Examining the Effects of Project and Resource-Based Teaching Methods on Social Intelligence, Metacognitive Thinking and Academic Achievement

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 176 - 194, 01.03.2024

Cengiz Gündüzalp , Yüksel Göktaş

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.25.11.2

Abstract

This study aimed to reveal the effects of project- and resource-based teaching methods on student teachers' social intelligence, metacognitive thinking skills, and academic achievements. A pretest-posttest control group design, a quasi-experimental method, was used in the study. The study used the purposeful sampling method to determine the study group. The study group consists of four different groups. The study analyzed the collected data by MANOVA and paired samples t-test. The findings obtained from the study showed that there was a significant difference in terms of metacognitive thinking skills and academic achievement between the groups to which different teaching methods were applied. In the study, it was understood that the group to which PBTM was applied was more successful than the other groups in terms of metacognitive thinking skills and academic achievements. It was observed that there was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores regarding the metacognitive thinking skills and academic achievement of the group to which PBTM was applied. On the other hand, it was determined that there was no significant difference in terms of the scores regarding social intelligence levels between the groups to which different teaching methods were applied in the study. It was observed that there was no significant difference between the social intelligence variable pre-test and post-test scores of the groups. In conclusion, the study revealed that different teaching methods used in lessons affected students' social intelligence, metacognitive thinking and academic achievement at different levels.

Keywords

Project based learning, resource based learning, social intelligence, metacognitive thinking, academic success

References

• Akerson, V., Bilican, K., Park Rogers, M., Pongsanon, K., & Weiland, I. (2014). Exploring elementary science methods course contexts to iımprove preservice teachers’ NOS of science conceptions and understandings of NOS teaching strategies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(6), 647-665. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/2022/22229.
• Akyüz, D. (2016). TPACK Analysis of preservice teachers under different iınstruction methods and class levels. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 7(1), 89-111. Doi: https://doi.org/10.16949/turcomat.75768.
• Aliyah, U. H., Suyitno, H., & Agoestanto, A. (2014). Keefektifan resource based learning terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah peserta didik materi lingkaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 2(1), 10-18. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v3i1.3888.
• Alsa, E., Kusumawati, I. B., & Nuriyatin, S. (2018). Penerapan pendekatan pembelajaran resource based learnıng (rbl) pada materı pola bılangan dı kelas vıııa mts. Rıyadlul ulum bangıl. Repository STKIP PGRI Sidoarjo. Retvieved from https://repository.stkippgri-sidoarjo.ac.id/359/.
• Apriliana, A., & Subanti, S. (2015). Eksperimentasi model pembelajaran resource based learning (rbl) dan problem based learning (pbl) ditinjau dari kemampuan komunikasi matematik peserta didik kelas xi sma sekabupaten kudus tahun 2013/2014. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(5), 483–494. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/s2math/article/view/6426/0.
• Arıcı, İ. (2007). The effective factors on the students in the religious culture and ethics course (Ankara Example) (Doctoral dissertation). Ankara University, Ankara. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=ePX_SaJ0b35Gq45swKG3lD-fG2nlRJ8bgFwjk5Iuk_MnLfoeza4WltkunkmgOyU-.
• Balay, R., Kaya, A. & Çevik, M. N. (2014). Teachers’ attitudes towards internet and their level of self–efficiency beliefs toward use of internet in education. Black Sea International Scientific Journal, 1(23),16-31. Doi: 10.17498/kdeniz.01935.
• Başbay, M. (2007). Project-based learning. Ö. Demirel (Ed.), In New trends in education (p. 298). Ankara: Pegem.
• Bayındır, N. (2008). The learning strategies’s instruction and teacher. National Education Journal, 180, 24-31.
• Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39-43. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415.
• Bilgin, İ., Karakuyu, Y., ve Ay, Y. (2015). The effects of project based learning on undergraduate students’ achievement and self-efficacy beliefs toward science teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(3), 469-477. Doi: http://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1015a.
• Blumenfeld, P. C., Guzdial, M., Krajcik, J. Marx, R. W., S., Palincsar, A., & Soloway, E. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139.
• Börekçi, C. (2018). Supporting learners' metacognitive and self regulation skills in project based learning process (Doctoral dissertation). Balıkesir University, Balıkesir. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=vbVkXe1KChYWNElr1MuLZo0z4noUVUh1gEXL_0nRtys-5xiyqxhT0XVKsz4YrrZ9. 9 .
• Buck Instıtute for Education (BIE) (2018). Project based learning. Retrieved from Buck Instıtute for Education http://www.bie.org.
• Cheong, C. (2010). From group-based learning to cooperative learning: a metacognitive approach to project-based group supervision. Informing Science: The International Jornual of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 13, 73-85. Retvieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228573431.
• Çelik, Z. (2011). The effects of different teaching methods in basketball on learning areas of students (Doctoral dissertation). Gazi University, Ankara. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=zqI_ZOq-b18GC2rT9c2JGtRV7qgtJElGpBwe13Pbn70DnbYfSoBbLlpUWYn_Qd5R.
• Çelikoğlu, F., & Deniz, J. (2020). An analysis on teaching design developed for improving blues improvisation skills in flute playing. Journal of Institute of Fine Arts, 26, 306-313. Doi: https://doi.org/10.32547/ataunigsed.640692.
• Çiftçi, S. (2014). Project-based learning in social studies teaching. R. Turan (Ed.), In New approaches in teaching social studies I (2nd edition pp. 165-190). Ankara: Pegem.
• Dane, A., Kudu, M., & Balkı, N. (2009). The factors negatively effecting high school students’ mathematical success according to their perceptions. Journal of Erzincan Institute of Science and Technology, 2(1), 17-34. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/erzifbed/issue/6018/80620.
• Deringöl, Y. (2020). Methods and techniques that classroom teachers use in mathematics lesson., Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 21(1), 1-12. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.467893.
• Doğan, T., & Çetin, B. (2008). The investigation of relationship between social intelligence, depression and some variables at university students. Journal of Human Sciences, 5(2), 1-19. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/472.
• Doğanay, A., & Tok, Ş. (2007). Contemporary approaches in teaching. A. Doğanay (Ed.), In Teaching principles and methods (pp. 239-297). Ankara: Pegem.
• Dsouza, J. (2016, April 17). RBL-resource-based learning (Web log post). Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/based-learning-18-rbl-resource-based-john-dsouza/?trackingId=WG5aB4bUQKSIZmrrgWWu%2Bg%3D%3D.
• Emmerling, R., & Boyatzis, R. (2012). Emotional and social intelligence competencies: Cross cultural implications. Cross Cultural Management, 19(1), 4-18. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13527601211195592.
• English, M. C. & Kitsantas, A. (2013). Supporting student self-regulated learning in problem- and project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2), 6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1339.
• Erdem, E. (2015). The effect of enriched learning environment on mathematical reasoning and attitude (Doctoral dissertation). Atatürk University. Erzurum. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=sY7m19PfcL6F1NUw-cr80H08mRl-Ohv1ywQQnWvkVtZ3BEUFsdbeVId-nvx85yTH.
• Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L.B., Resnick (Ed.),The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Fraenkel, J. R., Hyun, H. H. & Wallen, N. E. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
• Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37-52. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504914.
• Howie, S. J., & Pietersen, J. J. (2001). Mathematics literacy of final year students: South African Rrealities. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27(1), 7-25.
• Iwamoto, D.H., Hargis, J., & Vuong, K. (2016). The effect of project based learning on student performance: An action research study. International Journal of the Scholarship of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 24-42. Retrieved from https://scholar.archive.org/work/uvx4lmd5sfafhmeh2ow5gu6tje/access/wayback/http://ejournals.library.gatech.edu:80/ijsotel/index.php/ijsotel/article/viewFile/5/5.
• Johnson, S.A., & Cuevas, J. (2016). The effects of inquiry Projectproject-based learning on student reading motivation and student perceptions of inquiry learning processes. Georgia Educational Researcher, 13(1), 51-85. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/gerjournal/vol13/iss1/2/.
• Kao, M. C., Yuan, Y. H., & Wang, Y. X. (2023). The study on designed gamified mobile learning model to assess students’ learning outcome of accounting education. Heliyon, 9(2). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13409.
• Karaçallı, S. (2011). Effect of Project Based Learning method on students? academic achievement, attitude and impact of persistency of at primary school 4th grade science and technology course (Master’s thesis). Mehmet Akif Ersoy University. Burdur. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=zD1B0cW7zVr3VcnZjitVXjS1bz4LbUx9MSVgFdU210N5mWI4C5GmPMzqvUzwV0RP.
• Karadağ, E., (2018). Investigation of conceptual change of hearing impaired students about moon phases and the reasons of phases (Master’s thesis). Çukurova University, Adana. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=MzP7PYssFqdb3WIjlroAkUOOkyWEf-VpHhrQK38l4DUYkObCJDyadURUYH15laJA.
• Kargın, T., Güldenoğlu, B. ve Şahin, F. (2010). Opinions of the general education teachers on the adaptations for students with special needs in general education classrooms. Educational sciences: Theory & Practice, 10(4), 2431-2464. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/download/52602891/Genel_Eitim_Snflarndaki_zel_Gereksinimli20170412-17265-1gd8nwz.pdf.
• Kocaman, A. (2016). Project-based learning. Y. Göktaş & K. Çağıltay (Eds.), In Fundamentals of instructional Technologies (2nd edition, pp. 243-258). Ankara: Pegem.
• Korkmaz, H. & Kaptan, F. (2001).. Project-Based learning aproach in science education Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 20(20), 193–200. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/87968.
• Kuncoro, K. S., & Junaedi, I. (2018, March). Analysis of problem solving on project based learning with resource based learning approach computer-aided program. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 983, No. 1, p. 012150). IOP Publishing. Retrieved from https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012150/meta.
• Kutluca Canbulat, A. & Yüce, S. (2017). Child centered and care based practices according to constructivist learning approach. Trakya University Journal of Education Faculty, 8(1), 136-161. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/download/55381412/Yapilandirmaci_Ogrenme_Yaklasimina_Gore_Cocugu_Merkeze_Almak_ve_Ilgilenmek.pdf.
• Küçükahmet, L. (2017). Teaching principles and methods. Ankara: Nobel Publ.
• Lasaka, N. A., Jamaludin, J., & Saneba, B. (2017). Meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa melalui metode resource based learning (rbl) pada pembelajaran pkn di kelas IV SDN Sampaka. Jurnal Kreatif Online, 5(1), 152-177. Retrieved from http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/JKTO/article/view/3767.
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. USA: Pearson Higher Ed.
• Metin, Ş., & Aral, N. (2016). Analysis of the effects of project-based education on the visual perceptions of five-year-old children (60-72 months). Educatıon and Scıence, 41(186). Doi: http://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2016.4594.
• Morgan, K., Kingston K., & Sproule J. (2005). Effects of different teaching styles on the teacher behaviours that ınfluence motivational climate and pupils’ motivation in physical education. European Phycical Education Review, 11(3), 257-285. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X05056651.
• Peng, J., Wang, M., ve Sampson, D. (2017, July). Scaffolding project-based learning of computer programming in an online learning environment. Paper presented at the meeting of the 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Timisoara. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8001792/.
• Perkins, D. (1992). Is literary history possible? (p. 33). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Phillips, C. R., & Trainor, J. E. (2014). Milennial students and the flipped classroom. Proceedings of the ASBBS Annual Conference, 21(1), 519-530. Retrieved from http://www.asbbs.org/files/ASBBS2014/PDF/P/Phillips_Trainor(P519-530).pdf.
• Ramadani, R., S., & Har, E. (2013). Penerapan pendekatan resource based learnıng dalam (rbl) pembelajaran biologi sıswa kelas VII SMP bunda padang. Abstract of Undergraduate, Faculty of Education, 2(4). Retrieved from https://ejurnal.bunghatta.ac.id/index.php/JFKIP/article/view/1643.
• Reigeluth, C. M. (2016). Instructional theory and technology for the new paradigm of education. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 50, 2-17. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red/50/1b
• Sart, G. (2014). The effects of the development of metacognition on project-based learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 131-136. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.169.
• Silvera, D., Dahl, T. I., & Martinussen, M. (2001). The Tromsø social ıntelligence scale, a self‐report measure of social intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 313-319. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00242.
• Sitepu, B. P. (2010, July, 2). The role of learning resources center in improving the access & quality of education. (Web log post). Retrieved from https://bintangsitepu.wordpress.com/2010/07/02/the-role-of-learning-resources-center/.
• Talu, N. (1999). Multiple intelligence theory and its reflections on education. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 15(15), 164-172. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/88078.
• Taşpınar, M. (2009). Teaching principles and methods from theory to practice. Ankara: Data.
• Teegelbeckers, J. Y., Nieuwelink, H., & Oostdam, R. J. (2023). School-based teaching for democracy: A systematic review of teaching methods in quantitative intervention studies. Educational Research Review, 39, 1-22, 100511. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100511.
• Tonbuloğlu, B., Altun S., Aslan, D., & Aydın, H. (2013). The impact of project based learning on students' metacognitive skills, perceptions of self-sufficiency and project outcomes. Mustafa Kemal University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 10 (23), 97-117. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mkusbed/issue/19550/208235.
• Topay, N. (2013). A comparative analysis of computer assisted and project based educational methods on cell division and reproduction in terms of their effect on the success of students (Master's thesis). Gazi University, Ankara. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=1zw6GvYMe-q3Hf6HR-3US36g1LtRWVCGXSdtLBHtVy-O85XqzEHZhkTiAnbV4zbr.
• Tuncer, M., & Kaysi, F. (2013). Evaluation of prospective teachers in terms of their metacognition thinking skills. Turkish Journal of Education, 2(4), 44-54. Doi: https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.181069.
• Ulubey, Ö. (2015). The effect of the implementation of citizenship and democracy education curriculum with creative drama and other interactive teaching methods on academic achievement and loyalty to democratic values (Doctoral dissertation). Ankara University, Ankara. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=WBc656i315e2eV6-EZV1opRmwzwrQtaQl2MtRaSCEhEcE-t_8Qn-C9aFQboGV4nr.
• Vural, B. (2006). Planning-measurement and strategies in education and training. İstanbul: Hayat Publ.
• Wang, D. B. (2004). Family background factors and mathematics success: A comparison of Chinese and US students. International Journal of Educational Research. 41, 40-54. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.04.013.
• Wati, E. (2016). Influence model learning resource based learning (RBL) to the student mathematical problem solving ability (Master’s thesis). Gorontalo State University, Gorontalo. Retrieved from https://repository.ung.ac.id/skripsi/show/411412087/pengaruh-model-pembelajaran-resource-based-learning-rbl-terhadap-kemampuan-pemecahan-masalah-matematika-siswa.html.
• Wijaya, H. (2019, July). Resource-based Learning: A paradigm shift in materials design. Paper presented at the meeting of the 6th International Conference on Educational Research and Innovation, Yogyakarta. Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/iceri-18/125912803.
• Yermentaeyeva, A., Aureova, M., Uaidullakyzy, E., Almira, A., & Muldabekova, K. (2014). Social intelligence as a condition for the development of communicative competence of the development of communicative competence of the future teachers. Procedia-Social And Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4758-4763. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1021.