Primary School Teachers’ Perceptions of School Report

Year 2016, Special Issue 2016 II, 157 - 172, 01.02.2016

Nida Bayındır Levent Sevi Aynur Çukurcalıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.16.spi.2.16

Abstract

School
report is a document prepared by a teacher to follow up and evaluate a
student’s progress in lessons throughout a certain educational period. It is
also an academic tool that allows the student and parents to be informed about
the progress during that time and to see the shortcomings and to take the
necessary precautions. The main objective of school report is not to show
students’ scores or to determine whether they have passed a lesson, but rather,
to give information about their current state, to manage their skills by taking
their differences into account, to guide them according to their interests,
needs and skills, to determine the difficulties and deficiencies they come up
against throughout the learning process and to help do away with them.  However, if a school report is only
considered in terms of scores and so becomes an indicator of students’ success
or failure, taking the report as a reference, the students whose report shows
them successful might consider themselves more accepted, more important and
valuable. Those with lower academic success, on the other hand, are naturally
driven into a defensive psychology, which causes serious problems because the
report has become the main target and is only assessed in terms of scores. The
fault of parents and teachers to regard school report as an aim to achieve
affects students negatively in many ways and might cause psychological problems
in them in the short term. Perspectives arising
from wrong responses, worries and fears, comparisons, high expectations,
attributing failure to personality, critics without thinking, weathering and
unnecessary rewards or punishments once again reveal the importance of school
report worry. The research aims to reveal how
primary school teachers, the first step of teaching, perceive school report. Teacher’s perception of school report is the variable
playing a fundamental role in shaping both student’s and parents’ definition of
and expectations from school report. The
research encompasses 190 primary school teachers in the city of Kütahya. According to the research results, 62,6% of the
teachers think that school report shows the lessons the students are good at
and 61,6% think that school report shows the lessons the students are deficient
in and their academic progress while 59,5% consider it only as a tool. The
teachers don’t consider school report as a means of punishment and as the
determiner of personality, and they think that it shouldn’t be a source of
honor or shame. The findings show that primary school teachers’ perceptions of
school report are mostly positive in favor of students. In this respect, it can
be said that they perceive school report relevantly to its purpose. Regardless
of the age group of the students, not turning the repot period into a trauma is
based upon not only teachers’ but also parents and students’ perception of
school report. Primary school teachers should reflect their perceptions of
school report to students and parents and should also tell them that school
reports are only a route map involving certain indicators in the early period
and that all students are precious regardless of their reports. As regards to
the school aspect, counsellors should explain the purpose of school report to
teachers, parents and students and should provide the required guidance and
warnings. When media is considered, the traditional school report understanding
should be evaded and by sensitively planning the stress factors of school
report like report festivals, awards and ads, it should be reiterated that
school report is a documentation of students’ mean scores.  With the cooperation between the Directorates
of National Education and Education Faculties, preservice teachers should be
provided such training during theoretical and practical applications of
assessment and evaluation lessons that shows school report as a tool depending
on a process, uses scientific assessment and evaluation arguments, and gives
priority to student psychology and health. Perceptions of students and parents
about school report should be researched. School reports that don’t only
provide quantitative information but also give student success and success
areas prominence should be designed; that is, as well as academic scores,
school reports should also involve student success, areas requiring progress,
parents’ roles in teaching process, what students will/should do at school, statistical
graphs showing previous success levels, in-class success, expected success
levels, thoughts of the teacher, student and parents, study habits, target and
suggestions

Keywords

Primary school teachers, School report, Perception of school report, Assessment and evaluation

References

• Acar, M. & Anıl, D. (2009). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Performans Değerlendirme Sürecindeki Değerlendirme Yöntemlerini Kullanabilme Yeterlikleri, Karşılaştıkları Sorunlar Ve Çözüm Önerileri [Proficiency of Primary School Teachers in Using Assessment Methods during Performance Assessment Process, Problems They Encounter and Suggestions for Solution]. TUBAV Journal of Science, Vol:2, No:3, 354-363.
• Akbaba, Altun, S. (2009). İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Akademik Başarısızlıklarına İlişkin Veli, Öğretmen Ve Öğrenci Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi [Analysis of Parents, Teacher and Student’s Opinions about Academic Failure of Primary School Students]. Primary Education Online, 8(2), 567-586. [Online]: Http://İlkogretim-Online.Org.Tr
• Anıl, D. & Acar, M. (2008). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Ölçme Değerlendirme Sürecinde Karşılaştıkları Sorunlara İlişkin Görüşleri [Opinions of Primary School Teachers about The Problems They Encounter during Evaluation and Assessment Process]. 100th Year University, Journal of Education Faculty. December 2008. Vol:V, No:II, 44-61. Http://Efdergi.Yyu.Edu.Tr
• Çakan, M, (2004). Öğretmenlerin Ölçme-Değerlendirme Uygulamaları Ve Yeterlik Düzeyleri: İlk Ve Ortaöğretim [Evaluation and Assessment Practices of Teachers and Their Proficiency Levels: Primary and Secondary Education]. Ankara University Journal of Education Faculty, 37(2), 99-114.
• Çelenk, S. (2003). Okul Başarısının Ön Koşulu: Okul Aile Dayanışması [Prerequisite for School Success: School-Parents Cooperation]. Primary Education-Online 2 (2), 28-34. Http://Www.İlkogretim-Online.Org.Tr
• Çil, A. Ders Başarısı Mı, Sosyal Başarı Mı? Karnelerin Görünmez/Görünemez Yüzü [Course Success or Social Success? Unseen Face of School Reports]. Http://Www.Kariyerpenceresi.Com/?Rehberlik,111/Ders-Basarisi-Mi-Sosyal-Basari-Mi.Html Accessed on 8th October 2015
• Çoklar, A. N., Vural, L. and Şahin, Y. L. (2009). Öğretmen Adaylarının Uygulayabilecekleri Ölçme-Değerlendirme Yaklaşımları İle Ölçme-Değerlendirme Amaçlı Teknoloji Kullanım Özyeterlikleri [Evaluation and Assessment Approaches Prospective Teachers Can Practice and Their Self-Efficacy in Using Technology for Evaluation and Assessment]. Adıyaman University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, Year: 2, No: 3, S. 35-54.
• Duban, N. & Küçükyılmaz, E. A. (2008). Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Alternatif Ölçme- Değerlendirme Yöntem Ve Tekniklerinin Uygulama Okullarında Kullanımına İlişkin Görüşleri [Opinions of Prospective Primary School Teachers about the Use of Alternative Evaluation and Assessment Methods and Techniques in Practice Schools]. Primary Teaching Online, 7(3), 769-784. [Online]: Http://İlkogretim-Online.Org.Tr
• Gelbal, S. & Kelecioğlu, H. (2007). Öğretmenlerin Ölçme Ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri Hakkındaki Yeterlik Algıları Ve Karşılaştıkları Sorunlar [Proficiency Perceptions of Teachers about Evaluation and assessment Methods and Problems They Encounter]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education 33: 135-145.
• Gök, B, & Şahin, E, A, (2009). İlköğretim 4 Ve 5. Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Değerlendirme Araçlarını Çoklu Kullanımı Ve Yeterlik Düzeyleri [4th and 5th Classes’ Primary School Teachers’ Multiple Use of Assessment Instruments and Their Proficiency Levels]. Education and Science, 34,(153), 127-143.
• Kabapınar, Y. & Ataman, M. (2010). İlköğretim Sosyal Bilgiler (4-5. Sınıf) Programları’ndaki Ölçme Ve Değerlendirme Yöntemlerine İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşleri [Teachers’ Opinions about Evaluation and Assessment Methods in Primary Education Social Studies (4th-5th Classes) Program]. Primary Education Online, 9(2), 776-791. [Online]: Http://İlkogretim-Online.Org.Tr
• Kuran, K, & Kanatlı, F, (2009). Alternatif Ölçme Değerlendirme Teknikleri Konusunda Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Görüşlerinin Değerlendirilmesi [Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions about Alternative Evaluation and Assessment Techniques]. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 6(12), 209-234.
• MEB, (2014). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Okul Öncesi Eğitim Ve İlköğretim Kurumları Yönetmeliği [Ministry of National Education’s Regulation of Institutes of Pre-School and Primary Education]. Official Gazette, No, 29072.
• Özdemir, S. M. (2010). İlköğretim Öğretmenlerinin Alternatif Ölçme Ve Değerlendirme Araçlarına İlişkin Yeterlikleri Ve Hizmet İçi Eğitim İhtiyaçları [Proficiency of Primary School Teachers in Alternative Evaluation and Assessment Instruments & Their In-service Training Needs]. Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, Fall 2010, 8(4), 787-816.