Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Duygusal İşlemleme Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun Psikometrik Özellikleri

Year 2020, , 165 - 179, 29.12.2020

Cennet Yastıbaş , Duygu Güngör , Gülay Dirik

https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.736347

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Duygusal İşlemleme Ölçeği’ni (DİÖ) Türkçeye uyarlanıp üniversite öğrencilerinden oluşan bir örneklemde psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. DİÖ yaşları 18 ile 33 arasında değişen 484 üniversite öğrencisine uygulanmıştır. Cronbach alfa ve test-tekrar test güvenirlik katsayıları hesaplanmıştır. Faktörleri belirlemek için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Geçerliliğin değerlendirilmesi amacıyla Courtauld Duygusal Kontrol Ölçeği, Toronto Aleksitimi Ölçeği ve Kısa Semptom Envanteri kullanılmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi neticesinde ölçeğin 25 maddelik versiyonunun kabul edilebilir uyum gösterdiği saptanmış olup ekstra model testleri ile formun hem orijinal versiyonu uyumlu olarak 5 alt boyut puanlarının hem de toplam puanlarının kullanılabileceği belirlenmiştir. Güvenirlik analizleri ölçeğin toplam puan ve alt boyutlarının kabul edilebilir içsel tutarlık katsayılarına sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca, geçerlik bağlamında, DİÖ ile aleksitimi, duygusal kontrol ve psikolojik belirtiler arasında beklenen şekilde pozitif yönde ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Çalışmanın sonucunda DİÖ Türkçe formunun üniversite öğrencilerinde duygusal işlemlemeyi ölçmede kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçüm aracı olduğu görülmüştür.

Keywords

duygu, duygusal işlemleme, geçerlik, güvenirlik, faktör analizi

Supporting Institution

Herhangi bir proje kapsamında yapılmamıştır.

Project Number

-

Psychometric Properties of the Emotional Processing Scale Turkish Form in University Students

Abstract

The aim of this study was to adapt the Emotional Processing Scale (EPS) to Turkish and find out the psychometric properties of the adapted scale in a sampling composed of university students. The EPS was administered to 484 university students whose ages were between 18 and 33. Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest reliability coefficients were calculated. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to determine the factors. To assess and evaluate the validity of the adapted scale, Courtauld Emotional Control Scale, Toronto Alexithymia Scale and Brief Symptom Inventory were used. According to confirmatory factor analysis, the 25-item version of the scale has an acceptable validity and it was determined through additional model tests that both the scores of five sub-dimensions of the scale in line with the original scale and the total score can be used. The reliability analyses indicated that the total score and sub-dimensions of the scale have acceptable internal consistency coefficients. Besides, in terms of validity, positive high correlations were found out between alexithymia, emotional control and psychological symptoms and the EPS as expected. We can conclude that the Turkish version of the EPS is a reliable and valid scale to measure emotional processing in university students.

Keywords

emotion, emotional processing, factor analysis

Project Number

-

References

• Bagby RM, Parker JD, Taylor GJ (1994) The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale—I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res 38: 23-32.
• Baker R, Gale L, Abbey G ve ark. (2013) Emotional Processing Therapy for post traumatic stress disorder. Couns Psychol Q 26: 362-385.
• Baker R, Holloway J, Thomas PW ve ark. (2004) Emotional processing and panic. Behav Res Ther 42: 1271-1287.
• Baker R, Owens M, Thomas S ve ark. (2012) Does CBT facilitate emotional processing?. Behav Cogn Psychother 40: 19-37.
• Baker R, Thomas S, Thomas PW ve ark. (2007) Development of an emotional processing scale. J Psychosom Res 62: 167-178.
• Baker R, Thomas S, Thomas PW ve ark. (2010) The Emotional Processing Scale: scale refinement and abridgement (EPS-25). J Psychosom Res 68: 83-88.
• Baker R, Thomas P, Thomas S ve ark. (2015). The emotional processing scale. Oxford UK, Hogrefe.
• Cisler JM, Olatunji BO, Feldner MT ve ark. (2010). Emotion regulation and the anxiety disorders: An integrative review. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 32: 68-82.
• Çapık C (2014) Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanımı. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 17: 196-205.
• Derogatis LR (1992) SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring & procedures manual-II for the (revised) version and other instruments of the psychopathology rating scale series. Clinical Psychometric Research: 1-16.
• Esteves JE, Wheatley L, Mayall C ve ark. (2013) Emotional processing and its relationship to chronic low back pain: Results from a case-control study. Man Ther 18: 541-546.
• Foa EB, Kozak MJ (1986) Emotional processing of fear: exposure to corrective information. Psychol Bull 99: 20-35.
• Foa EB, Kozak MJ (1991) Emotional processing: Theory, research and clinical implications for anxiety disorders. Emotion, Psychotherapy & Change, JD Safran, LS Greenberg (Ed), New York, Guilford Press, s. 21-49.
• Garnefski N, Kraaij V, Spinhoven P (2001) Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Pers Individ Dif 30: 1311-1327.
• Gay MC, Baker R, Vrignaud P ve ark. (2019) Cross-cultural validation of a French version of the Emotional Processing Scale (EPS-25). Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée 69: 91-99.
• Gay MC, Bungener C, Thomas S ve ark. (2017) Anxiety, emotional processing and depression in people with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol 17: 43.
• Gilboa‐Schechtman E, Avnon L, Zubery E ve ark. (2006) Emotional processing in eating disorders: specific impairment or general distress related deficiency?. Depress Anxiety 23: 331-339.
• Górska D, Jasielska A (2010) Konceptualizacja przetwarzania emocjonalego i jego pomiar-badania nad polską wersją skali przetwarzania emocjonalnego Bakera i współpracowników. Studia Psychologiczne 48: 75-87.
• Gotlib IH, Joormann J (2010) Cognition and depression: current status and future directions. Annu Rev Clinl Psychol 6: 285-312.
• Gratz KL Roemer L (2004) Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 26: 41-54.
• Gross JJ, John OP (2003) Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 85: 348-362.
• Gross JJ, Muñoz RF (1995) Emotion regulation and mental health. Clin Psychol (New York) 2: 151-164.
• Gross JJ, Thompson RA (2007) Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. Handbook of emotion regulation, JJ Gross (Ed), New York, Guilford Press, s. 3-24.
• Güleç H, Köse S, Güleç MY ve ark. (2009) Reliability and factorial validity of the Turkish version of the 20-item Toronto alexithymia scale (TAS-20). Klinik Psikofarmakol Bülteni 19: 214-220.
• Honkalampi K, Hintikka J, Tanskanen A ve ark. (2000) Depression is strongly associated with alexithymia in the general population. J Psychosom Res 48: 99-104.
• Kemmis LK, Wanigaratne S, Ehntholt KA (2017) Emotional processing in individuals with substance use disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. Int J Ment Health Addict 15: 900-918.
• Lane RD, Quinlan DM, Schwartz GE ve ark. (1990) The Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale: A cognitive-developmental measure of emotion. J Pers Assess 55: 124-134.
• Lane RD, Schwartz GE (1987) Levels of emotional awareness: a cognitive-developmental theory and its application to psychopathology. Am J Psychiatr 144: 133-143.
• Litz BT, Orsillo SM, Kaloupek D ve ark. (2000) Emotional processing in posttraumatic stress disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 109: 26-39.
• Lulé D, Schulze UM, Bauer K ve ark. (2014) Anorexia nervosa and its relation to depression, anxiety, alexithymia and emotional processing deficits. Eating and Weight Disorders-Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity 19: 209-216.
• Martin RC, Dahlen ER (2005) Cognitive emotion regulation in the prediction of depression, anxiety, stress, and anger. Pers Individ Dif 39: 1249-1260.
• Martino ML, Gargiulo A, Lemmo D ve ark. (2019) Longitudinal effect of emotional processing on psychological symptoms in women under 50 with breast cancer. Health Psychol Open 6: 1-9.
• Okyavuz ÜH (1993) Use of Toronto Alexithymia Scale and Courtauld Emotional Control Scale in a Turkish Population. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 4: 18-23.
• Oldershaw A, DeJong H, Hambrook D ve ark. (2012) Emotional processing following recovery from anorexia nervosa. Eur Eat Disord Rev 20: 502-509. Orbegozo U, Matellanes B, Estévez A ve ark. (2018) Adaptación al castellano del Emotional Processing Scale-25. Ansiedad y Estrés 24: 24-30.
• Pennebaker JW (1997) Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychol Sci 8: 162-166.
• Rachman S (1980) Emotional processing. Behav Res Ther 18: 51-60.
• Rachman G (2001) Is the Anglo‐American relationship still special?. Wah Q 24: 5-20.
• Sibelli A, Chalder T, Everitt H ve ark. (2018) Positive and negative affect mediate the bidirectional relationship between emotional processing and symptom severity and impact in irritable bowel syndrome. J Psychosom Res 105: 1-13.
• Şahin NH, Durak AB, Uğurtaş S (2002) The validity, reliability and factor structure of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). Turk Psikiyatri Derg 13: 125-135.
• Taylor GJ (1984) Alexithymia: concept, measurement, and implications for treatment. Am J Psychiatr 141: 725-732. Teasdale JD (1999) Emotional processing, three modes of mind and the prevention of relapse in depression. Behav Res Ther 37: 53-77.
• Wang HB, Liu T Lu JM ve ark. (2013) Reliability and validity of the emotional processing scale in Chinese undergraduates. Chin J Clin Psychol 21: 209–212.
• Watson M, Greer S (1983) Development of a questionnaire measure of emotional control. J Psychosom Res 27: 299-305.
• Weihs KL, Enright TM, Simmens SJ (2008) Close relationships and emotional processing predict decreased mortality in women with breast cancer: Preliminary evidence. Psychosom Med 70: 117-124.