Reflections on Education Reform and Team Leadership

Year 2018, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 339 - 347, 15.12.2018

Tricia Browne-ferrigno , Lars G. Björk

https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2018.2.9

Cited By: 1

Abstract

During recent
decades, the notion of team leadership has emerged as a central theme in the
international discourse on systemic education reform. This issue of Research in Educational Administration and
Leadership not only captures a collective sense of commitment to education
as means for advancing national social, economic, and political wellbeing but
also reflects a changing nature of leadership across a wide spectrum of
educational organizations and contexts. Given the increasing complexity of 21^st
century education, effective leaders at all levels tend to rely less on
bureaucratic, hierarchical structures and more on relational approaches to
accomplish tasks. In this regard, teamwork has become an indispensable
characteristic of organizational life, and depending on the task, teams may
involve a wide array of stakeholders (e.g., superintendents, school board
members, district support staff, principals, teachers, parents, students) or a
select few representing specific constituencies to address specific issues.

Keywords

education, reform, team, leadership

References

• Ball, S. J. (1987). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. New York, NY: Routledge. Björk, L. G., Kowalski, T. J., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2014). The school district superintendent in the United States of America. In A. E. Nir (Ed.), The educational superintendent: Between trust and regulation. An international perspective (pp. 17-38). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science. Björk, L. G., Kowalski, T. J., & Young, M. D. (2005). National reports and implications for professional preparation and development. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice and development (pp. 45-70). Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin. Blase, J., & Blase J. (2000). The micropolitics of instructional supervision: A call for research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(1), 6-44. Blase J., & Björk L. (2010). The micropolitics of educational change and reform: Cracking open the black box. In A. Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (Vol 2, pp. 237-258). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass. Boyd, W.L. (1991). Foreword. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. vii-x). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Boyd, R., & Richardson, P. J. (2009). Culture and the evolution of human cooperation. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 364(1533), 3281-3288. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks. Choo, C. W. (2006). The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decisions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford Press. Cibulka, J. G. (2001). The changing role of interest groups in education: Nationalization and the new politics of education productivity. Educational Policy, 15(1), 12-40. Collinson, V., & Cook, T. F. (2007). Organizational learning: Improving learning, teaching, and leading in school systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Darwin, C. (1871/1981). The decent of man and selection in relation to sex. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (2000). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books. Dittmer, L. (1977). Political culture and political symbolism: Toward a theoretical synthesis. World Politics, 29(4), 552-583. Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Foley, R., & Gamble, C. (2009). The ecology of social transitions in human evolution. Philosophical Transactions, 364(1533), 3267-3279. Fullan, M. (2004). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press. Handy, C. B. (2005). Understanding organizations: How understanding the ways organizations actually work can be used to manage them better. New York, NY: Penguin. Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2001). The discipline of teams: A mindbook-workbook for delivering small group performance. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Kowalski, T. J.(2002). Contemporary school administration: An introduction (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. Laswell, H. D. (1990). Who gets what, when and how. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (Eds.). (1985). Ambiguity and choice in organizations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Mawhinney, H. B. (1999). Reappraisal: The problems and prospects of studying the micropolitics of leadership in reforming schools. School Leadership & Management, 19(2), 159-170. Murphy, J. F., & Datnow, A. (2002). Leadership lessons from comprehensive school reforms. Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin. Parker, G. M. (1990). Team players and teamwork: The new competitive business strategy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Rost, J. C. (1991). Leadership for the twenty-first century. Westport, CT: Praeger. Sarason, S. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change the course before it’s too late? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership and administration: A sociological interpretation. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Senge, P. M (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (Revised and updated). New York, NY: Doubleday. Tooby, J., & Devore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modelling. In W. G. Kinzey (Ed.), The evolution of primate behavior: Primate models (pp. 183-237). Albany: SUNY Press.