Analyzing the Motivations of Consumers to Buy Counterfeit Products According to Expectancy Theory: A Study on Generation Z

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 531 - 552, 31.12.2024

Mehmet Marangoz , Oğuzhan Güneş

https://doi.org/10.47097/piar.1590848

Abstract

Although counterfeit products first emerged in the 1970s, they are widely used by consumers today. The reasons why consumers prefer counterfeit products are low price, fast access to the product, status consumption, quality perception, and many other reasons. Although many studies have been conducted on consumers' reasons for purchasing counterfeit products, the fact that the counterfeit product market is increasing steadily on a yearly basis increases the importance of the issue. The purpose of this study is to examine the motivation of Generation Z, which shows purchasing behaviors in line with intangible values (prestige, image, etc.) more than previous generations and attaches importance to ostentatious and status consumption, to purchase counterfeit products according to expectancy theory. According to the findings obtained from the analysis given in the study, it was revealed that instrumentality has a low-level significant relationship with the motivation to purchase counterfeit products, while valence and expectancy have a medium-level significant relationship with the motivation to purchase counterfeit products. In addition, it was found that there was a significant difference in the participants' motivation to purchase counterfeit products according to family monthly income, while there was no significant difference in their motivation to purchase counterfeit products according to gender, mother's education level, father's education level and number of siblings.

Keywords

Counterfeit Product, Expectancy Theory, Purchase Motivation, Generation Z.

Tüketicilerin Taklit Ürün Satın Alma Motivasyonunun Beklenti Teorisine Göre İncelenmesi: Z Kuşağı Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Abstract

Taklit ürünler ilk olarak 1970’li yıllarda ortaya çıkmış olmakla birlikte günümüzde tüketiciler tarafından oldukça yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Tüketicilerin taklit ürün tercih etme gerekçeleri düşük fiyat, ürüne hızlı erişim imkânı, statü tüketimi, kalite algısı ve daha birçok nedenden kaynaklanmaktadır. Tüketicilerin taklit ürün satın alma gerekçelerine yönelik çok sayıda çalışma yapılmış olmasına karşın taklit ürün pazarının yıl bazında istikrarlı bir artış gösteriyor olması konunun önemini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı önceki kuşaklara nazaran daha fazla soyut değerler (prestij, imaj, vb.) doğrultusunda satın alma davranışları gösteren, gösterişçi ve statü tüketimine önem veren Z kuşağının taklit ürün satın alma motivasyonunu beklenti teorisine göre incelemektir. Çalışmada verilen analizi sonucu elde edilen bulgulara göre; araçsallığın taklit ürün satın alma motivasyonuyla düşük düzeyde anlamlı bir ilişkiye sahip olduğu görülürken değerlik ve beklentinin ise taklit ürün satın alma motivasyonuyla orta düzeyde anlamlı bir ilişkiye sahip olduğu ortaya konmuştur. Ayrıca aile aylık gelirine göre katılımcıların taklit ürün satın alma motivasyonlarında anlamlı bir farklılık olduğu tespit edilirken cinsiyet, anne eğitim düzeyi, baba eğitim düzeyi ve kardeş sayısına göre taklit ürün satın alma motivasyonlarında anlamlı bir farklılık olmadığı görülmüştür.

Keywords

Taklit Ürün, Beklenti Teorisi, Satın Alma Motivasyonu, Z Kuşağı.

References

• Altunbay, M. ve Bıçak, N. (2018). Türkçe eğitimi derslerinde “z kuşağı” bireylerine uygun teknoloji tabanlı uygulamaların kullanımı. Journal of World of Turks/Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken, 10(1), 1031-1048.
• Alvi, M. U. (2019). Attitude of consumers and issue of credibility in facebook advertising of counterfeit products. Journal of Marketing Strategies, 1(1), 1-21.
• Ashraf, A. (2021). The impact of factors affecting purchase intention of counterfeit products. Journal of Marketing Strategies, 3(2), 23-37.
• Bagozzi, R. P., Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2016). The role of anticipated emotions in purchase intentions. Psychology & Marketing, 33(8), 629-645.
• Bahar, R. ve Villi, B. (2023). Hedonik tüketim ile gelişmeleri kaçırma korkusu (fomo) arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: Z kuşağı tüketiciler üzerine bir araştırma. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi Sbe Dergisi, 13(1), 588-607.
• Basu, M. M., & Lee, J. (2015). Factors affecting consumer intention to buy counterfeit product. Marketing Management Journal, 39-47.
• Bhatia, V. (2018). Examining consumers’ attitude towards purchase of counterfeit fashion products. Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(2), 193-207.
• Bian, X., & Moutinho, L. (2011). The role of brand image, product involvement, and knowledge in explaining consumer purchase behaviour of counterfeits: Direct and indirect effects. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 191-216.
• Budiman, S., & Wijaya, T. (2014). Purchase intention of counterfeit products: The role of subjective norm. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6(2), 145-152.
• Bupalan, K., Rahim, S. A., Ahmi, A., & Rahman, N. A. A. (2019). Consumers’ repurchase intention towards counterfeit products. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(3), 973-981.
• Can, P. ve Er, D. (2019). Narsisizm ile marka bağlılığı ve taklit ürün satın alma eğilimi arasındaki ilişkiler. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2), 147-166.
• Candra, S., Frederica, E., Putri, H. A., & Loang, O. K. (2024). The UTAUT approach to Indonesia’s behavioral intention to use mobile health apps. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management.
• Cesur, Z. ve Candan Çam, B. (2022). Tüketicilerin gösterişçi tüketim eğilimlerinin y ve z kuşağı açısından incelenmesi. Balkan & Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences (BNEJSS), (8), 73-80.
• Chaudhry, P. E., & Stumpf, S. A. (2011). Consumer complicity with counterfeit products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(2), 139-151.
• Chaudhrya, P., Cordellb, V., & Zimmermanc, A. (2005). Modelling anti-counterfeiting strategies in response to protecting intellectual property rights in a global environment. The Marketing Review, 5(1), 59-72.
• Cheng, S. I., Fu, H. H., & Tu, L. C. (2011). Examining customer purchase intentions for counterfeit products based on a modified theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(10), 278-284.
• Chiang, C. F., & Jang, S. S. (2008). An expectancy theory model for hotel employee motivation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(2), 313-322.
• Dağlı, A. ve Baysal, N. (2016). Yaşam doyumu ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(59), 1250-1263.
• Davidson, A., Nepomuceno, M. V., & Laroche, M. (2019). Shame on you: When materialism leads to purchase intentions toward counterfeit products. Journal of Business Ethics, (155), 479-494.
• Eisend, M. (2019). Morality effects and consumer responses to counterfeit and pirated products: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, (154), 301-323.
• Ergin, E. A. (2010). The rise in the sales of counterfeit brands: The case of Turkish consumers. African Journal of Business Management, 4(10), 2181.
• Fan, W. S., Lan, C. H., Huang, Y. K., & Chang, R. S. (2013). A study on purchasing behavior of teenagers in Taiwan: Example of counterfeit goods. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(6), 1289-1300.
• Fernandes, C. (2013). Analysis of counterfeit fashion purchase behaviour in UAE. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 17(1), 85-97.
• Furnham, A., & Valgeirsson, H. (2007). The effect of life values and materialism on buying counterfeit products. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(5), 677-685.
• Gani, M. O., Alam, M. I., Chowdhury, S. A., & Faruq, M. O. (2019). Factors affecting consumers’ purchase intention for counterfeit luxury goods in Bangladesh. Innovative Marketing, 15(4), 27.
• Garas, S. R. R., Mahran, A. F. A., & Mohamed, H. M. H. (2023). Do you consider buying a counterfeit? New evidence from the theory of planned behaviour and cognitive dissonance theory. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 32(4), 544-565.
• George, D. & Mallery, P. (2011). SPSS for windows step by step. A simple guide and reference. (4th Edition). Pearson.
• Göktaş, S., Işıklı, B., Önsüz, M. F., Yenilmez, Ç. ve Metintaş, S. (2019). Ruh sağlığı okuryazarlığı ölçeği’nin (RSOY ölçeği) Türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğinin değerlendirilmesi. Konuralp Medical Journal, 11(3), 424-431.
• Gyepi-Garbrah, T., Preko, A., Mohammed, I., & Mohammed, I. (2023). Using goal-setting theory and expectancy theory to understand career goal implementation in the hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, (32), 1-11.
• Hamelin, N., Nwankwo, S., & El Hadouchi, R. (2013). ‘Faking brands’: Consumer responses to counterfeiting. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12(3), 159-170.
• Hidayat, A., & Diwasasri, A. H. A. (2013). Factors influencing attitudes and intention to purchase counterfeit luxury brands among Indonesian consumers. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 5(4), 143.
• Hussain, A., Kofinas, A., & Win, S. (2017). Intention to purchase counterfeit luxury products: A comparative study between Pakistani and the UK consumers. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 29(5), 331-346.
• Islam, T., Pitafi, A. H., Akhtar, N., & Xiaobei, L. (2021). Determinants of purchase luxury counterfeit products in social commerce: The mediating role of compulsive internet use. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 62, 102596.
• Iyer, R., Babin, B. J., Eastman, J. K., & Griffin, M. (2022). Drivers of attitudes toward luxury and counterfeit products: The moderating role of interpersonal influence. International Marketing Review, 39(2), 242-268.
• Kassim, N. M., Zain, M., Bogari, N., & Sharif, K. (2020). Why do consumers buy counterfeit luxury products? A tale of two major cities in two different countries. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 33(2), 416-446.
• Karaman, A. ve Efeoğlu, M. S. (2022). Z kuşağı ve kariyer planlaması: Bir üniversite örneği. Pamukkale Üniversitesi İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 465-487.
• Kartal, A. ve Tatlı, E. (2020). Yeşil reklamların z kuşağı tüketicilerin satın alma kararları üzerine etkisi. Uluslararası Kültürel ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(1), 208-224.
• Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile internet: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 111-126.
• Koay, K. Y. (2018). Understanding consumers’ purchase intention towards counterfeit luxury goods: An integrated model of neutralisation techniques and perceived risk theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(2), 495-516.
• Lloyd, R., & Mertens, D. (2018). Expecting more out of expectancy theory: History urges inclusion of the social context. International Management Review, 14(1), 24-66.
• Lutfie, H., & Marcelino, D. (2020, 23-24 October). Investigating facebook advertising feature through performance expectancy on customer purchase intention [Conference presentation]. In 2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), Pangkal, Indonesia.
• Maaz, M., & Ali, T. (2020). How counterfeits goods are destroying brand reputation. Journal of Engineering and Economic Development, 6(2), 38-49.
• Marangoz, M. (2006). Tüketicilerin marka fonksiyonu algılamaları ile satın alma sonrası davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2), 107-128.
• Moon, M. A., Javaid, B., Kiran, M., Awan, H. M., & Farooq, A. (2018). Consumer perceptions of counterfeit clothing and apparel products attributes. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(7), 794-808.
• Musnaini, M., Astuti, S. W., Sukoco, B. M., & Yacob, S. (2017). Effect of hedonic value and consumer knowledge on buying intention for luxury brand counterfeit products. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 19(4), 497-511.
• National Crime Prevention Council, (2022). Buyer beware!. https://www.ncpc.org/resources/ip-theft/fake-consumer-goods/.
• Ndofirepi, T. M., Chuchu, T., Maziriri, E., & Nyagadza, B. (2022). Examining the influence of price-quality inference and consumer attitudes on the inclination to buy non-deceptive counterfeit goods: Evidence from South Africa. European Journal of Management Studies, 27(3), 317-339.
• Norum, P. S., & Cuno, A. (2011). Analysis of the demand for counterfeit goods. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 15(1), 27-40.
• OECD/EUIPO (2021). Illicit trade global trade in fakes: A worrying threat, OECD Publishing.
• Onurlubaş, E. (2023). Hazır giyim sektöründe influencerların marka imajı ve satın alma niyeti üzerindeki etkisi: Z kuşağı örneği. Tekstil ve Mühendis, 30(130), 148-157.
• Orel, F. D. ve Kaçmaz, Ö. (2019). Hedonik ve faydacı değerlerin müşteri tatminine etkilerinin y ve z kuşakları açısından incelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28(3), 277-297.
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019). Trade in Fake Goods is Now 3.3% of World Trade and Rising. https://web-archive.oecd.org/2019-03-19/511489-trade-in-fake-goods-is-now-33-of-world-trade-and-rising.htm.
• Özkoç, H. H., Eroğlu, Ş. G. ve Kazancı, E. (2018). Taklit ürün ve tüketici etiği: Üniversite öğrencilerinin açık parfüm kullanma eğilimleri üzerine bir araştırma. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (32), 319-332.
• Panwar, S., & Pareek, A. (2019). Consumer intent and attitudes about counterfeit fashion products: A study of selected influencing factors. VIMARSH–A Bi-Annual Peer-Reviewed Refereed Journal, 10(1), 24-31.
• Patel, A. K., Singh, A., & Parayitam, S. (2022). Risk-taking and WOM as moderators in the relationship between status consumption, brand image and purchase intention of counterfeit brand shoes. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 20(2), 161-187.
• Peštek, A., & Katica, A. (2022). Analysis of attitudes of consumers in Bosnia and Herzegovina toward counterfeit products. In Counterfeiting and Fraud in Supply Chains, 241-259.
• Ratten, V. (2015). Factors influencing consumer purchase intention of cloud computing in the United States and Turkey: The role of performance expectancy, ethical awareness and consumer innovation. EuroMed Journal of Business, 10(1), 80-97.
• Renko, M., Kroeck, K. G., & Bullough, A. (2012). Expectancy theory and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 39, 667-684.
• Rosendo-Rios, V., & Shukla, P. (2023). When luxury democratizes: Exploring the effects of luxury democratization, hedonic value and instrumental self-presentation on traditional luxury consumers’ behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113448.
• Quoquab, F., Pahlevan, S., Mohammad, J., & Thurasamy, R. (2017). Factors affecting consumers’ intention to purchase counterfeit product: Empirical study in the Malaysian market. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29(4), 837-853.
• Quoquab, F., Pahlevan, S., & Hussin, N. (2016). Counterfeit product purchase: What counts—materialism or religiosity?. Advanced Science Letters, 22(5-6), 1303-1306.
• Saracel, N., Bilgiç, E., Topal, F., Kozak, G. T., Kütükcü, H. ve Madi, N. (2023). Yöneticilerin bakış açısı ile z kuşağı çalışanların liderlik beklentileri. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(2), 970-987.
• Sengabira Ndereyimana, C., Lau, A. K., Lascu, D. N., & Manrai, A. K. (2022). Luxury goods and their counterfeits in Sub-Saharan Africa: A conceptual model of counterfeit luxury purchase intentions and empirical test. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34(6), 1222-1244.
• Singh, A., Patel, A. K., & Parayitam, S. (2022). The relationship between functional theory of attitudes and purchase intention of counterfeit luxury sunglasses: A moderated moderated-mediation conditional model. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 13(4), 304-327.
• Staake, T., Thiesse, F., & Fleisch, E. (2009). The emergence of counterfeit trade: A literature review. European Journal of Marketing, 43(3/4), 320-349.
• Stevenson, M., & Busby, J. (2015). An exploratory analysis of counterfeiting strategies: Towards counterfeit-resilient supply chains. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(1), 110-144.
• Stumpf, S. A., Chaudhry, P. E., & Perretta, L. (2011). Fake: Can business stanch the flow of counterfeit products?. Journal of Business Strategy, 32(2), 4-12.
• Talwar, S., Kaur, P., Kumar, S., Hossain, M., & Dhir, A. (2021). What determines a positive attitude towards natural food products? An expectancy theory approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 327, 129204.
• Taş, H. Y., Demirdöğmez, M. ve Küçükoğlu, M. (2017). Geleceğimiz olan z kuşağının çalışma hayatına muhtemel etkileri. Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(13), 1031-1048.
• Tutar, H. ve Altınöz, M. (2010). Örgütsel iklimin işgören performansı üzerine etkisi: OSTİM imalat işletmeleri çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 65(02), 196-218.
• Ulusoy, A. ve Demirel, S. (2022). Türk bankacılık sisteminde dijitalleşme-kârlılık etkileşimi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(1), 184-200.
• Usmani, S., & Ejaz, A. (2020). Consumer buying attitudes towards counterfeit and green products: Application of social comparison theory and materialism. South Asian Journal of Management, 14(1), 82-103.
• U.S. Chamber of Commerce, (2022, August 11). Back-to-school: Business and law enforcement team up to protect students, parents, and teachers from counterfeit goods. https://www.uschamber.com/intellectual-property/back-to-school-business-and-law-enforcement-team-up-to-protect-students-parents-and-teachers-from-counterfeit-goods.
• Vilnai-Yavetz, I., & Koren, R. (2013). Cutting through the clutter: Purchase intentions as a function of packaging instrumentality, aesthetics, and symbolism. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 23(4), 394-417.
• Vroomm, V. H. (1964), Work and Motivation, Wiley.
• Wee, C. H., Ta, S. J., & Cheok, K. H. (1995). Non‐price determinants of intention to purchase counterfeit goods: An exploratory study. International Marketing Review, 12(6), 19-46.