Bibliometric Analysis of Studies Focusing on Critical Thinking in Early Childhood

Abstract

This study aimed to examine studies on critical thinking in early childhood through bibliometric analysis. In the research, 251 studies on the concept of "critical thinking" were selected according to the inclusion criteria and analyzed with the VOS-viewer program. In the study, co-author, co-reference, co-citation and co-word analysis of the studies on the concept of "critical thinking" was carried out according to the distribution of the ten most cited authors and publications, years, published sources and countries. According to the results of bibliometric analysis on critical thinking, it was concluded that the birthplace of the subject and the most productive country is the USA. According to the co-author analysis, it was concluded that Daniel and Gagnon were the authors who contributed the most to the subject, Lipman and Kuhn according to the result of co-citation analysis, and Dovigo and Karadağ according to the result of co-citation analysis. In addition, according to co-word analysis, the most recurring keywords in the studies were critical thinking, early childhood education, creativity, early childhood, cognitive development, teacher training, preschool. As a result of the research, it was concluded that the number of studies on critical thinking in early childhood is low and there should be an increase in studies with children as the sample.

Keywords

• Critical thinking
• Early childhood education
• Preschool period

References

1. Acar, A., Soysal-Acar, A. Ş., & Ünver, E., (2021). A research on the relationship between problem-solving appraisal, attention, and visuospatial skills of first-year architecture students. MEGARON, 16, (2), 212-222. http://doi.org/10.14744/megaron.2021.98623
2. Açışlı-Çelik, S. (2022). STEM etkinliklerinin ortaokul 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin problem çözme becerilerine, eleştirel düşünmelerine ve STEM’e yönelik tutumlarına etkisinin araştırılması. [An investigation on the effect of stem practices on sixth-grade students’ problem-solving skills, critical thinking, and attitudes toward stem]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Pamukkale University Faculty of Education], (56), 287-313. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1054678
3. Adam, H., & Byrne, M. (2023). ‘I’m not from a country, I’m from Australia.’Costumes, scarves, and fruit on their heads: The urgent need for Culturally Responsive Pedagogy when sharing diverse books with children. The Australian Educational Researcher, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00631-x
4. Akça-Üşenti, Ü., & Davaslıgil, Z. Ü. T. (2021). Effect of the integrated curriculum model on writing skills. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 36(3), 742-757. http://dx.doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2020062038
5. Al, U., Sezen, U., & Soydal, İ. (2019). Türkiye'nin bilimsel yayınlarının sosyal ağ analizi yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Proje Raporları No: 110K044, Ankara.
6. Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2172929. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929
7. Avcı, N. (2007). Gelişimde 0-3 yaş. “Yaşama merhaba”. Morpa.
8. Balcaen, P. L., & Hirtz, J. R. (2007). Developing critically thoughtful e-learning communities of practice. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 5(3), 173-182.

9. Batur, Z., & Özcan, H. Z. (2020). Eleştirel düşünme üzerine yazılan lisansüstü tezlerinin bibliyometrik analizi [Bibliometric analysis of graduate theses written on critical thinking]. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi [International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education], 9(2), 834-854. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1174262
10. Behnamnia, N., Kamsin, A., & Ismail, M. A. B. (2020a). The landscape of research on the use of digital game-based learning apps to nurture creativity among young children: A review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100666
11. Behnamnia, N., Kamsin, A., Ismail, M. A. B., & Hayati, A. (2020b). The effective components of creativity in digital game-based learning among young children: A case study. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105227
12. Ben Maad, M. R. (2020). Any role for foreign languages in promoting children’s critical thinking? The case of stereotyping. Language Awareness, 29(1), 60-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1686508
13. Berk, L.E. (2013). Çocuk gelişimi (B. Onur. ve A. Dönmez, Çev.). İmge.
14. Bredekamp, S. (2015). Erken çocukluk eğitiminde etkili uygulamalar. Z. İnan & T. İnan (Ed.), Kültürel ve dilsel farklılıkları benimseme (Z. Öztürk, Çev.) içinde (s. 170-203). Ankara: Nobel.
15. Camuñas, N., Pablos, C. L., López, E., López, M. H., Pascual, D., & Alcaide, M. (2012). Inclusion of social networks and mobile devices as educational resources in higher education. In Inted2012 Proceedings (pp. 3167-3174). IATED.
16. Carvajal-Sánchez, P., Gallego-Henao, A., Vargas-Mesa, E., & Arroyave-Taborda, L. (2023). Scientific competences in children from early childhood. Revista Electrónica Educare, 27(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.27-1.14402
17. Çevirme, H. (2021). Masallarda eleştirel düşünme: Müskürümü Sultan Masalı örneği [Critical Thinking in Tales: The Case of Müskürümü Sultan]. Folklor/Edebiyat [Folklore/Literary], 27(106), 419-435. https://doi.org/10.22559/folklor.1436
18. Çiftçi, S., Sağlam, A., & Yayla, A. (2021). 21. yüzyıl becerileri bağlamında öğrenci, öğretmen ve eğitim ortamları [Student, teacher and educational environments in the context of 21. Century skills]. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi [RumeliDE J ournal of Language and Literature Studies], (24), 718-734. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.995863
19. Daniel, M. F., & Gagnon, M. (2011). Developmental process of dialogical critical thinking in groups of pupils aged 4 to 12 years. Creative Education, 2(05), 418. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2011.250
20. Daniel, M. F., Gagnon, M., & Pettier, J. C. (2012). Philosophy for children and the developmental process of dialogical critical thinking in groups of preschool children. In J. A. Sutterby (Ed.), Early education in a global context (advances in early education and day care) (Vol. 16, pp. 159–181). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
21. Daniel, M., & Auriac, M. (2011). Philosopy, critical thinking and philolophy for children. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(5), 415-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00483.x
22. Daniel, M., Gagnon, M., & Auriac-Slusarczyk, E. (2017). Dialogical critical thinking in kindergarten and elementary school: Studies on the impact of philosophical praxis in pupils. In M. R. Gregory, J. Haynes, & K. Murris (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of philosophy for children (pp. 236–244). Routledge.
23. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: MA: Heath.
24. Doherr, E. A. (2000). The demonstration of cognitive abilities central to cognitive behaviour therapy in young children: Examining the influence of age and teaching method on degree of ability (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). University of East Anglia.
25. Dovigo, F. (2016). Argumentation in preschool: A common ground for collaborative learning in early childhood. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(6), 818-840. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2016.1239327
26. Duran, M. E. (2021). Eleştirel düşünme ve dindarlık: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerine nicel bir araştırma [Critical thinking and religiousness: A quantitative study among undergraduate students]. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi (SAUIFD) [Journal of Sakarya University Faculty of Theology], 23(43), 53-79. https://doi.org/10.17335/sakaifd.905315
27. Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44-48. https://jgregorymcverry.com/readings/ennis1985assessingcriticalthinking.pdf
28. Ennis, R. H. (1989). Goals for critical thinking curriculum. A. Costa (ed), Developing minds: A source book for teaching thinking. Virginia: Association for supervision and curriculum development.
29. Facione, P.A. (1984). Toward a theory of critical thinking. Liberal Education, 70(3), 253-261.
30. Feijoo, B., Sádaba, C., & Zozaya, L. (2023). Distrust by default: Analysis of parent and child reactions to health misinformation exposure on TikTok. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 28(1), 2244595. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2023.2244595
31. Feliu-Torruella, M., Fernández-Santín, M., & Atenas, J. (2021). Building relationships between museums and schools: Reggio Emilia as a bridge to educate children about heritage. Sustainability, 13(7), 3713. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073713
32. Fields, J. (1995). Empirical data research into the claims for using philosophy techniques with young children, Early Child Development and Care, 107, 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443951070113
33. Flynn, S. (2021). Convergent identities, compounded risk: Intersectionality and parenting capacity assessment for disabled children. Children and Youth Services Review, 129, 106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106185
34. Freeley, A. J., & Steinberg, D. L. (2013). Argumentation and debate. Cengage Learning.
35. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (MB Ramos, Trans.). Continuum.
36. Galinsky, E. (2010). Mind in the making: The seven essential life skills every child needs. NAEYC special ed. HarperCollins.
37. Geletu, G. M. (2023). Conceptualisation and implementation of play-based curriculum and pedagogy in early childhood education in preschools in Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Education, 3(13), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2169050
38. Gómez-Gómez, M. P., & Botero-Bedoya, S. M. (2020). Apreciación del docente para contribuir al desarrollo del pensamiento crítico. Eleuthera, 22(2), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.17151/eleu.2020.22.2.2
39. Gupta, N. (2021). Trends in IoT research: A bibliometric and science mapping analysis of internet of things. Library Philosophy and Practice, 0(0), 1-20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5269
40. Güven, Z. Z., & Bülbül, A. (2023). Uluslararası öğrenciler için hazırlanmış ders kitaplarının 21. yüzyıl becerileri açısından incelenmesi: İstanbul kitap seti [Examining course books designed for international students in terms of 21st century skills: Istanbul book set]. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi [Journal of Higher Education and Science], 13(1), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1241320
41. Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and media literacy: A plan of action. Washington: The Aspen Institute.
42. Jakobovich, R., Berry, E. M., Levita, A., & Levin-Zamir, D. (2023). Developing healthy lifestyle behaviors in early age-an intervention study in kindergartens. Nutrients, 15(11), 2615. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15112615
43. Jiang, L., & Alizadeh, F. (2023). Community-based theatre: Critical pedagogy for promoting social connectedness recovery in the post-pandemic era. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), 2198311. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2198311
44. Kaplan, A. (2017). Evaluation of studies on the critical thinking approach through content analysis. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education (IJTASE), 6(1). https://ijtase.net/index.php/ijtase/article/view/180/212
45. Karadağ, F., & Demirtaş, V. Y. (2018). The effectiveness of the philosophy with children curriculum on critical thinking skills of pre-school children. Education and Science [Eğitim ve Bilim], 43(195). https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7268
46. Karadağ, M., Alpaslan, Ö., Yıldırım Şişman, N., & Pekin İşeri, Ö. (2018). Hemşirelik ve ebelik öğrencilerinin problem çözme becerileri ve epistemolojik inançları [Problem solving skills and epistemological beliefs of nursing and midwifery students]. Cukurova Medical Journal, 43, 1-6. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cumj/issue/28626/340081
47. Karagöz, F., Ecevit, T., & Özdemir Şimşek, P. (2022). Sosyobilimsel durum senaryoları aracılığıyla sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin çevre ile ilgili deneyim ve görüşleri [Environmental experience and views of eighth grade students via socio-scientific case scenarios]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education], 37(2), 541-559. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2020064746
48. Kaya, H. (1997). Üniversite öğrencilerinde eleştirel akıl yürütme gücü. [Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi], İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
49. Kazancı, O. (1989). Eğitim psikolojisi. Kazancı Matbaacılık.
50. Knochel, A.D. (2013). Assembling visuality: Social media, everyday imaging, and critical thinking in digital visual culture. Visual Arts Research, 39(2), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.5406/visuartsrese.39.2.0013
51. Koyuncu, E., & Demircan, H. (2022). An evaluative case study on investigating preschool teachers' views on philosophy with children. Education and Science, 47(210). https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2022.10380
52. Kraak, B. (2018). Kritisches denken als bldungsaufgabe. Erişim adresi: https://www.hochbegabtenhilfe.de/kritisches-denken-als-bildungsaufgabe/ (Erişim Tarihi: 10.10.2023)
53. Krauskopf, E. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Infection and Public Health: 2008–2016. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 11(2), 224-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2017.12.011
54. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16-46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028002016
55. Kurnaz, A. (2013). Eleştirel düşünme öğretimi etkinlikleri planlama-uygulama ve değerlendirme. Eğitim Kitabevi.
56. Kurudayıoğlu, M., & Temur, N. (2021). A glance from the 21th century skills framework to Turkish proverbs. Bilig, (99), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.9900
57. Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 131- 137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543588
58. Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge University Press.
59. Lipman, M., & Bierman, J. (1970). Appendix B: Experimental research in philosophy for children. M. Lipman, A. M. Sharp and F. Oscanyon (Ed.), Philosophy in the classroom. Temple University Press Philadelphia.
60. Lipman, M., Sharp, A. M., & Oscanjan, F. (1980). Philosophy in the classroom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
61. López, M. J., Santelices, M. V., & Taveras, C. M. (2023). Academic performance and adjustment of first-generation students to higher education: A systematic review. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2209484. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2209484
62. López-Deflory, C., Perron, A., & Miró‐Bonet, M. (2023). An integrative literature review and critical reflection on nurses' agency. Nursing Inquiry, 30(1), e12515. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12515
63. McPeck, J. E. (1981). Critical thinking and education. Oxford: Martin Robenson.
64. Metiri Group, & NCREL. (2003). EnGauge 21st century skills: Literacy in the digital age. Chicago, IL: NCREL.
65. Miller, P. H. (2017). Gelişim psikolojisi kuramları. (Yay. Haz. B. Onur). İmge.
66. Nikolopoulou, K. (2023). STEM activities for children aged 4–7 years: Teachers’ practices and views. International Journal of Early Years Education, 31(3), 806-821. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2022.2128994
67. Oja, M. (2019). Muutused hariduselus ja ajalooõpetuse areng Eesti iseseisvuse taastamise eel 1987–91 [Abstract: Changes in educational conditions and the development of teaching in history prior to the restoration of Estonia’s independence in 1987–1991]. Ajalooline Ajakiri. The Estonian Historical Journal, (3/4), 365-401. https://doi.org/10.12697/AA.2019.3-4.03
68. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development [OECD], (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. Paris, France: OECD. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf
69. Özcan, M. (2022). The relationship between preschool children's early thinking skills and independent learning behaviors. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 51(2), 1448-1467. https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.1122723
70. Öztürk, N., & Kurutkan, M. N. (2020). Kalite yönetiminin bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile incelenmesi [Examination of quality management with bibliometric analysis method]. Journal of Innovative Healthcare Practices, 1(1), 1-13. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1905104
71. Partnership for 21st Century Learning (2015). Official website.Available online at: http://www.p21.org/
72. Partnership for 21st Century Skills, (2006). A state leader’s action guide to 21st century skills: A new vision for education. Tucson, AZ: Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Retrieved from http://apcrsi.pt/website/wp-content/uploads/20170317_ Partnership_for_21st_Century_Learning.pdf
73. Paul, R. (1989). Critical thinking handbook: High school. A Guide for Redesigning Instruction. Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA 94928. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED325805.pdf
74. Pecore, J. L. (2013). Beyond beliefs: Teachers adapting problem-based learning to preexisting systems of practice. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1359
75. Pithers, R. T., & Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: A review. Educational Research, 42(3), 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/001318800440579
76. Quitadamo, I.J. (2002). Critical thinking higger education: The influence of teaching styles and peer collaboration on science and math learning (Doctor of Philosaphy Thesis). Washington State University, Washington.
77. Ramanathan, G., Cosso, S., & Pool, J. (2023). Engineering in preschool: What little minds can teach us about big skills. Early Childhood Education Journal, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-023-01512-9
78. Reid Chassiakos, Y. L., Radesky, J., Christakis, D., Moreno, M. A., Cross, C., Hill, D., ... & Swanson, W. S. (2016). Children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics, 138(5). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2593
79. Sönmez, E. (2021). Technology-enhanced CT: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100913
80. Ssemugenyi, F. (2023). Teaching and learning methods compared: A pedagogical evaluation of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture methods in developing learners’ cognitive abilities. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2187943. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2187943
81. Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). A systematic review of integrating computational thinking in early childhood education. Computers and Education Open, 100122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100122
82. Szabo, Z., & Brakas, N. (2020). Children's ability to recognize implicit and explicit reasoning of story book characters. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research, 28(1), 24-44. https://www.marianjournals.com/files/JPER_articles/JPER_28_1_2020/Szabo_Brakas_JPER_2020_28_1_24_44.pdf
83. Şahin, N. (2022). Investigation of the effect of digital story activities on student attitudes in terms of various moderator variables: A meta-analysis study. BUGU Dil ve Eğitim Dergisi [BUGU Journal of Language and Education], 3(3), 200-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.46321/bugu.96
84. Taylor, T. A., Kemp, K., Mi, M., & Lerchenfeldt, S. (2023). Self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: A systematic review. Medical Education Online, 28(1), 2189553. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2189553
85. Tozduman-Yaralı, K. (2020). Gelişimsel açıdan eleştirel düşünme ve çocuklarda eleştirel düşünmenin desteklenmesi [Developmentally critical thinking and supporting critical thinking in children]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [PAU Journal of Education], 48, 454-479. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.536546
86. Trickey, S., & Topping, K. J. (2004). ‘Philosophy for children’: A systematic review. Research papers in Education, 19(3), 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152042000248016
87. Uçak, S. & Erdem, H. H. (2020). Eğitimde yeni bir yön arayışı bağlamında “21. yüzyıl becerileri ve eğitim felsefesi” [On the skills of 21st century and philosophy of education in terms of searching a new aspect in education]. Uşak Üniversitesi Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi [Usak University Journal of Educational Research], 6(1), 76-93. https://doi.org/10.29065/usakead.690205
88. Ulu, H., & Baş, Ö. (2020). Relationships between pre-service teachers' purpose of social network sites usage, critical thinking tendencies, and media literacy. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.16986/huje.2019050203
89. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N.P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
90. Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
91. Watson, G. & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal. Cleveland, OH: Psychological Corporation.
92. Weber, A. M., & Greiff, S. (2023). ICT skills in the deployment of 21st century skills: A (Cognitive) developmental perspective through early childhood. Applied Sciences, 13(7), 4615. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074615
93. Weeks, M., Ooi, L. L., & Coplan, R. J. (2016). Cognitive biases and the link between shyness and social anxiety in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 36(8), 1095-1117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431615593175
94. WEF (October, 2020). https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/10/top-10-work-skills-of-tomorrow-how-long-it-takes-to-learn-them/ (Erişim Tarihi: 22.10.2023)
95. Williams, S. (1993). Evaluating the effects of Philosophical Enquiry in a secondary school. Derbyshire, England: Derbyshire County Council.
96. Wood, D. (2003). Çocuklarda düşünme ve öğrenme. Doruk.
97. Yilmaz-Na, E., & Sönmez, E. (2023). Unfolding the potential of computer-assisted argument mapping practices for promoting self-regulation of learning and problem-solving skills of pre-service teachers and their relationship. Computers & Education, 193, 104683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104683
98. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629