discursive Continuities with Europe’s Imperial Past”, Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 22/6, 741-762.
  • Barlas, D. ve Gülmez, S. B. (2018). “Turkish–British relations in the 1930s: from ambivalence to partnership”, Middle Eastern Studies, 54/5, 827-840.
  • Blaikie, N. (2004). “Research Question”, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, (Ed: M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman ve T. F. Liao), Cilt 1, California, SAGE.Berridge, G. R. (2010). Diplomacy Theory and Practice, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation, Cambridge, Polity.
  • Bozdağlıoğlu, Y. ve Özen, Ç. (2004). “Liberalizmden Neoliberalizme Güç Olgusu ve Sistemik Bağımlılık”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 1/4, 59-79.
  • Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods, 4. Baskı, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Buhari Gülmez, D. (2010). “Stanford School on Sociological Institutionalism: A Global Cultural Approach”, International Political Sociology, 4/3, 253–270.
  • Buhari Gülmez, D. (2020). “The resilience of the US–Turkey alliance: Divergent threat perceptions and worldviews”, Contemporary Politics, 26/4, 475-492.
  • Coşan Yılmaz, M. ve Emiroğlu, O. N. (2005). “Bilimsel makale nasıl yazılır?”, Hemșirelikte Araștırma Geliștirme Dergisi, 1/2, 26-38.
  • Çakmakkaya, Ö. S. (2012). “Bilgiyi Paylaşmak: Biyomedikal Alanda Bilimsel Makale Yazım Kuralları ile ilgili Derleme”, Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 3/3, 142-150.
  • Çuhadar, Ç. E., Kaarbo, J., Kesgin, B. ve Özkeçeci-Taner, B. (2020). “Turkish leaders and their foreign policy decision-making style: a comparative and multi-method perspective”, Turkish Studies, DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2020.1724511
  • Day, R. A. ve Gastel, B. (2012). How to write and public a scientific paper, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • De Volo, L. B. ve Shatz, E. (2004). “From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research”, PS: Political Science and Politics, 37/2, 267-271.
  • Eisenhart, M. (1998). “On the subject of interpretive reviews”, Review of Educational Research, 68/4, 391–399.
  • Ekmekçi, A. ve Konaç, E. (2009). “Bilimsel yazımın bazı temel kuralları”, TUBAV Bilim Dergisi, 2/1, 117-121.
  • Esen, B. (2020). “Praetorian Army in Action: A Critical Assessment of Civil– Military Relations in Turkey”, Armed Forces & Society, 1-22, DOI: 10.1177/0095327X20931548
  • Götz, E. (2019). “Enemy at the Gates: A Neoclassical Realist Explanation of Russia's Baltic Policy”, Foreign Policy Analysis, 15/1, 99-117.
  • Gülmez, S. B. (2017). “Turkish Foreign Policy as an Anomaly: Revisionism and Irredentism through Diplomacy in the 1930s”, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 44/1, 30-47.
  • Gülmez, S. B. (2019). “Do Diplomats matter in Foreign Policy? Sir Percy Loraine and the Turkish-British Rapprochement in the 1930s”, Foreign Policy Analysis, 15/1, 65-82.
  • Gülmez, S. B. ve Cebeci, E. (2020). "Self-Determinasyon Hareketlerinde Kamu Diplomasisinin Rolü: Katalonya Örneği", Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 39, 239-253.
  • Halperin, S. ve Heath, O., (2011) Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Hammersley, M. (2004). “Literature Review”, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, (Ed: M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman ve T. F. Liao), Cilt 1, California, SAGE.
  • Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review, London, Sage.
  • Hatipoglu, E. ve Palmer, G. (2016). “Contextualizing change in Turkish foreign policy: the promise of the ‘two-good’ theory”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29/1, 231-250.
  • Hermann, Margaret G. (1980). “Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders”, International Studies Quarterly, 24/1, 7–46.
  • Hermann, M. G. (2001). “How Decision Units Shape Foreign Policy: A Theoretical Framework”, International Studies Review, 3/2, 47-81.
  • Holsti, K. J. (1970). “National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy”, International Studies Quarterly, 14/3, 233-309.
  • Hooghe, L., Marks, G. ve Wilson, D. J. (2002). “Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?”, Comparative Political Studies, 35/8, 965-989.
  • Ilgıt, A. ve Prakash, D. (2019). “Making Human Rights Emotional: A Research Agenda to Recover Shame in “Naming and Shaming””, Political Psychology, 40/6, 1297-1313.
  • İşeri, E. (2009). “The US Grand Strategy and the Eurasian Heartland in the Twenty-First Century”, Geopolitics, 14/1, 26-46.
  • Johns, R. (2009). “Tracing Foreign Policy Decisions: A Study of Citizens' Use of Heuristics”, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 11/4, 574-592.
  • Kavaklı, K. C., Chatagnier, J. T. ve Hatipoğlu, E. (2020). “The Power to Hurt and the Effectiveness of International Sanctions”, The Journal of Politics, 82/3, 1-36.
  • Kiraz, S. (2020). “Bir Dış Politika Analizi Yaklaşımı Olarak Neoklasik Realizmin İncelenmesi”, Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13/4, 665-686.
  • Köstem, S. (2020). “Russian-Turkish cooperation in Syria: geopolitical alignment with limits”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, DOI:10.1080/09557571.2020.1719040
  • Külah, B. ve Külah, B. B. (2015). “Bilimsel makale yazımının esasları”, Bozok Tıp Dergisi, 5/1, 53-58.
  • Marx, G. T. (1997). “Of Methods and Manners for Aspiring Sociologists: 37 Moral Imperatives”, American Sociologist, 28, 102–25.
  • Özdamar, Ö. ve Erciyas, O. (2020). “Turkey and Cyprus: A Poliheuristic Analysis of Decisions during the Crises of 1964, 1967, and 1974”, Foreign Policy Analysis, 16/3, 457-477.
  • Papuççular, H. (2021). “Anlatı, Analiz ve Teori: Siyasi Tarih Araştırmalarına Farklı Yaklaşımlar”, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, basımda.
  • Rumelili, B. (2012). “Liminal identities and processes of domestication and subversion in International Relations”, Review of International Studies, 38/2, 495-508.
  • Rumelili, B. (2015). “Identity and desecuritisation: the pitfalls of conflating ontological and physical security”, Journal of International Relations and Development, 18, 52–74.
  • Saatçioğlu, B. (2001) “Revisiting the Role of Credible EU Membership Conditionality for EU Compliance: The Turkish Case”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 8/31, 23-44.
  • Soyaltın-Colella, D. (2020a). “Uluslararası ve Bölgesel Yolsuzlukla Mücadele Rejimlerinde Yaptırım ve Sosyal Baskı: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz”, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 19/1, 61-77.
  • Soyaltın-Colella, D. (2020b). “(Un)Democratic change and use of social sanctions for domestic politics: Council of Europe monitoring in Turkey”, International Political Science Review, 1-17, DOI: 10.1177/0192512120927120
  • Tiryaki, O. (2014). “Bilimsel Yayın Hazırlama Teknikleri”, ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2/1, 143–155.
  • Tokdemir, E. (2017). “Winning hearts & minds (!): The dilemma of foreign aid in anti-Americanism”, Journal of Peace Research, 54/6, 819-832.
  • Tokdemir, E. (2020). “Feels like home: Effect of transnational identities on attitudes towards foreign countries”, Journal of Peace Research, 1-15, DOI: 10.1177/0022343320943251
  • Tokdemir, E., Akcinaroglu, S., Ozen, H. E. Ve Karakoc, E. (2020). “‘Wars of others’: national cleavages and attitudes toward external conflicts”, International Interactions, DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2020.1792898
  • Türkeş-Kılıç, S. (2020). “Justifying privileged partnership with Turkey: an analysis of debates in the European Parliament”, Turkish Studies, 21/1, 29-55.
  • Ünver, Ü., Keleşoğlu, A. ve Küçükkaya, E. (2017). “Mühendislik Disiplinleri İçin Bilimsel Makale Yazım Esasları”, Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8/3, 235-247.

ON WRITING ARTICLE IN SOCIAL SCIENCES

Year 2021, , 169 - 180, 16.02.2021
https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.808843

Abstract

This study aims to offer fresh clues to readers on how to write an academic article in Social Sciences. There is a particular gap in the Social Sciences literature in Turkish on article writing. Therefore, the study contributes to the academic efforts to fill the existing gap in the literature. In this context, the study will first focus on the discussion in detail of the three indispensible aspects of article writing; 1-research question, 2-literature review, and 3-academic contribution. The discussion will be enriched through up-to-date examples from the current academic literature. The study will then concentrate on the article format. Here, the study will discuss key strategies on how to come up with the article’s main title, abstract and key words. In addition, it will offer key insights on how to form the structure of an article. In the concluding section, the study will prescribe four key points for new researchers on how to write an academic article.

References

  • Aydın, M. (2004). “Uluslararası İlişkilerin “Gerçekçi” Teorisi: Kökeni, Kapsamı, Kritiği”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 1/1, 33-60.
  • Aydınlı, E. ve Mathews, J. (2008). “Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory out of Anatolia”, Review of International Studies, 34/4, 693-712.
  • Aydın-Düzgit, S., Rumelili, B. ve Gülmez, S. B. (2020). “Turkey as a Model for the Mediterranean? Revealing Discursive Continuities with Europe’s Imperial Past”, Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 22/6, 741-762.
  • Barlas, D. ve Gülmez, S. B. (2018). “Turkish–British relations in the 1930s: from ambivalence to partnership”, Middle Eastern Studies, 54/5, 827-840.
  • Blaikie, N. (2004). “Research Question”, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, (Ed: M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman ve T. F. Liao), Cilt 1, California, SAGE.Berridge, G. R. (2010). Diplomacy Theory and Practice, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation, Cambridge, Polity.
  • Bozdağlıoğlu, Y. ve Özen, Ç. (2004). “Liberalizmden Neoliberalizme Güç Olgusu ve Sistemik Bağımlılık”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 1/4, 59-79.
  • Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods, 4. Baskı, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Buhari Gülmez, D. (2010). “Stanford School on Sociological Institutionalism: A Global Cultural Approach”, International Political Sociology, 4/3, 253–270.
  • Buhari Gülmez, D. (2020). “The resilience of the US–Turkey alliance: Divergent threat perceptions and worldviews”, Contemporary Politics, 26/4, 475-492.
  • Coşan Yılmaz, M. ve Emiroğlu, O. N. (2005). “Bilimsel makale nasıl yazılır?”, Hemșirelikte Araștırma Geliștirme Dergisi, 1/2, 26-38.
  • Çakmakkaya, Ö. S. (2012). “Bilgiyi Paylaşmak: Biyomedikal Alanda Bilimsel Makale Yazım Kuralları ile ilgili Derleme”, Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 3/3, 142-150.
  • Çuhadar, Ç. E., Kaarbo, J., Kesgin, B. ve Özkeçeci-Taner, B. (2020). “Turkish leaders and their foreign policy decision-making style: a comparative and multi-method perspective”, Turkish Studies, DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2020.1724511
  • Day, R. A. ve Gastel, B. (2012). How to write and public a scientific paper, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • De Volo, L. B. ve Shatz, E. (2004). “From the Inside out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research”, PS: Political Science and Politics, 37/2, 267-271.
  • Eisenhart, M. (1998). “On the subject of interpretive reviews”, Review of Educational Research, 68/4, 391–399.
  • Ekmekçi, A. ve Konaç, E. (2009). “Bilimsel yazımın bazı temel kuralları”, TUBAV Bilim Dergisi, 2/1, 117-121.
  • Esen, B. (2020). “Praetorian Army in Action: A Critical Assessment of Civil– Military Relations in Turkey”, Armed Forces & Society, 1-22, DOI: 10.1177/0095327X20931548
  • Götz, E. (2019). “Enemy at the Gates: A Neoclassical Realist Explanation of Russia's Baltic Policy”, Foreign Policy Analysis, 15/1, 99-117.
  • Gülmez, S. B. (2017). “Turkish Foreign Policy as an Anomaly: Revisionism and Irredentism through Diplomacy in the 1930s”, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 44/1, 30-47.
  • Gülmez, S. B. (2019). “Do Diplomats matter in Foreign Policy? Sir Percy Loraine and the Turkish-British Rapprochement in the 1930s”, Foreign Policy Analysis, 15/1, 65-82.
  • Gülmez, S. B. ve Cebeci, E. (2020). "Self-Determinasyon Hareketlerinde Kamu Diplomasisinin Rolü: Katalonya Örneği", Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 39, 239-253.
  • Halperin, S. ve Heath, O., (2011) Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Hammersley, M. (2004). “Literature Review”, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, (Ed: M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman ve T. F. Liao), Cilt 1, California, SAGE.
  • Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review, London, Sage.
  • Hatipoglu, E. ve Palmer, G. (2016). “Contextualizing change in Turkish foreign policy: the promise of the ‘two-good’ theory”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29/1, 231-250.
  • Hermann, Margaret G. (1980). “Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders”, International Studies Quarterly, 24/1, 7–46.
  • Hermann, M. G. (2001). “How Decision Units Shape Foreign Policy: A Theoretical Framework”, International Studies Review, 3/2, 47-81.
  • Holsti, K. J. (1970). “National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy”, International Studies Quarterly, 14/3, 233-309.
  • Hooghe, L., Marks, G. ve Wilson, D. J. (2002). “Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?”, Comparative Political Studies, 35/8, 965-989.
  • Ilgıt, A. ve Prakash, D. (2019). “Making Human Rights Emotional: A Research Agenda to Recover Shame in “Naming and Shaming””, Political Psychology, 40/6, 1297-1313.
  • İşeri, E. (2009). “The US Grand Strategy and the Eurasian Heartland in the Twenty-First Century”, Geopolitics, 14/1, 26-46.
  • Johns, R. (2009). “Tracing Foreign Policy Decisions: A Study of Citizens' Use of Heuristics”, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 11/4, 574-592.
  • Kavaklı, K. C., Chatagnier, J. T. ve Hatipoğlu, E. (2020). “The Power to Hurt and the Effectiveness of International Sanctions”, The Journal of Politics, 82/3, 1-36.
  • Kiraz, S. (2020). “Bir Dış Politika Analizi Yaklaşımı Olarak Neoklasik Realizmin İncelenmesi”, Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13/4, 665-686.
  • Köstem, S. (2020). “Russian-Turkish cooperation in Syria: geopolitical alignment with limits”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, DOI:10.1080/09557571.2020.1719040
  • Külah, B. ve Külah, B. B. (2015). “Bilimsel makale yazımının esasları”, Bozok Tıp Dergisi, 5/1, 53-58.
  • Marx, G. T. (1997). “Of Methods and Manners for Aspiring Sociologists: 37 Moral Imperatives”, American Sociologist, 28, 102–25.
  • Özdamar, Ö. ve Erciyas, O. (2020). “Turkey and Cyprus: A Poliheuristic Analysis of Decisions during the Crises of 1964, 1967, and 1974”, Foreign Policy Analysis, 16/3, 457-477.
  • Papuççular, H. (2021). “Anlatı, Analiz ve Teori: Siyasi Tarih Araştırmalarına Farklı Yaklaşımlar”, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, basımda.
  • Rumelili, B. (2012). “Liminal identities and processes of domestication and subversion in International Relations”, Review of International Studies, 38/2, 495-508.
  • Rumelili, B. (2015). “Identity and desecuritisation: the pitfalls of conflating ontological and physical security”, Journal of International Relations and Development, 18, 52–74.
  • Saatçioğlu, B. (2001) “Revisiting the Role of Credible EU Membership Conditionality for EU Compliance: The Turkish Case”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 8/31, 23-44.
  • Soyaltın-Colella, D. (2020a). “Uluslararası ve Bölgesel Yolsuzlukla Mücadele Rejimlerinde Yaptırım ve Sosyal Baskı: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz”, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 19/1, 61-77.
  • Soyaltın-Colella, D. (2020b). “(Un)Democratic change and use of social sanctions for domestic politics: Council of Europe monitoring in Turkey”, International Political Science Review, 1-17, DOI: 10.1177/0192512120927120
  • Tiryaki, O. (2014). “Bilimsel Yayın Hazırlama Teknikleri”, ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2/1, 143–155.
  • Tokdemir, E. (2017). “Winning hearts & minds (!): The dilemma of foreign aid in anti-Americanism”, Journal of Peace Research, 54/6, 819-832.
  • Tokdemir, E. (2020). “Feels like home: Effect of transnational identities on attitudes towards foreign countries”, Journal of Peace Research, 1-15, DOI: 10.1177/0022343320943251
  • Tokdemir, E., Akcinaroglu, S., Ozen, H. E. Ve Karakoc, E. (2020). “‘Wars of others’: national cleavages and attitudes toward external conflicts”, International Interactions, DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2020.1792898
  • Türkeş-Kılıç, S. (2020). “Justifying privileged partnership with Turkey: an analysis of debates in the European Parliament”, Turkish Studies, 21/1, 29-55.
  • Ünver, Ü., Keleşoğlu, A. ve Küçükkaya, E. (2017). “Mühendislik Disiplinleri İçin Bilimsel Makale Yazım Esasları”, Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8/3, 235-247.
There are 51 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects International Relations
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Seçkin Barış Gülmez 0000-0003-1690-1041

Publication Date February 16, 2021
Acceptance Date November 18, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2021

Cite

APA Gülmez, S. B. (2021). SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE MAKALE YAZIMI ÜZERİNE. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(42), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.808843
AMA Gülmez SB. SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE MAKALE YAZIMI ÜZERİNE. PAUSBED. February 2021;(42):169-180. doi:10.30794/pausbed.808843
Chicago Gülmez, Seçkin Barış. “SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE MAKALE YAZIMI ÜZERİNE”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, no. 42 (February 2021): 169-80. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.808843.
EndNote Gülmez SB (February 1, 2021) SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE MAKALE YAZIMI ÜZERİNE. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 42 169–180.
IEEE S. B. Gülmez, “SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE MAKALE YAZIMI ÜZERİNE”, PAUSBED, no. 42, pp. 169–180, February 2021, doi: 10.30794/pausbed.808843.
ISNAD Gülmez, Seçkin Barış. “SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE MAKALE YAZIMI ÜZERİNE”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 42 (February 2021), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.808843.
JAMA Gülmez SB. SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE MAKALE YAZIMI ÜZERİNE. PAUSBED. 2021;:169–180.
MLA Gülmez, Seçkin Barış. “SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE MAKALE YAZIMI ÜZERİNE”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, no. 42, 2021, pp. 169-80, doi:10.30794/pausbed.808843.
Vancouver Gülmez SB. SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE MAKALE YAZIMI ÜZERİNE. PAUSBED. 2021(42):169-80.