Dijital çağda çevirmen eğitimi: Mütercim ve Tercümanlık Bölümü öğrencileri ve çevirimiçi öğrenmede hazırbulunuşlukları

Year 2021, Issue: 23, 823 - 840, 21.06.2021

Nurcihan Yürük

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.949702

Abstract

Bugün Covid 19 nedeniyle, Türkiye'deki tüm üniversitelere çevrimiçi yöntemler kullanılarak dersler verilmektedir. Bu nedenle, çevrimiçi öğrenmenin tasarımında ve uygulanmasında öğrencilerin çevrimiçi hazırbulunuşlukları önemlidir ve öğrencilerin hazır bulunuşluklarının yanı sıra çevrimiçi derslerden memnuniyetleri, çevrimiçi öğrenme uygulamalarının başarılı olması için gerekli bir süreçtir. Bu çalışma, Selçuk Üniversitesi Mütercim Tercümanlık Anabilim Dalı öğrencilerinin (1., 2. ve 3. öğrenciler) çevrimiçi hazırlık düzeylerini araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Veriler, Yurdugül and Alsancak Sırakaya, (2013) tarafından geliştirilen bilgisayar / internet öz-yeterliği, öz-yönetimli öğrenme ve öğrenme motivasyonu, öğrenen kontrolü ve çevrimiçi iletişim öz yeterliği olarak beş boyut içeren 18 maddeden oluşan Lickert tipi Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Hazır Bulunuşluluk Ölçeği vasıtasıyla toplanmıştır. Ölçeğin güvenirlik katsayısı Cronbach's Alpha katsayısı (α = .864) olarak bulunmuştur. Çalışma, tüm sınıf seviyelerindeki öğrencilerin çevrimiçi ortamda öğretime aşina olduklarını ve herhangi bir zorluk yaşamadıklarını göstermektedir. Ayrıca erkek öğrencilerin Çevrimiçi İletişim Öz-Yeterlik düzeylerinin kız öğrencilere göre daha yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. 24 yaş ve üzeri olanların kendi öğrenmelerini yönetmede 18-20 yaş grubundakilere göre daha başarılı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bilgisayar ve İnternet Öz-Yeterlik alt faktörü ile bilgisayar sahibi olma arasında anlamlı bir fark saptanmış ve web tabanlı eğitime katılanların hem toplamda hem de Bilgisayar ve İnternet Öz-Yeterliklerinde daha yüksek olduğu görülmüştür.

Keywords

Çevirimiçi öğrenme, öğrenmede hazırbulunuşluk, çevirmen eğitimi, uzaktan eğitim, Covid 19

Training translators in the Digital age: Students of translation and their readiness for online learning

Abstract

Due to Covid 19 today, most universities in Turkey have preferred online teaching methods for the courses in their programmes. Therefore, students’ readiness is important in the design and implementation of online learning. Also, their satisfaction with online courses is a necessary process for online learning applications to be successful. The aim of this study is to investigate the level of online readiness of students (1st, 2nd, and 3rd students) at Translation and Interpretation Department at Selçuk University. The data was gathered through the The Scale of Online Learning Readiness (Yurdugül and Alsancak Sırakaya, 2013) including five dimensions (18 items with a 5 point Lickert scale) as computer/Internet self-efficacy, self-directed learning, and motivation for learning, learner control, and online communication self-efficacy. The reliability coefficient of the scale was found to be Cronbach's Alpha coefficient (α = .864). The study shows that students at all class levels are familiar with the teaching in an online environment and do not have any difficulties. Also, it was found that male students had higher Online Communication Self-Efficacy levels than female students. It was determined that those aged 24 and above were more successful in managing their own learning than those in the 18-20 age groups. There was a significant difference was found between Computer and Internet Self-Efficacy sub-factor and owning a computer and it was found that those who participated in web-based training were higher in both the total and the Computer and Internet Self-Efficacy sub-factor compared to those who did not.

Keywords

Online learning, learning readiness, translation training, distance education, Covid 19

References

• Affouneh, S. & Salha, S. & Khlaif, Z. (2020). Designing Quality E-Learning Environments for Emergency Remote Teaching in Coronavirus Crisis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. 11. 10.30476/ijvlms.2020.86120.1033.
• Alshebab, M. (2013). The Impact of E-Learning in Students’ Ability in Translation from English into Arabic at Irbid National University in Jordan. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(14), 123-133.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
• Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye’de Uzaktan Eğitimin Dünü, Bugünü ve Yarını. 3. 85-124.
• Cojocariu, V. & Iuliana, L. & Nedeff, V. & Lazar, G. (2013). SWOT Anlysis of E-learning Educational Services from the Perspective of their Beneficiaries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 116. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.510.
• Colchester, K., Hagras, H., Alghazzawi, D.M., & Aldabbagh, G. (2017). A Survey of Artificial Intelligence Techniques Employed for Adaptive Educational Systems within E-Learning Platforms. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing Research, 7, 47 - 64.
• Çelen, F. K., Çelik, A., Seferoğlu, S. S. (2011). Yükseköğretimde Çevrimiçi Öğrenme: Sistemde Yaşanan Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri. Journal of European Education, 1(1).
• Dhawan S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2020;49(1):5-22. doi:10.1177/0047239520934018.
• Dorri, R. & Khani, F. (2018). Innovation in Translation Pedagogy Using Online Collaborative Translator Training, https://translationjournal.net/April-2018/innovation-in-translation-pedagogy-using-online-collaborative-translator-training.html
• Ellis R. & Allen, M. (2004) Down with boring E-Learning - Interview with e-learningguru Michael Allen. Retrieved July 12th, 2009 from http://www.astd.org/LC/2004/0704_allen.htm.
• Gilbert, N. & Driscoll, M. (2002). Collaborative knowledge building: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development. 50. 59-79. 10.1007/BF02504961. Granell, X. 2014. Multilingual Information Management: Information, Technology and Translators. UK: Chandos Publishing.
• Guglielmino, P. & Guglielmino, L. (2003). Are your learners ready for e-learning? In G. Piskurich (Ed.), The AMA handbook of e-learning. New York: American Management Association.
• Hartnett, M. (2016). The Importance of Motivation in Online Learning. 10.1007/978-981-10-0700-2_2.
• Hung, M., Chou, C., Chen, C. & Own, Z. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55, 1080–1090.
• Karsten, R., Roth, M. R. (1998). The relationship of computer experience and computer self-efficacy to performance in introductory computer literacycourse. Journal of Research on Technology Education, 31(1), 14-24.
• Kebritchi, Mansureh & Lipschuetz, Angie & Santiague, Lilia. (2017). Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education: A Literature Review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 46. 4-29. 10.1177/0047239516661713.
• Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press.
• Lawless, K. A., Brown, S. W. (1997). Multimedia Learning Environments: Issues of Learner Control and Navigation, Instructional Science, 25 (2), 117-131.
• Lee, K., Tsai, P.S., Chai, C.S. & Koh, J.H.L. (2014). Students' Perceptions of Self-Directed Learning and Collaborative Learning with and without Technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(5), 425-437. Retrieved January 19, 2021 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/154012/
• McVay, M. (2000). Developing a web-based distance student orientation to enhance student success in an online bachelor’s degree completion program. Unpublished practicum report presented to the Ed.D. Program. Florida: Nova Southeastern University.
• McVay, M. (2001). How to be a successful distance learning student: Learning on the Internet. New York: Prentice Hall.
• Mnyanyi, Cosmas & Mbwette, Tolly. (2009). Open and Distance Learning In Developing Countries: The Past, The Present And The Future.
• Newby, T. J., Stepich, D. A., Lehman, J. D., & Russell, J. D. (2000). InstructionTechnology for Teaching and Learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
• O’Donnell, E. (2010). The Student Perspective: Can the Use of Technologies Transform Learning? In R. Donnelly, J. Harvey, & K. O’Rourke, Critical Design and Effective Tools for E-Learning in Higher Education (pp. 262-279). New York: IGI Global
• Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Pym, A. (n.d.). E-Learning and Translator Training. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from http://usuaris.tinet. cat/apym/on-line/training/2001_elearning. pd
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
• Schreurs, J., Sammour, G. &Ehlers, U. (2008). E-learning Readiness Analysis (ERA): an e-health case study of e-learning Readiness. Int. J. Knowledge and Learning, 4(5), 496-508.
• Shyu, H. Y., & Brown, S. W. (1992). Learner control versus program control in interactive videodisc instruction: what are the effects in procedural learning? International Journal of Instructional Media, 19(2), 85–95.
• Soni, Vishal Dineshkumar. (2020). Global Impact of E-learning during COVID 19. SSRN Electronic Journal. 12. 10.2139/ssrn.3630073.
• Tang, S. F. & Lim, C. L. (2013). Undergraduate students’ readiness in e-learning: a study at the business school in a Malaysian private university. International Journal of Management & Information Technology, 4 (2). 198-204.
• Teo, Timothy & Tan, Seng Chee & Lee, Chwee Beng & Chai, Ching & Koh, Joyce & Li, Chen & Cheah, Horn. (2010). The self-directed learning with technology scale (SDLTS) for young students: An initial development and validation. Computers&Education. 55. 1764-1771. 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.001.
• Volery, T. & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5). 216-223.
• Wighting, M.J., Liu, J. & Rovai, A.P. (2008). Distinguishing Sense of Community and Motivation Characteristics between Online and Traditional College Students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(3), 285-295. Retrieved May 28, 2021 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/106743/.
• Yurdugül, Halil & Alsancak Sırakaya, Didem. (2013). The Scale of Online Learning Readiness: A Study of Validity and Reliability. Egitim ve Bilim. 38. 391-406.
• https://education.gov.gy/web/index.php/mediacenter/item/5663-ministry-of-education-covid-19-health-advisory-as-at-march-23-2020 (Ministry of Education, 2020). https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse (UNESCO, 2020a).
• https://covid19.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/HaberDuyuru/opinion-turkish-higher-education-in-days-of-pandemic.aspx (YÖK, 2020f).