Yapay Zekânın İşgücü Verimliliği ve İstihdam Üzerindeki Etkileri

Abstract

Bu çalışma, yapay zekânın işgücü verimliliği ve istihdam üzerindeki etkilerini araştırmaktadır. Çalışmada yapay zekâ araçlarının kullanımı ve entegrasyonu arasındaki ilişki göz önünde bulundurularak işgücü piyasalarında yarattığı verimlilik ve bu verimliliğin istihdam açısından etkileri incelenmektedir. Yapay zekâ, çeşitli ekonomik sektörlerde verimlilikte dönüşüm sağlama ve istihdam ortamını yeniden şekillendirme potansiyeline sahip, çok önemli bir teknoloji olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. 2022 yılı sonlarında ChatGPT gibi gelişmiş modellerin ticari olarak piyasaya sürülmesinden bu yana, internetin ortaya çıkışına benzer dönüştürücü bir değişim beklentisini gündeme getirmiştir. Yapay zekânın ekonomik etkisi çok yönlü ve karmaşıktır. Yapay zekâ bir taraftan insan emeğinin tamamlayıcısı diğer taraftan da insan emeğinin yerine geçen bir unsurdur. Bu yönüyle yapay zekâ, birçok gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülke ekonomisinde düşük verimlilik artışını da beraberinde getirmekte veya karar alma süreçlerini ve operasyonel verimliliği artırarak işgücü verimliliğini hızlandırmaktadır. Burada önemli olan teknolojinin, hayatı kolaylaştıran ve verimliliği artıran bir şekilde, amaç odaklı olarak kullanılmasıdır. Çalışmanın amacını yapay zekânın işgücü verimliliği ve istihdam açısından gerçek ekonomik etkilerini ortaya koymak oluşturmaktadır.

Keywords

• Yapay zekâ
• işgücü verimliliği
• istihdam

The Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Workforce Productivity and Employment

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of artificial intelligence on workforce productivity and employment. This study examines the relationship between the use and integration of artificial intelligence tools, the productivity they create in labor markets, and the impact of this productivity on employment. Artificial intelligence has emerged as a critical technology with the potential to transform productivity across various economic sectors and reshape the employment landscape. Since the commercial launch of advanced models like ChatGPT in late 2022, expectations of a transformative shift similar to the emergence of the internet have been raised. The economic impact of artificial intelligence (AI) is multifaceted and complex. AI is both a complement to human labor and a replacement for it. In this respect, AI brings about low productivity growth in many developed and developing economies or accelerates labor productivity by improving decision-making processes and operational efficiency. What is important here is that technology is used in a purposeful way, making life easier and increasing efficiency. The aim of this study is to reveal the real economic impacts of artificial intelligence on labor productivity and employment.

Keywords

• Artificial intelligence
• labor productivity
• employment

References

1. Acemoglu, D. & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings in O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics, 4, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2. Acemoglu, D. & Restrepo P. (2017). The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares and employment. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2(1), 11-18.
3. Agrawal, A., Gans, J. & Goldfarb, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: The ambiguous labor market impact of automating prediction. Journal of Economic Perspect, 33, 31–50.
4. Arnold, D., Butschek, S.,Müller, D. & Steffes, S. (2016). Digitalisierung am Arbeitsplatz: Forschungsbericht, 468. Bundesministeriums Arbeit und Soziales, Nürnberg.
5. Arntz, M., Gregory, T. & Zierahn, U. (2016a.). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis, social, employment and migration working paper 189, Paris: OECD.
6. Arntz, M., Gregory,T., Lehmer, F., Matthes, B. & Zierahn, U. (2016b). Arbeitswelt 4.0 – stand der digitalisierung in Deutschland: Dienstleister haben die nase vorn, IAB Kurzbericht, 22, 1-8.
7. Arntz, M., Gregory, T., Jansen, S. & Zierahn, U. (2016c). Tätigkeitswandel und weiterbildungsbedarf in der digitalen transformation. Econstor, 7(1), 1-55.
8. Atkinson, R. D. (2016). Think like an enterprise: Why nations need comprehensive productivity strategies. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. http://www2.itif.org/2016-think-like-anenterprise.pdf?_ga=2.112124294.382854264.1506957444 487073861 1494271158.

9. Autor, D. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30.
10. Brynjolfsson, E.,Mitchell, T. & Rock, D. (2018a). What can machines learn and what does ıt mean for occupations and the economy? AEA Papers and Proceedings., 108, 43–47.
11. Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D. & Syverson, C. (2018b). The productivity J-curve: How intangibles complement general purpose technologies. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 13, 333–372.
12. Cai, Y., Ke, W., Cui, E. & Yu, F. A (2022). Deep recommendation model of cross-grained sentiments of user reviews and ratings. Information Processing & Management Journal, 59, 102-842.
13. Czarnitzki, D., Fernández, G.P. & Rammer, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 211, 188–205.
14. Eurofound (2017). Occupational change and wage inequality: European jobs monitör. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
15. Gemp, I., Anthony, T., Bachrach, Y., Bhoopchand, A., Bullard, K., Connor, J., Dasagi, V., De Vylder, B., Duenez-Guzman, E.A., Elie, R., vd. (2022). Developing, evaluating and scaling learning agents in multi-agent environments. The European Journal on Artificial Intelligence, 35(4), 271–284.
16. Goos, M., Manning, A. & Salomons, A. (2014). Explaining job polarization: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2509–526.
17. Gorjifard, R. (2022). The healthy workforce: enhancing wellbeing and productivity in the workers of the future. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 2(3), 14-21.
18. Gregory, T., Salomons, A. & Zierahn, U. (2016). Racing with or against the machine? Evidence from Europe’, ZEW Discussion Paper, 16(53), 2-5.
19. Lawrence, M., Roberts, C. & King, L. (2017). Managing automation: Employment, inequality and ethics in the digital age. IPPR Commission on Economic Justice, London: Institute for Public Policy Research, https://www.ippr.org/files/2018-01/cej-managing-automationdecember2017.pdf
20. Leslie, K., Bartram, M., Atanackovic, J., Chamberland-Rowe, C.,Tulk, C. & Bourgeault, I. L. (2022). Enhancing the capacity of the mental health and substance use health workforce to meet population needs: insights from a facilitated virtual policy dialogue. Health Research Policy and Systems, 20(1), 51.
21. Mudawi, N.A., Beloff, N. & White, M. (2020). Issues and challenges: Cloud computing e-government in developing countries. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(4), 7-9.
22. Nelson, E. (2018). Job automation will hurt women first but will ultimately hurt men more’, quartz. https://qz.com/1198953/ after-three-waves-of-automation-men-will-face-greater-job-lossesthan-women-a-pwc-study-shows/?mc_cid=a47e86c151&mc_ eid=7a8caf6ba0.
23. O’Reilly, J., Leschke, J., Ortlieb, R., Seeleib-Kaiser, M. & Villa, P. (2018). Youth labour in transition: Inequalities, mobility and policies in Europe, New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2017). OECD Employment Outlook, Paris: OECD Publishing.
25. Premarathne, A., Malka H., Samarakody, R. & Nirmalathas, A. (2020). Real-time cryptocurrency price prediction by exploiting IoT concept and beyond: Cloud computing, data parallelism and deep learning. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Appllications, 11(3), 12-23.
26. Ramírez, J. G. C. (2020). Integrating AI and NISQ technologies for enhanced mobile network optimization. QJETI, 5(1), 11–22.
27. Ramírez, J. G. C. (2021). Vibration analysis with AI: Physics-informed neural network approach for vortex-induced vibration. International Journal of Radiation Applications Instrumentation Part C. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 11(3), 1-3.
28. Ramírez, J. G. C. (2023a). From autonomy to accountability: Envisioning AI’s legal personhood. ARAIC, 6(9), 1–16.
29. Ramírez, J. G. C. (2023b). Comprehensive exploration of the CR model: A systemic approach to Strategic Planning. International Journal of Culture and Education, 1(3), 5-7.
30. Ramirez, J.G.C. & Kamal, M (2023). Graphene plasmonics for enhanced quantum information processing. AIFIR, 13(11), 18-25.
31. Ranft, F. (2016). Aiming high: Progressive politics in a high-risk, high-opportunity era. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
32. Saragih, S.A., Munar, A. & Rina, W. (2024). Forescating the amount of corn production in North Sumatra based on 2017 –2021 data using the single and double exponential smoothing method. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications, 3(2), 614–617.
33. Segal-Gidan, F., Resnik, C., Reilly, J.M. & Stevens, G.D. (2022). Enhancing geriatric workforce competency: Impact of 3 distinct geriatric interprofessional education programs. Health, Interprofessional Practice and Education, 4(3), 2233.
34. Shastri, A.S., Nargundkar, A., Kulkarni, A.J. & Sharma, K.K. (2020). Multi-cohort intelligence algorithm for solving advanced manufacturing process problems. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(18), 15055–15075.
35. Trends in Telecommunication Reform (ITUTRENDS) (2018). Assessing the economic impact of artificial intelligence. Issue Paper No. 1. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/opb/gen/S-GEN-ISSUEPAPER-2018-1-PDF-E.pdf
36. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK) (2025). Yapay Zekâ İstatistikleri. https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr/tr/press/57945
37. Wolter, M. I., Mönnig, A., Hummel, M., Schneemann, C., Weber, E., Zika, G., Helmrich, R., Maier, T. & Neuber-Pohl , C. (2015), Industrie 4.0 und die Folgen für Arbeitsmarkt und Wirtschaft. Szenario-Rechnungen im Rahmen der BIBB-IAB-Qualifikations- und Berufsfeldprojektionen. IAB Forschungsbericht, 8(1), 6-55.