Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 227 - 236, 01.12.2017

Abstract

References

  • Alper, A. & Gülbahar, Y. (2009). Trends and issues in educational technologies: A review of research in TOJET. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 124-135.
  • Çağlar, M. ve Reis, O. (2007). Eğitimde paradigmal dönüşümler sürecinde çağdaş ve küryerel eğitim planlaması. Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Göktaş, Y., Küçük, S., Aydemir, M., Telli, E., Arpacık, Ö., Yıldırım, G. & Reisoğlu, İ. (2012). Türkiye’de eğitim teknolojileri araştırmalarındaki eğilimler: 2000-2009 dönemi makalelerinin içerik analizi [Educational Technology Research Trends in Turkey: A Content Analysis of the 2000-2009 Decade]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 12(1), 177-199.
  • Gülbahar, Y. & Alper, A. (2009). Öğretim teknolojileri alanında yapılan araştırmalar konusunda bir içerik analizi [A Content Analysis of the Studies in Instructional Technologies Area]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 42 (2), 93-111.
  • Hannafin, R. D., & Young, M. (2008). Research on educational technologies. In M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. V. Merrienboer, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3th ed., pp. 731-739). NY: Routledge.
  • Huh, Y., & Reigeluth, C.M. (2016). Designing Instruction for Self-Regulated Learning. Charles M. Reigeluth, Brian J. Beatty, Rodney D. Myers (Eds.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models, Volume IV: The learner-centered paradigm of education (pp. 243-267). Publisher: Routledge.
  • Ifenthaler, D. (2012). Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problem solving scenarios. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 1, 38–52.
  • Kılıç Çakmak, E., Kukul, V., Çetin, E., Berikan, B., Kandemir, B., Pamukçu, B. S., Taşkın, N. & Marangoz, M. (2015). 2013 Yılı Eğitim Teknolojileri Araştırmalarının İncelenmesi: AJET, BJET, C&E, ETRD, ETS ve L&I Dergileri [Examination of Educational Technology Researches within 2013: AJET, BJET, C&E, ETRD, ETS ve L&I Journals]. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 5(1), 128-160.
  • Kılıç Çakmak, E., Özüdoğru, G., Bozkurt, Ş. B., Ülker, Ü., Özgül Ünsal, N., Boz, K., Bozkurt, Ö. F., Ergül Sönmez, E., Baştemur Kaya, C., Karaca, C., Bahadır, H. & Üstün Gül, H. (2016). 2014 yılında eğitim teknolojileri alanındaki yayımlanan makalelerin incelenmesi [Examination of Educational Technology Articles within 2014]. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 6(1), 80-108.
  • Kılıç Çakmak, E., Çebi, A., Mihçi, P., Günbatar, M. S., & Akçayir, M. (2013). A Content Analysis of Educational Technology Research in 2011. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 74-83.
  • Küçük, S., Aydemir, M., Yıldırım, G., Arpacık, O., & Göktaş, Y. (2013). Educational technology research trends in Turkey from 1990 to 2011. Computers & Education, 68, 42-50.
  • Ley, K., & Young, D. B. (2001). Instructional principles for self-regulation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 93-105.
  • Masood, M. (2004). A ten year analysis: Trends in traditional educational technology literature. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology (MOJIT), 1(2), 73–91.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego: Academic.
  • Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
  • Shea, P. & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55, 4, 1721–1731.
  • Şimşek, A., Özdamar, N., Becit, G., Kılıçer, K., Akbulut, Y. & Yıldırım, Y. (2008). Türkiye’deki eğitim teknolojisi araştırmalarında güncel eğilimler [Current Trends in Educational Technology Research in Turkey]. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19, 439-458.
  • Şimşek, A., Özdamar, N., Uysal, Ö., Kobak, K., Berk, C., Kılıçer, T. & Çiğdem, H. (2009). İki binli yıllarda Türkiye’deki eğitim teknolojisi araştırmalarında gözlenen eğilimler [Current Trends in Educational Technology Research in Turkey in the New Millennium]. Kuram ve Uy¬gulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 9, 941-966.
  • Sözbilir, M., & Kutu, H. (2008). Development and current status of science education research in Turkey. Essays in Education (Special Issue), 1-22.
  • Tsai, C. W., Shen, P. D. & Tsai, M. C. (2011). Developing an appropriate design of blended learning with web-enabled self-regulated learning to enhance students’ learning and thoughts regarding online learning. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30, 2, 261–271.
  • Tsai, C.-W., Shen, P.-D. & Fan, Y.-T. (2013), Research trends in self-regulated learning research in online learning environments: A review of studies published in selected journals from 2003 to 2012. British Journal Educational Technology, 44: E107–E110. doi:10.1111/bjet.12017
  • Wang, M., Peng, J., Cheng, B., Zhou, H. & Liu, J. (2011). Knowledge visualization for self-regulated learning. Educational Technology & Society, 14, 3, 28–42.

Examination of Articles Published about Self-Regulated Learning in Selected Journals of Instructional Technologies Field from 2011 to 2016

Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 227 - 236, 01.12.2017

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the articles on self-regulated learning published between the years 2011-2016 leading international 6 journals in the field of instructional technologies within Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). Examined articles contain the words “self-regulated learning” or “self-regulation” in the title, abstract or keywords of the Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET), British Journal of Educational Technology (BJET), Computers & Education (C&E), Educational Technology Research & Development (ETR&D), Educational Technology & Society (ET&S) and Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (JCAL). In the study, data collection tool as called “Article Review Form” have been used. The title, abstract, or keywords of the selected journals include 56 articles containing the words “self-regulated learning” or “self- regulation” examined using content analysis method in terms of research method, sample method, sample level, sample size, sample type, data collection tool, data collection method and data analysis method. When the results of the research are examined, the most “quantitative method” as a method, the most “survey” as a data collection tool, the most “online/computer supported” as a data collection method, the most “random” as a sampling choice, the most “31- 100 interval” as the sampling size, the most “undergraduate level” as sample level, except of science, mathematics and social the most “other” as the sample type and it has been seen that the most “predictive analysis” method is preferred to the data analysis method.

References

  • Alper, A. & Gülbahar, Y. (2009). Trends and issues in educational technologies: A review of research in TOJET. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 124-135.
  • Çağlar, M. ve Reis, O. (2007). Eğitimde paradigmal dönüşümler sürecinde çağdaş ve küryerel eğitim planlaması. Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Göktaş, Y., Küçük, S., Aydemir, M., Telli, E., Arpacık, Ö., Yıldırım, G. & Reisoğlu, İ. (2012). Türkiye’de eğitim teknolojileri araştırmalarındaki eğilimler: 2000-2009 dönemi makalelerinin içerik analizi [Educational Technology Research Trends in Turkey: A Content Analysis of the 2000-2009 Decade]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 12(1), 177-199.
  • Gülbahar, Y. & Alper, A. (2009). Öğretim teknolojileri alanında yapılan araştırmalar konusunda bir içerik analizi [A Content Analysis of the Studies in Instructional Technologies Area]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 42 (2), 93-111.
  • Hannafin, R. D., & Young, M. (2008). Research on educational technologies. In M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. V. Merrienboer, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3th ed., pp. 731-739). NY: Routledge.
  • Huh, Y., & Reigeluth, C.M. (2016). Designing Instruction for Self-Regulated Learning. Charles M. Reigeluth, Brian J. Beatty, Rodney D. Myers (Eds.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models, Volume IV: The learner-centered paradigm of education (pp. 243-267). Publisher: Routledge.
  • Ifenthaler, D. (2012). Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problem solving scenarios. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 1, 38–52.
  • Kılıç Çakmak, E., Kukul, V., Çetin, E., Berikan, B., Kandemir, B., Pamukçu, B. S., Taşkın, N. & Marangoz, M. (2015). 2013 Yılı Eğitim Teknolojileri Araştırmalarının İncelenmesi: AJET, BJET, C&E, ETRD, ETS ve L&I Dergileri [Examination of Educational Technology Researches within 2013: AJET, BJET, C&E, ETRD, ETS ve L&I Journals]. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 5(1), 128-160.
  • Kılıç Çakmak, E., Özüdoğru, G., Bozkurt, Ş. B., Ülker, Ü., Özgül Ünsal, N., Boz, K., Bozkurt, Ö. F., Ergül Sönmez, E., Baştemur Kaya, C., Karaca, C., Bahadır, H. & Üstün Gül, H. (2016). 2014 yılında eğitim teknolojileri alanındaki yayımlanan makalelerin incelenmesi [Examination of Educational Technology Articles within 2014]. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 6(1), 80-108.
  • Kılıç Çakmak, E., Çebi, A., Mihçi, P., Günbatar, M. S., & Akçayir, M. (2013). A Content Analysis of Educational Technology Research in 2011. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 74-83.
  • Küçük, S., Aydemir, M., Yıldırım, G., Arpacık, O., & Göktaş, Y. (2013). Educational technology research trends in Turkey from 1990 to 2011. Computers & Education, 68, 42-50.
  • Ley, K., & Young, D. B. (2001). Instructional principles for self-regulation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 93-105.
  • Masood, M. (2004). A ten year analysis: Trends in traditional educational technology literature. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology (MOJIT), 1(2), 73–91.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego: Academic.
  • Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
  • Shea, P. & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55, 4, 1721–1731.
  • Şimşek, A., Özdamar, N., Becit, G., Kılıçer, K., Akbulut, Y. & Yıldırım, Y. (2008). Türkiye’deki eğitim teknolojisi araştırmalarında güncel eğilimler [Current Trends in Educational Technology Research in Turkey]. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19, 439-458.
  • Şimşek, A., Özdamar, N., Uysal, Ö., Kobak, K., Berk, C., Kılıçer, T. & Çiğdem, H. (2009). İki binli yıllarda Türkiye’deki eğitim teknolojisi araştırmalarında gözlenen eğilimler [Current Trends in Educational Technology Research in Turkey in the New Millennium]. Kuram ve Uy¬gulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 9, 941-966.
  • Sözbilir, M., & Kutu, H. (2008). Development and current status of science education research in Turkey. Essays in Education (Special Issue), 1-22.
  • Tsai, C. W., Shen, P. D. & Tsai, M. C. (2011). Developing an appropriate design of blended learning with web-enabled self-regulated learning to enhance students’ learning and thoughts regarding online learning. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30, 2, 261–271.
  • Tsai, C.-W., Shen, P.-D. & Fan, Y.-T. (2013), Research trends in self-regulated learning research in online learning environments: A review of studies published in selected journals from 2003 to 2012. British Journal Educational Technology, 44: E107–E110. doi:10.1111/bjet.12017
  • Wang, M., Peng, J., Cheng, B., Zhou, H. & Liu, J. (2011). Knowledge visualization for self-regulated learning. Educational Technology & Society, 14, 3, 28–42.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Other Fields of Education
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Sinan Kaya This is me

Beyza Özkeş This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 4 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kaya, S., & Özkeş, B. (2017). Examination of Articles Published about Self-Regulated Learning in Selected Journals of Instructional Technologies Field from 2011 to 2016. Participatory Educational Research, 4(2), 227-236.