ANALYSIS THE DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN PERCEIVED COACHING BEHAVIORS, GOAL ORIENTATION, TEAM COHESION, PERCEIVED MOTIVATIONAL CLIMATE VE COLLECTIVE EFFICACY AMONG THE YOUNG MALE BASKETBALL PLAYERS BEFORE AND AFTER THE TOURNAMENT

Year 2011, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 39 - 39, 09.02.2011

Turhan Toros

Abstract

This paper aims to analysis the diferentiation between the perceived coaching behaviors, the goal orientation, the team cohesion, the perceived motivational climate, collective efficacy among the young  male basketball players before and after the tournament. In this research, the young male basketball players who played in the young male basketball teams in 2005-2006 league season and moreover, the ones who took parts in the teams participated into the Turkish National Championship were included. The only 12 teams (144 players) of the total 16 teams who participated into the Turkish National Championship were included. In collecting the data, Leadership for Sport Scale-LSS, Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire-TEOSQ, Group Environment Questionnaire-GEQ, Perceived Motivational Climate in Sport Questionnaire- PMCSQ and Collective Efficacy Scale-CES were used. The data were calculated with The Analysis of the Descriptive Statistical Techiques, Repeated Measurements ANOVA Analysis. Results revealed significant differences for autocratic behavior [F (1,143)=8.566;p<0.004;Eta-kare=.026], positive feedback [F (1,143)=7.288;p<0.008; Eta-kare=.025], task orientation [F (1,143) =9.533;p<0.002;Eta-kare=.027], İntegration-Task [F (1,143)=26.892;p<0.000;Eta-kare=.046] and Attraction to Social [F (1,143)=12.717;p<0.000;Eta-kare=.035] before the Turkish National Championship and after the Turkish National Championship.

Keywords

Perceived coaching behaviors, Goal orientation, Team cohesion, Perceived motivational climate ve Collective efficacy

References

• Anshel, M.H. (2003). Sport Psychology: From Theory to Practice (4th edition). San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
• Arıburun, B., Aşçı, F.H. (2005). “Amerikan futbolu oyuncularında hedef yönelimi ve algılanan güdüsel iklim”. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, III (3), pp. 111-114.
• Barrow, J. C. (1977). The variables of leadership: A review and conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 2, 231-251.
• Bray, S., Balaguer, I., ve Duda, J.L. (2004). The relationship of task self-efficacy and role efficacy beliefs to role performance in Spanish youth soccer. Journal of Sport Sciences, 22 (5), 429-437.
• Carpenter, P.J. ve Yates, B. (1997). “Relationship between achievement goals and the perceived purposes of soccer for semi-professional and amateur players”. J Sport Exerc Psychology, 19, pp. 302- 311.
• Carron, A.V., Widmeyer, W.N., L.R. Brawley (1985). “The Development of Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire”. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7: 244-266 (1985).
• Carron, A.V., Widmeyer W.N., L.R. Brawley (1998). The Meauserement of Cohesiveness in Sport Groups. Advances in Sport and Exercise Psychology Measurment (213-226). Morganton, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
• Cervello, E., Santos-Rosa F.J., Garcia Calvo, T., Jimenez, R., ve Iglesias D. (2007). Young tennis players’ competitive task involvement and performance: the role of goal orientations, contextual motivational climate, and coach-initiated motivational climate. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19, 304-321.
• Chelladurai, P. ve Saleh, S. (1978). Preferred leadership in sports. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 3, 85-92.
• Chelladurai, P. ve Saleh, S. (1980). Dimensions of leadership behavior in sport: Development of a leadership scale. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 34-45.
• Duda, J.L., ve Nicholls, J. (1992). Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 290-299.
• Duda, J.L., ve Horn, H.L. (1993). Interdependencies between the perceived and self- reported goal orientations of young athletes and their parents. Pediatric Exercise Science, 5, 234-241.
• Duda, J.L., Chi, L., Newton, M.L., Walling, M.D. ve Catley, D. (1995). “Task and ego orientation and intrinsic motivation in sport”. Int J.Sport Psychology, 26, pp. 40-63.
• Kavussanu, M. (2007). The effects of goal orientations on global and physical self- esteem in physical education students. The Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 4, 111- 132.
• Kocaekşi, S. (2005). Başarılı ve Başarısız Hentbol Takımlarında Grup Sargınlığı ve Etki Eden Değişkenler İle Başarı Arasındaki İlişkinin Belirlenmesi. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara.
• McArdle, A., ve Duda, J.K. (2002). Implications of the motivational climate in youth sports. In F.L. Smoll & R.E. Smith (Eds.), Children and Youth in Sport (2nd edition) (pg. 409-434). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company. 17.
• Öcel, H. (2002). Takım Sporu Yapan Oyuncularda Kollektif Yeterlik Öz-Yeterlik
• ve Sargınlık ile Başarı Algı ve Beklentileri Arasındaki İlişkiler. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek
• Lisans Tezi. Ankara.
• Riggs, M.L., J. Warka., B.Babasa., R. Betancour., S. Hooker (1994). Development and Validation of Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy Scales for Job-Related Applications. Educational and Psychological Measuurement, 54, 793-802 (1994).
• Sage, L., ve Kavussanu, M. (2007). The effects of goal involvement on moral behavior in an experimentally manipulated competitive setting. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 190-207.
• Toros, T. (2001). “Elit ve elit olmayan erkek basketbolcularda hedef yönelimi, güdüsel iklim ve hedeflerin özgünlük güçlük derecesi özelliklerinin yaşam doyumuna etkisi”. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
• Toros, T. (2002). “Elit ve elit olmayan erkek basketbolcularda hedef yönelimi, güdüsel (motivasyonel) iklim ve yaşam doyumu”. H.Ü. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 13(3), pp. 24-36.
• Toros, T. (2004). “Sporda Görev ve Ego Yönelim Ölçeği- SGEYÖ’nin Türk sporcuları için güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması”. H.Ü. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 15, 3, pp. 155-166.
• Toros, T. (2005). “Genç Basketbolcuların Oyunda Kalma Süreleri ile Hedef Perspektif Yaklaşımı, Yaşam Doyumu ve Algılanan Motivasyonel İklim Arasındaki İlişki”. H.Ü. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 16, 2, pp. 50-63. 24.
• Toros, T. ve Tiryaki, Ş. (2006). “Sporda Liderlik Ölçeği’nin - Futbolcuların
• Antrenör Davranışlarını Algılaması Versiyonunun- Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik
• Çalışması”. 9. Uluslararası Spor Bilimleri Kongresi, 3-5 Kasım, Muğla, Türkiye.
• Toros, T. ve Yetim, Ü. (2000). “Elit bayan basketbolcularda hedef yönelimi ve güdüsel (motivasyonel) iklimin yaşam doyumu ile ilişkisi”. Hacettepe Spor Bilimleri Kongresi, 3-5 Kasım, Ankara.
• Turman, P.D. (2003). Coaches and cohesion: The impact of coaching techniques on team cohesion in the small group setting. Journal of Sport Behavior, 26, 86-103.
• Walling, M. D., Duda, J. L., ve Chi, L., (1993). The perceived motivational climate in sport questionnaire: construct and predicative validity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15, 172-183.
• White, S. A. ve Zillner, S. R. (1996). “The relationship between goal orientation beliefs about the cause of sport success, and trait anxiety among high school intercollegiate, and recreational sport participants”. The Sport Psychologist, 10, pp. 58-72.
• Zaccaro, S., Blair, V., Peterson, C., ve Zazanis, M. (1995). Collective efficacy. In J. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment (pg. 305-328). New York: Plenum.