Research Article

Rituals and Explorations in Students’ Mathematical Discourses: The Case of Polynomial Inequalities

Volume: 11 Number: 1 January 1, 2024
EN

Rituals and Explorations in Students’ Mathematical Discourses: The Case of Polynomial Inequalities

Abstract

The study is a qualitative case study that seeks to determine whether students’ mathematical discourses in solving polynomial inequalities are more ritualistic or explorative. A comprehensive analysis of students’ routines was conducted through the observations of what they said and did (write, draw, and so on) around task situations in a small group. This study’s participants were five 11th-grade students from a public high school. These participants were chosen using the maximum diversity method of sampling. The data for this study were obtained through small-group work. The small-group interactions lasted 80 minutes and were video-recorded with two cameras. The commognitive approach was used to analyze the student routines in this study. The criteria for analyzing routines were the performers’ agentivity /external authority, focus on the goal or the procedure, and flexibility. The findings of this study revealed that the students’ routines were neither purely ritualistic nor sheer explorative. Even those whose routines were ritualistic in all task situations thought about the procedure and asked logical questions about the task. In addition, the findings indicate that teachers can play an important role in encouraging students to engage in more exploratory mathematical discourse. This study contributes to the future research on students’ discourse in the context of inequality.

Keywords

commognition, mathematical dicourse, routine, rituals, explorations, polynomial inequalities

References

  1. Argün, Z., Arıkan, A., Bulut, S., & Halıcıoğlu, S. (2020). Temel matematik kavramların künyesi [Tags of basic mathematical concepts]. Ankara: Palme Publications.
  2. Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2021). To tell a story, you need a protagonist: How dynamic interactive mediators can fulfill this role and foster explorative participation to mathematical discourse. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(2), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10009-w
  3. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London, UK: Sage Publications.
  5. Emre-Akdoğan, E., Güçler, B., & Argün, Z. (2018). The development of two high school students’ discourses on geometric translation in relation to the teacher’s discourse in the classroom. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1605–1619. doi:10.29333/ejmste/84885
  6. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., Elbaum-Cohen, A., & Tabach, M. (2022). The aRithmetic discourse profile as a tool for evaluating students’ discourse according to the ritual to explorative continuum. Proceedings of CERME 12¬ – Twelfth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics, Bolzen-Bolzano: Italy. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03811304v2
  7. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., & Graven, M. (2016). Between people-pleasing and mathematizing: South African learners’ struggle for numeracy. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(3), 349-373. doi:10.1007/s10649-015-9637-8
  8. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., & Graven, M. (2019). Rituals and explorations in mathematical teaching and learning: Introduction to the special issue. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09890-x
  9. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., & Shabtay, G. (2019). Narratives of ‘good’ instruction: Teachers’ identities as drawing on exploration vs. acquisition pedagogical discourses. ZDM, 51(3), 541–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-01019-3
  10. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., Smith, M., Bill, V., & Resnick, L. B. (2019). From ritual to explorative participation in discourse-rich instructional practices: A case study of teacher learning through professional development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9849-9
APA
Akçakoca, T., Yazgan Sağ, G., & Argün, Z. (2024). Rituals and Explorations in Students’ Mathematical Discourses: The Case of Polynomial Inequalities. Participatory Educational Research, 11(1), 178-197. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.11.11.1
AMA
1.Akçakoca T, Yazgan Sağ G, Argün Z. Rituals and Explorations in Students’ Mathematical Discourses: The Case of Polynomial Inequalities. PER. 2024;11(1):178-197. doi:10.17275/per.24.11.11.1
Chicago
Akçakoca, Tuba, Gönül Yazgan Sağ, and Ziya Argün. 2024. “Rituals and Explorations in Students’ Mathematical Discourses: The Case of Polynomial Inequalities”. Participatory Educational Research 11 (1): 178-97. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.11.11.1.
EndNote
Akçakoca T, Yazgan Sağ G, Argün Z (January 1, 2024) Rituals and Explorations in Students’ Mathematical Discourses: The Case of Polynomial Inequalities. Participatory Educational Research 11 1 178–197.
IEEE
[1]T. Akçakoca, G. Yazgan Sağ, and Z. Argün, “Rituals and Explorations in Students’ Mathematical Discourses: The Case of Polynomial Inequalities”, PER, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 178–197, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.17275/per.24.11.11.1.
ISNAD
Akçakoca, Tuba - Yazgan Sağ, Gönül - Argün, Ziya. “Rituals and Explorations in Students’ Mathematical Discourses: The Case of Polynomial Inequalities”. Participatory Educational Research 11/1 (January 1, 2024): 178-197. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.11.11.1.
JAMA
1.Akçakoca T, Yazgan Sağ G, Argün Z. Rituals and Explorations in Students’ Mathematical Discourses: The Case of Polynomial Inequalities. PER. 2024;11:178–197.
MLA
Akçakoca, Tuba, et al. “Rituals and Explorations in Students’ Mathematical Discourses: The Case of Polynomial Inequalities”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 11, no. 1, Jan. 2024, pp. 178-97, doi:10.17275/per.24.11.11.1.
Vancouver
1.Tuba Akçakoca, Gönül Yazgan Sağ, Ziya Argün. Rituals and Explorations in Students’ Mathematical Discourses: The Case of Polynomial Inequalities. PER. 2024 Jan. 1;11(1):178-97. doi:10.17275/per.24.11.11.1