Ultraviyole Flekso Mürekkeplerin Karboksimetil Selüloz ve Polivinil Alkol ile Kaplanmış Kartonların Basılabilirlikleri Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılması

Year 2017, , 985 - 991, 20.12.2017

Sinan Sönmez

https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.369134

Cited By: 4

Abstract

The aim of this work is to compare the effect of
Ultraviolet (UV) flexo inks used in the paperboards coated with carboxymethyl cellulose
(CMC) and Polyvinyl alcohol (PVOH) on the printing quality. The study was made
at two stages. At the first one, the surface sizing prepared using 5 % of
carboxymethyl cellulose, 5 and 10 % of PVOH was coated on the surface of base
paperboard and fully dried at the room temperature. The surface roughness,
contact angles, cobb and gloss values of the coated base paperboard were
measured. At the second stage, the test printings using both water based flexo
ink and UV flexo ink on the coated base paperboard were carried out. The print
density, L*a*b* and gloss values (printed) were evaluated on the printed surface areas in the coated base paperboards. The obtained
results showed that the surface smoothness of the paperboards coated by PVOH
was better than the one coated using CMC, but their resistance to wetting was
smaller. The printing quality between the paperboards coated by PVOH or CMC was
not significantly different. The print density, delta gloss and chroma values
of printings attained using UV ink were higher compared to water based ink,
revealing that the UV inks increased the printing quality.

Keywords

Karton, CMC, PVOH, flekso baskı, UV mürekkep, su bazlı mürekkep

References

• [1] Stankovska M., Gigac J., Letko M., and Opalena, E., “The effect of surface sizing on paper wettability and on properties of inkjet prints”, Wood Research, 59(1): 67-76, (2014). [2] Rhim J. W., Lee J. H., and Hong S. I. “Water resistance and mechanical properties of biopolymer (alginate and soy protein) coated paperboards”, LWT - Food Science and Technology, 39(7): 808-813, (2006). [3] Biricik Y., Sönmez S., and Özden Ö., “Effects of surface sizing with starch on physical strength properties of paper”, Asian Journal of Chemistry, 23: 3151-3154, (2011). [4] Fukuda S., Chaussy D., Belgacem M. N., Bruas N. R., and Thielemans W., “Characterization of oil-proof papers containing new-type of fluorochemicals Part 1:Surface properties and printability”, Applied Surface Science, 277: 57-66, (2013). [5] Moutinho I. M. T., Ferreira P. J. T. ve Figueiredo M. L., “Impact of surface sizing on inkjet printing quality”, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 46(19): 6183-6188, (2007). [6] Lee H. L., Shin J. Y., Koh C. H., Ryu H., Lee D. J. and Sohn C. “Surface sizing with cationic starch: its effect on paper quality and papermaking process”, Tappi Journal, 1(1): 34-40, (2002). [7] Sonmez S. “Interactive effects of copolymers and nano-sized pigments on coated recycled paperboards in flexographic print applications”, Asian Journal of Chemistry, 23(6): 2609-2613, (2011). [8] Khwaldia K., Arab-Tehrany E., and Desobry S., “Biopolymer Coatings on Paper Packaging Materials”, Comprehensive Reviews In Food Science and Food Safety, 9(1): 82-91, (2010). [9] Ashori A., Raverty W. D., Vanderhoek N. and Ward J. V., “Surface topography of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) sized papers”, BioResources, 99 (2): 404-410, (2008). [10] Gencoglu E. N., Özden Ö., and Simseker O., “Effects of CMC on Printable Properties of Newspaper”, Asian Journal of Chemistry, 22(7): 5561-5566, (2010). [11] Ambjörnsson H. A., Schenzel K. and Germgard U., “Carboxymethyl cellulose produced at different merserization condition and characterized by NIR FT Raman Spectroscopy in combination with multivariate analytical methods CMC Mercerization”, BioResources, 8(2): 1918-1932, (2013). [12] Klow G., “Pigment Coating and Surface Sizing of Paper”, Paper making Science and Technology, Tappi Press, Helsinki: Finland, (2000). [13] Bacchin P., Bonino J. P., Martin F., Combacau M., Barthes P., Petit S. and Ferret J., “Surface pre-coating of talc particles by carboxyl methyl cellulose adsorption: Study of adsorption and consequences on surface properties and settling rate”, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 272(3): 211-219, (2006). [14] Chang J. H., Jang T. G., Ihn K. J., Lee W. K. and Sur G. S., “Poly (vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites with different clays: Pristine clays and organoclays”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 90(12): 3208–3214, (2003). [15] Tang X. and Alavi S., “Recent advances in starch, polyvinyl alcohol based polymer blends, nanocomposites and their biodegradability”, Carbohydrate Polymers, 85(1): 7-16, (2011). [16] Repeta V., “Influence of surface energy of polymer films on spreading and adhesion of UV-Flexo inks”, Acta Graphica : Journal for Printing Science and Graphic Communications, 24 (3-4): 79-84, (2013). [17] Jeong K.M., and Koseki K., “Rheological properties of UV-curable flexographic ink”, Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, 18(1): 165-170, (2005). [18] Sönmez S. ve Özden O., “Karboksil Metil Selüloz (CMC) Kullanılarak Kaplanmış Kartonların Baskılarında Ultraviole (UV) Mürekkep Kullanımı”, Basım Akademi Dergisi, 1(1): 42-49, (2016). [19] Sönmez S. ve Işık A. R., “Basım Sektöründe Kullanılan Ultraviyole Işık Yayan Diyotlar (UV Led)”, 5. Uluslararası Matbaa Teknolojileri Sempozyumu, 119-128, İstanbul, (2016). [20] Sonmez S., Fleming P. D., Joyce M. K. and Ozden O., “Effects of coat weight and pigment selection on flexographic printability of coated test liners”, Tappi PaperCon 2010, Atlanta, USA, (2010) [21] Sonmez S., “Effects of calendering on print densities of coated paperboards”, Marmara Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 4: 164-169, (2016). [22] Oittinen P., and Saarelma H., “Printing”, Papermaking science and technology, Tappi Press, Helsinki, Finland, (1998). [23] Wilson L. A. “What the printer should know about paper”, GATFPress, USA, (1997). [24] Yuan Y. and Lee T. R., “Chapter 1: Contact Angle and Wetting Properties”, Surface Science Techniques, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, (2013). [25] Gong R., Sonmez S. and Fleming P. D., “Application of Nano Pigments in Inkjet Paper Coating”, 26th International Conference on Digital Printing Technologies (NIP 26), 507-511, Texas, USA, (2010). [26] Elmas G. M., and Sonmez S., “Printability properties of some alkaline sulfite-anthraquinone-methanol handsheets”, Asian Journal of Chemistry, 23(6): 2515-2519, (2011). [27] Peng P., Zhou X. and Ma J., “Water glass compound starch used assurface sizing agent to improve the strength of linerboard”, BioResources, 6(4): 4158-4167, (2011). [28] Zawawi N.I.M., Asa'ari A. Z. M., Abdullah L. C., Abdullah H. H., Harun J. and Jawaid M., “Water absorbency and mechanical properties of kenaf paper blended via a disintegration technique”, BioResources, 8(4): 5570-5580, (2013). [29] Havlinova B., Cicak V., Brezova V. and Hornakova L., “Water-reducible flexographic printing inks—rheological behaviour and interaction with paper substrate”, Journal of Materials Science, 34: 2081 – 2088, (1999). [30] Zang Y. H. and Aspler J. S., “The influence of coating structure on the ink receptivity and print gloss of model clay coatings”, Tappi Journal, 78(1): 147-154, (1995). [31] Johnson J., Andersson C., Lestelius M., Järnström L., Rättö, P., and Blohm E., “Some properties of flexographic printing plates and aspects of print quality”, Appita Journal, 62(5): 371-378, (2009). [32] Juuti M., Prykäri T., Alarousu E., Koivula H., Myllys M., Lähteelä A., Toivakka M., Timonen J., Myllylä, R. and Peiponen K. E., “Detection of local specular gloss and surface roughness from black prints”, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 299(1-3): 101-108, (2007). [33] Sonmez S., “Development of printability of bio-composite materials using Luffa cylindrica Fiber”, BioResources, 12(1): 760-773, (2017). [34] Fairchild M. D., "Color appearance models: CIECAM02 and beyond”, (2004) (http://rit-mcsl.org/fairchild/PDFs/AppearanceLec.pdf), Erişim tarihi: 25 July 2016.