Dental Orta Hat Simetri-Asimetrisinin Dentofasiyal Estetik Algı Üzerine Etkisi

Abstract

Gülümseme sözsüz iletişimde etkili olup kişiye yönelik izlenimde önemli bir rol oynar. Estetik diş hekimliği uygulamalarında gülüş analizi tedavi yaklaşımının en önemli parçasıdır. Dental orta hat, iki santral kesici diş arasındaki temas yüzeyi olarak tanımlanır ayrıca anterior dişlerin konumlandırılmasında dikkate alınması gereken estetik faktörlerinden biridir. İdeal bir dental orta hat, dental kompozisyonda arzu edilen bir uyum ve birlik etkisini yaratır. Özellikle gülümseme simetrisinden söz edildiğinde, dental orta hat pozisyonunun önemi, dişsiz anterior bölgeyi restore ederken bir ön koşul oluşturmaktadır. Gülüş analizinde dental orta hat asimetri ve simetrisi özellikle değerlendirilmelidir. Bu çalışmadaki amacımız; gülüş simetrisinde rol oynayan dental orta hat asimetri ve simetrisinin fasiyal estetik algısı üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmektir. 

Keywords

• dental orta hat
• estetik algı
• simetri

Supporting Institution

Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birliği

Project Number

TDH-2020-8049

The Effect Of Dental Midline Symmetry-Asymmetry On Dentofacial Aesthetic Perception

Abstract

Smiling is effective in nonverbal communication and plays an important role in the impression of the person. Smile analysis is the most important part of the treatment approach in aesthetic dentistry applications. The dental midline is defined as the contact surface between two central incisors and is one of the aesthetic factors to consider when positioning anterior teeth. An ideal dental midline creates the desired effect of harmony and unity in the dental composition. Especially when talking about smile symmetry, the importance of dental midline position is a prerequisite when restoring the edentulous anterior region. Dental midline asymmetry and symmetry should be especially evaluated in smile analysis. Our aim in this study; To evaluate the effect of dental midline asymmetry and symmetry, which plays a role in smile symmetry, on facial aesthetic perception.

Keywords

• dental midline
• aesthetic perception
• symmetry

Project Number

TDH-2020-8049

References

1. [1] Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;29(4):358-382.
2. [2] Tjan AH, Miller GD, The JG. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51(1):24-28.
3. [3] Rufenacht CR. Principles of esthetic integration, Chicago Quintessence Pub. Co.,2000.
4. [4] Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza MA. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(6):748-753.
5. [5] Miller EL, Bodden Jr WR, Jamison HC. A study of the relationship of the dental midline to the facial median line. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1979;41(6):657-660.
6. [6] Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson MR. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21(5):517-522.
7. [7] Moore T, Southard KA, Casko JS, Qian F, Southard TE. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127(2):208-261.
8. [8] LaVacca MI, Tarnow D, Cisneros GJ. Interdental papilla length and the perception of aesthetics. Practical procedures & aesthetic dentistry: PPAD. 2005:17(6):405-12.

9. [9] Cardash HS, Ormanier Z, Laufer BZ. Observable deviation of the facial and anterior tooth midlines. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89(3):282-285.
10. [10] Beyer JW, Lindauer SJ. Evaluation of dental midline position. Semin Orthod. 1998;4(3):146-152.
11. [11] Rufenacht C. Fundamental of esthetics. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 1990, p.11-93.
12. [12] Bishara SE, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG. Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. Angle Orthod. 1994;64(2):89-98.
13. [13] Roden-Johnson D, Gallerano R, English J. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127(3):343-350.
14. [14] Janson G, Branco NC, Fernandes TM, Sathler R, Garib D, Lauris JR. Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(1):153-161.
15. [15] Kokich VO Jr, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11(6):311-324.
16. [16] Thomas JL, Hayes C, Zawaideh S. The effect of axial midline angulation on dental esthetics. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(4):359-364.
17. [17] Zhang YF, Xiao L, Li J, Peng YR, Zhao Z. Young people's esthetic perception of dental midline deviation. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(3):515-520.
18. [18] Chiche G. Esthetics of anterior fixed prosthodontics, first edition, 1994.
19. [19] Brisman AS. Esthetics: a comparison of dentists' and patients' concepts. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980;100(3):345-352.
20. [20] Ker AJ, Chan R, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson's perspective: a computer-based survey study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(10):1318-1327.
21. [21] Parekh SM, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(4):557-563.
22. [22] Ritter DE, Gandini LG, Pinto Ados S, Locks A. Esthetic influence of negative space in the buccal corridor during smiling. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(2):198-203.
23. [23] Lacerda Santos R, Pereira TB, Pithon MM. Esthetic perception of the buccal corridor in different facial types by laypersons of different ages. Bioscience Journal. 2015:31(4).
24. [24] Nimbalkar S, Oh YY, Mok RY, Tioh JY, Yew KJ, Patil PG. Smile attractiveness related to buccal corridor space in 3 different facial types: A perception of 3 ethnic groups of Malaysians. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(2):252-256.