Research Article

Corrosive Substance Ingestion in Adults: Seven-Year Retrospective Analysis of Endoscopic Findings and Complications

Volume: 16 Number: 3 September 22, 2026
TR EN

Corrosive Substance Ingestion in Adults: Seven-Year Retrospective Analysis of Endoscopic Findings and Complications

Abstract

Aim: Corrosive ingestion which is the act of swallowing substances that have the potential of causing tissue damage, presents a significant medical emergency. If not evaluated early, can lead to high morbidity and mortality as well as long-term complications if not managed appropriately

Material and Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients who were admitted to the Department of Emergency Medicine and referred to Gastroenterology with the complaint of caustic ingestion and underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy between April 2016 and July 2023. We evaluated the demographic findings of the patients, such as age, gender; intent of ingestion, characteristic of the caustic materials ingested, endoscopic findings and complications from medical records.

Results: We identified 143 patients who were consulted to gastroenterology due to caustic ingestion. The mostly ingested caustic materials were household bleach as 51.1% (n:67) and limescale remover as 20.6% (n:27). 97 patients had suicidal intent (74%) and 34 patients ingested caustic agent incidentally (%26).  49 patients (37.4%) had no pathological findings in their endoscopic evaluation, whereas 16 patients (12.2%) presented moderate to severe injuries (Zargar Grade 2B–3B). Long-term complications were esophageal stricture in 2 patients and gastric outlet obstruction in 4 patients.

Conclusion: Corrosive substance ingestion remains a serious medical and public health concern. Zargar’s classification is the most important independent predictor in development of complications. Early endoscopic evaluation is the most effective method for identifying tissue injury, determining treatment, and predicting prognosis.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Bakircay University (decision no: 1110 / 26.7.2023).

References

  1. Chen YJ, Seak CJ, Cheng HT, Chen CC, Chen TH, Sung CM, et al. Evaluation of a diagnostic and management algorithm for adult caustic ingestion: new concept of severity stratification and patient categorization. J Pers Med. 2022;12(6):989. doi:10.3390/jpm12060989.
  2. Di Maggio F, Vergani V, Tomasi I, Zhang C, Gossage J, Botha A, et al. Assessment and management after corrosive ingestion: when is specialist centre referral needed? A 10-year UK experience. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(8):5753-65. doi:10.1007/s00464-022-09174-1.
  3. Banagozar Mohammadi A, Zaare Nahandi M, Ostadi A, Ghorbani A, Hallaj S. Endoscopic, laboratory, and clinical findings and outcomes of caustic ingestion in adults; a retrospective study. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2022;15(1):59-65.
  4. Kochhar R, Ashat M, Reddy YR, Dhaka N, Manrai M, Sinha SK, et al. Relook endoscopy predicts the development of esophageal and antropyloric stenosis better than immediate endoscopy in patients with caustic ingestion. Endoscopy. 2017;49(7):643-50. doi:10.1055/s-0043-104857.
  5. Contini S, Scarpignato C. Caustic injury of the upper gastrointestinal tract: a comprehensive review. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(25):3918-30. doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i25.3918.
  6. Riffat F, Cheng A. Pediatric caustic ingestion: 50 consecutive cases and a review of the literature. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:89-94.doi:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00867.x.
  7. Mamede RC, de Mello Filho FV. Ingestion of caustic substances and its complications. Sao Paulo Med J. 2001;119(1):10-5. doi:10.1590/s1516-31802001000100004.
  8. Hollenbach M, Tünnemann J, Struck MF, Feisthammel J, Schlosser T, Schaumburg T, et al. Endoscopic findings and outcome in caustic ingestion of acidic and alkaline agents in adults: a retrospective analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(35):e16729. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000016729.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 22, 2026

Submission Date

November 5, 2025

Acceptance Date

June 26, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 16 Number: 3

APA
Uğur Kantar, F. (2026). Corrosive Substance Ingestion in Adults: Seven-Year Retrospective Analysis of Endoscopic Findings and Complications. Value in Health Sciences, 16(3), 456-464. https://doi.org/10.33631/sabd.1818396
AMA
1.Uğur Kantar F. Corrosive Substance Ingestion in Adults: Seven-Year Retrospective Analysis of Endoscopic Findings and Complications. VHS. 2026;16(3):456-464. doi:10.33631/sabd.1818396
Chicago
Uğur Kantar, Funda. 2026. “Corrosive Substance Ingestion in Adults: Seven-Year Retrospective Analysis of Endoscopic Findings and Complications”. Value in Health Sciences 16 (3): 456-64. https://doi.org/10.33631/sabd.1818396.
EndNote
Uğur Kantar F (September 1, 2026) Corrosive Substance Ingestion in Adults: Seven-Year Retrospective Analysis of Endoscopic Findings and Complications. Value in Health Sciences 16 3 456–464.
IEEE
[1]F. Uğur Kantar, “Corrosive Substance Ingestion in Adults: Seven-Year Retrospective Analysis of Endoscopic Findings and Complications”, VHS, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 456–464, Sept. 2026, doi: 10.33631/sabd.1818396.
ISNAD
Uğur Kantar, Funda. “Corrosive Substance Ingestion in Adults: Seven-Year Retrospective Analysis of Endoscopic Findings and Complications”. Value in Health Sciences 16/3 (September 1, 2026): 456-464. https://doi.org/10.33631/sabd.1818396.
JAMA
1.Uğur Kantar F. Corrosive Substance Ingestion in Adults: Seven-Year Retrospective Analysis of Endoscopic Findings and Complications. VHS. 2026;16:456–464.
MLA
Uğur Kantar, Funda. “Corrosive Substance Ingestion in Adults: Seven-Year Retrospective Analysis of Endoscopic Findings and Complications”. Value in Health Sciences, vol. 16, no. 3, Sept. 2026, pp. 456-64, doi:10.33631/sabd.1818396.
Vancouver
1.Funda Uğur Kantar. Corrosive Substance Ingestion in Adults: Seven-Year Retrospective Analysis of Endoscopic Findings and Complications. VHS. 2026 Sep. 1;16(3):456-64. doi:10.33631/sabd.1818396