Traditional Medicinal Plants Used in Dermatologic Disorders in Ardahan, Iğdır and Kars

Year 2022, , 1142 - 1158, 31.12.2022

Songül Karakaya , Zehra Kımışoğlu , Serdar Volkan Yılmaz , Özkan Aksakal , Yusuf Ziya Sümbüllü , Ümit İncekara , Ahmet Polat

https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1133853

Abstract

Ethnobotany is briefly defined as a"human-plant relationship". Mankind has used plants as a food source since ancient times, resorted to healing and accumulated their experiences. About 12.000 plant species grow in Turkey. The World Health Organization (WHO) has determined the number of herbal medicines as approximately 1900 and it has been determined that approximately 20,000 plants are grown in Turkey, 600 of which are used for therapeutic purposes. This investigation was conducted to document the species, family, and local names, usage types and localities of medicinal plants utilized by people living in and around Ardahan, Iğdır and Kars provinces between 2020-2021 for dermatologic disorders. To that end, medicinal plant species utilized by the local mankind for therapeutic aims were collected and detected. The visitations were organised to the investigation regions at regular intervals, and survey investigations were realized by interviewing and talking with the local people one-on-one. 82 medicinal plant taxa belonging to 31 plant families utilized in dermatologic disorders were collected from Ardahan, Iğdır and Kars provinces and their surroundings. Of these, 68 species are wild and 14 are cultivated plants. It has been reported that the most commonly utilized medicinal plant families in dermatologic disorders are Asteraceae (12), Scrophulariaceae (7), Boraginaceae (5), Fabaceae (5), and Salicaceae (5). As a conclusion, despite the deep-rooted history in such regions, the transmission and use of traditional knowledge have remained limited.

Keywords

Ardahan, Iğdır, Kars, Dermatologic.

Supporting Institution

T.C. Tarim ve Orman Bakanliği Doğa Koruma Ve Milli Parklar 13. Bölge Müdürlüğü Ardahan Şube Müdürlüğü’ne, 13. Bölge Müdürlüğü Iğdir Şube Müdürlüğü’ne ve 13. Bölge Müdürlüğü Kars Şube Müdürlüğü’ne

Project Number

2020/134501

Thanks

We would like to thank the “Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks, 13. Regional Directorate Ardahan Branch Office, 13. Regional Directorate Iğdır Branch Office and 13. Regional Directorate Kars Branch Office.” for supporting the project “Kars-Ardahan-Iğdır İl Şube Müdürlüklerinin Sınırları İçerisinde Bulunan Köylerde Biyolojik Çeşitliliğe Dayalı Geleneksel Bilginin Kayıt Altına Alınması”

References

• [1] H. Akan, M. M. Korkut, M. M. Balos, “Arat Dağı ve Çevresinde (Birecik, Şanlıurfa) Etnobotanik Bir Araştırma.,”. Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 67-81, 2008.
• [2] U. R. Inayat, A. Aftab, I. Zafar, I. Farhana, A. Niaz, S. Muzammil, U. Sana, W. B. Rainer, “Historical perspectives of ethnobotany.,”. Clinics in Dermatology, vol. 37, pp. 382-388, 2019.
• [3] M. Heinrich, “Ethnobotany and its Role in Drug Development.,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 14, pp. 479–488, 2000.
• [4] H. Akan, Y. B. Sade, “Kâhta (Adıyaman) Merkezi ve Narince Köyü’nün Etnobotanik Açıdan Araştırılması.,” Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol 4, no. 2, pp. 219-248, 2015.
• [5] G. Akgül, “Çıldır (Ardahan) ve çevresinde bulunan bazı doğal bitkilerin yerel adları ve etnobotanik özellikleri.,” OT Sistematik Botanik Dergisi, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 5-88, 2008.
• [6] Z. Kadıoğlu, K. Çukadar, A. Kandemir, N. N. Kalkan, H. Vurgun, V. Dönderalp, “Kars İlinde Sebze Olarak Tüketilen Yabani Bitki Türlerinin Tespiti ve Kullanım Şekilleri.,” Anadolu Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 11-32, 2020.
• [7] E. Acıöz, G. Gökdemir, A. Köşlü, “Dermatolojide Yaşam Kalitesi.,” Turkish Archives of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 16-23. 2003.
• [8] G. T. Demirci, İ. Altunay, A. Küçükünal, E. Mertoğlu, S. Sarıkaya, G. Atış, B. Ateş, “Complementary and Alternative Medicine Usage in Skin Diseases and the Positive and Negative Impacts on Patients.,” Türk Dermatoloji Dergisi, vol. 6, pp. 150-154, 2012.
• [9] O. Coşkun, “Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi'nde Kentleşme ve Kentsel Gelişim.,” Eastern Geographical Review, vol. 30, pp. 239-256, 2013.
• [10] E. Sezik, E. Yeşilada, M. Tabata, G. Honda, T. Yoshihisa, F. Tetsuro, T. Toshihiro, T. Yoshio, “Traditional Medicine in Turkey Vııı. Folk Medicine in East Anatolia; Erzurum, Erzincan, Ağrı, Kars, Iğdır Provinces.,” Economic Botany, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 195-211, 1997.
• [11] F. Özgokçe, H. Ozelik, “Ethnobotanical Aspects of Some Taxa in East Anatolia.,” Economic Botany, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 697-704, 2004.
• [12] E. Altundağ, “Iğdır İlinin (Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi) Doğal Bitkilerinin Halk Tarafından Kullanımı.,” PhD, İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi. 2009.
• [13] [N. Özhatay, F. Güneş, “An Ethnobotanical Study From Kars (Eastern) Turkey.,” Biological Diversity and Conservation, vol. 4, pp. 30-41, 2011.
• [14] A, Baysal, “Doğu Anadolu Arkeolojisinde Göçebelik Ve Yaylacilik Kültürü (M.Ö. Ii. Bin): Veriler Işığında Yeni Düşünceler.,” U.Ü. Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 13, pp. 255-268, 2012.
• [15] M. Çelik, İ. Kopar, H. Bayram, “Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nin Mevsimlik Kuraklık Analizi.,” Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Eylül, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1741-1761. 2018.
• [16] R. Polat, U. Çakılcıoğlu, F. Ertuğ, F. Satıl, “An evaluation of ethnobotanical studies in Eastern Anatolia.,” Biological Diversity and Conservation, vol. 5, pp. 23-40, 2012.
• [17] M. Ozturk, E. Altundağ, S. J. Ibadullayeva, V. Altay, B. Aslanipour, “A comparative analysis of medicinal and aromatic plants used in the traditional medicine of Iğdır (Turkey), Nakhchivan (Azerbaijan), and Tabriz (Iran).,” Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol, 50, no. 1, pp. 337-343, 2018.