Dijital Diplomasinin Değişen Dili: Rusya’nın Skripal Vakasında Twitter Diplomasisi Kullanımı Örneği

Yenal Göksun

doi:10.29000/rumelide.1369546

Dijital Diplomasinin Değişen Dili: Rusya’nın Skripal Vakasında Twitter Diplomasisi Kullanımı Örneği

Öz

Bu araştırmada 2018 yılında İngiltere’nin Salisbury kentinde eski ajan Sergei Skripal ve kızı Yulia Skripal'in zehirlenmesinin ardından Rusya ile İngiltere arasında çıkan diplomatik krizin Rusya tarafından dijital diplomasi yoluyla nasıl yönetildiği ele alınmıştır. Diplomasinin dili dijitalleşmeyle birlikte büyük bir dönüşüm geçirmektedir. Dijital teknolojilerin ve sosyal medya platformlarının kullanımı, diplomatların iletişim kurma, yabancı topluluklarla ilişki geliştirme ve kamuoyunu bilgilendirme biçimlerinde devrim yaratmıştır. Rusya da kamu diplomasisi ve dijital diplomasi stratejisi kapsamında sosyal medya kullanımını önemsemektedir. Bu araştırmada Skripal olayının gerçekleştiği 4 Mart 2018 tarihinden itibaren bir ay boyunca Rusya’nın İngiltere ve ABD’deki büyükelçiliklerinin resmi Twitter hesaplarından paylaşılan toplam 103 gönderi incelenmiştir. Metin ve görsel içeriklerin dahil olduğu bu gönderiler içerik analizi ve göstergebilimsel analiz yöntemleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Rusya’nın karşı karşıya kaldığı bu diplomatik krizi yönetmek için dijital diplomasiyi nasıl kullandığı, nasıl bir dil ve söylem geliştirdiği, hangi argümanlara başvurduğu, nasıl bir karşı anlatı kurguladığı incelenmiştir. Sonuç olarak diplomasi dilinin dijitalleşmeyle birlikte dönüşüm geçirdiği, Rusya’nın mizah ve ironi unsurlarını kullanarak kendi argümanlarını gündemleştirdiği, imajını güçlendirdiği ve diplomatik krizi yönettiği ortaya konulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

References

Berger, A. A. (1998). Media Research Techniques. SAGE.
Borger, J., Wintour, P., & Stewart, H. (2018, Mart 27). Western allies expel scores of Russian diplomats over Skripal attack. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/26/four-eu-states-set-to-expel-russian-diplomats-over-skripal-attack
Danziger, R., & Schreiber, M. (2021). Digital Diplomacy: Face Management in MFA Twitter Accounts. Policy & Internet.
Disinformation and Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. (t.y.). OECD. Geliş tarihi 16 Ağustos 2023, gönderen https://www.oecd.org/ukraine-hub/policy-responses/disinformation-and-russia-s-war-of-aggression-against-ukraine-37186bde/
Doctrine of Information Security of the Russian Federation. (2016). Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 646. http://www.scrf.gov.ru/security/information/DIB_engl/
Doncel-Martín, I., Catalán-Matamoros, D., & Elías, C. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Diplomacy as Formulas to Reduce Hate Speech on Social Media in the Fake News Era. Corporate Communications an International Journal.
EU imposes sanctions on state-owned outlets RT/Russia Today and Sputnik’s broadcasting in the EU. (t.y.). Geliş tarihi 16 Ağustos 2023, gönderen https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/03/02/eu-imposes-sanctions-on-state-owned-outlets-rt-russia-today-and-sputnik-s-broadcasting-in-the-eu/
Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

Golan, G. J., Manor, I., & Arceneaux, P. (2019). Mediated Public Diplomacy Redefined: Foreign Stakeholder Engagement via Paid, Earned, Shared, and Owned Media. American Behavioral Scientist.
Hedling, E. (2023). Emotional Labour in Digital Diplomacy: Perceptions and Challenges for European Diplomats. Emotions and Society.
Jönsson, C., & Hall, M. (2005). Essence of Diplomacy.
Kaplan, A. (1943). Content Analysis and the Theory of Signs. Philosophy of Science, 10(4), 230-247.
Kelly, M. (2019, Kasım 18). Analysis | How Russia weaponized social media, got caught and escaped consequences. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/11/18/how-russia-weaponized-social-media-got-caught-escaped-consequences/
Kopper, Á. (2020). The Use of Humour in Diplomatic Tweets: The Affiliative Potential of Ridicule. Cooperation and Conflict.
Manor, I. (2021). The Russians are Laughing! The Russians are Laughing! How Russian Diplomats Employ Humour in Online Public Diplomacy. Global Society, 35(1), 61-83.
Pavón-Guinea, A. (2023). «It’s the Context, Stupid»: The European Union’s Public Diplomacy in Times of Ontological Insecurity. Communication & Society.
Pipchenko, N., & Ryzhkov, M. (2019). Foreign Policy Factors of Public Diplomacy: Comparative Context of Changes During 2013-2018. Actual Problems of International Relations.
Russia “meddled in all big social media” around US election. (2018, Aralık 17). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-46590890
Russia orders out 60 U.S. diplomats over spy poisoning affair. (2018, Mart 29). Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-diplomats-idUSKBN1H52MN
Russian Embassy in USA on X. (2018, Mart 26). Twitter. https://twitter.com/RusEmbUSA/status/978273613349556224
Russian Embassy, UK on X. (2018, Mart 13). Twitter. https://twitter.com/RussianEmbassy/status/973610762794127361
Russian spy: Highly likely Moscow behind attack, says Theresa May. (2018, Mart 12). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-43377856
Russian spy poisoning: UK warns Russia over chemical weapons. (2018, Eylül 27). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-45668986
Saari, S. (2014). Russia’s Post-Orange Revolution Strategies to Increase its Influence in Former Soviet Republics: Public Diplomacy po russkii. Europe-Asia Studies, 66(1), 50-66.
Simeng, Y. (2023). Russian Digital Diplomacy Towards China in the Context of the Russian Special Military Operation in Ukraine: The Instance of the Official Weibo Account of the Embassy of the Russian Federation in China. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Serija 4 Istorija Regionovedenie Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenija.
Simons, G. (2019). Digital Communication Disrupting Hegemonic Power in Global Geopolitics. Russia in Global Affairs.
Simons, G. (2020). Russian Foreign Policy and Public Diplomacy: Meeting 21st Century Challenges. Vestnik Rudn International Relations.
The Concept of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation. (2023). Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 229. https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/fundamental_documents/1860586/
Tsvetkova, N. (2020). Russian Digital Diplomacy: A Rising Cyber Soft Power? Içinde A. A. Velikaya & G. Simons (Ed.), Russia’s Public Diplomacy: Evolution and Practice (ss. 103-117). Springer International Publishing.
Wamsley, L. (2018, Mart 26). U.S. Expels 60 Russian Officials, Closes Consulate In Seattle. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/03/26/596966272/us-expels-dozens-of-russian-diplomats-closes-consulate-in-seattle
White, C. (2015). Exploring the Role of Private-Sector Corporations in Public Diplomacy. Public Relations Inquiry.
Zamanli, E. (2022). Intensification Cycle in Digital Diplomacy. Kne Social Sciences.
Zinovieva, E. S., & Bulva, V. I. (2021). Digital Diplomacy in Russian-European Relations: Cross-Cultural Aspects. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture, 5(4), 30-40.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Communication Technology and Digital Media Studies

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Yenal Göksun ^* This is me
0000-0003-2833-243X
Türkiye

Publication Date

October 21, 2023

Submission Date

August 18, 2023

Acceptance Date

October 20, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Number: 36

DOI

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1369546

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA66ZG36HH

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Göksun, Y. (2023). Dijital Diplomasinin Değişen Dili: Rusya’nın Skripal Vakasında Twitter Diplomasisi Kullanımı Örneği. RumeliDE Dil Ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 36, 825-841. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1369546