Finite Element Modeling of RC Beams Produced with Low-Strength Concrete and Strengthened for Bending and Shear with CFRP and GFRP

Year 2024, , 1326 - 1341, 31.12.2024

Yusuf Sümer , Ali Sarıbıyık , Wael Mansur Hussien Aldhabir

https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1469172

Abstract

In this study, the analysis of reinforced concrete (RC) beams strengthened with Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composites against bending and shear loads was carried out with the finite element technique, using ABAQUS software, which is widely used in simulating experimental circumstances in numerical studies. It has been reported that buildings in areas damaged by earthquakes are generally constructed using low-strength concrete and inadequate reinforcement. Additionally, construction errors also contribute to reducing the load-bearing capacity of structural elements. For this purpose, nine rectangular cross-section RC beams were experimentally constructed using low-strength concrete and inadequate bending and shear reinforcement. These beams were strengthened by wrapping them in different configurations with Carbon and Glass FRP (CFRP and GFRP) composites to resist shear and bending forces in both transverse and longitudinal directions, and their load-displacement curves were obtained. Subsequently, a three-dimensional Finite Element Model (FEM) was created to validate the experimental results. The FEM validation demonstrated high accuracy in replicating experimental outcomes, emphasizing the influence of mesh size, dilation angle, and concrete constitutive models on simulation fidelity. Parametric studies revealed that increasing longitudinal reinforcement diameters had minimal effect on load capacity but highlighted the critical role of transverse reinforcement, as reducing stirrup spacing significantly improved load-bearing capacity. GFRP-reinforced beams exhibited superior ductility and a 15% higher strength compared to CFRP, suggesting their suitability for applications demanding enhanced displacement capacity. Furthermore, the findings underline the need for refined FEM models to better capture inclined fiber orientations and optimize structural reinforcement strategies.

Keywords

Reinforced concrete beam, Strengthening, Finite element model, CFRP, GFRP

References

• N. Caglar, I. Vural, O. Kirtel, A. Saribiyik, Y. Sümer, “Structural damages observed in buildings after the 24 January 2020 Elazığ-Sivrice earthquake in Türkiye,” Case Studies in Constrtruction Materials, 2023.
• A. Doğangün, B. Yön, O. Onat, M. E. Öncü, S, Sağıroğlu, “Seismicity of east Anatolian of Turkey and failures of infill walls induced by major earthquakes,” Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 2021.
• B. Yön, “Identification of failure mechanisms in existing unreinforced masonry buildings in rural areas after April 4, 2019 earthquake in Turkey,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 43, 2021.
• B. Yön, O. Onat, M. E. Oncü, “Earthquake damage to nonstructural elements of reinforced concrete buildings during 2011 Van Seismic sequence,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 33, no. 6, 2019.
• B. Yön, E. Sayin, O. Onat, “Earthquakes and structural damages,” Earthquakes- Tectonics, Hazard and Risk Mitigation, 2017.
• A. Doǧangün, “Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the May 1, 2003 Bingöl Earthquake in Turkey,” Engineering Structures, vol. 26, no. 6, 2004, pp. 841–856.
• Y. T. Obaidat, S. Heyden, O. Dahlblom, G. Abu-Farsakh, Y. Abdel-Jawad, “Retrofitting of reinforced concrete beams using composite laminates,” Construction and Building Materials, 25(2), 591-597, 2011.
• I. A. Sharaky, L. Torres, J. Comas, C. Barris, “Flexural response of reinforced concrete (RC) beams strengthened with near surface mounted (NSM) fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) bars,” Composite Structures, 109, 8-22, 2014.
• S. S. Choobbor, R. A. Hawileh, A. Abu-Obeidah, J. A. Abdalla, “Performance of hybrid carbon and basalt FRP sheets in strengthening concrete beams in flexure,” Composite Structures, 227, 111337, 2019.
• S. U. Miakhil, W. U. Shakir, G. Singh, “Retrofitting of Reinforced Concrete beams using CFRP Sheets: A Review,” Strain, 70, 90, 2020.
• M. Panahi, S. A. Zareei, A. Izadi, “Flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams through externally bonded FRP sheets and near surface mounted FRP bars,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15, e00601, 2021.
• R. Al-Shamayleh, H. Al-Saoud, M. Alqam, “Shear and flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams with variable compressive strength values using externally bonded carbon fiber plates,” Results in Engineering, 14, 100427, 2022.
• C. Aksoylu, “Shear strengthening of reinforced concrete beams with minimum CFRP and GFRP strips using different wrapping technics without anchoring application,” Steel and Composite Structures, An International Journal, 44(6), 845-865, 2022.
• M. E. Uz, Y. Guner, E. Avci, “Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams via CFRP Orientation,” Buildings, 14(1), 82, 2023.
• O. A. Mohamed, M. A. Kewalramani, A. M. Imran, “Shear and flexure of FRP-reinforced concrete beams and slabs–A review, Materials Today: Proceedings,” 2023.
• K. Sengun, G. Arslan, “Performance of RC beams strengthened in flexure and shear with CFRP and GFRP,” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 48(1), 117-130, 2024.
• N. Mejía, A. Sarango, A. Espinosa, “Flexural and shear strengthening of RC beams reinforced with externally bonded CFRP laminates postfire exposure by experimental and analytical investigations,” Engineering Structures, 308, 117995, 2024.
• J. Cui, G. Xing, P. Miao, Y. Zhang, Z. Chang, A. Q. Khan, “Flexural behavior of RC beams strengthened with BFRP bars and CFRP U-jackets: Experimental and numerical analysis,” Journal of Building Engineering, 97, 110932, 2024.
• A. Sarıbıyık, “Beton Dayanımı Düşük Betonarme Yapı Elemanlarının Lifli Kompozitlerle Güçlendirilmesi Ve Karşılaştırılması,” Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2013.
• C. Escrig, L. Gil, E. Bernat-Maso, F. Puigvert, “Experimental and analytical study of reinforced concrete beams shear strengthened with different types of textile-reinforced mortar,” Construction and building materials, 83, 248-260, 2015.
• A. Siddika, M. A. Al-Mamun, R. Alyousef, Y. M. Amran, “Strengthening of reinforced concrete beams by using fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A review,” Journal of Building Engineering, 25, 100798, 2019.
• Y. M. Alharthi, M. Emara, A. S. Elamary, I. A. Sharaky, “Flexural response and load capacity of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with reinforced mortar layer,” Engineering Structures, 245, 112884, 2021.
• Y. J. Xue, W. W. Wang, Z. H. Wu, S. Hu, J. Tian, “Experimental study on flexural behavior of RC beams strengthened with FRP/SMA composites,” Engineering Structures, 289, 116288, 2023.
• A. Chole, A. Tembhurne, A. Bawanthade, H. Bhadade, H. A. Khan, S. K. Shaw, “Strengthening of reinforced concrete beams by using FRPs-An overview,” Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023.
• O. H. Hussein, A. M. Ibrahim, S. M. Abd, H. M. Najm, S. Shamim & M. M. S. Sabri, “Hybrid Effect of Steel Bars and PAN Textile Reinforcement on Ductility of One-Way Slab Subjected to Bending,” Molecules, 27(16), 5208, 2022.
• S. M. Abd, R. Hadi, S. Abdal, S. Shamim, H. M. Najm, M. M. S. Sabri, “Effect of Using Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) and Deformed Steel Bars on the Bonding Behavior of Lightweight Foamed Concrete,” Buildings, 13(5), 1153, 2023.
• M. Aktas, Y. Sumer, “Nonlinear finite element analysis of damaged and strengthened reinforced concrete beams,” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(2), 201-210, 2014.
• Y. Sümer, M. Aktaş, “Finite element modeling of existing cracks on pre-loaded reinforced concrete beams,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 39, 2611-2619, 2014.
• A. Demir, N. Caglar, H. Ozturk, Y. Sumer, “Nonlinear finite element study on the improvement of shear capacity in reinforced concrete T-Section beams by an alternative diagonal shear reinforcement,” Engineering Structures, vol. 120, pp. 158–165, 2016.
• Y. B. A. Tahnat, M. M. Dwaikat, M. A. Samaaneh, “Effect of using CFRP wraps on the strength and ductility behaviors of exterior reinforced concrete joint,” Composite Structures, 201, 721-739, 2018.
• V. V. Cao, H. R. Ronagh, “A model for damage analysis of concrete,” Advances in concrete construction, 1(2), 187, 2013.
• S. M. Varghese, K. Kamath, S. R. Salim, “Effect of concrete strength and tensile steel reinforcement on RC beams externally bonded with fiber reinforced polymer composites: A finite element study,” Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023.
• Abaqus/CAE, User’s Guide, V7.0, (2020). Programme, Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp. Providence, RI, USA.
• J. Lublineri, J. Oliver, S. Oller, E. Oñate, “A plasticdamage model for concrete,” International Journal of Solids and Structures 25(3): 299–326, 1989.
• Y. Sumer, M. Aktas, “Defining parameters for concrete damage plasticity model,” Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 1(3), 149–155, 2015.
• Abaqus/CAE, Theory Manual, V7.0, (2020). Programme, Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp. Providence, RI, USA.
• A. Zangeneh Kamali, “Shear strength of reinforced concrete beams subjected to blast loading: Non-linear dynamic analysis,” 2012.
• G. P. Balomenos, A. S. Genikomsou, M. A. Polak, M. D. Pandey, “Efficient Method for Probabilistic Finite Element Analysis with Application to Reinforced Concrete Slabs,” Engineering Structures, Vol. 103, 85–101, 2015.
• Comité Euro-Internacional Du Béton (2010). Ceb-Fib Model Code 2010, London.
• V. V. Cao, and H. R. Ronagh, “A model for damage analysis of concrete,” Advances in Concrete Construction, 1(2), 187-200, 2013.
• Türkiye Building Earthquake Code, (in Turkish), Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, 2018.
• R. Malm, “Predicting Shear Type Cracks Initiation and Growth in Concrete with Nonlinear Finite Elements Methods”, PhD thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Division of Structural Design and Bridges, Stockholm, Sweden. 2009.
• C. A. Coronado, M. M. Lopez, “Sensitivity analysis of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with FRP laminates,” Cement and Concrete Composites, 28(1), 102-114, 2006.