Active and Accountable Social Inquiry: Implications and Examples

Year 2014, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 13 - 20, 01.12.2014

Norma Ra Romm

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.14.07.1.2

Cited By: 9

Abstract

This
article is based on my inaugural lecture that I delivered at the University of
South Africa on 6 November 2013. The topic of the inaugural lecture was “active
and accountable social inquiry” In the inaugural address I focused on what it
might mean to practice what I call active as well as accountable social
research. I explained the various research contexts in which I, with
colleagues, have used the term “active” to characterize research where
responsibility is taken for the possible impacts that research endeavours have
in the social world of which research is a part. I also indicated that active
research implies that one engages research participants in processes of
research/inquiry. This engagement implies that the research is not led solely
by the initiating researchers, but is a product of a variety of inputs and
decisions about the meaning of the research and its potential action
implications. The approach to active research that is detailed in this article
is pertinent to this journal on Participatory Educational Research, which is
aimed at publicizing various efforts on the parts of researchers to develop a
more participatory style of inquiry. Active research is one way of developing
such a style.

Keywords

active research, accountable research, research participants, co-inquiring, co-learning

References

• Chilisa, B. (2007). Decolonizing ethics in social research. Issues of accountability in survey, ethnographic, and action research. In A. Rwomire & F. B. Nyamnjoh (Eds.), Challenges and responsibilities of social research in Africa: Ethical issues (pp. 199-208). Addis Ababa: The Organization for Social Science Research in Eastern and Southern Africa (OSSREA).
• Coghlan, D., & Shani, A.B. (2005). Roles, politics and ethics in action research design. Action Research 18(6): 533-545.
• Harris-Lacewell, M. (2003). The heart of the politics of race: Centering Black people in the study of White racial attitudes. Journal of Black Studies 34(2): 222-249.
• Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. London: Sage.
• Holstein, J.A., & Gubrium, J.F. (1995). The Active Interview. London: Sage.
• McKay, V.I., & Romm, N.R.A. (2008). Active research toward the addressal of HIV/AIDS in the informal economy in Zambia: Recognition of complicity in unfolding situations. Action Research 6(2): 149-170.
• Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology and Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
• Milner IV, H.R. (2007). Race, culture and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational Researcher 36(7): 388-400.
• Omi, M.A. (2001). The changing meaning of race, in N. Smelser, W.J. Wilson, & F. Mitchell (eds.), America Becoming (pp. 243-262). Washington: National Academy Press.
• Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Johnson, R.B., & Collins, K.M.T. (2009). Assessing legitimation in mixed research: A new framework. Quality and Quantity, 45(6):1253-1271.
• Romm, N.R.A., & Hsu, C-Y. (2002). Reconsidering the exploration of power distance: An active case study approach. Omega 30(6): 403-414.
• Romm, N.R.A., & Adman, P. (2004). Exploring the complexity of human dynamics within 360-degree feedback processes: The development of (active) qualitative inquiry. Journal of Business and Society 17(1&2): 170-189.
• Romm, N.R.A., Nel, N.M., & Tlale, L.D.N. (2013). Active facilitation of focus groups: Co-exploring with participants the implementation of inclusive education. South African Journal of Education 33(4) (article 811).
• Romm, N.R.A. (2001). Accountability in Social Research: Issues and Debates. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
• Romm, N.R.A. (2002). A Trusting Constructivist approach to systemic inquiry: Exploring accountability, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 19(5): 455-467.
• Romm, N. R. A. (2007). Issues of accountability in survey, ethnographic, and action research. In A. Rwomire & F. B. Nyamnjoh (Eds.), Challenges and responsibilities of social research in Africa: Ethical issues (pp. 51-76). Addis Ababa: The Organization for Social Science Research in Eastern and Southern Africa (OSSREA).
• Romm, N.R.A. (2010). New Racism: Revisiting Researcher Accountabilities. New York: Springer.
• Romm, N.R.A. (2013). Employing questionnaires in terms of a constructivist epistemological stance: Reconsidering researchers’ involvement in the unfolding of social life. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 12: 651-669.