Investigation of Environmental-friendly Technology for a Paint Industry Wastewater Plant in Turkey

Pelin Yapıcıoğlu

doi:10.19113/sdufbed.22148

Investigation of Environmental-friendly Technology for a Paint Industry Wastewater Plant in Turkey

Abstract

Paint manufacturing process has several unfavorable aspects to the environment in Turkey. One of these impacts is wastewater treatment. Paint wastewater contains huge amounts of toxic chemical substances, bio refractory compounds, pigments and microorganisms. So, advanced treatment requirement is available to dispose of colour, microorganisms and chemical oxygen demand (COD). The high organic content of wastewater causes serious environmental challenges and contamination for the living organisms and the ecosystem in the receiver media unless it is treated adequately. In this context, the treatment process to be implemented should be preferred in such a way as to give the least damage to the environment. In this study, three treatment scenarios that contain electrocoagulation (Scenario-1), Fenton process (Scenario-2) and membrane distillation (Scenario-3) have been created for wastewater treatment facility of a paint industry in Turkey. For three scenarios, environmental impact assessment has been carried out with Fine-Kinney method. It is aimed to choose best environmental technology before investment. The evaluation results revealed that Scenario-2 has the less environmental impacts that total impact value is 556. Scenario-1 has the highest total impact value as 756, relatively. Total impact value related to Scenario-3 is 637. According to the evaluation results, Fenton process is the best environmental-friendly treatment technology for wastewater treatment of a paint industry in Turkey.

Keywords

Environmental impact,Paint wastewater; Electrocoagulation; Fenton process; Membrane distillation

References

[1] Yao, J., Wen D, et al. 2016. Zero Discharge Process for Dyeing Wastewater Treatment. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 11 (2016), 98-103.
[2] Lotito, A.M., De S.M., et al. 2014. Textile Wastewater Treatment: Aerobic Granular Sludge vs Activated Sludge Systems. Water Research, 54 (2014), 337–346.
[3] Libra, J.A., Borchert, M., et al. 2004. Two Stage Biological Treatment of a Diazo Reactive Textile Dye and the Fate of the Dye Metabolites. Chemosphere, 56(2004), 167–180.
[4] Yang, C., Li, L., et al. 2015. Advanced Treatment of Textile Dyeing Secondary Effluent Using Magnetic Anion Exchange Resin and its Effect Onorganic Fouling in Subsequent RO Membrane. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 284(2015), 50–57.
[5] Akyol, A. 2012. Treatment of Paint Manufacturing Wastewater by Electrocoagulation. Desalination, 285(2012), 91-99.
[6] Zhang, J., Giorno, L., Drioli, E. 2006. Study of a Hybrid Process Combining PACs and Membrane Operations for Antibiotic Wastewater Treatment. Desalination, 194(2006), 101–107.
[7] Akyol, A., Yatmaz, H.C., Bayramoglu, M. 2004. Photocatalytic Decolourization of Remazol Red RR in Aqueous ZnO Suspensions. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 54(2004), 19–24.
[8] Fu, J., Kyzas, G.Z. 2014. Wet Air Oxidation for the Decolorization of Dye Wastewater: An overview of the Last Two Decades. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 35(2014), 1–7.

[9] Wu, H.F., Wang, S.H., Kong, H.L., Liu, T.T., Xia, M.F., 2007. Performance of Combined Process of Anoxic Baffled Reactor Biological Contact Oxidation Treating Printing and Dyeing Wastewater. Bioresource Technology 98 (2007), 1501-1504.
[10] APHA. 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th ed. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, USA.
[11] Toro, J., Requena, I., Duarte, O., Zamorano, M.A. 2013. Qualitative Method Proposal to Improve Environmental Impact Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 43(2013), 9–20.
[12] Wathern, P. 1994. An introductory guide to EIA. In:Wathern, P. (Ed.), Environmental Impact Assessment: Theory and Practice. Biddles Ltd, Guilford and King's Lynn, London, 353 p.
[13] Wood, C.H. 2003. Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, London, 430 p.
[14] Bilgin, A. 2015. Analysis of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive and the EIA decision in Turkey. Environ. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 53(2015), 40-51.
[15] Çakmak, E. 2014. Atölye Tipi Üretim Yapan Sanayi İşletmelerinde İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği, Reseach Thesis, ÇASGEM, Ankara.
[16] Kinney, G.F., Wiruth, A.D. 1976. Practical Risk Analysis for Safety Management, Technical Report 5865, CA: Naval Weapons Center, 27, California, 27 p.
[17] Oturakçı, M., Dağsuyu, C., Kokangül, A. 2015. A New Approach to Fine Kinney Method and an Implementation Study. The Journal of Operations Research, Statistics, Econometrics and Management Information Systems alphanumeric journal, 3 (2015), 83-92.
[18] Krithika, D., Philip, L. 2016. Treatment of Wastewater from Water-based Paint Industries Using Submerged Attached Growth Reactor. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 107 (2016),31-41.
[19] Holt, P.K., Barton, G.W., Mitchell, C.A. 2005. The Future for Electrocoagulation as a Localized Water Treatment Technology. Chemosphere, 59(2005), 355–367.
[20] Kobya, M., Hiz, H. et al. 2006. Treatment of Potato Chips Manufacturing Wastewater by Electrocoagulation. Desalination, 190(2006), 201–211.
[21] Daneshvar, N., Sorkhabi, H.A., Kasiri, M.B. 2004. Decolorization of Dye Solution Containing Acid Red 14 by Electrocoagulation with a Comparative Investigation of Different Electrode Connections. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 112(2004), 55–62.
[22] Vidal, J., Villegas, L. et al. 2016. Removal of Acid Black 194 Dye from Water by Electrocoagulation with Aluminum Anode. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 51(2016), 289–296.
[23] Kobya, M., Demirbas, E., Akyol, A. 2009. Electrochemical Treatment and Operating Cost Analysis of Textile Wastewater Using Sacrificial Iron Electrodes. Water Science and Technology, 60(2009), 2261–2270.
[24] Aoudj, S., Khelifa, A. et al. 2010. Electrocoagulation Process Applied to Wastewater Containing Dyes from Textile Industry. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 49(2010), 1176–1182.
[25] Fajardoa, A.S., Martins, R.C. et al. 2017. Dye Wastewaters Treatment Using Batch and Recirculation Flow Electrocoagulation Systems. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 801(2017), 30–37.
[26] Kılıç, Y.M., Kestioğlu, K. 2008. Investigation of Applicability of Advanced Oxidation Processes for Industrial Wastewater Treatment. Journal of Uludağ University Engineering Faculty, 13(2008), 67-80.
[27] Kurt, U., Avsar, Y., Gonullu, M.T. 2006. Treatability of Water-based Paint Wastewater with Fenton Process in Different Reactor Types. Chemosphere, 64(2006), 1536–1540.
[28] Szpyrkowicz, L., Juzzolino, C., Santosh, N.K. 2001. A Comparative Study on Oxidation of Disperse Dyes by Electrochemical Process, Ozone, Hypochlorite and Fenton Reagent. Water Research, 35(2001), 2129–2136.
[29] Neamtu, M., Yediler, A. et al. 2004. Decolorization of Disperse Red 354 Azo Dye in Water by Several Oxidation Processes—A Comparative Study. Dyes and Pigments, 60(2004), 61–68.
[30] Kang, S.F., Liao, C.H., Hung, H.P. 1999. Peroxidation Treatment of Dye Manufacturing Wastewater in the Presence of Ultraviolet Light and Ferrous Ions. Journal of Hazardous Materials B, 65(1999), 317–333.
[31] An, A.K., Guo, J. 2016. High Flux and Antifouling Properties of Negatively Charged Membrane for Dyeing Wastewater Treatment by Membrane Distillation. Water Research, 103(2016), 362-371.
[32] Dasgupta, J., Sikder, J. et al. 2015. Remediation of Textile Effluents by Membrane Based Treatment Techniques: A state of the Art Review. Journal of Environmental Management, 147(2015), 55-72.
[33] Tang, C., Chen, V. 2002. Nanofiltration of Textile Wastewater for Water Reuse. Desalination, 143(2002),11-20.
[34] Alcaina-Miranda, M.I., Barredo-Damas, S. et al. 2009. Nanofiltration as a Final Step Towards Textile Wastewater Reclamation. Desalination, 240(2009), 290-297.
[35] Aouni, A., Fersi, C. et al. 2012. Reactive Dyes Rejection and Textile Effluent Treatment Study Using Ultrafiltration and Nanofiltration Processes. Desalination, 297(2012), 87-96.
[36] Han, R., Zhang, S. et al. 2009. Treating Sulphur Black Dye Wastewater with Quaternized Poly (phthalazinone ether sulfone ketone) Nanofiltration Membranes. Separation and Purification Technology, 67(2009), 26-30.
[37] Mo, J.H., Lee, Y. et al. 2008. Treatment of Dye Aqueous Solutions Using Nanofiltration Polyamide Composite Membranes for the Dye Wastewater Reuse. Dye Pigment, 76(2008), 429-434.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Pelin Yapıcıoğlu

Publication Date

February 21, 2018

Submission Date

October 13, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 22 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufbed.22148

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA78RA74EN

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Yapıcıoğlu, P. (2018). Investigation of Environmental-friendly Technology for a Paint Industry Wastewater Plant in Turkey. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(1), 98-106. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufbed.22148

AMA

1.Yapıcıoğlu P. Investigation of Environmental-friendly Technology for a Paint Industry Wastewater Plant in Turkey. J. Nat. Appl. Sci. 2018;22(1):98-106. doi:10.19113/sdufbed.22148

Chicago

Yapıcıoğlu, Pelin. 2018. “Investigation of Environmental-Friendly Technology for a Paint Industry Wastewater Plant in Turkey”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 22 (1): 98-106. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufbed.22148.

EndNote

Yapıcıoğlu P (April 1, 2018) Investigation of Environmental-friendly Technology for a Paint Industry Wastewater Plant in Turkey. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 22 1 98–106.

IEEE

[1]P. Yapıcıoğlu, “Investigation of Environmental-friendly Technology for a Paint Industry Wastewater Plant in Turkey”, J. Nat. Appl. Sci., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 98–106, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.19113/sdufbed.22148.

ISNAD

Yapıcıoğlu, Pelin. “Investigation of Environmental-Friendly Technology for a Paint Industry Wastewater Plant in Turkey”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 22/1 (April 1, 2018): 98-106. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufbed.22148.

JAMA

1.Yapıcıoğlu P. Investigation of Environmental-friendly Technology for a Paint Industry Wastewater Plant in Turkey. J. Nat. Appl. Sci. 2018;22:98–106.

MLA

Yapıcıoğlu, Pelin. “Investigation of Environmental-Friendly Technology for a Paint Industry Wastewater Plant in Turkey”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 22, no. 1, Apr. 2018, pp. 98-106, doi:10.19113/sdufbed.22148.

Vancouver

1.Pelin Yapıcıoğlu. Investigation of Environmental-friendly Technology for a Paint Industry Wastewater Plant in Turkey. J. Nat. Appl. Sci. 2018 Apr. 1;22(1):98-106. doi:10.19113/sdufbed.22148

Cited By

Seasonal water footprint assessment for a paint industry wastewater treatment plant

Sakarya University Journal of Science

https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.411137

Prediction of effluent arsenic concentration of wastewater treatment plants using machine learning and kriging-based models

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16916-6

Recent Developments and Emerging Trends in Paint Industry Wastewater Treatment Methods

Applied Sciences

https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010678