EN
TR
Investigation of Different Tillage and Seeding Methods in Chickpea Cultivation
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the methods of traditional soil tillage (GTI), reduced
tillage (ATI) and direct seeding (DE) in chickpea cultivation. The effect of used methods was
examined on the degree of sprouting time, germination rate, weed growth and yield. Also soil
porosity, bulk density, penetration resistance and weed growth were determined according to
traditional soil tillage, reduced tillage and direct seeding methods. The most appropriate tillage and
seeding methods of Usak province were determined by evaluating the data.
According to the results; germination rate (TFCD) for GTI, ATI and DE were 98%, 85% and
87.7/88?%, respectively and also in same ordering, germination time (OCS) was recorded as 22.4,
23.5, and 23.1 days, respectively. Weed growing for GTI, ATI and DE were 15%, 56% ve 29%,
respectively. Penetration resistances in the 0-80 cm soil depth for GTI, ATI and DE were 1.67, 1.84
and 1.83 MPa, respectively. Soil bulk density in 0-30 cm soil depth for GTI, ATI and DE were 1.15,
1.22 ve 1.24 g cm-3, respectively. Soil porosity for GTİ, ATİ and DE were determined as 56.7 %,
53.7% and 53.1.9% respectively. Yield for GTI, ATI and DE methods were obtained as 161.7, 128.2
and 181.7 kg da-1, respectively.
While the maximum yield was found in the DE treatment, the least yield was found in the ATI
treatment. It was found that direct seeding methods could be applicable for chickpea cultivation as
technical end economic aspect in Usak province.
Keywords
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Publication Date
September 1, 2015
Submission Date
September 1, 2015
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2015 Volume: 10 Number: 2
APA
Küçükalbay, M., & Akbolat, D. (2015). Nohut Yetiştirirciliğinde Farklı Toprak İşleme ve Ekim Yöntemlerinin İncelenmesi. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 1-10. https://izlik.org/JA59FD39NM
AMA
1.Küçükalbay M, Akbolat D. Nohut Yetiştirirciliğinde Farklı Toprak İşleme ve Ekim Yöntemlerinin İncelenmesi. ISUBU JAF. 2015;10(2):1-10. https://izlik.org/JA59FD39NM
Chicago
Küçükalbay, Murat, and Davut Akbolat. 2015. “Nohut Yetiştirirciliğinde Farklı Toprak İşleme Ve Ekim Yöntemlerinin İncelenmesi”. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 10 (2): 1-10. https://izlik.org/JA59FD39NM.
EndNote
Küçükalbay M, Akbolat D (September 1, 2015) Nohut Yetiştirirciliğinde Farklı Toprak İşleme ve Ekim Yöntemlerinin İncelenmesi. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 10 2 1–10.
IEEE
[1]M. Küçükalbay and D. Akbolat, “Nohut Yetiştirirciliğinde Farklı Toprak İşleme ve Ekim Yöntemlerinin İncelenmesi”, ISUBU JAF, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–10, Sept. 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA59FD39NM
ISNAD
Küçükalbay, Murat - Akbolat, Davut. “Nohut Yetiştirirciliğinde Farklı Toprak İşleme Ve Ekim Yöntemlerinin İncelenmesi”. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 10/2 (September 1, 2015): 1-10. https://izlik.org/JA59FD39NM.
JAMA
1.Küçükalbay M, Akbolat D. Nohut Yetiştirirciliğinde Farklı Toprak İşleme ve Ekim Yöntemlerinin İncelenmesi. ISUBU JAF. 2015;10:1–10.
MLA
Küçükalbay, Murat, and Davut Akbolat. “Nohut Yetiştirirciliğinde Farklı Toprak İşleme Ve Ekim Yöntemlerinin İncelenmesi”. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 10, no. 2, Sept. 2015, pp. 1-10, https://izlik.org/JA59FD39NM.
Vancouver
1.Murat Küçükalbay, Davut Akbolat. Nohut Yetiştirirciliğinde Farklı Toprak İşleme ve Ekim Yöntemlerinin İncelenmesi. ISUBU JAF [Internet]. 2015 Sep. 1;10(2):1-10. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA59FD39NM