Modeling and Evaluation of Ömerli Basin (Mardin, Southeastern Türkiye) Groundwater Potential using the GIS-Based Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach

Year 2024, Volume: 28 Issue: 1, 117 - 132, 29.02.2024

Veysel Aslan

https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1189618

Abstract

Water, which is an indispensable element of human life, is also a basic need for living things and nature. Groundwater, which is the world's freshwater source, has low-cost usage opportunities because it is generally of high quality and does not need to be treated. For this reason, there has been an excessive increase in the use of groundwater in recent years due to the low rainfall and limited surface waters. Accordingly, in recent years, the lack of precipitation and the decrease in surface water potential have led to an excessive increase in groundwater use. Nowadays, technology, which is called the information age and finds its place in almost all professional applications, supports practitioners in terms of time, effort, and cost. Among these technological studies, Geographic Information System (GIS) applications are one of the most popular fields of study (detection and monitoring of groundwater resources and application of thematic maps with spatial analysis). The AHP technique, one of the GIS-supported MCDM methods, was used to reveal the groundwater potential of the Ömerli district basin of Mardin province. First of all, raster maps were created in the GIS program ArcGIS ArcMap environment, and then reclassified maps were produced. These data regarding the basin study were obtained from official institutions and private drilling companies that work on groundwater. In the first stage of the study, data related to groundwater potential such as precipitation, static water level, dynamic water level, well yield, depth, and aspect were modeled. In the second stage, these data were weighted in AHP and the resulting map was created and interpreted; It was created and interpreted with very bad, bad, moderate, good and very good values. In the third and last stage, the results and recommendations were discussed.

Keywords

AHP Method One, GIS Two, Groundwater Three, MCDM ethod Four

References

• [1] (GDM). General Directorate of Meteorology, “Annual Total Area Precipitation Data”, 2017.
• [2] D. Yang, Y. Yang, J. Xia, “Hydrological cycle and water resources in a changing world: A review”. Geography and Sustainability, vol. 2, no. 2, 115-122, 2021.
• [3] M. Özdoğan, A. O. Üstündağ and H. Demirel, “Evaluation of Aydın Province Groundwater in terms of Drinking Water Quality for Livestock”. Adnan Menderes University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, vol. 13, no. 2, 113-122, 2016.
• [4] C. H. Chang, “Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function”. European journal of operational research, vol. 96, no. 2, 343-350 1997.
• [5] O. Rahmati, A. Nazari Samani, M. Mahdavi, H. R. Pourghasemi, H. Zeinivand, “Groundwater potential mapping at Kurdistan region of Iran using analytic hierarchy process and GIS”. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol. 8, no. 9, 7059-7071, 2015.
• [6] S. Çalışır, “Promotional Facilities in Irrigation”. Chapter 14. Agricultural Machinery Book Editor: Gazanfer ERGUNES, Nobel Publication Distribution, 2009.
• [7] N. Orhan, “Determination of critical immersion depth in submersible pumps”, 2018.
• [8] H. Schulz, “The Pumps: How They Work, Calculation, Construction”. Springer-Verlag, 2013.
• [9] T. Melese, T. Belay, “Groundwater potential zone mapping using analytical hierarchy process and GIS in Muga Watershed”, Abay Basin, Ethiopia. Global Challenges, vol. 6, no.1, 2100068, 2022.
• [10] C. Mercan, S. Arpag, “Evaluation of Soil and Land Characteristics Using Geographic Information System Analysis”: Türkiye, Mardin Province Land. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research Magazine, vol. 7, no. 1, 23-33, 2020.
• [11] R. Çelik, "Investigation of groundwater potential in Diyarbakır's historical sur region". Dicle University Faculty of Engineering Engineering Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, 319-326, 2017.
• [12] T. Kaya, C. Kahraman, “An integrated fuzzy AHP–ELECTRE methodology for environmental impact assessment”. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 7, 8553-8562, 2011.
• [13] O. Günhan, “An Appropriate Methodology Study for the Evaluation of Groundwater Quality”. TR Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs Specialization Thesis, 113, 2014.
• [14] F. Yıldırım, E. Önder, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods”, Dora Publishing, Istanbul, 2014.
• [15] E. H. Forman, M.A. Selly, “Decision by Objectives: How to Convince Others That You Are Right”, World Scientific, 2001.
• [16] K. C. Chejarla, O. S. Vaidya, S. Kumar, “MCDM applications in logistics performance evaluation: A literature review”. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 29, no. 3-4, 274-297, 2022,
• [17] T. L. Saaty, L. G. Vargas, H. J. Zoffer, “A structured scientific solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: the analytic hierarchy process approach”. Decision Analytics, vol. 2, no. 1, 1-53, 2015.
• [18] M. Timor, “Analytical Hierarchy Process, Turkmen Bookstore”, ISBN: 9786054259502, 2011.
• [19] V Aslan, R. Çelik, “Integrated gis-based multi-criteria analysis for groundwater potential mapping in the euphrates’s sub-basin, harran basin, Türkiye”. Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 13, 7375, 2021.
• [20] O. S. Vaidya, S. Kumar, “Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications”. European Journal of operational research, vol. 169, no. 1,1-29, 2006.
• [21] V. Aslan, M. Y. Sepetçioğlu, “Modeling Of Groundwater Potential And Quality Of Harran Plain ByGis Supported Ahp And Topsis Methods”. Turkish Hydraulic Magazine, vol. 6, no. 1, 31-41, 2022.
• [22] A. Öner, F. Ülengin, “AHP approach to weapon selection”. Military Academy, 1st Systems Engineering and Defense Applications Symposium, Proceedings-II, 1109, 1122. 1995.
• [23] M. Zeinolabedini, A. Esmaeily, “Groundwater potential assessment using geographic information systems and AHP method (Case study: Baft city, Kerman, Iran)”. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 40, 769-774. 2015.
• [24] M. Kavurmacı, A. Üstün, “Evaluation of water quality using multi-criteria decision analysis and Geographic Information System (GIS)”. KSU Journal of Natural Sciences, vol. 19, no. 2, 208-220, 2016.
• [25] H. F. Yeh, Y. S. Cheng, H. I. Lin, C. H. Lee, “Mapping groundwater recharge potential zone using a GIS approach in Hualian River”, Taiwan. Sustainable Environment Research, vol. 26, no. 1, 33-43, 2016.
• [26] M. J. Nasır, S. Khan, H. Zahid, A. Khan, “Delineation of groundwater potential zones using GIS and multi influence factor (MIF) techniques: a study of district Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan”. Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 77, 1-11, 2018.
• [27] Ö. Arif, M., O. Dengiz, M. Sağlam, A. Erkoçak, F. Türkmen, “Mapping and assessment-based modeling of soil fertility differences in the central and eastern parts of the Black Sea region using GIS and geostatistical approaches”. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol. 10, 1-9, 2017.