A Literature Review on Aligning Curricula with ChatGPT

Year 2026, Issue: Advanced Online Publication, 1 - 17

Oktay Akbaş

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.01.13.1

Abstract

The primary function of ChatGPT is to serve as a cognitive artifact that contributes to solving human cognitive tasks. The purpose of this study is to review how generative AI can be aligned with curricula, offering guidance for curriculum designers and practitioners. The study employed the semi-systematic literature review method. The inclusion criteria of the study include research addressing the purpose, content, learning experience, and assessment dimensions of curricula. Aligning curricula with GenAI involves not only encouraging its use but also establishing rules and, when necessary, implementing restrictions. While interaction with GenAI can be intentionally integrated into certain learning outcomes, it may not be required for others. Curriculum designers and teachers, just as they align courses and content, should treat GenAI as a distinct area of focus and ensure proper alignment. In this context, it is recommended that decisions be made on whether GenAI use should be incorporated, restricted, or prohibited depending on the targeted cognitive skills, and that students utilize GenAI as a preparatory tool for idea generation during the process of re-constructing course content. Another suggestion is that the distinction between conversational and learning purposes be clearly established when GenAI is employed as a tool for interaction and learning, and that supervised applications, along with open-use procedures, be developed for assessment and evaluation practices.

Keywords

GenAI , ChatGPT , Curriculum alignment , Learning outcomes , Content

Supporting Institution

Authors declare that this study was not funded by any organization.

References

• Akbaş, O. (2025). Rethinking Teacher Education in the ChatGPT Era through a Currere Perspective. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 7(1), 164-171.
• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc..
• Anderson, L. W. (2002). Curricular alignment: A re-examination. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 255-260.
• Aylsworth, T., & Castro, C. (2024). Should I use ChatGPT to write my papers?. Philosophy & Technology, 37(4), 117.
• Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakcı, O., & Mariman, R. (2024). Generative AI can harm learning. The Wharton School Research Paper.
• Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher education, 32(3), 347-364.
• Bower, M., Torrington, J., Lai, J. W., Petocz, P., & Alfano, M. (2024). How should we change teaching and assessment in response to increasingly powerful generative Artificial Intelligence? Outcomes of the ChatGPT teacher survey. Education and Information Technologies, 29(12), 15403-15439.
• Bliszczyk, A. (2023) AI Writing tools like ChatGPT are the future of learning & no, it’s not cheating. Vice. Retrieved 19 08 2025, from https://www.vice.com/en/article/xgyjm4/ai-writing-tools-like-chatgpt-are-the-future-of-learning-and-no-its-not-cheating.
• Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2025). Generative AI at work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(2), 889-942.
• Cardon, P., Fleischmann, C., Aritz, J., Logemann, M., & Heidewald, J. (2023). The challenges and opportunities of AI-assisted writing: Developing AI literacy for the AI age. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 86(3), 257-295.
• Cassinadri, G. (2024). ChatGPT and the technology-education tension: Applying contextual virtue epistemology to a cognitive artifact. Philosophy & Technology, 37 (1), 14.
• Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in education and teaching international, 61(2), 228-239.
• Dede, C. (2023). Educating in a world of artificial intelligence (J. Anderson, Host). Harvard EdCast. Harvard Graduate School of Education. Retrieved 19 07 2025, from https://www.gse.harvard.edu/ideas/edcast/23/02/educating-world-artificial-intelligence
• Demeuse, M. & Strauven, C. (2016). Eğitimde Program Geliştirme (Çev. Yusuf Budak) [Curriculum Development in Education (Translated by Yusuf Budak) ], Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Fasoli, M. (2018). Substitutive, complementary and constitutive cognitive artifacts: Developing an interaction-centered approach. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(3), 671-687.
• Freeman, J. (2025). Student generative AI survey 2025. Higher Education Policy Institute: London, UK.
• Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., Zhang, S., de Koning, B. B., & Paas, F. (2024). Research avenues supporting embodied cognition in learning and instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 10.
• Healy, M. (2023). Using Curriculum Theory to Inform Approaches to Generative AI in Schools. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4564372
• Henderson, J. G. ve Gornik, R. (2007). Transformative curriculum leadership. Pearson College Division.
• Hernholm, S. (2025). 5 Ways students can use AI to balance school and work responsibilities. Forbes. Retrieved 15 07 2025, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahhernholm/2025/03/28/5-ways-students-can-use-ai-to-balance-school-and-work-responsibilities.
• Heung, Y. M. E., & Chiu, T. K. (2025). How ChatGPT impacts student engagement from a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100361.
• Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
• Kim, H., & Koo, T. K. (2024). The impact of generative AI on syllabus design and learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 46(1), 1–22.
• Lakhani, K., & Ignatius, A. (2023). AI won’t replace humans–but humans with AI will replace humans without AI. Harvard Business Review, 4.
• Levine, S., Beck, S. W., Mah, C., Phalen, L., & PIttman, J. (2025). How do students use ChatGPT as a writing support?. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 68(5), 445-457.
• Loos, E., Gröpler, J., & Goudeau, M. L. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT in education: Human reflection on ChatGPT’s self-reflection. Societies, 13(8), 196.
• Jamieson, P., Bhunia, S., & Rao, D. M. (2023). With ChatGPT, do we have to rewrite our learning objectives-CASE study in Cybersecurity. In 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-5).
• Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Large language models in education: A focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and ChatGPT. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 15873-15892.
• Jongkind, R., Elings, E., Joukes, E., Broens, T., Leopold, H., Wiesman, F., & Meinema, J. (2025). Is your curriculum GenAI-proof? A method for GenAI impact assessment and a case study. MedEdPublish, 15(11), 11.
• Mahowald, K., Ivanova, A. A., Blank, I. A., Kanwisher, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Fedorenko, E. (2024). Dissociating language and thought in large language models. Trends in cognitive sciences, 28(6), 517-540.
• Mai, D. T. T., Da, C. V., & Hanh, N. V. (2024, February). The use of ChatGPT in teaching and learning: a systematic review through SWOT analysis approach. In Frontiers in Education, Vol. 9, p. 1328769
• Martone, A., & Sireci, S. G. (2009). Evaluating alignment between curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Review of educational research, 79(4), 1332-1361.
• McKinsey & Company. (2024). What is generative AI? Retrieved 10 06 2025, from https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-generative-ai
• Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2023). Using AI to implement effective teaching strategies in classrooms: Five strategies, including prompts. The Wharton School Research Paper.
• Ng'ambi, D. (2013). Effective and ineffective uses of emerging technologies: Towards a transformative pedagogical model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 652-661.
• Pasineti, J. (2025). Google brain founder andrew Ng's startup wants to use AI agents to redefine teaching. Retrieved 10 06 2025, from https://www.businessinsider.com/andrew-ng-startup-wants-to-use-ai-agents-redefine-teaching-2025-4?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
• Prestridge, S., Fry, K., & Kim, E. J. A. (2025). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs for Gen AI use in secondary school. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 34(2), 183-199.
• Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Stewart, I., & O’Hora, D. (2002). Relational frame theory: A new paradigm for the analysis of social behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 25(1), 75-91.
• Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
• Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). Unlocking the power of ChatGPT: A framework for applying generative AI in education. ECNU Review of Education, 6(3), 355-366.
• Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100075.
• Tillmanns, T., Salomão Filho, A., Rudra, S., Weber, P., Dawitz, J., Wiersma, E. & Reynolds, S. (2025). Mapping tomorrow’s teaching and learning spaces: A systematic review on GenAI in higher education. Trends in Higher Education, 4(1), 2.
• Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. In Curriculum studies reader. Routledge.
• UNESCO (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO Publishing.
• Valcea, S., Hamdani, M. R., & Wang, S. (2024). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on business school education: Prospects, boundaries, and paradoxes. Journal of Management Education, 48(5), 915-947.
• Walkington, C., Boncoddo, R., Williams, C., Nathan, M. J., Alibali, M. W., Simon, E., & Pier, E. (2014). Being mathematical relations: Dynamic gestures support mathematical reasoning. Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
• Weidinger, L., Mellor, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Uesato, J., Huang, P. S.,& Gabriel, I. (2021). Ethical and social risks of harm from language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.04359.
• Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2e). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
• Zhao, X., Cox, A., & Cai, L. (2024). ChatGPT and the digitisation of writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-9.
• Ziebell, N., & Skeat, J. (2023). How Is Generative AI Being Used by University Students and Academics?. Semester, 1, 2023.