Numerical Analysis of the Lamb Metacarpal Bone: Approximation of Bending Tests

Year 2018, , 1253 - 1259, 01.10.2018

İbrahim Kutay Yılmazçoban

https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.333519

Abstract

In the development of new
strategies for fracture fixation, new methods have to be tested biomechanically
under in vitro conditions before clinical trials can be performed. Several
recent developments, including tensile, compressive, and bending tests fresh
whole bone specimens, offer the possibility to understand animal bones
mechanical behavior. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to determine
the effects of three point bending tests on the lamb metacarpal bones at
different speeds and determine the mechanical properties of bone and to compare
these properties with the finite element analysis of the tests. 12 specimens
were obtained from 1 year old Ankara curly lambs. Three point bending tests
were conducted using three different compression speeds to assess and compare
bone fracture properties. From the test results bending moments, stresses,
strains and deformations were calculated for three different compression
speeds. Finite Element Analysis results were compared to the test results.
Because of the use fresh bone specimens of an animal part are used like in vivo
tests in biomechanical studies, investigating failure loads of the metacarpus
by bending tests and numerical analysis are guiding for clinical operations and
computer simulations.

Keywords

Finite element analysis, bending test, lamb metacarpal bone, biomechanics

References

• [1] D. Vashishth, “Small animal bone biomechanics,” Bone, vol. 43, pp. 794-797, 2008.
• [2] U. Stefan, B. Michael, S. Werner, “Effects of three different preservation methods on the mechanical properties of human and bovine cortical bone,” Bone, vol. 47, pp. 1048-1053, 2010.
• [3] ED. Sedlin, “A rheologicmodel for cortical bone. A study of the physical properties of human femoral samples,” Acta Orthop Scand Suppl, vol. 83, pp. 1–77, 1965.
• [4] ED. Sedlin, C. Hirsch, “Factors affecting the determination of the physical properties of femoral cortical bone,” Acta Orthop Scand, vol. 37, pp. 29–48, 1966.
• [5] GF. Evans, “Mechanical Properties of Bone,” Charles C. Thomas Springfield, IL, USA, 1973.
• [6] F. Linde, HC. Sorensen, “The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone,” J Biomech, vol. 26, pp. 1249–52, 1993.
• [7] M.M. Panjabi, M. Krag, D. Summers, T. Videman, “Biomechanical time-tolerance of fresh cadaveric human spine specimens,” J Orthop Res, vol. 3, pp. 292–300, 1985.
• [8] C. Ohman, E. Dall'Ara, M. Baleani, S. Van Sint Jan, M. Viceconti, “The effects of embalming using a 4% formalin solution on the compressive mechanical properties of human cortical bone,” Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), vol. 23, pp. 1294–8, 2008.
• [9] J.L. Schriefer, A.G. Robling, S.J. Warden, A.J. Fournier, J.J. Mason, CH. Turner, “A comparison of mechanical properties derived from multiple skeletal sites in mice,” J Biomech, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 467–75, 2005.
• [10] R. Jungmann, M.E. Szabo, G. Schitter, Raymond Yue-Sing Tang, D. Vashishth, P.K. Hansma, PJ. Thurner, “Local strain and damage mapping in single trabeculae during three-point bending tests,” Journal of The Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials,” vol. 4, pp. 523-534, 2011.
• [11] P.J. Thurner, B. Erickson, R. Jungmann, Z. Schriock, J.C. Weaver, G.E. Fantner, G. Schitter, D.E. Morse, P.K. Hansma, “High-speed photography of compressed human trabecular bone correlates whitening to microscopic damage,” Eng. Fract. Mech, vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 1928–1941, 2007.
• [12] C. Kokoroghiannis, I. Charopoulos, G. Lyritis, P. Raptou, T. Karachalios, N. Papaioannou, “Correlation of pQCT bone strength index with mechanical testing in distraction osteogenesis,” Bone, vol. 45, pp. 512-516, 2009.
• [13] B. Borah, G.J. Gross, T.E. Dufresne, T.S. Smith, M.D. Cockman, P.A. Chmielewski, M.W. Lundy, J.R. Hartke, E.W. Sod, “Three-dimensional microimaging (MRmicroI and microCT), finite element modeling, and rapid prototyping provide unique insights into bone architecture in osteoporosis,” Anat. Rec, vol. 265, no. 2, pp. 101–110, 2001.
• [14] B. van Rietbergen, “Micro-FE analyses of bone: state of the art,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol, vol. 496, pp. 21–30, 2001.
• [15] B. van Rietbergen, S. Majumdar, D. Newitt, B. MacDonald, “High-resolution MRI and micro-FE for the evaluation of changes in bone mechanical properties during longitudinal clinical trials: application to calcaneal bone in postmenopausal women after one year of idoxifene treatment,” Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon), vol. 17, no 2, pp. 81–88, 2002.
• [16] R. Muller, G.H. van Lenthe, “Trabecular bone failure at the microstructural level,” Curr. Osteoporos. Rep, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 80–86, 2006.
• [17] Z. Li, M.W. Kindig, J.R. Kerrigan, C.D. Untaroiu, D. Subit, J.R. Crandall, R.W. Kent, “Rib fractures under anterior–posterior dynamic loads: Experimental and finite-element study,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 43, pp. 228-234, 2010.
• [18] J.M. Cormier, J.D. Stitzel, S.M. Duma, F. Matsuoka, “Regional variation in the structural response and geometrical properties of human ribs,” Proceedings of Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, vol. 9, pp. 153–170, 2005.
• [19] G. Granik, I. Stein, “Human ribs: static testing as a promising medical application,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 6, pp. 237–240, 1973.
• [20] A.R. Kemper, C. McNally, E.A. Kennedy, S.J. Manoogian, A.L. Rath, T.P. Ng, J.D. Stitzel, E.P. Smith, S.M. Duma, “Material properties of human rib cortical bone from dynamic tension coupon testing,” Stapp Car Crash Journal, vol. 49, pp. 199–230, 2005.
• [21] A.R. Kemper, C. McNally, C.A. Pullins, L.J. Freeman, S. Duma, “The biomechanics of human ribs: material and structural properties from dynamic tension and bending tests,” Stapp Car Crash Journal, vol. 51, pp. 235–273, 2007.
• [22] D.R. Schultz, A.B. Benson, C. Hirsch, “Force-deformation properties of human ribs,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 7, pp. 303–309, 1974.
• [23] I.D. Stein, G. Granik, “Rib structure and bending strength: an autopsy study,” Calcified Tissue Research, vol. 20, pp. 61–73, 1976.
• [24] J.D. Stitzel, J.M. Cormier, J.T. Barretta, E.A. Kennedy, E.P. Smith, A.L. Rath, S.M. Duma, F. Matsuoka, “Defining regional variation in the material properties of human rib cortical bone and its effect on fracture prediction,” Stapp Car Crash Journal, vol. 47, pp. 243–265, 2003.
• [25] N. Yoganandan, F.A. Pintar, “Biomechanics of human thoracic ribs,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 120, pp. 100–104, 1998.
• [26] J.W. Farah, R.G. Craig, K.A. Meroueh, “Finite element analysis of three- and four-unit bridges,” J. Oral. Rehabil, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 603–611, 1989.