BibTex RIS Cite

G-7 Ülkelerinin Yakınsama Deneyimi: 1870-2006

Year 2010, Volume: 15 Issue: 3, 311 - 324, 01.09.2010

Abstract

References

  • Barro, R. J. (1991). “Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2): 407-43.
  • Barro, R. J., Sala-i Martin, X. (1990). “ Economic Growth and Convergence Across the United States”. NBER Working Paper No: 3419.
  • Barro, R. J., Sala-i Martin, X. (1992). “Convergence”. Journal of Political Economy, 100:223-51.
  • Baumol, W. J. (1986). “Productivity Growth, Convergence and Welfare: What the Long-Run Data Show?”. The American Economic Review, 76 (5): 1072-1085.
  • Bentzen, J. (2005). “Testing for cathing-up periods in time series convergence”, Economics Letters, 88: 232-328.
  • Bernard, A. B., Durlauf, S. N. (1996). “Interpreting Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis”, Journal of Econometrics 71: 161-173.
  • DeLong, B. J. (1988). “Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: A Comment”, The American Economic Review, 78 (5): 1138-54.
  • Dowrick, S., Nguyen, D. (1989). “OECD Comperative Economic Growth 1950-85: Catch-Up and Convergence”. The American Economic Review, 79 (5): 11030.
  • Friedman, M. (1992), “Do Old Fallacies Ever Die?”. Journal of Economic Literature, 30: 2129-32.
  • Galor, O. (1996). “Convergence? Inference from Theoretical Models”. Economic Journal, 206: 1056-69.
  • Greasley , D., Oxley, L. (1995). “A Time Series Perspective on Convergence: Australia, UK, and USA since 1870”, Economic Record, 71: 259-270.
  • Greasley , D., Oxley, L. (1997). “Time Series Based Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis: Some Positive Results”, Economics Letters, 56: 143-147.
  • Islam, N. (2003). “What Have We Learnt From The Convergence Debate?”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 17 (3): 309-62.
  • King, R. G., Rebelo, S. T. (1989). “Transitional Dynamics and Economic Growth in the Neoclassical Model”, NBER Working Paper, No: 3185.
  • Mankiw, G. N., Romer, D., Weil, D. (1992) “A Contribution to The Empirics of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 407-37.
  • Nahar, S., Inder, B. (2002). “Testing Convergence in Economic Growth for OECD Countries”. Applied Economics, 34: 2011-2022.
  • Quah, D. (1993). “Galton’s Fallacy and Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95: 427-43.
  • Quah, D. (1996a). “Empirics for Economic Growth and Convergence”, European Economic Review, 40: 1353-75.
  • Quah, D. (1996b). “Convergence Empirics Across Economies”, Journal of Economic Growth, 1: 95-124.
  • Rassekh, F., Panik, J. M., Kolluri, B. R. (2001). “A Test of The Convergence Hypothesis: The OECD Experience, 1950-1990”, International Review of Economics and Finance, 10: 147.
  • Romer, P.M. (1986). “Increasing returns and long-run growth”, The Journal of Political Economy. 94 (5): 1002-1037.
  • Sala-i Martin, X. (1996a). “Regional Cohesion: Evidence and Theories of Regional Growth and Convergence”. European Economic Review, 40: 1325-52.
  • Sala-i Martin, X. (1996b). “The Classical Approach to Convergence Analysis”, Economic Journal, 106: 1019-36.
  • Sala-i Martin, X. (2002). “15 Years of New Growth Economics: What Have We Learnt?”. Central Bank of Chile, Working Papers, No: 172.
  • Solow, R. M. (1956). “A contribution to the theory of growth”, Quartely Journal of Economics, 70(1): 65-94.
  • Ta-i Leung, T., Hinich, M. J., Khim-Sen Liew, V., Lim, K. (2008). “Time Series Test of Nonlinear Convergence and Transitional Dynamics”, Economics Letters, 100: 337-339. 27. www.ggdc.net

G-7 ÜLKELERİNİN YAKINSAMA DENEYİMİ: 1870-2006

Year 2010, Volume: 15 Issue: 3, 311 - 324, 01.09.2010

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, G-7 ülkelerinin 1870-2006 dönemindeki yakınsama deneyimi ele alınmaktadır. Analizde önce 1870-2006 aralığı, ardından da 1870-1945 ve 1946-2006 aralıkları incelenmektedir. Zaman serisi metodolojisine dayalı standart ADF birim kök testi ve ele alınan serilerde birim kökün varlığı halinde bile yakınsamaya izin veren Nahar-Inder testi, G7 örnekleminin yakınsama deneyimini test etmek için kullanılmaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular, Nahar-Inder testinin ADF birim kök testine göre daha güçlü yakınsama sonucu verdiğini göstermektedir

References

  • Barro, R. J. (1991). “Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2): 407-43.
  • Barro, R. J., Sala-i Martin, X. (1990). “ Economic Growth and Convergence Across the United States”. NBER Working Paper No: 3419.
  • Barro, R. J., Sala-i Martin, X. (1992). “Convergence”. Journal of Political Economy, 100:223-51.
  • Baumol, W. J. (1986). “Productivity Growth, Convergence and Welfare: What the Long-Run Data Show?”. The American Economic Review, 76 (5): 1072-1085.
  • Bentzen, J. (2005). “Testing for cathing-up periods in time series convergence”, Economics Letters, 88: 232-328.
  • Bernard, A. B., Durlauf, S. N. (1996). “Interpreting Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis”, Journal of Econometrics 71: 161-173.
  • DeLong, B. J. (1988). “Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: A Comment”, The American Economic Review, 78 (5): 1138-54.
  • Dowrick, S., Nguyen, D. (1989). “OECD Comperative Economic Growth 1950-85: Catch-Up and Convergence”. The American Economic Review, 79 (5): 11030.
  • Friedman, M. (1992), “Do Old Fallacies Ever Die?”. Journal of Economic Literature, 30: 2129-32.
  • Galor, O. (1996). “Convergence? Inference from Theoretical Models”. Economic Journal, 206: 1056-69.
  • Greasley , D., Oxley, L. (1995). “A Time Series Perspective on Convergence: Australia, UK, and USA since 1870”, Economic Record, 71: 259-270.
  • Greasley , D., Oxley, L. (1997). “Time Series Based Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis: Some Positive Results”, Economics Letters, 56: 143-147.
  • Islam, N. (2003). “What Have We Learnt From The Convergence Debate?”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 17 (3): 309-62.
  • King, R. G., Rebelo, S. T. (1989). “Transitional Dynamics and Economic Growth in the Neoclassical Model”, NBER Working Paper, No: 3185.
  • Mankiw, G. N., Romer, D., Weil, D. (1992) “A Contribution to The Empirics of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 407-37.
  • Nahar, S., Inder, B. (2002). “Testing Convergence in Economic Growth for OECD Countries”. Applied Economics, 34: 2011-2022.
  • Quah, D. (1993). “Galton’s Fallacy and Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95: 427-43.
  • Quah, D. (1996a). “Empirics for Economic Growth and Convergence”, European Economic Review, 40: 1353-75.
  • Quah, D. (1996b). “Convergence Empirics Across Economies”, Journal of Economic Growth, 1: 95-124.
  • Rassekh, F., Panik, J. M., Kolluri, B. R. (2001). “A Test of The Convergence Hypothesis: The OECD Experience, 1950-1990”, International Review of Economics and Finance, 10: 147.
  • Romer, P.M. (1986). “Increasing returns and long-run growth”, The Journal of Political Economy. 94 (5): 1002-1037.
  • Sala-i Martin, X. (1996a). “Regional Cohesion: Evidence and Theories of Regional Growth and Convergence”. European Economic Review, 40: 1325-52.
  • Sala-i Martin, X. (1996b). “The Classical Approach to Convergence Analysis”, Economic Journal, 106: 1019-36.
  • Sala-i Martin, X. (2002). “15 Years of New Growth Economics: What Have We Learnt?”. Central Bank of Chile, Working Papers, No: 172.
  • Solow, R. M. (1956). “A contribution to the theory of growth”, Quartely Journal of Economics, 70(1): 65-94.
  • Ta-i Leung, T., Hinich, M. J., Khim-Sen Liew, V., Lim, K. (2008). “Time Series Test of Nonlinear Convergence and Transitional Dynamics”, Economics Letters, 100: 337-339. 27. www.ggdc.net
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

  Dr.Reşat Ceylan This is me

Publication Date September 1, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 15 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Ceylan, .D. (2010). G-7 ÜLKELERİNİN YAKINSAMA DENEYİMİ: 1870-2006. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(3), 311-324.