Modeling the Psychological Determinants of Student Adoption of Video-Enabled Feedback Tools

Veysel Bilal Arslankara; Ertuğrul Usta

doi:10.17275/per.26.72.13.5

Modeling the Psychological Determinants of Student Adoption of Video-Enabled Feedback Tools

Abstract

Video-enabled feedback is increasingly integrated into technology-enhanced learning environments, offering rich opportunities for interaction aligned with evolving digital communication practices. However, its adoption is highly sensitive to psychological determinants such as trust, perceived risk, and perceived usefulness. This study explores how these constructs influence learners’ acceptance of video-enabled feedback, conceptualized here as a strategic service design intervention. A quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test design was employed over a 10-week intervention. Data were collected from 88 high school students assigned to an experimental group (video feedback) and a control group (text feedback). The data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings revealed that exposure to video feedback significantly increased trust and perceived usefulness while decreasing perceived risk. Furthermore, perceived usefulness and trust strongly predicted student satisfaction, which in turn served as a central mediator driving both continuance intention and the willingness to invest in personalized learning (WIPL). Perceived risk, conversely, negatively affected trust and satisfaction. The study also highlights the moderating roles of individual differences: virtual risk sensitivity amplified the effects of risk perceptions, whereas creative thinking and self-regulation strengthened the impact of perceived usefulness on satisfaction. These results demonstrate that the acceptance of digital educational tools depends critically on mitigating psychological barriers. By integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Expectation Confirmation Model (ECM) with a trust-risk framework, this research offers practical implications for EdTech developers to design trustworthy, user-centered systems that foster sustainable user engagement and revenue models.

Keywords

Video-enabled feedback, usefulness, risk, trust, technology acceptance model (TAM), PLS-SEM

References

Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204
Alias, N. (2025). AI-supported e-learning systems and continuance intention: Extending the ECM model in the context of education communication and management. Education Communication and Management.
Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers & Education, 80, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.006
Ansori, A. D., & Nugroho, S. (2024). The role of trust on the continuance usage intention of Indonesian mobile payment application. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.70452
Arslankara, V. B., & Seferoglu, S. S. (2024). The effect of video feedback on reflective thinking skills of vocational skills training students. Ahi Evran University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 10(1), 152-168. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.1424510
Arslankara, V. B., & Usta, E. (2018). Development of virtual world risk perception scale (vwrps). Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 7(1), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.356898
Beaton, D.E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., et al. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25, 3186-3191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
Bellg, A. J., Borrelli, B., Resnick, B., Hecht, J., Minicucci, D. S., Ory, M., Ogedegbe, G., Orwig, D., Ernst, D., Czajkowski, S., & Treatment Fidelity Workgroup of the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. (2004). Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH behavior change consortium. Health Psychology, 23(5), 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301

Camilleri, M. A., & Camilleri, A. C. (2022). Remote learning via video conferencing technologies: Implications for research and practice. Technology in Society, 68, 101881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101881
Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In: Gage, N.L., Ed., Handbook of research on teaching, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL, 171-246.
Chen, X., & Li, S. (2017). Understanding continuance intention of mobile payment services: An empirical study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 57(4), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1180649
Cheng, Z., Shao, B., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Effect of product presentation videos on consumers’ purchase intention: The role of perceived diagnosticity, mental imagery, and product rating. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 812579. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812579
Daft, R.L., & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Des Jarlais, D. C., Lyles, C., Crepaz, N., & the Trend Group (2004). Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 361-366.
Dodds, W.B., Monroe, K.B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 307-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3172866
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using g*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
Ha, M. T., Tran, K. T., Sakka, G., & Ahmed, Z. U. (2023). Understanding perceived risk factors toward mobile payment usage by employing extended technology continuance theory: A Vietnamese consumers’ perspective. Journal of Asia Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/jabs-01-2023-0025
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem). 2nd Edition, Sage.
Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C.M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of pls-sem. European Business Review, 31, 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Handoyo S. (2024). Purchasing in the digital age: A meta-analytical perspective on trust, risk, security, and e-WOM in e-commerce. Heliyon, 10(8), e29714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29714
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Jiang, Z., & Benbasat, I. (2007). Research note - Investigating the influence of the functional mechanisms of online product presentations. Information Systems Research, 18(4), 454-470. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0124
Jo, H. (2022). Determinants of continuance intention towards e-learning during COVID-19: an extended expectation-confirmation model. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 45(2), 479-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2140645
Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001
Kim, D., & Ammeter, A. P. (2018). Shifts in online consumer behavior: A preliminary investigation of the net generation. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 13(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762018000100102
Kim, Y. & Peterson, R. A. (2022). A meta-analysis of online trust relationships in e-commerce. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 38, 44-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.01.001
Kim, Y. W., Cha, M. C., Yoon, S. H., & Lee, S. C. (2025). Not merely useful but also amusing: Impact of perceived usefulness and perceived enjoyment on the adoption of AI-powered coding assistant. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(10), 6210–6222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2375701
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in MOOCs. Computers & Education, 104, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 11, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Kwapisz, M. B., Kohli, A., Cheesman, A., Majumder, R., Agarwal, Y., & Hou, Y. (2024). Privacy concerns of student data shared with instructors in an online LMS. CHI ‘24 Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642914
Li, Q., Liu, Y., & Chen, C. (2025). Satisfaction and continuation intention in music streaming services: investigating key factors for user retention. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1552800. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1552800
Liu, Q., & Khalil, M. (2023). Understanding privacy and data protection issues in learning analytics using a systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(4), 1715–1747. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13388
Liu, T.-L., Lin, T. T., & Hsu, S.-Y. (2022). Continuance usage intention toward e-payment during the covid-19 pandemic from the financial sustainable development perspective using perceived usefulness and electronic word of mouth as mediators. Sustainability, 14(13), 7775. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137775
Liu, Y., Li, Q., Edu, T., & Negricea, I. (2020). Exploring the continuance usage intention of travel applications in the case of Chinese tourists. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 47(1), 6–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020962553
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet user’s information privacy concern (IUIPC): the construct, the scale and causal model. Information Systems Research, 15, 336-355. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032
Máñez, I., Serrano-Mendizábal, M., Descals, A., & García-Ros, R. (2025). Examining the impact of video-feedback and academic engagement on students’ feedback perceptions, feedback reviews, and academic achievement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00510-8
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., et al. (2021). Video improves learning in higher education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 204–236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321990713
Ozgenel, M., & Cetin, M. (2017). Development of the marmara creative thinking dispositions scale: Validity and reliability analysis. Marmara University Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 46(46), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.335087
Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275
Perdue, B. C., & Summers, J. O. (1986). Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 317-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378602300401
Pintrich, P., Smith, D., García, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Pitts, G., & Motamedi, S. (2025). Understanding human-AI trust in education. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.09160
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003
Sarosa, S., & Setyowati, A. R. (2022). Trust and perceived risks in high school students’ online learning behaviour during COVID-19 pandemic. INTENSIF: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Penerapan Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 6(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.29407/intensif.v6i1.16477
Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Velasquez Estrada, J. M., & Chatla, S. B. (2016). The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4552–4564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.049
Soren, A.A. & Chakraborty, S. (2024). Adoption, satisfaction, trust, and commitment of over-the-top platforms: An integrated approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, Article 103574, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103574
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137-1148. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069429
Tripathi, R. (2023). Determinants of continuance intention to use mobile wallets technology in the post-pandemic era: Moderating role of perceived trust. Journal of International Technology and Information Management. 31(3), 128-170. https://doi.org/10.58729/1941-6679.1570
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of IT: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of IT: Extending the unified theory (UTAUT2). MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Viberg, O., Kizilcec, R. F., Jivet, I., et al. (2023). Cultural differences in students’ privacy concerns in learning analytics across five countries. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02093
Wang, H. H., Hua, Y., & Wilson, C. (2025). Do college students demand lower tuition for online learning? Empirical evidence from choice experiments during COVID-19. Education Economics, 33(2), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2024.2318215
Wang, T., Lin, C.-L., & Su, Y.-S. (2021). Continuance intention of university students and online learning during the covid-19 pandemic: A modified expectation confirmation model perspective. Sustainability, 13(8), 4586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084586
Willis, G. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1037/e538062007-001
Wu, F., & Xie, G. (2024). Research on the influence of perceived quality on users’ continuance usage intention of online live streaming class platforms: The mediating role of flow experience and the moderating impact of perceived usefulness. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1455597
Wu, W. & Yu, L. (2022). How does personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology promote knowledge workers’ innovative work behavior?, Information & Management, 59(6), 103688.
Yadav, P., Kumar, A., Mishra, S., & Kochhar, K. (2024). Financial equality through technology: Do perceived risks deter Indian women from sustained use of mobile payment services? International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4, 100266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100266
Zhang, A., Gao, Y., Suraworachet, W., Nazaretsky, T., & Cukurova, M. (2025). Evaluating trust in AI, human, and co-produced feedback among undergraduate students. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.10961
Zhang, N. (2023). Product presentation in the live-streaming context: The effect of consumer perceived product value and time pressure on consumer’s purchase intention. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1124675. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124675
Zhang, T., Jiang, Q. & Zhang, W. (2025). Exploring the influence of cognitive factors among Chinese parents on the sustainability of children’s digital education. BMC Psychol, 13, 298. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02614-2
Zhu, Y., Zhai, X., & Li, Y. (2025). Design and validation of a conceptual model for children’s continuance intention to use video apps. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13573

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Instructional Technologies

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Veysel Bilal Arslankara ^*
0000-0002-9062-9210
Türkiye

Ertuğrul Usta
0000-0001-6112-9965
Türkiye

Publication Date

August 30, 2026

Submission Date

April 20, 2026

Acceptance Date

May 18, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 13 Number: 5

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.72.13.5

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA45GW93RS

APA

Arslankara, V. B., & Usta, E. (2026). Modeling the Psychological Determinants of Student Adoption of Video-Enabled Feedback Tools. Participatory Educational Research, 13(5), 204-225. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.72.13.5

AMA

1.Arslankara VB, Usta E. Modeling the Psychological Determinants of Student Adoption of Video-Enabled Feedback Tools. PER. 2026;13(5):204-225. doi:10.17275/per.26.72.13.5

Chicago

Arslankara, Veysel Bilal, and Ertuğrul Usta. 2026. “Modeling the Psychological Determinants of Student Adoption of Video-Enabled Feedback Tools”. Participatory Educational Research 13 (5): 204-25. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.72.13.5.

EndNote

Arslankara VB, Usta E (August 1, 2026) Modeling the Psychological Determinants of Student Adoption of Video-Enabled Feedback Tools. Participatory Educational Research 13 5 204–225.

IEEE

[1]V. B. Arslankara and E. Usta, “Modeling the Psychological Determinants of Student Adoption of Video-Enabled Feedback Tools”, PER, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 204–225, Aug. 2026, doi: 10.17275/per.26.72.13.5.

ISNAD

Arslankara, Veysel Bilal - Usta, Ertuğrul. “Modeling the Psychological Determinants of Student Adoption of Video-Enabled Feedback Tools”. Participatory Educational Research 13/5 (August 1, 2026): 204-225. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.72.13.5.

JAMA

1.Arslankara VB, Usta E. Modeling the Psychological Determinants of Student Adoption of Video-Enabled Feedback Tools. PER. 2026;13:204–225.

MLA

Arslankara, Veysel Bilal, and Ertuğrul Usta. “Modeling the Psychological Determinants of Student Adoption of Video-Enabled Feedback Tools”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 13, no. 5, Aug. 2026, pp. 204-25, doi:10.17275/per.26.72.13.5.

Vancouver

1.Veysel Bilal Arslankara, Ertuğrul Usta. Modeling the Psychological Determinants of Student Adoption of Video-Enabled Feedback Tools. PER. 2026 Aug. 1;13(5):204-25. doi:10.17275/per.26.72.13.5

27707

Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 International Lisance

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoicGVyIHNjb3B1cyBpc3RhdHRpc3Rpay5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiOTg5Ni9mN2E1LzU3ZDcvNmEyMmIyZmFlMGJkYjYuMDUyNjIyMDMucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzgwNjYyNTM5LCJub25jZSI6IjcxYzczMjhhOTdkOWYxM2ExZjE2NWExYjQyMzMyOWJhIn0.g4uvJoi6Oy8W0gRoUNW-d5FO9m4u30pEA0l1h8DwzSE

Modeling the Psychological Determinants of Student Adoption of Video-Enabled Feedback Tools

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite