Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Experiences of an Expert-Guided Online Education Project

Oktay Kızkapan; Melek Karaca; Seyide Eroglu

doi:10.17275/per.23.96.10.6

EN

Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Experiences of an Expert-Guided Online Education Project

Abstract

There exist different approaches and models in teacher training. Among them, the constructivist approach is widely preferred in many countries. The constructivist approach is commonly embraced for its role in helping educators nurture students who actively investigate, inquire, and exhibit curiosity about the world. In recent years, incidents such as pandemic and natural disasters seriously affect normal life and have led to educational environments becoming online. Thus, the need to adapt constructivist learning approaches to online environments emerged. In line with this need, an online education project was organized to enable pre-service science teachers to gain knowledge, experience and awareness about how constructivist learning approaches can be integrated into distance education environments. This research aimed to reveal the experiences of pre-service science teachers (PSST) regarding the online education project. The research adopted the phenomenology design. Data were collected from 19 PSSTs through semi-structured focus group interviews. The PSSTs’ experiences fell in the following six themes: the perceptions of the teaching profession, the use of constructivist approach in distance education, lesson planning competencies in distance education, technological/pedagogical competencies, (Limited) contribution to subject knowledge and professional and academic career goals. The research findings offer valuable insight regarding the advantages of education project focused on enhancing the lesson planning skills of pre-service science teachers in line with the constructivist approach within distance learning settings. Based on the results, suggestions were made that could shed light on similar educational projects for teachers and teacher candidates from other fields.

Keywords

pre-service science teachers, teacher education, distance education, constructivism

Supporting Institution

The data of this research were collected from pre-service science teachers who participated in the project called "Pre-service science teachers construct distance education through interactive applications" supported within the scope of TÜBİTAK 2237-A Grant Program for Scientific Training.

Project Number

1129B372101198

References

Alagül, Ö., & Gürsel, F. (2019). Teacher who (cannot) change: experimental processes of physical education teachers by means of pedagogical innovations at the time of their professional development. Education and Science, 44(197), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.8016
Anderson, E. M., & Shannon, A. L. (1988). Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. Journal of Teacher education, 39(1), 38-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718803900109
Aşiroğlu, S., & Koç Akran, S. (2018). Examining of preservice teachers' performance preparing lesson plan. Caucasian Journal of Educational Research, 5(3),1-10. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.442694
Ayvacı, H. Ş., & Bakırcı, H. (2012). Examining the views of science and technology teachers about science teaching processes in terms of 5E model. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(2), 132-151.
Bakay, O. (2006). The examination of trainee teachers’ perceptions of their mentors’ sufficiency in terms of different variables (Balıkesir sample). Unpublished master's thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
Bakioglu, B., & Cevik, M. (2020). Views of science teachers on distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Electronic Turkish Studies, 15(4), 109-129. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.43502
Buldu, M. (2014). A suggestion on teacher proficiency level assessment and planning professional development trainings. Journal of National Education, 44(204), 114-134. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/milliegitim/issue/36160/406469
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegem.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: the report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association/Mahwah Erlbaum.
Council of Higher Education [CoHE] (2018). Teacher training undergraduate programs. https://www.yok.gov.tr/kurumsal/idari-birimler/egitim-ogretim-dairesi/yeni-ogretmen-yetistirme-lisans-programlari

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. American Educational Research Association, 38, 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Doğan, İ. (1999). Quality and accreditation problem in education: An essay on education faculties. Educational Management in Theory and Practice, 20(20), 503-519.
Duman, S. N. (2020). Evaluation of the distance education process carried out during the epidemic period. Journal of National Education, 49(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.768887
Eraslan, A. (2008). A faculty–school partnership programme: prospective mathematics teachers' reflections on school practice course. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 34, 95-105.
Erdal, B., & Karakaya, S. (2009). Evaluation of the effectiveness of constructivist curriculum applications in teacher education. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 8(28), 40-55.
Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L. & Allen, S. T. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: a guide to methods. Sage: Beverly Hills, CA
FAPEO. (2011). Quelle formation initiale pour nos enseignants ? Les analyses de la FAPEO 2011, Fédération des Associations de Parents de l’Enseignement Officiel, Bruxelles
Gomez, M. (2020). A COVID-19 intervention: Using digital escape rooms to provide professional development to alternative certification educators. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 425-432. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216251/.
Goodyear, V. A., & Casey, A. (2015). Innovation with change: developing a community of practice to help teachers move beyond the “honeymoon” of pedagogical renovation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 20(2), 186-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2013.817012
Güneş, F. (2012). Skills and competencies set forth by Bologna process in higher education. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 2(1), 001-009. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2012.026
Hamutoğlu, N. B., Sezen Gültekin, G., & Savaşçı, M. (2019). The views of teacher candidates toward distance education: Open education practices. Journal of Higher Education (Turkey), 9(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.18.023
Houser, J. (2015). Nursing research: reading, using, and creating evidence. (3rd ed.). Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Huang, K., & Law, V. (2022). Help seeking from peers in an online class: roles of students’ help-seeking profiles and epistemic beliefs. Educational Technology & Society, 25(3), 1-14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48673720
Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2004). Educational research. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Boston: Pearson.
Kaleli Yılmaz, G., & Güven, B. (2015). Determining the perceptions of teacher candidates towards distance education through metaphors. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 299-322. https://doi.org/10.16949/turcomat.75936
Kesal, F., & Aksu, M. (2005). Constructivist learning environment in ELT Methodology II courses. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28, 118-126.
Kitzinger J. (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311(7000), 299-302. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lincoln, S. Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education. London: Routledge.
MacPhail, A., Tannehill, D., & O’Sullivan, M. (2006). The educational experiences of pre-service and beginning physical education teachers. Paper presented at the AIESEP World Congress, July 5 – 8, in Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. (2006). Designing qualitative research, (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks:
Mathur, S., & Murray, T. (2006). Authentic assessment online: A practical & theoretical challenge in higher education. In D. D. Williams, S. L. Howell, M. Hricko (Eds.), Online assessment, measurement, and evaluation: Emerging practices (pp. 238-258). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Maxwell J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Mayer, G., Lingle, J., & Usselman, M. (2017). Experiences of advanced high school students in synchronous online recitations. Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 15–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90002160
Mirici, S., & Uzel, N. (2019). Viewpoints and self-efficacy of teachers participated in project training towards project-based learning. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 6(4), 1037-1056.
MoNE. (2002). Teacher competencies. Ankara: National Education Printing.
Paydar, S., & Doğan, A. (2019). Teacher candidates' views on open and distance learning environments. Education & Technology, 1(2), 154-162. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/egitek/issue/50136/650237
Postlethwaite, K. (1993). Differentiated science teaching. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Sharts-Hopko, N. C. (2002). Assessing rigor in qualitative research. Journal of the Association of Nurses in Aids Care, 13(4), 84-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-3290(06)60374-9
Speily, O. R. B., & Kardan, A. A. (2018). Increasing information reposting behaviour in online learning community. Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 100–110. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26511541
Streubert, H. J., & Carpenter, D. R. (2011). Qualitative research in nursing. (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Taşçı, S. (2021). Evaluation of emergency distance language education: Perspectives of ELT students. Journal of Nevsehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Institute of Social Sciences, 11(1), 286-300. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.877657
Tatar, N., & Ceyhan, N. (2018). Development of pre-service science teachers' constructivist-oriented teaching practices. Elementary Education Online, 17(1), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2018.413758.
Taylor, P. C. (1995). UCLES: A questionnaire for evaluating portfolio cultures in postgraduate teaching. In 4th Annual Teaching Learning Forum. http://cleo.murdoch.edu.au/asu/pubs/tlf/ tlf95/taylo252
Trotman, W. (2015). Researching the researchers: A case study of perceptions and reflections of teacher researchers in a higher education context in Turkey. K. Dikilitaş, R. Smith ve W. Trotman (Ed.), in Teacher- researchers in action (s. 419-429). England: İatefl.
Tunaz, M. (2023). Pre-service elt teachers’perspectives of language assessment in emergency distance education. EKEV Academy Journal, 93, 330-341. https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1202936
Uçar, R. (2017). Examination of the in-service training practices of the Ministry of National Education according to the opinions of inspectors, administrators and teachers. International Journal of Human Sciences, 14(4), 4725-4741. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v14i4.5018
Wilkinson, S. (2004). Focus group research. In D. Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method, and practice (pp. 177–199). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yaman, S., İncebacak, B. B., & Tungaç, A. S. (2021). Impacts of project preparation course for students studying at postgraduate education in the field of educational sciences: a national project example. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(2), 88-99. https://dx.doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.2.367
Zuljan, M. V., & Bizjak, C. (2007). A mentor between supporting and challenging a novice's reflection. Professional Iinductions of Teachers in Europe and Elsewhere, 309-323.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Other Fields of Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Oktay Kızkapan
0000-0001-6781-9879
Türkiye

Melek Karaca
0000-0002-6957-5932
Türkiye

Seyide Eroglu ^*
0000-0002-7363-6638
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

November 3, 2023

Publication Date

November 1, 2023

Submission Date

January 8, 2023

Acceptance Date

October 9, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 10 Number: 6

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.96.10.6

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA23YB59KX

APA

Kızkapan, O., Karaca, M., & Eroglu, S. (2023). Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Experiences of an Expert-Guided Online Education Project. Participatory Educational Research, 10(6), 192-207. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.96.10.6

AMA

1.Kızkapan O, Karaca M, Eroglu S. Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Experiences of an Expert-Guided Online Education Project. PER. 2023;10(6):192-207. doi:10.17275/per.23.96.10.6

Chicago

Kızkapan, Oktay, Melek Karaca, and Seyide Eroglu. 2023. “Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Experiences of an Expert-Guided Online Education Project”. Participatory Educational Research 10 (6): 192-207. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.96.10.6.

EndNote

Kızkapan O, Karaca M, Eroglu S (November 1, 2023) Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Experiences of an Expert-Guided Online Education Project. Participatory Educational Research 10 6 192–207.

IEEE

[1]O. Kızkapan, M. Karaca, and S. Eroglu, “Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Experiences of an Expert-Guided Online Education Project”, PER, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 192–207, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.17275/per.23.96.10.6.

ISNAD

Kızkapan, Oktay - Karaca, Melek - Eroglu, Seyide. “Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Experiences of an Expert-Guided Online Education Project”. Participatory Educational Research 10/6 (November 1, 2023): 192-207. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.96.10.6.

JAMA

1.Kızkapan O, Karaca M, Eroglu S. Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Experiences of an Expert-Guided Online Education Project. PER. 2023;10:192–207.

MLA

Kızkapan, Oktay, et al. “Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Experiences of an Expert-Guided Online Education Project”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 6, Nov. 2023, pp. 192-07, doi:10.17275/per.23.96.10.6.

Vancouver

1.Oktay Kızkapan, Melek Karaca, Seyide Eroglu. Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Experiences of an Expert-Guided Online Education Project. PER. 2023 Nov. 1;10(6):192-207. doi:10.17275/per.23.96.10.6