BibTex RIS Cite

Genel cerrahi dersinde görsel-işitsel araçların kullanılmasında öğrenci tercihleri

Year 2005, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 26 - 29, 08.04.2009

Abstract

SüleymanDemirel Üniversitesi
TIP FAKÜLTESİ DERGİSİ: 2005 Haziran; 12(2)








Genel cerrahi dersinde görsel-işitsel araçların kullanılmasında öğrenci tercihleri



Ömer Rıdvan Tarhan, İbrahim Barut, Celal Çerçi, Sibel Yeşildal, Erol Eroğlu,Mahmut Bülbül



Özet

Bu çalışmada tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinin derste kullanılan görsel araçlar ve ders notları hakkındaki tercihlerinin incelenmesi hedeflenmiştir. Dönem IV, V ve VI öğrencilerine (n=114, 58 erkek, 56 kadın) anket uygulanmıştır. Ders anlatımında görsel araç kullanımının öğrencilerin hemen tamamı tarafından tercih edildiği saptanmıştır. Tepegöz (reflektör) yaygın olarak kullanılan bir görsel araçtır. Ancak öğrencilerin hemen hiç biri tepegözü tercih etmemektedir. Bununla birlikte öğrencilerin büyük çoğunluğu anlatılan dersle ilgili ders notu verilmesini istemektedir.



Anahtar Kelimeler: Ders anlatma, öğrenci tercihleri, görsel-işitsel araçlar



Abstract



The Preferences of Medical Students in Audio-Visual Tool used in General Surgery Lecture

In the present study, we aimed to determine medical students' preference regarding visual tools used at the lecture and lecture handouts. A questionnaire was applied third, forth and sixth year students (n=114, 58male, 56 female). It was determined that, using visual tool in the lecture was preferred by almost all students. Reflector is widely used visual tool. But almost no students were preferred reflector. However majority of the students wish handouts concerned the lecture.



Key Words: Lecturing, student preferences, Audio-Visual tools

References

  • Jonson D, Johnson R. Learninmg Together and Alone. Anglewood Cliffs. NJ Prentice-Hall 1974.
  • Brown J, Collins A, Daguid P. Situated cognition and culture of learning. Educational Researcher 1989; 18(1):32-42
  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbuilt. Anchored instruction and its relation to situated cognition. Educational researcher 1990; 19(6) 2-10.
  • O’Donnel A, Dansereau D. Learning from lectures: Effects of cooperative review. Journal of experimental education 1994;61(2):116-125.
  • Saroyan A, Snell LS, Variations in lecturing styles. Higher Education 1997; 33: 85-104.
  • Copeland HL, Longworth DL, Hewson MG, Stoller JK. Successful lecturing: a prospective study to validate attributes of the effective medical lecture. J Gen Intern Med. 2000; 15(6):366-71.
  • Copeland HL, Stoller JG, Hewson MG, Longworth DL. Making the continuing medical education lecture effective. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1998;18:227-34.
  • Tom F, Cushman H. The cornel diagnostic observation and reporting system for student description of college teaching. Search 1985;5(8):1-27.
  • http://www.orscu.8m.com/, Mayýs 2004’de ulaþýldý
  • Amato D, Quirt I. Lecture handouts of projected slides in a medical course. Med Teach. 1990; 12(3-4):291-6.
  • http://training.ifas.ufl.edu/deft/produce/ppart.htm Mayýs 2004’de ulaþýldý.
  • Voss D, Kefe DD, Willett JD, Lanius C, McDonald K. PowerPoint in the classroom. Cell Biol Educ. 2004 Fall; 3(3):155-61.
Year 2005, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 26 - 29, 08.04.2009

Abstract

References

  • Jonson D, Johnson R. Learninmg Together and Alone. Anglewood Cliffs. NJ Prentice-Hall 1974.
  • Brown J, Collins A, Daguid P. Situated cognition and culture of learning. Educational Researcher 1989; 18(1):32-42
  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbuilt. Anchored instruction and its relation to situated cognition. Educational researcher 1990; 19(6) 2-10.
  • O’Donnel A, Dansereau D. Learning from lectures: Effects of cooperative review. Journal of experimental education 1994;61(2):116-125.
  • Saroyan A, Snell LS, Variations in lecturing styles. Higher Education 1997; 33: 85-104.
  • Copeland HL, Longworth DL, Hewson MG, Stoller JK. Successful lecturing: a prospective study to validate attributes of the effective medical lecture. J Gen Intern Med. 2000; 15(6):366-71.
  • Copeland HL, Stoller JG, Hewson MG, Longworth DL. Making the continuing medical education lecture effective. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1998;18:227-34.
  • Tom F, Cushman H. The cornel diagnostic observation and reporting system for student description of college teaching. Search 1985;5(8):1-27.
  • http://www.orscu.8m.com/, Mayýs 2004’de ulaþýldý
  • Amato D, Quirt I. Lecture handouts of projected slides in a medical course. Med Teach. 1990; 12(3-4):291-6.
  • http://training.ifas.ufl.edu/deft/produce/ppart.htm Mayýs 2004’de ulaþýldý.
  • Voss D, Kefe DD, Willett JD, Lanius C, McDonald K. PowerPoint in the classroom. Cell Biol Educ. 2004 Fall; 3(3):155-61.
There are 12 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Araştırma Makaleleri
Authors

Ömer Tarhan This is me

İbrahim Barut This is me

Celal Çerçi This is me

Sibel Yeşildal This is me

Erol Eroğlu This is me

Mahmut Bülbül This is me

Publication Date April 8, 2009
Submission Date April 6, 2009
Published in Issue Year 2005 Volume: 12 Issue: 2

Cite

Vancouver Tarhan Ö, Barut İ, Çerçi C, Yeşildal S, Eroğlu E, Bülbül M. Genel cerrahi dersinde görsel-işitsel araçların kullanılmasında öğrenci tercihleri. Med J SDU. 2009;12(2):26-9.

                                                                                               14791 


Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi/Medical Journal of Süleyman Demirel University is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International.