Oidipus kompleksinin adlandırılmasından dolayı mitte Kral Oidipus'un dekonstrüksiyonu

Öz

Disiplinler arası çalışmaların hızlanması ile farklı alanlardan ilham alarak buluşları isimlendirmek aynı hızla yaygınlaşmıştır. Bu çalışmada, psikolojide tanımlanan hastalık ya da sendromların edebiyat ve tarih çemberindeki mitlerden esinlenilerek isimlendirildiği ancak bu isimlendirmenin, mitleri bilmeyenlerin mitteki karakteri yanlış anlamalarına ve yanlış yorumlamalarına neden olduğu vurgulanmaktadır. Buna ek olarak, isimlendiren kişinin hayat hikayesinden yola çıkılarak esinlenilen mitin aslında yanlış yorumlanmış olabileceği vurgulandı. Sofokles'in Kral Oidipus'u, karakterine yanlış teşhis konulan mitlerden biridir. Freud, kendi hayat hikayesini yansıttığı için keşfettiği sendromun adı olarak Oidipus'u seçmiştir, ancak Freud'un bilinçli olarak hissettikleri ile Oidipus'un farkında bile olmadan yaşadığı kader arasında büyük bir fark vardır. Bunun gibi, diğer mitlerin başına gelen bu talihsizliği ortadan kaldırabilmek, hastalıkların isimlendirilmesinde ilham kaynağı olan mitleri seçmeden önce tüm hikayeye hakim olmayı gerektirir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Oidipus Kompleksi
• Kral Oidipus
• Sofokles
• Freud
• Mitoloji
• Psikiyatri
• Psikanaliz

Deconstruction of Oedipus the King in Myth Due to the Naming of the Oedipus Complex

Abstract

With the acceleration of interdisciplinary studies, naming discoveries inspired by different fields has become widespread at the same speed. In this study, it is emphasized that the diseases or syndromes defined in psychology are named after the myths in the circle of literature and history, but this naming causes those who do not know the myths to misunderstand and misinterpret the character in the myth. In addition, it has been emphasized that the inspired myth may actually have been misinterpreted based on the life story of the name maker. Sophocles' Oedipus the King is one of the myths in which his character is misdiagnosed. Freud chose Oedipus as the name of the syndrome he discovered because it reflects his own life story, but there is a big difference between what Freud felt consciously and the fate that Oedipus lived without even being aware of it. To be able to eliminate this misfortune that has happened to other myths like this, requires mastering the whole story before choosing the myths that are the source of inspiration in naming diseases.

Keywords

• Oedipus Complex
• Oedipus the King
• Sophocles
• Freud
• Mythology
• Psychiatry
• Psychoanalysis

References

1. Adams, J. M. P. A. C. L. A. L. (n.d.). The Story of Oedipus. Copyright (C) 2006 John Paul Adams. Retrieved October 15, 2022, from https://www.csun.edu/%7Ehcfll004/oedstory. html
2. Aristotle, and Francis Fergusson. Aristotle's Poetics. Translated by S. H. Butcher, 1st ed., Hill and Wang, 1961. Library Genesis.
3. Aristotle. Poetika. Translated by İsmail Tunalı, 12th ed., Remzi Kitabevi, 2005.
4. Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel, and Douglas Brick. “The Oedipus Problem in Freud and Lacan.” Vol. 20, no. 2, 1994, pp. 267–282. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/ 1343911. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019.
5. Bowins, Brad. “Psychological Defense Mechanisms: A New Perspective.” American Journal of Psychoanalysis, vol. 64, 1 Apr. 2004, pp. 1–26., doi:10.1023/ B:TAJP.0000017989.72521.26.
6. Chase, Cynthia. “Oedipal Textuality: Reading Freud's Reading of Oedipus.” Vol. 9, no. 1, 1979, pp. 54–68. JSTOR, doi:10.2307/464700. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019.
7. Choi, C. Q. (2019, July 10). Uranus: The Ringed Planet That Sits on its Side. Space.com. Retrieved October 15, 2022, from https://www.space.com/45-uranus-seventh-planet-in-earths-solar-system-was-first-discovered-planet.html
8. Costa, R. M. (2017). Projection (Defense Mechanism). SpringerLink. Retrieved October 15, 2022, from https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1413-1? error=cookies_not_supported&code=29ac4895-56e4-40a2-9cd0-c4722d454877

9. Estin, Colette, and Hélène Laporte. Yunan Ve Roma Mitolojisi = Le Livre De La Mythologie Grecque Et Romaine. Translated by Musa Eran, TÜBİTAK, 2003.
10. Ferrell, Robyn. Passion in Theory: Conceptions of Freud and Lacan. pdf, Routledge, 1996. Library Genesis, 93.174.95.29/_ads/2BDBF03B03B155AB7BDEF2B3A 8BE1D20.
11. Foley, Helene P. “The Phoenissae.” Ritual Irony, Cornell University Press, 1985, pp. 106–146. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvn1tb8f.7.
12. Freud, Sigmund. Metapsikoloji 1: Ruhsal Olayların İki İlkesi Üzerine Formülasyonlar. Translated by Aziz Yıldırımlı, 2nd ed., İdea Yayınevi, 2011.
13. ---, Metapsikoloji 3: Yas Ve Melankoli, Haz İlkesinin Ötesinde. Translated by Aziz Yıldırımlı, İdea Yayınevi, 2011.
14. ---, The Ego and The Id. Edited by James Strachey. Translated by Joan Riviere, pdf, W.W. Norton, 1962. Library Genesis, 93.174.95.29/_ads/90674E59313A 0CD2C66A6B36C591DC2E.
15. ---, The Interpretation of Dreams. Edited by James Strachey, pdf, First Trade Paper Edition ed., Basic Books, 2010, https://libgen.is, gen.lib.rus.ec/book/ index.php? md5=2F657696A18487E41FE74811AA17E81C.
16. ---, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Edited by James Strachey, pdf, 1st ed., W.W. Norton, 1976, https://libgen.is, gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=094936C19A16A8845854B7273972C1A5.
17. ---, Three Contributions to The Theory of Sex . Edited by Smith Ely Jelliffe and WM. A. White. Translated by A. A. Brill, Dutton, 1962.
18. ---, Yaşamım Ve Psikanaliz. Translated by Kamuran Şipal, 2nd ed., Say, 1993.
19. “Freud’s Cases Reread.” NYU Press, 1991, pp. 49–77. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/ j.ctt9qfvz3.7. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019.
20. Gallagher, Philip J. “Beyond the Oedipus Complex.” Milton Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 3, 1984, pp. 84–92., doi:10.1111/j.1094-348x.1984.tb00293.x. Geçtan, Engin. Psikanaliz Ve Sonrası. Metis Yayınları, 2002.
21. Glenn, Justin. “Psychoanalytic Writings on Classical Mythology and Religion: 1909-1960.” Vol. 70, no. 4, 1976, pp. 225–247. JSTOR, doi:10.2307/4348642. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019.
22. Gürel, Emet, and Canan Muter. “Psikomitolojik Terimler: Psikoloji Literatüründe Mitolojinin Kullanılması.” Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 1, 2007, pp. 537–569. Acarindex.com, www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423869664. pdf .
23. Hains, D. D. “The Presentation of Classical Plays. Part I.” Vol. 9, no. 5, 1914, pp. 189–198. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/3287523. Accessed 30 Dec. 2019.
24. Haute, Philippe Van, and Tomas Geyskens. A Non-Oedipal Psychoanalysis?: A Clinical Anthropology of Hysteria in The Work of Freud and Lacan. Translated by Joey Kok, pdf, Leuven University Press, 2012. Library Genesis, 93.174.95.29/_ads/B86EE5BE70AF2D2AE88C0E9FAA59F62F.
25. Knoll, M., Starrs, C. J., & Perry, C. J. (2020). Rationalization (Defense Mechanism). SpringerLink. Retrieved October 15, 2022, from https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1419?error=cookies_not_supported&code=75fc7177-6eae-4806-a503-853ad2702779
26. Leah, Gordon. “Lifting the Curse: Reflections on Retribution and Restoration.” European Journal of Theology, vol. 22, no. 1, 1 Jan. 2013, pp. 19–27.
27. Lehmann, Herbert. “Reflections on Freud’s Reaction to the Death of His Mother.” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 2, 1983, pp. 237–249., doi:10.1080/21674086.1983.11927030.
28. Lothane, Zvi. “The Sigmund Freud/Minna Bernays Romance: Fact or Fiction?” Vol. 64, no. 1, 2007, pp. 129–133. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26305396. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019.
29. Maciejewski, Franz. “Minna Bernays as ‘Mrs. Freud’: What Sort of Relationship Did Sigmund Freud Have with His Sister-in-Law?” Vol. 65, no. 1, 2008, pp. 5–21. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26305334. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019.
30. May, Ulrike. “Nineteen Patients in Analysis with Freud (1910–1920).” Vol. 65, no. 1, 2008, pp. 41–105. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26305336. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019.
31. Mcleod, S. (2017, May 5). Defense Mechanisms. Retrieved October 15, 2022, from https://www.simplypsychology.org/defense-mechanisms.html
32. Niederland, William G. “Freud's ‘Déjà Vu’ on the Acropolis.” Vol. 26, no. 4, 1969, pp. 373–378. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26302772. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019.
33. Northoff, Georg, et al. “How Does Our Brain Constitute Defense Mechanisms? First-Person Neuroscience and Psychoanalysis.” Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, vol. 76, no. 3, 2007, pp. 141–153., doi:10.1159/000099841. Parker, Ian. Psychoanalytic Mythologies. pdf, Anthem Press, 2009. Library Genesis, 93.174.95.29/_ads/CE6E11EADE250FD69D8D322D9333CE98.
34. Perrin, B. “Recognition Scenes in Greek Literature.” Vol. 30, no. 4, 1909, pp. 371–404. JSTOR, doi:10.2307/288428. Accessed 30 Dec. 2019.
35. Petty, D. (2019, December 1). Scleroderma Canada Annual Conference in Calgary. Trey Petty Oral Health. Retrieved October 15, 2022, from https://drtrey.ca/2019/01/16/scleroderma-canada-calgary/
36. Poland, Warren S. “Oedipal Complexes, Oedipal Schemas.” Vol. 64, no. 4, 2007, pp. 561–565. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26305271. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019.
37. Post, Chandler Rathfon. “The Dramatic Art of Sophocles.” Vol. 23, 1912, pp. 71–127. JSTOR, doi:10.2307/310448. Accessed 27 Dec. 2019.
38. Posèq, Avigdor W. G. “Ingres's Oedipal ‘Oedipus and the Sphinx.’” Vol. 21, no. 1, 2001, pp. 24–32. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/23206972. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019.
39. Reid, Stephen A. “Teaching Oedipus Rex.” Vol. 29, no. 8, 1968, pp. 615–619. JSTOR, doi:10.2307/374565. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019.
40. Roomland, C. (2022, January 11). Oedipus The King - Sophocles - Oedipus Rex Analysis, Summary, Story. Ancient Literature. Retrieved October 15, 2022, from https://www.ancient-literature.com/greece_sophocles_oedipus_king.html
41. Roth, G. A., & Fee, E. (2011, March). The Invention of Braille. American Journal of Public Health, 101(3), 454–454. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2010.200865
42. Rudnytsky, Peter L. “Oedipus and Anti-Oedipus.” Vol. 56, no. 3, 1982, pp. 462–470., doi:10.2307/40137217. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019.
43. Rushridger, Richard. “Elements Of The Oedipus Complex: Building Up The Picture.” British Journal of Psychotherapy, vol. 15, no. 4, 1999, pp. 488–500., doi:10.1111/j.1752-0118.1999.tb00479.x.
44. Skavych, V. “P03.377 Russian Psychoanalysis Must Correct the Freud's Mistake.” European Psychiatry, vol. 15, ser. 2, 2000. 2, doi:10.1016/s0924-9338(00) 94784-9.
45. Smith, Ivan. Freud For Scholars: Freud - Complete Works. pdf, 2014. Library Genesis, 93.174.95.29/_ads/C4FDEA89A94A778F541D942B035F477C.
46. Solomon, Maynard. “Freud's Father on the Acropolis.” Vol. 30, no. 2, 1973, pp. 142–156. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26302750. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019.
47. Sophocles. Kral Oidipus. Translated by K. Cüneyt Çetinkaya, Bordo-Siyah, 2008.
48. ---, The Complete Plays of Sophocles. Edited by Moses Hadas. Translated by Richard Cleverhouse Jebb, Bantam Dell, 2006.
49. Sprengnether, Madelon. “Reading Freud's Life.” Vol. 52, no. 1, 1995, pp. 9–54. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26304371. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019.
50. Steinberger, Deborah. “The Song of Rolland: An Interpretation of Freud's ‘A Disturbance of Memory on the Acropolis.’” Vol. 54, no. 1, 1997, pp. 69–80. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26304596. Accessed 17 Dec. 2019.