Applying Virtual Reality Technology to Geoscience Classrooms

Year 2019, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 577 - 590, 31.12.2019

Piyaphong Chenrai Sukonmeth Jitmahantakul

https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.592771

Abstract

Applying virtual reality (VR) technology to geoscience classrooms provides a new way to engage students. Visualizing geological information in 360-degree allows students to experience processes of the Earth and makes them feel like they are outside the classroom. This paper describes a convenient technique for making 360-degree VR environments specifically for geoscience classrooms. In comparison to traditional classrooms, this teaching method enables students to more easily comprehend how geological features occur in nature through a series of 360-degree outcrop scenes and 360-degree infographic images. The learning from using this VR environment in geoscience classrooms at the high-school level is assessed. Results from three different high schools show that the learning gain of students is improved by 22 – 28% and the overall average post-test scores are significantly higher than pre-test scores at the p = 0.05 level after using the VR environment in the classrooms. This technique could potentially benefit any science classroom and have applications in other disciplines requiring similar visualization techniques.

Keywords

Virtual reality, Geoscience, Geoscience Education, Learning gain, Classroom, Smartphone

Supporting Institution

The Thailand Research Fund (TRF) and Chulalongkorn University

Project Number

Grant Number RDG6140029 and Grants for Development of New Faculty Staff, Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund

Thanks

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) under Grant Number RDG6140029 and Grants for Development of New Faculty Staff, Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund, Chulalongkorn University. Google applications used in this study are thanked for free web opened tools. Anonymous reviewers are thanked for their useful and constructive comments.

References

• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing. Longman, New York.
• Arrowsmith, C., Counihan, A., & McGreevy, D. (2005). Development of a multi-scaled virtual field trip for the teaching and learning of geospatial science. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 1(3), 42-56.
• Bailey, J. E., Whitmeyer, S. J., & De Paor, D. G. (2012). Introduction: The application of Google Geo Tools to geoscience education and research. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 492, 7-19.
• Çaliskan, O. (2011). Virtual field trips in education of earth and environmental sciences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3239-3243.
• Carmichael, P., & Tscholl, M. (2013). Cases, simulacra, and Semantic Web technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 31-42.
• Dolphin, G., Dutchak, A., Karchewski, B., & Cooper, J. (2019). Virtual field experiences in introductory geology: Addressing a capacity problem, but finding a pedagogical one. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(2), 114-130.
• Elkins, J. T., & Elkins, N. M. (2007). Teaching geology in the field: Significant geoscience concept gains in entirely field-based introductory geology courses. Journal of geoscience education, 55(2), 126-132.
• Esteves, H., Ferreira, P., Vasconcelos, C., & Fernandes, I. (2013). Geological fieldwork: A study carried out with Portuguese secondary school students. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(3), 318-325.
• Fuller, I. C. (2012). Taking students outdoors to learn in high places. Area, 44(1), 7-13.
• Gilley, B., Atchison, C., Feig, A., & Stokes, A. (2015). Impact of inclusive field trips. Nature Geoscience, 8(8), 579.
• Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
• Hesthammer, J., Fossen, H., Sautter, M., Sæther, B., & Johansen, S. E. (2002). The use of information technology to enhance learning in geological field trips. Journal of Geoscience Education, 50(5), 528-538.
• Hurst, S. D. (1998). Use of “virtual” field trips in teaching introductory geology. Computers & Geosciences, 24(7), 653-658.
• Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
• Kastens, K. (2010). Commentary: Object and spatial visualization in geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(2), 52-57.
• King, C. (2008). Geoscience education: An overview. Studies in Science Education, 44(2), 187-222.
• Leydon, J., & Turner, S. (2013). The challenges and rewards of introducing field trips into a large introductory geography class. Journal of Geography, 112(6), 248-261.
• Liou, W. K., & Chang, C. Y. (2018, February). Virtual reality classroom applied to science education. In 2018 23rd International Scientific-Professional Conference on Information Technology, 1-4.
• Ma, X., Cackett, M., Park, L., Chien, E., & Naaman, M. (2018). Web-based VR experiments powered by the crowd. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, 33-43.
• Martínez-Graña, A., González-Delgado, J., Pallarés, S., Goy, J., & Llovera, J. (2014). 3D virtual itinerary for education using Google Earth as a tool for the recovery of the geological heritage of natural areas: Application in the “Las Batuecas Valley” nature park (Salamanca, Spain). Sustainability, 6(12), 8567-8591.
• McCaffrey, K. J. W., Jones, R. R., Holdsworth, R. E., Wilson, R. W., Clegg, P., Imber, J., Holliman, N., & Trinks, I. (2005). Unlocking the spatial dimension: digital technologies and the future of geoscience fieldwork. Journal of the Geological Society, 162(6), 927-938.
• Meagher, B. J., Cataldo, K., Douglas, B. J., McDaniel, M. A., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2018). Training of rock classifications: The use of computer images versus physical rock samples. Journal of Geoscience Education, 66(3), 221-230.
• Qiu, W., & Hubble, T. (2002). The advantages and disadvantages of virtual field trips in geoscience education. The China Papers, 1, 75-79.
• Stieff, M., Bateman, R. C., & Uttal, D. H. (2005). Teaching and learning with three-dimensional representations. In Visualization in science education. Springer, Dordrecht, 93-120.
• Welsh, K., & France, D. (2012). Spotlight on... Smartphones and fieldwork. Geography, 97, 47.
• Whitmeyer, S., Feely, M., De Paor, D., Hennessy, R., Whitmeyer, S., Nicoletti, J., Santangelo, B., Daniels, J., & Rivera, M. (2009). Visualization techniques in field geology education: A case study from western Ireland. Field geology education: Historical perspectives and modern approaches, 461, 105.