Elektrikli Otomobil Kullanım ve Satın Alma Niyetinin Birleştirilmiş Teknoloji Kabul ve Kullanım Teorisi ile İncelenmesi: Tüketici Etnosentrizminin Düzenleyici Rolü

Abstract

İnovatif bir ürün olan elektrikli otomobillere talep dünyada ve Türkiye’de son üç yılda düzenli olarak artış göstermiştir. Elektrikli otomobillerin pazarda hızla yayılması ekonomik ve ekolojik açıdan birçok fayda sağlamaktadır. Ancak bunlar yeni teknolojiye sahip olduğundan, tüketicilerin nasıl uyum sağlayabileceği ve kabulleneceği yanıt aranan soruların başında gelmektedir. Türkiye’de yürütülen çalışmalar genellikle elektrikli otomobil tercihini belirleyen ürün kaynaklı sebeplere odaklanmış, tüketici uyum süreci ise yerli alan yazında yeterince irdelenmemiştir. Çalışmanın amacı, tüketicilerin elektrikli otomobillere nasıl adapte olabileceğini Birleştirilmiş Teknoloji Kabul ve Kullanım Teorisi zemininde açıklamaktır. Ayrıca, tüketici etnosentrizminin kabul sürecinde düzenleyici rolünü olup olmadığını keşfetmektir. Araştırma kapsamında kolayda örnekleme yöntemiyle İstanbul’da 18 yaş ve üzeri 414 katılımcıdan geçerli veri toplanmıştır. Çoklu regresyon, aracılık analizi ve düzenleyici analiz sonucunda, performans & çaba beklentisi, sosyal etki, kişisel yenilikçilik ve ekolojik kaygı boyutları, elektrikli otomobil kullanım niyetini doğrudan, satın alma niyetini ise dolaylı olarak etkilemiştir. Performans & çaba beklentisinin kullanım niyetine etkisinde ise tüketici etnosentrizminin düzenleyici rolü bulunmuştur. Buna göre yüksek etnosentrizm seviyesine sahip tüketiciler için performans & çaba beklentisinin etki gücü daha düşükken, düşük etnosentrizme sahip tüketicilerde söz konusu etki daha kuvvetlidir. Araştırmada ulaşılan bulgulardan hareketle teorisyenler ve uygulayıcılar açısından çıkarımlar yapılmış, gelecek çalışmalara dair öneriler sunulmuştur.

Keywords

• teknoloji kabulü
• Tüketici davranışı
• elektrikli otomobiller
• teknoloji kabulü
• tüketici uyumu
• tüketici etnosentrizmi

Investigating Intention to Use and Purchase Electric Vehicles via Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: The Moderating Role of Consumer Ethnocentrism

Abstract

The demand for electric vehicles representing an innovative product has risen regularly in the last three years. The penetration of electric vehicles in the market provides economic and ecological benefits. However, how consumers accept electric vehicles is questioned. Studies conducted in Türkiye predominantly focused on the motives determining the preference for an electric vehicle, yet explaining the consumer adoption process has been neglected in the domestic literature. The study aims to explain how consumers can adopt electric vehicles in the context of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. It also purposes to explore the moderating role of consumer ethnocentrism in the adoption process. 414 valid data were obtained through the convenience sampling method from individuals who were 18 and above and lived in Istanbul. Following multiple regression, mediator, and moderator analyses, the dimensions of performance and effort expectancy, social influence, personal innovativeness, and ecological anxiety directly predicted the intention to use electric vehicles and indirectly influenced purchase intention. The research also revealed that consumer ethnocentrism moderates the relationship between performance & effort expectancy, and intention to use. Accordingly, the volume of the influence of performance & effort expectancy on usage intent is lower (vs. higher) in consumers with high (vs. low) ethnocentrism. Regarding the research findings, theoretical and practical implications were made, and suggestions for further studies were offered.

Keywords

• technology acceptance
• consumer adoption
• Consumer behavior
• electric vehicles
• technology acceptance
• consumer adoption
• consumer ethnocentrism

References

1. Abbasi, H. A., Johl, S. K., Shaari, Z. B. H., Moughal, W., Mazhar, M., Musarat, M. A., Rafiq, W., Farooqi, A. S. & Borovkov, A. (2021). Consumer motivation by using unified theory of acceptance and use of technology towards electric vehicles. Sustainability, 13(21), 12177.
2. Acikdilli, G., Ziemnowicz, C., & Bahhouth, V. (2018). Consumer ethnocentrism in Turkey: Ours are better than theirs. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 30(1), 45-57.
3. Ackaah, W., Kanton, A. T., & Osei, K. K. (2022). Factors influencing consumers’ intentions to purchase electric vehicles in Ghana. Transportation Letters, 14(9), 1031-1042.
4. Aggarwal, A. K., Syed, A. A., & Garg, S. (2019). Factors driving Indian consumer’s purchase intention of roof top solar. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 13(3), 539-555.
5. Ahmad, S., Chaveeesuk, S., & Chaiyasoonthorn, W. (2024). The adoption of electric vehicle in Thailand with the moderating role of charging infrastructure: an extension of a UTAUT. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 43(1), 2387908.
6. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
7. Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & health, 26(9), 1113-1127.
8. Akın, M. S., Baloğlu, S., Okumuş, A., & Öztürk, S. (2017). Tüketici etnosentrizmi, kozmopolitlik, satın alma tarzı, ilgilenim ve algılanan riskin yerli giyim ürünü satın alma niyetine etkisi. Tüketici ve Tüketim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 257-296.

9. Akın, M. S., & Okumuş, A. (2023). Creating value for patients through service encounter experiences: evidence from Turkey. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(4), 828-848.
10. Al-Saedi, K., Al-Emran, M., Ramayah, T., & Abusham, E. (2020). Developing a general extended UTAUT model for M-payment adoption. Technology in Society, 62, 101293.
11. Alzubaidi, H., Slade, E. L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Examining antecedents of consumers’ pro-environmental behaviours: TPB extended with materialism and innovativeness. Journal of Business Research, 122, 685-699.
12. Anjam, M., Khan, H., Ahmed, S., & Thalassinos, E. I. (2020). The antecedents of consumer eco-friendly vehicles purchase behavior in United Arab Emirates: The roles of perception, personality innovativeness and sustainability. International Journal of Economics & Management, 14(3), 343-363.
13. Atulkar, S. (2022). Purchase intention of Indian customers: A study on solar PV technology. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 16(5), 946-964.
14. Bhat, F. A., Verma, M., & Verma, A. (2022). Measuring and modelling electric vehicle adoption of Indian consumers. Transportation in Developing Economies, 8(6), 1-13.
15. Casado-Aranda, L. A., Sánchez-Fernández, J., Ibáñez-Zapata, J. Á., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J. (2020). How consumer ethnocentrism modulates neural processing of domestic and foreign products: A neuroimaging study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101961.
16. Chand, S. S., Kumar, B. A., Goundar, M. S., & Narayan, A. (2022). Extended UTAUT Model for Mobile Learning Adoption Studies. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 14(1), 1-20.
17. Chang, K. C., & Cheng, Y. S. (2023). How sensory perceptions and sensory brand experience influence customer behavioral intentions in the context of cartoon-themed restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 115, 103604.
18. Chauhan, H., Pandey, A., Mishra, S., & Rai, S. K. (2021). Modeling the predictors of consumers’ online purchase intention of green products: the role of personal innovativeness and environmental drive. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 16769–16785.
19. Chen, J., Liang, M., & Wei, Y. (2024). The influence of brand innovativeness on consumer purchase intentions towards domestic global brands in emerging markets: Evidence from China. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(3), 1208-1218.
20. Çelik, H. (2016). Customer online shopping anxiety within the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Technology (UTAUT) framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 28(2).
21. Çoşkun, İ. T. (2022). Çok kriterli karar verme teknikleri ile elektrikli otomobil seçimi: SDMULTIMOORA yaklaşımı. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 57(1), 68- 82.
22. Dai, D., Wu, M., & Huang, X. (2022). Study on environmental knowledge and environmental concern to consumers’ purchase intention of green products. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 23(6), 2455-2460.
23. Degirmenci, K., & Breitner, M. H. (2017). Consumer purchase intentions for electric vehicles: Is green more important than price and range?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 51, 250-260.
24. Dodgson, M., Gann, D. M., & Phillips, N. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of innovation management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information systems frontiers, 21, 719-734.
26. Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
27. Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., Jaafar, N., Fayolle, A., Ayupp, K., Radovic-Markovic, M., & Sajid, A. (2017). Acceptance and use of lecture capture system (LCS) in executive business studies: Extending UTAUT2. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(4), 329-348.
28. Fedorko, I., Bacik, R., & Gavurova, B. (2018). Technology acceptance model in e-commerce segment. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 13(4), 1242-1256.
29. Fishbein, M. (1979). A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implications. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 27, 65–116.
30. Fontes, E., Moreira, A. C., & Carlos, V. (2021). The influence of ecological concern on green purchase behavior. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 16(3), 246-267.
31. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
32. García de Blanes Sebastián, M., Sarmiento Guede, J. R., Azuara Grande, A., & Juárez- Varón, D. (2024). Analysis of factors influencing attitude and intention to use electric vehicles for a sustainable future. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 49(4), 1347-1368.
33. Galib, M. H., Hammou, K. A., & Steiger, J. (2018). Predicting consumer behavior: An extension of technology acceptance model. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 10(3), 73-90.
34. Gavcar, E., & Nusret, K. (2020). Elektrikli otomobil seçiminde ENTROPI ve TOPSIS yöntemlerinin uygulanması. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 7(2), 351-359.
35. Gong, S., Ardeshiri, A., & Rashidi, T. H. (2020). Impact of government incentives on the market penetration of electric vehicles in Australia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 83, 102353.
36. Gulzari, A., Wang, Y., & Prybutok, V. (2022). A green experience with eco-friendly cars: A young consumer electric vehicle rental behavioral model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102877.
37. Guo, X., & Bunchapattanasakda, C. (2020). Impacts of consumer ethnocentrism on purchasing intention of electric vehicles: A case study of Henan Province, China. International Business Research, 13(3), 1-59.
38. Gürbüz, S. (2019). Sosyal bilimlerde aracı, düzenleyici ve durumsal etki analizleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
39. Hafeez, F., Mas’ ud, A. A., Al-Shammari, S., Sheikh, U. U., Alanazi, M. A., Hamid, M., & Azhar, A. (2024). Autonomous vehicles perception, acceptance, and future prospects in the GCC: An analysis using the UTAUT-Based model. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(5), 186.
40. Hair, J. F., Celsi, M. W., Ortinau, D. J., & Bush, R. P. (2017). Essentials of marketing research. McGraw-Hill.
41. Han, C. M., & Guo, C. (2018). How consumer ethnocentrism (CET), ethnocentric marketing, and consumer individualism affect ethnocentric behavior in China. Journal of Global Marketing, 31(5), 324-338.
42. Hao, F. (2021). Acceptance of contactless technology in the hospitality industry: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 26(12), 1386-1401.
43. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
44. He, H., Wang, C., Wang, S., Ma, F., Sun, Q., & Zhao, X. (2022). Does environmental concern promote EV sales? Duopoly pricing analysis considering consumer heterogeneity. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 91, 102695.
45. He, Z., Zhou, Y., Wang, J., Shen, W., Li, W., & Lu, W. (2023). Influence of emotion on purchase intention of electric vehicles: a comparative study of consumers with different income levels. Current Psychology, 42(25), 21704-21719.
46. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2015), A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
47. Hirsh, J. B. (2010). Personality and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 245-248.
48. Huaman-Ramirez, R., Albert, N., & Merunka, D. (2019). Are global brands trustworthy? The role of brand affect, brand innovativeness, and consumer ethnocentrism. European Business Review, 31(6), 926-946.
49. Huang, Y. C. (2023). Integrated concepts of the UTAUT and TPB in virtual reality behavioral intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103127.
50. Jadil, Y., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). A meta-analysis of the UTAUT model in the mobile banking literature: The moderating role of sample size and culture. Journal of Business Research, 132, 354-372.
51. Jain, N. K., Bhaskar, K., & Jain, S. (2022). What drives adoption intention of electric vehicles in India? An integrated UTAUT model with environmental concerns, perceived risk and government support. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 42, 100730.
52. Jensen, A. F., Cherchi, E., & Mabit, S. L. (2013). On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 24-32.
53. Jeon, H. M., Sung, H. J., & Kim, H. Y. (2020). Customers’ acceptance intention of self-service technology of restaurant industry: expanding UTAUT with perceived risk and innovativeness. Service Business, 14(4), 533-551.
54. Jewer, J. (2018). Patients’ intention to use online postings of ED wait times: A modified UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 112, 34-39.
55. Karoui, S., & Khemakhem, R. (2019). Consumer ethnocentrism in developing countries. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 25(2), 63-71.
56. Khazaei, H. (2019). The influence of personal innovativeness and price value on intention to use of electric vehicles in Malaysia. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 8(3), pp-483.
57. Khazaei, H., & Tareq, M. A. (2021). Moderating effects of personal innovativeness and driving experience on factors influencing adoption of BEVs in Malaysia: An integrated SEM–BSEM approach. Heliyon, 7(9).
58. Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., & Ndjambou, P. (2016). A meta‐analysis of the UTAUT model: Eleven years later. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 33(2), 138-152.
59. Kock, F., Berbekova, A., & Assaf, A. G. (2021). Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: Detection, prevention and control. Tourism Management, 86, 104330.
60. Krishnan, V. V., & Koshy, B. I. (2021). Evaluating the factors influencing purchase intention of electric vehicles in households owning conventional vehicles. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(3), 1122-1129.
61. Kurtuluş, K. (1992). Pazarlama Araştırmaları, İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Yayınları.
62. Lashari, Z. A., Ko, J., & Jang, J. (2021). Consumers’ intention to purchase electric vehicles: Influences of user attitude and perception. Sustainability, 13(12), 6778.
63. Lee, S., Park, E. A., Cho, M., & Jin, B. (2018). Factors affecting tablet computer users’ intention to purchase mobile applications. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(1), 25-38.
64. Li, L., Wang, Z., Li, Y., & Liao, A. (2021). Impacts of consumer innovativeness on the intention to purchase sustainable products. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 774-786.
65. Lim, H., & Park, J. S. (2013). The effects of national culture and cosmopolitanism on consumers’ adoption of innovation: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 25(1), 16-28.
66. Liu, X., & Mu, R. (2016). Public environmental concern in China: Determinants and variations. Global Environmental Change, 37, 116-127.
67. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate behavioral research, 39(1), 99-128.
68. Mahardika, H., Thomas, D., Ewing, M. T., & Japutra, A. (2019). Predicting consumers’ trial/adoption of new technology: revisiting the behavioral expectations–behavioral intentions debate. The International review of retail, distribution and consumer research, 29(1), 99-117.
69. Malhotra, N.K. and Dash, S. (2016), Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, 7th ed., Tamil Nadu: Pearson India education.
70. Mandys, F. (2021). Electric vehicles and consumer choices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 142, 110874.
71. Manutworakit, P., & Choocharukul, K. (2022). Factors influencing battery electric vehicle adoption in Thailand—Expanding the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology’s variables. Sustainability, 14(14), 8482.
72. Martech. (2022). “Worldwide spend on marketing to hit $4.7 trillion by 2025”, https:// martech.org/worldwide-spend-on-marketing-to-hit-4-7-trillion-by-2025/, Erişim tarihi: 18.01.2024
73. Maso, R. A., & Balqiah, T. E. (2022). Analyzing factors affecting purchase intention of electric vehicle in indonesia; moderation role of personal innovativeness on those factors. Proceedings of International Conference on Economics Business and Government Challenges, 1(1), 350-361.
74. Masukujjaman, M., Alam, S. S., Siwar, C., & Halim, S. A. (2021). Purchase intention of renewable energy technology in rural areas in Bangladesh: Empirical evidence. Renewable Energy, 170, 639-651.
75. Miller, Z. D. (2017). The enduring use of the theory of planned behavior. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 22(6), 583-590.
76. Mustafa, S., Hao, T., Jamil, K., Qiao, Y., & Nawaz, M. (2022). Role of eco-friendly products in the revival of developing countries’ economies and achieving a sustainable green economy. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 1082.
77. Oye, N. D., A. Iahad, N., & Ab. Rahim, N. (2014). The history of UTAUT model and its impact on ICT acceptance and usage by academicians. Education and Information Technologies, 19, 251-270.
78. Patel, H., Shinde, Y., & Shendge, S. (2021). Understanding the Adoption and Public Intention to Buy Electric Vehicles in India Using UTAUT. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 9(8), 2528-2535.
79. Persaud, A., & Schillo, S. R. (2017). Purchasing organic products: role of social context and consumer innovativeness. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35(1), 130-146.
80. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.
81. Rašković, M., Ding, Z., Škare, V., Došen, Đ. O., & Žabkar, V. (2016). Comparing consumer innovativeness and ethnocentrism of young-adult consumers. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3682-3686.
82. Rogers, E. (2003), Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed., Free Press, New York: NY.
83. Santini, F. D. O., Ladeira, W. J., Sampaio, C. H., Perin, M. G., & Dolci, P. C. (2019). A meta-analytical study of technological acceptance in banking contexts. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(3), 755-774.
84. Saparudin, M., Rahayu, A., Hurriyati, R., Sultan, M. A., & Ramdan, A. M. (2020, August). Consumers’ Continuance Intention Use of Mobile Banking in Jakarta: Extending UTAUT Models with Trust. 2020 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), (pp. 50-54). IEEE.
85. Seuwou, P., Chrysoulas, C., Banissi, E., & Ubakanma, G. (2020). Measuring consumer behavioural intention to accept technology: Towards autonomous vehicles technology acceptance model (AVTAM). Trends and Innovations in Information Systems and Technologies, 1(8), (pp. 507-516). Springer International Publishing.
86. Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Rehman, S. U., & Zafar, A. U. (2022). Adoption of green innovation technology to accelerate sustainable development among manufacturing industry. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100231.
87. Shanmugavel, N., & Micheal, M. (2022). Exploring the marketing related stimuli and personal innovativeness on the purchase intention of electric vehicles through Technology Acceptance Model. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 3, 100029.
88. Siamagka, N. T., & Balabanis, G. (2015). Revisiting consumer ethnocentrism: review, reconceptualization, and empirical testing. Journal of International Marketing, 23(3), 66-86.
89. Smith, B., Olaru, D., Jabeen, F., & Greaves, S. (2017). Electric vehicles adoption: Environmental enthusiast bias in discrete choice models. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 51, 290-303.
90. Smyth, J., Chen, H., Donzella, V., & Woodman, R. (2021). Public acceptance of driver state monitoring for automated vehicles: Applying the UTAUT framework. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 83, 179-191.
91. Statista. (2023). Plug-in electric light vehicle sales worldwide 2015-2022, April 2023, https://www.statista.com/statistics/665774/global-sales-of-plug-in-light-vehicles/, Erişim tarihi: 15.01.2024
92. Sutopo, W., Hisjam, M., & Wicaksono, H. (2024). Exploring the determinants of intention to purchase electric motorcycles: the role of national culture in the UTAUT. Transportation research part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 100, 475-492.
93. Şencan, H., & Fidan, Y. (2020). Likert verilerinin kullanıldığı keşfedici faktör analizlerinde normallik varsayımı ve faktör çıkarma üzerindeki etkisinin SPSS, Factor ve Prelis yazılımlarıyla sınanması. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(1), 640-687.
94. Takács-Sánta, A. (2007). Barriers to environmental concern. Human Ecology Review, 14(1), 26-38.
95. Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: A meta-analytic evaluation of UTAUT2. Information Systems Frontiers, 23, 987-1005.
96. Topolšek, D., Babić, D., Babić, D., & Cvahte Ojsteršek, T. (2020). Factors influencing the purchase intention of autonomous cars. Sustainability, 12(24), 10303.
97. Tran, H. D., Diep, P. P. U., & Do, T. N. A. (2023). Advertising nationalism: How effective are advertisements appealing to consumer ethnocentrism?–The cases of electric vehicles and smartphones in a developing southeast Asian country. Asian Communication Research, 20(3), 215-233.
98. Trivedi, S. K., Patra, P., Srivastava, P. R., Kumar, A., & Ye, F. (2024). Exploring factors affecting users’ behavioral intention to adopt digital technologies: The mediating effect of social influence. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 13814- 13826.
99. Tunçel, N. (2022). Intention to purchase electric vehicles: Evidence from an emerging market. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 43, 100764.
100. TÜİK. (2023a). Motorlu Kara Taşıtları, Kasım 2023. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/ Index?p=Motorlu-Kara-Tasitlari-Kasim-2023-49431, Erişim tarihi: 15.01.2024
101. TÜİK. (2023b). Dünya Nüfus Günü, 2023, Temmuz 2023. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/ Index?p=Dunya-Nufus-Gunu-2023-49688, Erişim tarihi: 23.07.2024
102. TÜİK. (2024). Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi Sonuçları, 2023, https://data.tuik.gov. tr/ Bulten/Index?p=Adrese-Dayali-Nufus-Kayit-Sistemi-Sonuclari-2023-49684, Erişim tarihi: 25.07.2024
103. Uslu, H., & Demirel, O. (2022). Elektrikli otomobil satın alma istekliliğini etkileyen faktörler: Konya ili örneği. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 13(35), 961-975.
104. Vafaei-Zadeh, A., Wong, T. K., Hanifah, H., Teoh, A. P., & Nawaser, K. (2022). Modelling electric vehicle purchase intention among generation Y consumers in Malaysia. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 43, 100784.
105. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
106. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
107. Wu, J., Liao, H., Wang, J. W., & Chen, T. (2019). The role of environmental concern in the public acceptance of autonomous electric vehicles: A survey from China. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60, 37-46.
108. Yang, R., Tang, W., & Zhang, J. (2021). Technology improvement strategy for green products under competition: The role of government subsidy. European Journal of Operational Research, 289(2), 553-568.
109. Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 74-85.
110. Yıldırım, M., & Özdemir, Ş. (2021). Tüketici Etnosentrizmi ve Tüketici Yenilikçiliği Açısından Yerli Elektrikli Otomobili Satın Alma Niyetleri: Bir Ön Değerlendirme. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 10(2), 110-142.
111. Zeebaree, M., Agoyi, M., & Aqel, M. (2022). Sustainable adoption of E-Government from the UTAUT perspective. Sustainability, 14(9), 5370.
112. Zia, A., Alzahrani, M., Alomari, A., & AlGhamdi, F. (2022). Investigating the drivers of sustainable consumption and their impact on online purchase intentions for agricultural products. Sustainability, 14(11), 6563.
113. Zhu, Z., & Huang, W. (2023). A meta-analysis of mobile learning adoption using extended UTAUT. Information Development, 02666669231176428.