Lüks Tüketim ve Kültürel Farklılıklar

Year 2024, Issue: 40, 371 - 384, 25.06.2024

Yavuz Sarsılmaz

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1497565

Abstract

Bu makale, lüks tüketim ile kültürel farklılıklar arasındaki karmaşık ilişkiyi açıklığa kavuşturmayı ve bu ilişkinin iş dünyası ve akademik araştırmalar üzerindeki önemini vurgulamayı amaçlamaktadır. Lüks tüketim, yüksek kalite, benzersizlik, estetik ve maddi başarı gibi özelliklere sahip ürün ve hizmetlerin tüketimini ifade ederken, gösterişçi tüketim, bireylerin sosyal statü ve prestij kazanma amacıyla gerçekleştirdikleri tüketim davranışlarını tanımlamaktadır. Gösterişçi tüketim kuramı temel alınarak bireylerin sosyal statü ve prestij kazanma amacıyla lüks tüketim davranışlarını nasıl şekillendirdikleri ve bu davranışların kültürel bağlamda nasıl değiştiği analiz edilmiştir. Makale, lüks tüketimin sadece ekonomik bir fenomen değil, aynı zamanda sosyal bir fenomen olduğunu vurgulamaktadır. Kültürel farklılıklar, tüketici davranışlarını anlamak ve pazarlama stratejilerini belirlemek açısından kritik bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu farklılıklar, lüksün tanımı ve algısının kültürler arasında geniş ölçüde farklılık gösterebileceğini göstermektedir. Örneğin, bazı kültürlerde lüks, gösterişli ve dikkat çekici ürünlerle ilişkilendirilirken, diğer kültürlerde zariflik, sadelik ve içsel tatminle özdeşleştirilebilir. Makale ayrıca lüks tüketimin psikolojik motivasyonlarını da ele almaktadır. Bireyler lüks tüketimle kendilerini ifade etme, özgüvenlerini artırma ve sosyal kabul sağlama gibi psikolojik ihtiyaçlarını karşılamaktadırlar. Ekonomik açıdan, lüks tüketim bireylerin gelir düzeyleri ve ekonomik kaynakları ile doğrudan ilişkilidir. Yüksek gelirli bireyler lüks tüketim ürünlerine daha fazla harcama yapabilirken, düşük gelirli gruplar bu tür tüketim davranışlarına daha sınırlı bir şekilde katılabilirler. Ancak, borçlanma ve kredi kullanımı gibi araçlar düşük gelirli bireylerin de gösterişçi tüketimde bulunmalarına olanak tanımaktadır. Bu çalışma, lüks tüketim ve kültürel farklılıklar arasındaki dinamikleri daha iyi anlamamıza yardımcı olmakta ve lüks markaların küresel pazarlarda başarılı olabilmeleri için kültürel çeşitliliği nasıl ele alabileceklerine dair stratejiler geliştirmesi gerektiğini vurgulamaktadır.

Keywords

Tüketim, Lüks tüketim, Kültür

Luxury Consumption and Cultural Differences

Abstract

This article aims to clarify the complex relationship between luxury consumption and cultural differences and to emphasize the significance of this relationship for business and academic research. Luxury consumption refers to the consumption of products and services that possess characteristics such as high quality, uniqueness, aesthetics, and material success, while conspicuous consumption defines the consumption behaviors individuals engage in to gain social status and prestige. Based on the theory of conspicuous consumption, the article analyzes how individuals shape their luxury consumption behaviors to achieve social status and prestige and how these behaviors change in different cultural contexts. The article highlights that luxury consumption is not only an economic phenomenon but also a social phenomenon. Cultural differences play a critical role in understanding consumer behaviors and determining marketing strategies. These differences demonstrate that the definition and perception of luxury can vary widely between cultures. For instance, in some cultures, luxury is associated with flashy and attention-grabbing products, while in others, it is linked with elegance, simplicity, and intrinsic satisfaction. Additionally, the article addresses the psychological motivations behind luxury consumption. Individuals use luxury consumption to express themselves, boost their self-confidence, and achieve social acceptance. Economically, luxury consumption is directly related to individuals' income levels and economic resources. High-income individuals can spend more on luxury consumption products, while low-income groups participate in such consumption behaviors more limitedly. However, tools such as borrowing and credit usage allow low-income individuals to engage in conspicuous consumption as well. This study helps us better understand the dynamics between luxury consumption and cultural differences and emphasizes that luxury brands need to develop strategies to address cultural diversity to succeed in global markets.

Keywords

Consumption, Luxury consumption, Culture

References

• Amatulli, C., & Guido, G. (2011). Determinants of purchasing intention for fashion luxury goods in the Italian market: A laddering approach. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management.
• Autio, M. (2004). Finnish young people’s narrative construction of consumer identity. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 388-398.
• Belk, R. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 139-168.
• Bezzaouıa, M., & Joanta, A. (2016). The Relationships Between Cultural Values And Consumer Motivations For Purchasing Luxury Brands. Ecuform.
• Brun, A., Caniato, F., Caridi, M., Castelli, C., Miragliotta, G., Ronchi, S., . . . Spina, G. (2008). Logistics and supply chain management in luxury fashion retail: Empirical investigation of Italian firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 554-570.
• Eastman, J., Goldsmith, R., & Flynn, L. R. (1999, 8 2). Status Consumption in Consumer Behavior: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 41-52.
• Frank, R. (2000). Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess. Review of Social Economy, 407-410.
• Gupta, D., Shin, H., & Jain, V. (2023). Luxury Experience and Consumer Behavior: A Literature Review. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 199-213.
• Han, Y. J., Nunes, J., & Drèze, X. (2010). Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence. Journal of Marketing, 15-30.
• Hauck, W., & Stanforth, N. (2007). Cohort perception of luxury goods and services. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 175-188.
• Patsiaouras, G. (2010, 5). Rethinking Veblen’s contribution to Consumer Research. Leicester, İngiltere: School of ManagementUniversity of Leicester.
• Potavanich, T. (2015). The Concept of Luxury from a Consumer Culture Perspective. Manchester, İngiltere: Alliance Manchester Business School .
• Reddy, S., & Han, J. (2017). The Essence of luxury. Singapore: Singapore Management University.
• Silverstein, M., & Fiske, N. (2003). Luxury for the Masses. Harvard Business Review, 48-57.
• Truong, Y., Simmons, G., Mccoll, R., & Kitchen, P. (2008). Status and conspicuousness – are they related?: Strategic marketing implications for luxury brands. Journal of Strategic Marketing.
• Twitchell, J. (2002). Living It Up. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Veblen, T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Macmillan.
• Adam, S. (2008). Towards a cultural international political economy of financialisation: the transformation of private pension in the United Kingdom. Newcastle, İngiltere: Newcastle University.
• Alessandro, B., Federico, C., Maria, C., Cecilia, C., Giovanni, M., Stefano, R., . . . Gianluca, S. (2008, 8 9). Logistics and supply chain management in luxury fashion retail: Empirical investigation of Italian firms. International Journal of Production Economics, s. 554-570.
• Assimos, B. M., Pinto, M. d., Leite, R. S., & Andrade, M. L. (2019). Conspicuous Consumption and its Relation to Brand Consciousness, Status Consumption and Self-Expression. Brazilian Business Review, 350-368.
• Avcı, İ. (2022). The Effect of Conspicuous Consumption Behavior on Wasteful Consumption Behavior: The Intermediary Role of Hedonic Consumption Behavior. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 161-179.
• Ayverdi, İ. (2011). Misalli Büyük Türkçe Sözlük (2 b.). İstanbul: Milliyet-Kubbealtı.
• Babakhova, L. (2019). Deontologization of culture and identity transformation in the context of a consumer society. SHS Web of Conferences, 1-6.
• Barnier, V., Rodina, I., & Florence, P. (2006). Which luxury perceptions affect most consumer purchase behavior? Working Paper.
• Bayhan, M. (2022). Tüketim Toplumunda Kimlik İnşası. 19 Mayıs Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 47-57.
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Paris: Harvard University Press.
• Chevalier, M., Lu, P., & Toledano, S. (2012). Luxury China: Market Opportunities and Potential. Pekin: John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte. Ltd.
• Douglas, A., & Moore, C. (2009). The anatomy of the luxury fashion brand. Journal of Brand Management, 347-363.
• Dubois, B., & Duquesne, P. (1993, 2 1). The Market for Luxury Goods: Income versus Culture. European Journal of Marketing, s. 35-44.
• Eğinli, A. (2016). Kültürlerarası Yeterliliğin Kazanılmasında Kültürel Farklılık Eğitimlerinin Önemi. Global Media Journal, 215-227.
• Gronow, J. (2020). The Three Social Formations of Taste in Economic Markets. Helsinki University Press.
• Güleç, C. (2015). Thorstein Veblen Ve Gösterişçi Tüketim Kavramı. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 62-82.
• Han, C. (1989). Country Image: Halo or Summary Construct? Journal of Marketing Research, 222-229.
• Han, Y., Nunes, J., & Drèze,. (2010). Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence. Journal of Marketing, 15-30.
• Kaçalin, M. S. (2009). Sözlük. İslâm Ansiklopedisi (Cilt 37, s. 402-414). içinde İstanbul: TDV.
• Kamakura, W., & Du, R. Y. (2012). How Economic Contractions and Expansions Affect Expenditure Patterns. Journal of Consumer Research, 229-247.
• Kamakura, W., & Du, R. Y. (2012). How Economic Contractions and Expansions Affect Expenditure Patterns. Journal of Consumer Research, 229-247.
• Kapferer, J. N. (2016). Pursuing the Concept of Luxury. Journal of International Marketing Strategy, 6-23.
• Kovesi, C. (2015). What Is Luxury? : The Rebirth of a Concept in the Early Modern World. Luxury, 25-40.
• Morley, J. (2010). The works of Voltaire: a contemporary version with notes Volume 37. London: Paperback.
• Nueno, J. L., & Quelch, J. (1998). The mass marketing of luxury. Business Horizons, 61-68.
• Schaller, B. (2012, 11). Towards a heterodox economic theory of poverty production. Birmingham: Department of Political Science and International Studies.
• Seo, Y., & Oliver, M. (2015). Luxury branding: The industry, trends, and future conceptualisations. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 82-98.
• Solomon, M. (2018). Consumer Behavior. Boston: Pearson.
• Trigg, A. (2001). Veblen, Bourdieu, and Conspicuous Consumption. Journal of Economic Issues, 99-115.
• Zhang, Q., & Liu, H. (2014). An Analysis of Dee’s Identity Construction from the Perspective of Consumer Culture. Advances in Literary Study, 75-82.