Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies

Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies started its publication life in 2014. PJESS is a refereed e-journal which is published twice a year. The journal is a peer-reviewed international academic journal of covering topics of interest to all those researching and working in the sciences of economics, econometrics, management, finance, public finance, political science and public administration, international trade and finance, and labour economics and industrial relations.Editor also ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality, making use of appropriate software to do so. Following editor review, the manuscript is forwarded blind peer review.

Article categories:

Labour economics and industrial relations
Econometrics
Economics
Business administration
Accounting
Finance
Public finance
Political science and public administration
International trade and finance
Management information systems

Writing Rules

Manuscripts in Turkish and English are published in the Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies.
Writer(s) accept(s) that the manuscript is original, it was not sent to another journal to be published and it was not published before.
The plagiarism report of the manuscript is sent as an additional file.
Acceptation or rejection response of the manuscripts can change according to the duration of the scientific advisory board’s examination.
Orcid no information should be given by authors blow the name of the author
It is required to keep all data of issued manuscripts for 5 years by the writer/s.
Manuscripts sent to the journal should be typed with Microsoft Word (minimum version is Microsoft Office Word 2003), top and bottom spaces with 3 cm., right and left spaces with 2,5 cm. You should use 11 pt. Palatino Linotype (or Times New Roman) font.
Headline should consist of maximum of 14 words. There should be names, surnames and institutions they work for under the heading in accordance with the author order. Address, phone number and e-mail address of one of the authors should be given.
The abstract should be in Turkish and in English with the titles 'Özet' and 'Abstract', one paragraph that contains less than 150 words. Key words (4 to 10 words) should be presented under the Turkish abstract with the name of 'Anahtar Kelimeler' and under English abstract with the name of 'Key Words'. Aim, subjects, data collection instruments, method, data analysis, short results and short conclusion should be presented in abstract.
The text should contain an introduction, method, results, and discussion respectively. Method part should contain four titles which are; subjects, research group or sample, data collection instruments, method or data collection and data analysis.
Tables and figures should be in their own places in the main body. Table numbers and titles should be above the tables. In the table titles initial letter of only first word should be capitalized, other words should be all small letters.
While using abbreviations, its meaning should be written in parenthesis in the first place it comes up.

References Samples:
(LeDoux, 1995a: 210-212)
(Carstensen & Mikels, 2005)
(LeDoux, 1995b; Shipley, 1986: 13-17)
(Anderson vd., 2003: 5628)
Wilson vd. (1996:45)
Can & Güner (1992)
Kaya (2009) ya da (Kaya, 2009)

Anderson, A. K., Christoff, K., Panitz, D., De Rosa, E. & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2003). Neural correlates of the automatic processing of threat facial signals. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(1), 5627–5633.

Carstensen, L. L. & Mikels, J. A. (2005). At the intersection of emotion and cognition: Aging and the positivity effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 117–121

LeDoux, J. E. (1995). Emotion: Clues from the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 209–235.

Can, H. & Güner S. (1992). Açıklamalı, İçtihatlı Turizm Hukuku ve Mevzuatı. Ankara: Feryal Matbaacılık.

Shipley, W. C. (1986). Shipley Institute of Living Scale. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

Wilson, B. A., Alderman, N., Burgess, P. W., Emslie, H. C. & Evans, J. J. (1996). The Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome. Flempton, England: Thames Valley Test Company.

Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Müsteşarlığı. (1999). VIII. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı Hazırlık Çalışmaları [WEB duyurusu]. Ankara; İndirilme Tarihi: 5 Mayıs 2001, URL: http://plan8.dpt.gov.tr/

Kaya, İ. (2009, Aralık 22). Postmodern Marketing / Postmodern Pazarlama. Pazarlama Bi’tanedir. İndirilme Tarihi: 5 Mayıs 2010, URL: http://pazarlamabitanedir.blogspot.com/2009_12_01 _archive.html

Copyright Notice
The uploaded study belongs to the journal with its exclusive rights. For this reason, it is not necessary for the authors to sign any other documents. Scholarly, contextual, lingual and legal responsibility of the papers published in the journal belongs to the author(s) of the paper in question.
In the articles with more than one author, Corresponding author is regarded as the addressee, other authors are not communicated. The journal is not supposed to give information to other authors.
Publication rights of the published writings are belong to PAMUKKALE JOURNAL OF EURASIAN SOCIOECONOMIC STUDIES (PAMUKKALE AVRASYA SOSYOEKONOMİK ÇALIŞMALAR DERGİSİ). Before showing source it is not quoted. Copyright free is not paid to author(s). The legal obligations of the journal which are context wholly belong to its author(s).

Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

Publication Ethics:
The publication process at PJESS, Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies is the basis of the improvement and dissemination of information objectively and respectfully. Therefore, the procedures in this process improve the quality of the studies. Peer-reviewed studies are the ones that support and materialize the scientific method. At this point, it is of utmost importance that all parties included in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publisher, reviewers and editors) comply with the standards of ethical considerations. PJESS, Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies expects all parties to hold the following ethical responsibilities. iThenticate, Turnitin or intihal.net can bu used for professional plagiarism detection and prevention.
The following ethical duties and responsibilities are written in the light of the guide and policies made by Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).Ethical Responsibilities of Authors: The authors who submit their manuscripts to PJESS, Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies are expected to comply with the following ethical responsibilities:

1. Author(s) must submit original studies to the journal. If they utilize or use other studies, they must make the in-text and end-text references accurately and completely.
2. People who have not contributed to the study at the intellectual level should not be indicated as author.
3. If the manuscripts submitted to be published are subject of conflicting interests or relations, these must be explained.
During the review process of their manuscripts, author(s) may be asked to supply raw data. In such a case, author(s) should be ready to submit such data and information to the editorial board. Author(s) should document that they have the participants' consent and the necessary permissions related with the sharing and research/analysis of the data that are used. Author(s) bears the responsibility to inform the editor of the journal or publisher if they happen to notice a mistake in their study which is in early release or publication process and to cooperate with the editors during the correction or withdrawal process. Authors cannot submit their studies to multiple journals simultaneously. Each submission can be made only after the previous one is completed. Author responsibilities given in a study (e.g., adding an author, reordering of author names) cannot be changed if the review process has begun. Ethical Responsibilities of Editors: The editors of PJESS, Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies should hold the following ethical responsibilities that are based on the guides "COPE Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors" and "COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors" published as open Access by Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). General duties and responsibilities: Editors are responsible for each study published in PJESS, Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies. The editors' responsibilities:
1. Acess of their manuscripts, author(s) may be asked to supply raw data. In such a case, author(s) should be ready to submit such data and information to the editorial board.
2. Author(s) should document that they have the participants' consent and the necessary permissions related with the sharing and research/analysis of the data that are used.
3. Author(s) bears the responsibility to inform the editor of the journal or publisher if they happen to notice a mistake in their study which is in early release or publication process and to cooperate with the editors during the correction or withdrawal process.
4. Authors cannot submit their studies to multiple journals simultaneously. Each submission can be made only after the previous one is completed.
5. Author responsibilities given in a study (e.g., adding an author, reordering of author names) cannot be changed if the review process has begun.
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors: The editors of PJESS, Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies should hold the following ethical responsibilities that are based on the guides "COPE Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors" and "COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors" published as open Access by Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
General duties and responsibilities: Editors are responsible for each study published in PJESS, Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies.
The editors' responsibilities:
1. Making efforts to meet the demand for knowledge from readers and authors,
2. Ensuring the continuous development of the journal,
3. Managing the procedures aimed to improve the quality of the studies published in the journal,
4. Supporting intellectual freedom and Ensuring academic integrity,
5. Following the procedures without making concessions on intellectual property rights and ethical standards,
6. Being transparent and clear in issues that require correction or explanation.
Editors must make decisions taking into consideration the knowledge, skills and expectations of all readers, researchers and practitioners that they need. Editors must also ensure that the published studies should contribute to literature and be original. Moreover, they must take notice of the feedback received from readers, researchers and practitioners and provide explanatory and informative feedback.

Relationships with Authors: Editors have the following duties and responsibilities in their relations with authors:
1. Editors must make positive or negative decisions about the studies' importance, originality, validity, clarity in wording and suitability with the journal's aims and objectives.
2. Editors must take the studies that are within the scope of publication into pre-review process unless there are serious problems with the study.
3. Editors must not ignore positive suggestions made by reviewers unless there are serious problems with the study.
4. New editors, unless there are serious issues, must not change the previous editor's decisions about the studies.
5. "Double-Blind Review and Review Process" must be published and editors must prevent possible diversions from the defined processes.
6. Editors must publish an "Author's Guide" that is comprehensive enough in answering queries by authors. This guide must be updated regularly.
7. Authors should be provided with explanatory and informative feedback.
8. Relationships with Reviewers
Editors have the following duties and responsibilities in their relations with reviewers:
Editors must;
1. choose reviewers according to the subject of the study.
2. provide the information and guidance reviewers may need during the review process.
3. observe whether there are conflicting interests between reviewers and authors.
4. keep the identities of reviewers confidential in blind review.
5. encourage the reviewers to review the manuscript in an unbiased, scientific and objective tone.
6. evaluate reviewers regularly based on criteria like performance and timing.
7. develop practices and policies that increase the performance of reviewers.
8. take necessary steps to update the reviewer pool dynamically.
9. prevent unkind and unscientific reviews.
10. make effort to ensure the reviewer pool has a wide range.
Relationships with the Editorial Board:
must make sure that the members of the editorial board follow the procedures in accordance with the publication policies and guidelines, and must inform the members about the publication policies and developments. The editors must also train new members of the editorial board and provide the information they need.
Moreover, editors must
1. ensure that the members of the editorial board review the manuscripts in an unbiased and independent manner.
2. select the new members of the editorial board from those who can contribute to the journal and are qualified enough.
3. send manuscripts for review based on the subject of expertise of the editorial board members.
4. regularly communicate with the editorial board.
5. arrange regular meetings with the editorial board for the development of publication policies and the journal.
Relationships with the Journal's Owner and Publisher
The relationship between the editors and publisher is based on the principle of the independency of editors.
Editorial and Blind Review Processes
Editors are obliged to comply with the policies of "Blind Review and Review Process" stated in the journal's publication policies. Therefore, the editors ensure that each manuscript is reviewed in an unbiased, fair and timely manner.
Quality Assurance
Editors must make sure that articles in the journal are published in accordance with the publication policies of the journal and international standards.
Protection of Personal Information
Editors are supposed to protect the personal information related with the subjects or visuals in the studies being reviewed, and to reject the study if there is no documentation of the subjects' consent. Furthermore, editors are supposed to protect the personal information of the authors, reviewers and readers.
Encouraging Ethical Rules and Protection of Human and Animal Rights
Editors are supposed to protect human and animal rights in the studies being reviewed and must reject the experimental studies which do not have ethical and related committee’s approval about the population given in such studies.
Precautions against possible Abuse and Malpractice
Editors are supposed to take precautions against possible abuse and malpractice. They must conduct investigations meticulously and objectively in determining and evaluating complaints about such situations. They must also share the results of the investigation.
Ensuring Academic Integrity
Editors must make sure that the mistakes, inconsistencies or misdirections in studies are corrected quickly.
Protection of Intellectual Property Rights
Editors are responsible for protecting the intellectual property rights of all the articles published in the journal and the rights of the journal and author(s) in cases where these rights are violated. Also, editors must take the necessary precautions in order to prevent the content of all published articles from violating the intellectual property rights of other publications.
Constructiveness and Openness to Discussion
Editors must
1. pay attention to the convincing criticism about studies published in the journal and must have a constructive attitude towards such criticism.
2. grant the right of reply to the author(s) of the criticized study.
3. not ignore or exclude the study that include negative results.
Complaints: must examine the complaints from authors, reviewers or readers and respond to them in an explanatory and enlightening manner.
Political and Economic Apprehensions
Neither the owner of the journal, publisher or any other political or economical factor can influence the independent decision taking of the editors.
Conflicting Interests
Editors, acknowledging that there may be conflicting interests between reviewers and other editors, guarantee that the publication process of the manuscripts will be completed in an independent and unbiased manner.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
The fact that all manuscripts are reviewed through “Blind Review” has a direct influence on the publication quality. This process ensures confidentiality by objective and independent review. The review process at PJESS, Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies is carried out on the principle of double blind review. Reviewers do not contact the authors directly, and the reviews and comments are conveyed through the journal management system. In this process, the reviewer comments on the evaluation forms and full texts are assigned to the author(s) by the editor. In this context, the reviewers doing review work for PJESS, Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies are supposed to bear the following ethical responsibilities:
Reviewers must
1. agree to review only in their subject of expertise.
2. review in an unbiased and confidential manner.
3. inform the editor of the journal if they think that they encounter conflict of interests and decline to review the manuscript during the review process.
4. dispose the manuscripts they have reviewed in accordance with the principle of confidentiality after the review process. Reviewers can use the final versions of the manuscripts they have reviewed only after publication.
5. review the manuscript objectively and only in terms of its content and ensure that nationality, gender, religious and political beliefs, and economic apprehension do not influence the review.
6. review the manuscript in a constructive and kind tone, avoid making personal comments including hostility, slander and insult.
7. review the manuscript they have agreed to review on time and in accordance with the ethical rules stated above.
Ethical Responsibilities of Publisher: the publisher of PJESS, Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies , is a non-profit foundation. Therefore, the Board of PJESS, Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies is conscious of the fact that they must observe the ethical responsibilities below and act accordingly:
• Editors are responsible for all the processes that the manuscripts submitted to PJESS, Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies will go through. Within this framework, ignoring the economic or political interests, the decision-makers are the editors.
• The publisher undertakes to have an independent editorial decision made.
• The publisher bears all the responsibility to take the precautions against scientific abuse, fraud and plagiarism.
Unethical Behavior
Should you encounter any unethical act or content inPJESS, Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies apart from the ethical responsibilities listed above, please notify the journal by e-mail listed in contacts menu.
Publishing policy:
PJESS publishes studies in the fields of labor economics and industrial relations, econometrics, economics, business, accounting, finance, public finance, political science and public administration, international trade and finance, management information systems in Turkish or English.
The journal does not charge authors and/or for for submission or article processing fees.