Tibia Intramedüller Çivileme Sisteminde Proksimal Kilitleme Vidalarının Dirençlerinin Karşılaştırılması: Biyomekanik Çalışma

Year 2018, , 19 - 25, 01.03.2018

Ahmet Karaarslan Nihat Acar Meric Unal

https://doi.org/10.17343/sdutfd.286293

Abstract

Amaç: Parçalı tibia kırıklarınnın
tedavisinde kullanılan intramedüller çivinin kilitleme vidalarında deformasyon
sıklıkla görülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı tibia intramedüller çivileme
sisteminde beş farklı proksimal kilitleme vidasının bükülme dirençlerini
karşılaştırmaktır.

Metod: 50 adet vida üç farklı
çapta(4.5 mm, 5 mm ,5.5 mm) ve 2 farklı yiv şeklinde( yivli ve yivsiz)olacak
şekilde beş farklı gruba ayrıldı. 34 mm iç çapa sahip bir paslanmaz çelik tüp tibiayı
temsil etmek üzere hazırlandı. Tüm vidalara uygulama sonrası üç nokta bükülme
testi yapıldı.

Sonuçlar: Yivsiz 4.5 mm ve yivli 5mm
vida gruplarının ortalama değerleri yivsiz 5 mm, yivli 5.5 mm ve yivsiz 5.5 mm
gruplarına gore anlamlı derecede düşük bulundu(p=0.000)

Çıkarımlar: Proksimal kilitleme vidasının
deformasyonundan kaçınmak için yivsiz 4.5 mm ve yivli 5 mm vidaların
kullanılması uygun olmayabilir. Yivsiz 5 mm, yivli 5.5 mm ve yivsiz 5.5 mm
vidaların güvenli bir şekilde kullanılması önerilebilir.

Keywords

Parçalı tibia kırığı, tibia çivisi, kilitleme vidası

Comparison of the Resistance of Proximal Locking Screws in Tibia Nailing System – A Biomechanical Study

Abstract

Purpose:  Locking screw deformation is common in nailing
of comminuted tibia fractures.  The aim
is to compare five different proximal locking screws bending resistance in
tibia nailing system.

Methods: 50 screws were divided into
five groups. A stainless steel tube which has a 34 mm internal diameter was
prepared representing the proximal tibia. A 3-point bending tests were
performed on locking  screws for
determining their yield points with 3 different dimensions (4.5 mm, 5 mm and
5,5 mm) and with 2 different screw 
thread (low threaded and unthreaded).

Results: The mean yield point values
of smooth 4.5 mm and threaded 5 mm low locking screws were statistically
significant less than that of smooth 5 mm, low threaded 5.5 mm and smooth 5.5
mm,(P=0.000).

Conclusions:  To avoid proximal locking screw deformation,
use of smooth 4,5 mm and low threaded 5 mm locking screws should be avoided in
nailing of comminuted   tibia fractures
of unreliable persons.  Smooth 5 mm, low threaded
5.5 mm and smooth screws 5.5 mm may be used safely.

Keywords

Tibia comminuted fractures, tibia nail, locking screw

References

• 1. Whittle, A.P., et al., Treatment of open fractures of the tibia shaft with the use of interlocking nailing without reaming. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1992. 74(8): p. 1162-71.
• 2. Whittle, A.P., W. Wester, and T.A. Russell, Fatigue failure in small diameter tibial nails. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995(315): p. 119-28.
• 3. Boenisch, U.W., P.G. de Boer, and S.F. Journeaux, Unreamed intramedullary tibial nailing--fatigue of locking bolts. Injury, 1996. 27(4): p. 265-70.
• 4. Court-Brown, C.M., et al., Reamed or unreamed nailing for closed tibial fractures. A prospective study in Tscherne C1 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1996. 78(4): p. 580-3.
• 5. Yilmaz E, Karakurt L, Bulut M, Belhan O, Serin E. [Treatment of femoral shaft fractures and pseudoarthrosis with compressive and interlocking intramedullary nailing]. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica. 2005; 39(1):7-15.
• 6. Hapa O, HH Muratli, HY Yuksel, et al. Single or double distal locking in intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a prospective randomized study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2010; 16:33-7.
• 7. Hou, S.M., J.L. Wang, and J. Lin, Mechanical strength, fatigue life, and failure analysis of two prototypes and five conventional tibial locking screws. J Orthop Trauma, 2002. 16(10): p. 701-8.
• 8. Lin, J. and S.M. Hou, Bending strength and holding power of a prototype tibial locking screw. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002(403): p. 232-9.
• 9. Chao, C.K., et al., Increasing bending strength of tibial locking screws: mechanical tests and finite element analyses. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2007. 22(1): p. 59-66.
• 10. Karaarslan AA, Karakaşli A, Karci T, Aycan H, Yildirim S, Sesli E. A new compression design that increases proximal locking screw bending resistance in femur compression nails. Acta Orthop Belg. 2015 Jun;81(2):245-50.
• 11. Karaarslan AA, Karakaşlı A, Karcı T, Aycan H, Sesli E. Reliability of threaded locking screws.
• Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(5):552-7.
• 12. Karaarslan AA, Karakaşli A, Aycan H, Çeçen B, Yildiz DV, Sesli E. The best location for proximal locking screw for femur interlocking nailing: A biomechanical study. Indian J Orthop. 2016 Jan-Feb;50(1):94-8.
• 13. Aper, R.L., et al., Effect of bone diameter and eccentric loading on fatigue life of cortical screws used with interlocking nails. Am J Vet Res, 2003. 64(5): p. 569-73.
• 14. Gaebler, C., et al., Fatigue strength of locking screws and prototypes used in small-diameter tibial nails: a biomechanical study. J Trauma, 1999. 47(2): p. 379-84.
• 15. Griffin, L.V., R.M. Harris, and J.J. Zubak, Fatigue strength of common tibial intramedullary nail distal locking screws. J Orthop Surg Res, 2009. 4: p. 11.
• 16. Kinast C, Frigg R, Perren SM. Biomechanics of the interlocking nail. A study of the proximal interlock. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. 1990; 109(4):197-204.
• 17. Karuppiah SV, Johnstone AJ. How cross screw length influences the stiffnes of intramedullary nail system. JBiomedical Science and Engineering. 2010; 3:35-8.
• 18. Hsu CC, Yongyut A, Chao CK, Lin J. Notch sensitivity of titanium causing contradictory effects on locked nails and screws. Medical engineering & physics. 2010;32(5):454-60.
• 19. Zindrick, M.R., et al., A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1986(203): p. 99-112.
• 20. Fairbank, A.C., et al., Stability of reamed and unreamed intramedullary tibial nails: a biomechanical study. Injury, 1995. 26(7): p. 483-5.
• 21. Wehner, T., L. Claes, and U. Simon, Internal loads in the human tibia during gait. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2009. 24(3): p. 299-302.