Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial

Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2 15 Ağustos 2023
PDF İndir
EN TR

Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial

Öz

Objective: A comparative evaluation of the plaque removal efficacy of manual, electric, and chewable toothbrushes. Material-Method: Our randomized and examiner-blinded clinical study involved 90 dental students. The students were divided into three groups: manual, electric, and chewable toothbrush users. The plaque removal efficiency of the brushes was evaluated using the Turesky modification of the Quigley–Hein Index (TMQHI). Results: Ninety participants, consisting of 32 males and 58 females, aged between 21 and 23 years (average age 220.47) were included in the study. The mean TMQHI score before brushing was 2.4±0.49 in the manual brushing group, 1.81±0.61 in the electric toothbrush group, and 1.93±0.6 in the chewable brush group. The mean for the manual brushing group was thus higher than that of the other two groups (p<0.001). The mean TMQHI score after brushing was 1.37±0.43 in the manual brushing group, 0.91±0.52 in the electric toothbrush group, and 1.31±0.67 in the chewable brush group. The effectiveness of the chewable brush in plaque removal in all regions of the mouth was lower than that of the other two (p<0.001). There was no statistical difference between the manual and electric toothbrushes. Conclusion: The plaque removal efficiency of the chewable toothbrush was found to be lower than that of the electric and manual toothbrushes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. [1] Selwitz, R.H., Ismail, A.I., Pitts, N.B. 2007.Dental caries. Lancet, 369(9555), 51–59.
  2. [2] Lamster, I.B. 2006. Antimicrobial mouthrinses and the management of periodontal diseases. Introduction to the supplement. J Am Dent Assoc, 137(Suppl), 5-9.
  3. [3] Van Swol, R.L., Van Scotter, D.E., Pucher, J.J., Dentino, A.R. 1996. Clinical evaluation of an ionic toothbrush in the removal of established plaque and reduction of gingivitis. Quintessence Int, 27(1), 389-394.
  4. [4] Sicilia, A., Arregui, I., Gallego, M., Cabezas, B., Cuesta, S. 2002. A systematic review of powered vs manual toothbrushes in periodontal cause-related therapy. J Clin Periodontol, 29(3), 39-54.
  5. [5] Heanue, M., Deacon, S.A., Deery, C., et al. 2003. Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1(1), CD002281.
  6. [6] Van der Weijden, F.A., Campbell, S.L., Dörfer, C.E., González-Cabezas, C., Slot, D.E. 2011. Safety of oscillating-rotating powered brushes compared to manual toothbrushes: a systematic review. J Periodontol, 82(1), 5-24.
  7. [7] Williams, K., Ferrante, A., Dockter, K., Haun, J., Biesbrock, A.R., Bartizek, R.D. 2004. One- and 3-minute plaque removal by a battery-powered versus a manual toothbrush. J Periodontol, 75(8), 1107-1113.
  8. [8] Pujar, P., Subbareddy, V.V. 2013. Evaluation of the toothbrushing skills in children aged 6-12 years. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 14(1), 213-219.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

15 Ağustos 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

9 Nisan 2023

Kabul Tarihi

7 Temmuz 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yiğit, T., Karaaslan, F., Yiğit, U., & Dikilitaş, A. (2023). Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(2), 170-177. https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.1279913
AMA
1.Yiğit T, Karaaslan F, Yiğit U, Dikilitaş A. Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2023;14(2):170-177. doi:10.22312/sdusbed.1279913
Chicago
Yiğit, Tuğba, Fatih Karaaslan, Umut Yiğit, ve Ahu Dikilitaş. 2023. “Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 14 (2): 170-77. https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.1279913.
EndNote
Yiğit T, Karaaslan F, Yiğit U, Dikilitaş A (01 Ağustos 2023) Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 14 2 170–177.
IEEE
[1]T. Yiğit, F. Karaaslan, U. Yiğit, ve A. Dikilitaş, “Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 14, sy 2, ss. 170–177, Ağu. 2023, doi: 10.22312/sdusbed.1279913.
ISNAD
Yiğit, Tuğba - Karaaslan, Fatih - Yiğit, Umut - Dikilitaş, Ahu. “Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 14/2 (01 Ağustos 2023): 170-177. https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.1279913.
JAMA
1.Yiğit T, Karaaslan F, Yiğit U, Dikilitaş A. Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2023;14:170–177.
MLA
Yiğit, Tuğba, vd. “Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 14, sy 2, Ağustos 2023, ss. 170-7, doi:10.22312/sdusbed.1279913.
Vancouver
1.Tuğba Yiğit, Fatih Karaaslan, Umut Yiğit, Ahu Dikilitaş. Comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of chewable, electric, and manual toothbrushes: A randomized clinical trial. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 01 Ağustos 2023;14(2):170-7. doi:10.22312/sdusbed.1279913

CC

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Atıf gereklidir, ticari olmayan amaçlarla kullanılabilir ve değişiklik yapılarak türev eser üretilemez.