Research Article

Knowledge Sources and Opinions of Prospective Social Studies Teachers about Possible Risk and Benefit Analysis: Nuclear Energy and Power Stations

Volume: 6 Number: 2 August 31, 2016
EN

Knowledge Sources and Opinions of Prospective Social Studies Teachers about Possible Risk and Benefit Analysis: Nuclear Energy and Power Stations

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to determine the trust status of prospective social studies teachers regarding various knowledge sources related to nuclear energy and power stations regarded as a controversial socio- scientific issue and their perceptions on the possible risks and benefits of nuclear energy and power stations. Target population of the study consisted of prospective teachers studying in the Social studies Teaching Department of Faculty of Education at Afyon Kocatepe University during the fall term of 2015- 2016 academic year. Volunteer teacher candidates from each grade participated in the study. The data required for the study were collected by using "Risks and Benefits about Nuclear Energy" questionnaire developed by İşleri (2012) and a measurement tool which determines the reliability of the knowledge sources related to nuclear energy and establishment of power stations. Descriptive statistics were conducted on the data obtained after the application of the measurement tools to 270 prospective teachers. According to the results obtained from the study, it was found out that the prospective teachers agreed that the nuclear energy and power stations were both risky and beneficial. According to another result obtained, scientists working on the issue received the highest confidence whereas members of parliament, companies and news on televisions received the lowest confidence.

  

Keywords

References

  1. Altın, V . (2004). Y eni ufuklara: nükleer enerji. Bilim ve T eknik Dergisi. 441, 1-23. http://www.biltek.tubitak.gov.tr/bdergi/yeniufuk/icerik/nukleer.pdf Erişim tarihi: 10/01/2016
  2. Ateş, H. ve Saraçoğlu, M. (2013). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının gözünden nükleer enerji. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 14(3), 175-193.
  3. Çukurçayır, M. A. ve Sağır, H. (2007). Enerji sorunu, çevre ve alternatif enerji kaynakları. Selcuk University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 20, 257-278.
  4. Demirbaş, L. (2002). Türkiye’de enerji sektörü, sektörün problemleri, Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye’de enerji politikalari. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Isparta.
  5. Dudley, B. (2015). Bp statistical review of world energy. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-2015/bp- statistical-review-of-world-energy-2015-full-report.pdf Erişim tarihi: 15/02/2016
  6. Durğun, B. (2013).Elektrik tüketimi ile büyüme arasinda nedensellik ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Diyarbakır.
  7. Ediger, V.Ş. ve Kentmen, Ç. (2010). Enerjinin toplumsal boyutu ve Türk halkının enerji tercihleri. Mülkiye Dergisi, 34(268): 281-300.
  8. Güneş, C. (2012). Linyit kömürü sahalarının ekonomiye kazandırılması. http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/tr/Documents/energy-resources/tr-enerji- linyit-komuru.pdf Erişim tarihi: 01/02/2016

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Hakkı Yazıcı * This is me
Türkiye

Publication Date

August 31, 2016

Submission Date

June 13, 2016

Acceptance Date

August 11, 2016

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 6 Number: 2

APA
Yazıcı, H., Bulut, R., & Yazıcı, S. (2016). Knowledge Sources and Opinions of Prospective Social Studies Teachers about Possible Risk and Benefit Analysis: Nuclear Energy and Power Stations. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 6(2), 160-175. https://izlik.org/JA75JT75FT
AMA
1.Yazıcı H, Bulut R, Yazıcı S. Knowledge Sources and Opinions of Prospective Social Studies Teachers about Possible Risk and Benefit Analysis: Nuclear Energy and Power Stations. Review of International Geographical Education Online. 2016;6(2):160-175. https://izlik.org/JA75JT75FT
Chicago
Yazıcı, Hakkı, Ramazan Bulut, and Sibel Yazıcı. 2016. “Knowledge Sources and Opinions of Prospective Social Studies Teachers about Possible Risk and Benefit Analysis: Nuclear Energy and Power Stations”. Review of International Geographical Education Online 6 (2): 160-75. https://izlik.org/JA75JT75FT.
EndNote
Yazıcı H, Bulut R, Yazıcı S (August 1, 2016) Knowledge Sources and Opinions of Prospective Social Studies Teachers about Possible Risk and Benefit Analysis: Nuclear Energy and Power Stations. Review of International Geographical Education Online 6 2 160–175.
IEEE
[1]H. Yazıcı, R. Bulut, and S. Yazıcı, “Knowledge Sources and Opinions of Prospective Social Studies Teachers about Possible Risk and Benefit Analysis: Nuclear Energy and Power Stations”, Review of International Geographical Education Online, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 160–175, Aug. 2016, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA75JT75FT
ISNAD
Yazıcı, Hakkı - Bulut, Ramazan - Yazıcı, Sibel. “Knowledge Sources and Opinions of Prospective Social Studies Teachers about Possible Risk and Benefit Analysis: Nuclear Energy and Power Stations”. Review of International Geographical Education Online 6/2 (August 1, 2016): 160-175. https://izlik.org/JA75JT75FT.
JAMA
1.Yazıcı H, Bulut R, Yazıcı S. Knowledge Sources and Opinions of Prospective Social Studies Teachers about Possible Risk and Benefit Analysis: Nuclear Energy and Power Stations. Review of International Geographical Education Online. 2016;6:160–175.
MLA
Yazıcı, Hakkı, et al. “Knowledge Sources and Opinions of Prospective Social Studies Teachers about Possible Risk and Benefit Analysis: Nuclear Energy and Power Stations”. Review of International Geographical Education Online, vol. 6, no. 2, Aug. 2016, pp. 160-75, https://izlik.org/JA75JT75FT.
Vancouver
1.Hakkı Yazıcı, Ramazan Bulut, Sibel Yazıcı. Knowledge Sources and Opinions of Prospective Social Studies Teachers about Possible Risk and Benefit Analysis: Nuclear Energy and Power Stations. Review of International Geographical Education Online [Internet]. 2016 Aug. 1;6(2):160-75. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA75JT75FT