Undergraduate Students’ Use of Online Information in World Geography: Source Types and Selection Criteria

Abstract

Offering up-to-date information and diverse perspectives on issues, online information can be a valuable resource that supplements traditional course materials like textbooks. In this paper, the source types that students’ use for a course assignment and the criteria they apply to determine usefulness of the online information are examined. Sixty-five undergraduate students enrolled in a world geography course in fall 2015 were asked to search for 20 sources of online information about recent changes in oil prices and then to rank the sources based on their usefulness for understanding the topic. The findings will provide instructors with insights for guiding students’ appropriate use of online information for academic tasks and lifelong learning.

Keywords

• Online Resources,Information Literacy,Undergraduate Students,World Geograph

References

1. American Library Association. (1989). Presidential committee on information literacy: Final report (Chicago: American Library Association). Available at http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential (accessed 3 July, 2016).
2. American Library Association. (2016). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education (Chicago: American Library Association). Available at http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (accessed 26 November, 2016).
3. Asher, A. D., Duke, L. M., & Wilson, S. (2013). Paths of discovery: Comparing the search effectiveness of EBSCO Discovery Service, Summon, Google Scholar, and conventional library resources. College & Research Libraries, 74 (5), 464–488.
4. Becker, C. H. Jr. (2009). Student values and research: Are millennials really changing the future of reference and research? Journal of Library Administration, 49(4), 341-364.
5. Bloom, B., & Deyrup, M. (2015). The SHU research logs: Student behaviors trans-scripted. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41 (5), 593-601.
6. Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 487–508.
7. Bruce, C. (2004). Information literacy as a catalyst for educational change: A background paper. In P. A. Danaher (Eds.), Proceedings Lifelong learning: Whose responsibility and what is your contribution?, The 3rd International Lifelong Learning Conference (pp. 8-19). Queensland: Central Queensland University Press. Available at http://eprints.qut.edu.au/4977/1/4977_1.pdf (accessed 3 July, 2016).
8. Bruce, C., & Chesterton, P. (2002). Constituting collective consciousness: Information literacy in university curricula. International Journal for Academic Development, 7 (1), 31-40.

9. Bullard, J. E. (1998). Raising awareness of local agenda 21: The use of Internet resources. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 22 (2), 201-210.
10. Burton, V.T., & Chadwick, S.A. (2000). Investigating the practices of student researchers: Patterns of use and criteria for use of internet and library sources. Computers and Composition, 17 (3), 309-328.
11. Castleford, J., & Robinson, G. (1998). Evaluating IT-based resources for supporting learning and teaching in geography: Some case studies. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 22 (3), 375-381.
12. Chrisman, N. R., & Harvey, F. J. (1998). Extending the classroom: Hypermedia-supported learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 22 (1), 11-18.
13. Connaway, L. S., Dickey, T. J, & Radford, M. L. (2011). If it is too inconvenient I’m not going after it: Convenience as a critical factor in information-seeking behaviors. Library and Information Science Research, 33 (3), 179-190.
14. Connaway, L. S., White, D., Lanclos, D., & Le Cornu, A. (2013). Visitors and residents: What motivates engagement with the digital information environment? Information Research, 18 (1). Available at http://www.informationr.net/ir/18-1/paper556.html#.WJIq8PkrLIU (accessed 1 February 2017).
15. Currie, L., Devlin, F., Emde, J., & Graves, K. (2010). Undergraduate search strategies and evaluation criteria: Searching for credible sources. New Library World, 111 (3/4), 113- 124.
16. Dilevko, J., & Gottlieb, L. (2002). Print sources in an electronic age: a vital part of the research process for undergraduate students. The Journal of Academic librarianship, 28 (6), 381- 392.
17. Ebersole, S.E. (2005). On their own: students’ academic use of the commercialized web. Library Trends, 53 (4), 530-538.
18. Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57 (1), 163-173.
19. Eynon, R. (2005). The use of the internet in higher education: Academics’ experiences of using ICTs for teaching and learning. Aslib proceedings, 57 (2), 168-180.
20. Flanagin, A. J., & Metzge, M. J. (2010). Kids and credibility: An empirical examination of youth, digital media use, and information credibility. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
21. Gardner, A. (2003). Discovering networked information in the internet age: The JISC resource guide to geography & the environment. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27 (1), 103-107.
22. Goett, J. A., & Foote, K. E. (2000). Cultivating student research and study skills in web-based learning environments. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24 (1), 92-99.
23. Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2009). What today’s college students say about conducting research in the digital age. Project Information Literacy Progress Report. (Seattle: The Information School, University of Washington). Available at http://www.projectinfolit.org/uploads/2/7/5/4/27541717/2009_final_report.pdf (accessed 29 January, 2017).
24. Hsu, C.-Y., Tsai, M.-J., Hou, H.-T., & Tsai, C.-C. (2014). Epistemic beliefs, online search strategies, and behavioral patterns while exploring socioscientific issues. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23 (3), 471-480.
25. Jo, I., Hong, J. E., & Verma, K. (2016). Facilitating spatial thinking in world geography using Web-based GIS. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40 (3), 442-459.
26. Johnston, B., & Webber, S. (2003). Information literacy in higher education: A review and case study. Studies in Higher Education, 28 (3), 335-352.
27. Joo, S., & Choi, N. (2015). Factors affecting undergraduates' selection of online library resources in academic tasks: Usefulness, ease-of-use, resource quality, and individual differences. Library Hi Tech, 33 (2), 272-291.
28. Julien, H., & Barker, S. (2009). How high school students evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development. Library and Information Science Research, 31 (1), 12–17.
29. Kim, K.-S., & S.-C. J. Sin. (2007). Perception and selection of information sources by undergraduate students: Effects of avoidant style, confidence, and personal control in problem-solving. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33 (6), 655-665.
30. Kirkwood, A. (2008). Getting it from the web: Why and how online resources are used by independent undergraduate learners. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24 (5), (378-382).
31. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses?. Studies in Higher Education, 30 (3), 257-274.
32. Klein, P. (2003). Active learning strategies and assessment in world geography classes. Journal of Geography, 102 (4), 146-157.
33. Kolowich, S. (2011). What students don't know. Inside Higher Ed. Available at https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/08/22/erial_study_of_student_research_habit s_at_illinois_university_libraries_reveals_alarmingly_poor_information_literacy_and_ski lls (accessed 1 February 2017).
34. Lee, J. Y., Han, S., & Joo, S. (2008). The analysis of the information users’ needs and information seeking behavior in the field of science and technology. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25 (2), 127-141.
35. Lee, J. Y., Paik, W., & Joo, S. (2012). Information resource selection of undergraduate students in academic search tasks. Information Research, 17(1), paper511. Available at http://www.informationr.net/ir/17-1/paper511.html (accessed 3 July, 2016).
36. Leeder, C., & Shah, C. (2016). Practicing critical evaluation of online sources improves student search behavior. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42 (4), 459-468.
37. Maloney, E. (2007). What web 2.0 can teach us about learning. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53 (18), B26.
38. McDowell, L. (2002). Electronic information resources in undergraduate education: an exploratory study of opportunities for student learning and independence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33 (3), 255-266.
39. McMillan, S. J., & Morrison, M. (2006). Coming of age with the internet: A qualitative exploration of how the internet has become an integral part of young people’s lives. New Media Society, 8 (1), 73-95.
40. McMorrow, J. (2005). Using a web-based resource to prepare students for fieldwork: Evaluating the Dark Peak virtual tour. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29 (2), 223-240.
41. Newnham, R., Mather, A., Grattan, J., Holmes, A., & Gardner, A. (1998). An evaluation of the use of Internet sources as a basis for geography coursework. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 22 (1), 19-34.
42. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9 (5), 1-6.
43. Prensky, M. (2005). Listen to the natives. Educational Leadership, 63 (4), 8-13.
44. Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry. Computers & Education, 59 (1), 82– 94.
45. Reed, M., & Mitchell, B. (2001). Using information technologies for collaborative learning in geography: a case study from Canada. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 25 (3), 321-339.
46. Rees, P. W., & Legates, M. (2013). Returning “region” to world regional geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37 (3), 327–349.
47. Ritter, M. E., & Lemke, K. A. (2000). Addressing the ‘seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education’ with internet-enhanced education. Journal of geography in Higher Education, 24 (1), 100-108.
48. Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Williams, P., Huntington, P., Fieldhouse, M., Gunter, B., & Withey, R. (2008). The Google generation: The information behaviour of the researcher of the future. ASLIB Proceedings, 60 (4), 290–310.
49. Saunders, L. (2012). Faculty perspectives on information literacy as a student learning outcome. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38 (4), 226-236.
50. Selwyn, N. (2008). An investigation of differences in undergraduates’ academic use of the internet. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9 (1), 11-22.
51. Solem, M. N. (2000). The virtual geography department: Assessing an agent of change in geography education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24 (3), 353-364.
52. Steinberg, P. E., Walter, A., & Sherman-Morris, K. (2002). Using the internet to integrate thematic and regional approaches in geographic education. The Professional Geographer, 54 (3), 332-348.
53. Stewart, M., Stott, T., & Nuttall, A. M. (2011). Student engagement patterns over the duration of level 1 and level 3 geography modules: influences on student attendance, performance and use of online resources. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35 (1), 47-65.
54. Taffs, K. H., & Holt, J. I. (2013). Investigating student use and value of e-learning resources to develop academic writing within the discipline of environmental science. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37 (4), 500-514.
55. Taylor, A. (2012). A study of the information search behaviour of the millennial generation. Information Research, 17 (1), paper 508. Available at http://www.informationr.net/ir/17- 1/paper508.html (accessed 22 November, 2016).
56. Taylor, A., & Dalal, H. A. (2014). Information literacy standards and the world wide web: Results from a student survey on evaluation of internet information sources. Information Research, 19(4). Available at https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1050475 (accessed 1 February 2017).
57. Thomas, N. P. (2004). Information literacy and information skills instruction: Applying research to practice in The School Library Media Center (2nd ed.). Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.
58. Tomaiuolo, N. G. (2005). Faculty views of open web resource use by college students. The Journal of academic librarianship, 31 (6), 559-566.
59. Tsai, M.-J., Hsu, C.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). Investigation of high school students’ online science information searching performance: The role of implicit and explicit strategies. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21 (2), 246-254.
60. Weiler, A. (2005). Information-seeking behavior in generation Y students: Motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31 (1), 46-53.
61. Wong, D. (1998). Creating a web-based electronic reserve library for teaching world regional geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 22 (2), 257-262.
62. Xie, I., & Joo, S. (2009). Selection of information sources: Types of tasks, accessibility and familiarity of sources. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46 (1), 1-18.