Research Article

Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial

Volume: 14 Number: 2 August 15, 2023
EN TR

Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial

Abstract

Objective: A comparative evaluation of the plaque removal efficacy of manual, electric, and chewable toothbrushes. Material-Method: Our randomized and examiner-blinded clinical study involved 90 dental students. The students were divided into three groups: manual, electric, and chewable toothbrush users. The plaque removal efficiency of the brushes was evaluated using the Turesky modification of the Quigley–Hein Index (TMQHI). Results: Ninety participants, consisting of 32 males and 58 females, aged between 21 and 23 years (average age 220.47) were included in the study. The mean TMQHI score before brushing was 2.4±0.49 in the manual brushing group, 1.81±0.61 in the electric toothbrush group, and 1.93±0.6 in the chewable brush group. The mean for the manual brushing group was thus higher than that of the other two groups (p<0.001). The mean TMQHI score after brushing was 1.37±0.43 in the manual brushing group, 0.91±0.52 in the electric toothbrush group, and 1.31±0.67 in the chewable brush group. The effectiveness of the chewable brush in plaque removal in all regions of the mouth was lower than that of the other two (p<0.001). There was no statistical difference between the manual and electric toothbrushes. Conclusion: The plaque removal efficiency of the chewable toothbrush was found to be lower than that of the electric and manual toothbrushes.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Selwitz, R.H., Ismail, A.I., Pitts, N.B. 2007.Dental caries. Lancet, 369(9555), 51–59.
  2. [2] Lamster, I.B. 2006. Antimicrobial mouthrinses and the management of periodontal diseases. Introduction to the supplement. J Am Dent Assoc, 137(Suppl), 5-9.
  3. [3] Van Swol, R.L., Van Scotter, D.E., Pucher, J.J., Dentino, A.R. 1996. Clinical evaluation of an ionic toothbrush in the removal of established plaque and reduction of gingivitis. Quintessence Int, 27(1), 389-394.
  4. [4] Sicilia, A., Arregui, I., Gallego, M., Cabezas, B., Cuesta, S. 2002. A systematic review of powered vs manual toothbrushes in periodontal cause-related therapy. J Clin Periodontol, 29(3), 39-54.
  5. [5] Heanue, M., Deacon, S.A., Deery, C., et al. 2003. Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1(1), CD002281.
  6. [6] Van der Weijden, F.A., Campbell, S.L., Dörfer, C.E., González-Cabezas, C., Slot, D.E. 2011. Safety of oscillating-rotating powered brushes compared to manual toothbrushes: a systematic review. J Periodontol, 82(1), 5-24.
  7. [7] Williams, K., Ferrante, A., Dockter, K., Haun, J., Biesbrock, A.R., Bartizek, R.D. 2004. One- and 3-minute plaque removal by a battery-powered versus a manual toothbrush. J Periodontol, 75(8), 1107-1113.
  8. [8] Pujar, P., Subbareddy, V.V. 2013. Evaluation of the toothbrushing skills in children aged 6-12 years. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 14(1), 213-219.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

August 15, 2023

Submission Date

April 9, 2023

Acceptance Date

July 7, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 14 Number: 2

APA
Yiğit, T., Karaaslan, F., Yiğit, U., & Dikilitaş, A. (2023). Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(2), 170-177. https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.1279913
AMA
1.Yiğit T, Karaaslan F, Yiğit U, Dikilitaş A. Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2023;14(2):170-177. doi:10.22312/sdusbed.1279913
Chicago
Yiğit, Tuğba, Fatih Karaaslan, Umut Yiğit, and Ahu Dikilitaş. 2023. “Comparison of the Plaque Removal Efficacy of Chewable, Electric, and Manual Toothbrushes: A Randomized Clinical Trial”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 14 (2): 170-77. https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.1279913.
EndNote
Yiğit T, Karaaslan F, Yiğit U, Dikilitaş A (August 1, 2023) Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 14 2 170–177.
IEEE
[1]T. Yiğit, F. Karaaslan, U. Yiğit, and A. Dikilitaş, “Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 170–177, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.22312/sdusbed.1279913.
ISNAD
Yiğit, Tuğba - Karaaslan, Fatih - Yiğit, Umut - Dikilitaş, Ahu. “Comparison of the Plaque Removal Efficacy of Chewable, Electric, and Manual Toothbrushes: A Randomized Clinical Trial”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 14/2 (August 1, 2023): 170-177. https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.1279913.
JAMA
1.Yiğit T, Karaaslan F, Yiğit U, Dikilitaş A. Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2023;14:170–177.
MLA
Yiğit, Tuğba, et al. “Comparison of the Plaque Removal Efficacy of Chewable, Electric, and Manual Toothbrushes: A Randomized Clinical Trial”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 14, no. 2, Aug. 2023, pp. 170-7, doi:10.22312/sdusbed.1279913.
Vancouver
1.Tuğba Yiğit, Fatih Karaaslan, Umut Yiğit, Ahu Dikilitaş. Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2023 Aug. 1;14(2):170-7. doi:10.22312/sdusbed.1279913