Specialized Content Knowledge for Teaching Equations: A Case Study of Secondary Mathematics Teachers
Abstract
The Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching (MKT) framework conceptualizes specialized content knowledge (SCK) through the dimensions of justification, explanation, and representation. Drawing on this framework, this study investigates secondary school mathematics teachers’ specialized content knowledge in the teaching of first-order equations with one unknown and identifies the instructional responsibilities associated with this topic. Designed as a qualitative case study, the research was conducted with three secondary school mathematics teachers. Data were collected through an equation knowledge test for teaching, semi-structured interviews, and classroom observations conducted during the instruction of first-order equations and were analyzed using analytical rubrics aligned with the three dimensions of SCK. The findings indicate that although teachers demonstrated procedural fluency in solving equations, their justifications and explanations frequently lacked conceptual depth. Teachers encountered difficulties when responding to students’ questions about the relational meaning of the equality sign, the interpretation of variables, and the equivalence of different solution strategies. With respect to representation, teachers relied predominantly on symbolic forms, with limited integration of verbal explanations and visual models to support conceptual understanding. The study specifies topic-specific instructional responsibilities embedded in specialized content knowledge for first-order equations and offers a structured analytical perspective to inform future research and the design of teacher education programs in algebra instruction.
Keywords
mathematical knowledge for teaching, specialized content knowledge, mathematics teacher, equation
Ethical Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and relevant ethical guidelines for research involving human participants. Ethical approval was obtained from Dokuz Eylül University Ethics Committee (Approval No: 24112999). In addition, official research permission for the implementation of the study in schools was granted by the İzmir Provincial Directorate of National Education. Participation was voluntary, and written informed consent was obtained from parents or legal guardians.
References
- Aslan-Tutak, F., & Köklü, O. (2016). Öğretmek için matematik bilgisi [Mathematical knowledge for teaching]. In E. Bingölbali, S. Arslan, & İ.Ö. Zembat (Eds.), Matematik eğitiminde teoriler [Theories in mathematics education] (pp. 701–719). Pegem.
- Asquith, P., Stephens, A. C., Knuth, E. J., & Alibali, M. W. (2007). Middle school mathematics teachers’ knowledge of students’ understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equal sign and variable. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 249–272.
- Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(1), 14–17, 20–22, 43–46.
- Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433–456). American Educational Research Association.
- Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
- Baş, S., Erbaş, A. K., & Çetinkaya, B. (2011). Öğretmenlerin dokuzuncu sınıf öğrencilerinin cebirsel düşünme yapılarıyla ilgili bilgileri [Teachers’ knowledge about ninth grade students’ ways of algebraic thinking]. Eğitim ve Bilim [Education and Science], 36(159), 41–55.
- Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 3–13.
- Cenikli, N., Şahin, A., & İnan Tutkun, M. (2026). An examination of middle school mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge regarding prime numbers. Participatory Educational Research, 13(1), 36–56.
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
- Dede, Y., & Argün, Z. (2003). Cebir, öğrencilere niçin zor gelmektedir? [Why is algebra difficult for students?]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education], 24, 180–185.
