Career Engagement Scale: Examination of Turkish Psychometric Properties

Year 2023, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 203 - 217, 28.09.2023

Faruk Caner Yam

https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1332754

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt Career Engagement Scale (CES) developed by Hirschi, Freund, and Herrmann (2013) into Turkish. The data of the study were collected from 500 (64.7% female) university students. First of all, exploratory factor analysis was performed, and, unlike the original form, a two-factor structure with an eigenvalue greater than 1 and explaining 63.58% of the total variance was obtained. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to examine the validity of the two-factor structure obtained in Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). The model fit indices (x2 = 73.924, df = 25 x2/df =2.95, p < .001; GFI = .97, AFGI = .97 CFI = .98, RMR = .038; TLI = .95, IFI = .98, NFI = .97 and RMSEA = .063 %90 [.046-.079]) obtained as a result of the analysis reveal that the two-factor structure of the measurement tool was confirmed on Turkish samples. The internal consistency coefficients of CES were calculated as .88 for the whole scale, .84 for the proactive career planning dimension, and .83 for the career proactive skill development dimension. To examine the similar scale validity of CES, the correlation coefficient between the Vocational Outcome Expectations Scale (VOES), the Career Decision Regret Scale (CDRS), and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) was calculated. As a result of the analysis performed, a significant positive correlation was found between CES and VOES (r = .55; p < .01) and SWLS (r =.41, p < .01). However, a significant negative correlation was found between CES and CDRS (r = -.22; p < .05). All these results show that the two-factor structure of CES has been validated on a Turkish sample and it is a valid and reliable scale

Keywords

Adaptation, Career engagement, Career proactivity, Reliability, Validity

References

• Bacanlı, F. (2006). Kariyer araştırma yetkinlik beklentisi ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 6(2), 301-330.
• Brehaut J. C., O'Connor, A. M., Wood, T. J., Hack, T. F., Siminoff, L., Gordon, E. ve Feldman-Stewart, D. (2003). Validation of a decision regret scale. Medical Decision Making, 23(4), 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X03256005.
• Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301.
• Büyükgöze-Kavas, A. (2012). Turkish adaptation of career decision scale: Validity and reliability study. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 4(38), 159-168.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 32(32), 470-483.
• Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822-848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.
• Çelik, H. E. ve Yılmaz, V. (2013). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi temel kavramlar, uygulamalar ve programlama. Anı Yayıncılık.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (2. Basım). Pegem Akademi.
• Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. and Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49 (1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
• DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
• De Vos, A., De Clippeleer, I., & Dewilde, T. (2009). Proactive career behaviours and career success during the early career. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 761–777. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X471013.
• Eryilmaz, A., & Kara, A. (2020). Investigation of the effectiveness of a career adaptability program for prospective counsellors. Current Psychology, 39(4), 1260-1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9827-5.
• Erdurcan, S., & Kırdök, O. (2017). Career desicion regret scale: Adaptation, Validity and reliability study. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(3), 1140-1150. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.330880.
• Erdoğmuş-Zorver, C., & Korkut-Owen, F. (2011). Kariyer uyumu ve iyimserliği ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Fidan, T., Fidan, İ. Ö. ve Öztürk, H. (2018). Factors affecting career choice and career expectations of the vocational school students and graduates: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Higer Education, 8(3), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.18.008.
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS.(thrid edition). SAGE.
• Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
• Fouad, N.A., Guillen, A., Harris-Hodge, E., Henry, C., Novakovic, A., Terry, S.(2006). Need, awareness, and use of career services for college students. Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 407-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072706288928.
• Germer, C. K., Siegel, R. D., & Fulton, P. R. (2005). Mindfulness and psychotherapy. Guilford.
• Gould, S., & Penley, L. E. (1984). Career strategies and salary progression: A study of their relationships in a municipal bureaucracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 244–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90006-0.
• Giznberg, E. (1957). Toward a theory of occupational choice. Personal and Guidance, 30, 491-494. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-5892.1952.tb02708.x.
• Hall, D. T. (2002). Careers in and out of organizations. Sage.
• Heckhausen, J., & Tomasik, M. J. (2002). Get an apprenticeship before school is out: How German adolescents adjust vocational aspirations when getting close to a developmental deadline. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1864.
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
• Hirschi, A., & Freund, P. A. (2014). Career engagement: Investigating intraindividual predictors of weekly fluctuations in proactive career behaviors. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00066.x.
• Hirschi, A., Freund, P. A., & Herrmann, A. (2014). The career engagement scale: Development and validation of a measure of proactive career behaviors. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(4), 575-594. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072713514813.
• Hirschi, A. (2013). Career decision making, stability, and actualization of career intentions: The case of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(4), 555-571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712475287.
• Hirschi, A., Lee, B., Porfeli, E. J., & Vondracek, F. W. (2013). Proactive motivation and engagement in career behaviors: Investigating direct, mediated, and moderated effects. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.02.003.
• Hirschi, A., & Jaensch, V. K. (2015). Narcissism and career success: Occupational self-efficacy and career engagement as mediators. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 205-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.002.
• Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
• Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Psychological Assessment Resources.
• Işık, E. (2010). Effects of a social cognitive career theory-based group intervention on career decision self efficacy and vocational outcome expectations among undergraduate students. Doctoral thesis. Çukurova University, Institute of Social Sciences, Adana.
• Kalafat, T. (2012). Career futures ınventory (CFI): The examination of psychometric properties in Turkish sample. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 4(38), 169-179.
• Kline, T. J. B. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
• Kim, B., Jang, S. H., Jung, S. H., Lee, B. H., Puig, A., & Lee, S. M. (2014). A moderated mediation model of planned happenstance skills, career engagement, career decision self‐efficacy, and career decision certainty. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(1), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00070.x.
• Köksal, B., & Yam, F. C. (2023). A measurement tool foreEvaluating career goal inconsistencies between individuals and parents: A validity and reliability study of the Turkish version. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 13(68), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1271212b.
• Kuzgun, Y. (2003). Meslek rehberliği ve danışmanlığına giriş. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• MacCallum, R. C., Brown, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130.
• McWhirter, E. H., Crothers, M., & Rasheed, S. (2000). The effects of high school career education on social–cognitive variables. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(3), 330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.3.330.
• Meydan, C. H. ve Şeşen, H. (2015). Yapısal eşitlik modeli amos uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık.
• Özden, K. (2014). Psychosocial predictors of psychological well-being in university students based on social cognitive career theory. Master's thesis. İstanbul Arel University Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.
• Özden, K., & Sertel-Berk, Ö. (2017). Reliability and validity study of Turkish version of the Korean career stress inventory (KCSI). Studies in Psychology, 37(1), 35-51.
• Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633-662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554.
• Rottinghaus, P. J., Day, S. X., & Borgen, F. H. (2005). The Career Futures Inventory: A measure of career-related adaptability and optimism. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072704270271.
• Schmitt, T. A. (2011). Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 304-321.
• Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16(3), 282-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(80)90056-1.
• Super, D. E. (1953). A theory of vocational development. American Psychologist, 8(5), 185. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056046.
• Strauss, K., Griffin, M. A., & Parker, S. K. (2012). Future work selves: How salient hoped-for identities motivate proactive career behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 580–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026423.
• Sarı, S. V., Yazıcı, H., & Şahin, M. (2017). Psychometric properties of the CSES in Turkish university students. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(5), 1715-1728.
• Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik. Seçkin Yayınevi.
• Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş:(temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları). Ekinoks Yayınevi.
• Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5). Pearson.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6.baskı). Pearson.
• Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X502359.
• Yam, F. C., Alkın, S., & Barut, Y. (2020). Adaptation of career Goal Discrepancies Scale to Turkish: Validity and reliability study. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 7(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.629970.
• Wolff, H.-G., Schneider-Rahm, C. I., & Forret, M. L. (2011). Adaptation of a German multidimensional networking scale into english. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000070.