Information for Reviewers

  • Reviewers should agree to evaluate articles related to their field of expertise.
  • Reviewers should refuse to evaluate the article that they think is a conflict of interest, and inform the Editorial Board.
  • Reviewers should make the evaluation objectively in order to contribute to the editor's decision-making process, provide guidance that will help to increase the quality of the article to be published, and carry out this process confidentially.
  • Reviewers should make their evaluations away from personal comments, in accordance with academic rules and with a constructive language.
  • Reviewers should convey their correction suggestions stated on the evaluation form and / or the text to the Editorial Board through the journal management system to be forwarded to the author (s).
  • Reviewers should evaluate the article within the given time.
  • The issues that the reviewers should pay attention while uploading the Reviewer Reports to the DergiPark system are as follows;
    o The name of the reviewer should not appear in the detailed note you wrote to the editor or author.
    o You should open a "Description" box on the article text and write your comments and corrections.
    o In order for the process between the reviewers and the author(s) to be maintained with double-blind by keeping the identity information confidential,  the name of the reviewer should not appear in the "Description" boxes you open on the article text.

Last Update Time: 2/14/21, 4:55:33 PM

University of Health Sciences Journal of Nursing’s content is licensed under a Creative Commons Lisansı Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.