Bazı Yaprak Gübrelerinin Şeker Pancarı (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera)’nın Verim ve Kalitesine Etkileri

Year 2022, Volume: 17 Issue: 2, 49 - 54, 06.12.2022

Fidan Basalak , Tahsin Karadoğan

https://doi.org/10.54975/isubuzfd.955892

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Çalışma farklı yaprak gübrelerinin şeker pancarı (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera)’nın verim ve kalitesine etkisini belirlemek amacı ile Burdur ilinde 2016/2017 şeker pancarı üretim sezonunda yapılmıştır. Araştırmada şeker pancarı tarımında kullanılması önerilen Aminofol, Batguano, Borzinc, Comozink, Flora-X, Foton, Humatex-SF, Sıvı solucan gübresi olmak üzere 8 farklı yaprak gübresi kullanılmıştır. Uygulamaların şeker pancarının biyolojik verimini yaprak verimini, kök-gövde verimini, polar şeker oranı ve polar şeker verimini önemli seviyede etkilediği bulunmuştur. En yüksek yaprak (1055.7 kg/da,) kök-gövde (6947.0 kg/da), biyolojik (7896.3 kg/da) ve polar şeker verimi (1248.0 kg/da) Foton yaprak gübresi uygulandığı zaman alınmıştır. Polar şeker oranı Foton (% 17.96) ve Flora-X (% 17.81) yaprak gübresi uygulamalarında en yüksek olmuştur. Kullanılan diğer yaprak gübreleri de verime farklı oranlarda olumlu katkı sağlamışlardır. Kesin sonuca ulaşmak için bu çalışmaların uzun yıllar farklı lokasyonlarda yapılması gerektiği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Keywords

Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, kalite, şeker pancarı, verim, yaprak gübresi, quality, sugar beet, yield, foliar fertilizer

The Effects of Foliar Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet

Abstract

In this study, which was carried out in the 2016/2017 sugar beet production season in Burdur, it was aimed to determine the effects of foliar fertilizers on the yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera). In the research, 8 different foliar fertilizers were used, including Aminofol, Batguano, Borzinc, Comozink, Flora-X, Foton, Humatex-SF, Liquid vermicompost, which are recommended for sugar beet agriculture. Biological yield, leaf yield, root yield, polar sugar ratio and polar sugar yield were found to be statistically significant in the properties examined in the study. The highest leaf yield (1055.7 kg/da), root yield (6947.0 kg/da), biological yield (7896.3 kg/da) and polar sugar yield (1248.0 kg/da) were obtained when Photon foliar fertilizer was applied. Polar sugar ratio was highest in Foton (17.96%) and Flora-X (17.81%) foliar fertilizer applications. The other foliar fertilizers used also contributed positively to the yield at different rates. It was concluded that these studies should be carried out in different locations for many years in order to reach a definite result

Keywords

Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, quality, sugar beet, yield, foliar fertilizer

References

• Abdel-Motogaily, F. M. F., & Attia, K. K. (2009). Response of Sugar Beet Plants to Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilization in Sandy Calcareous Soil. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 11(6), 695-700.
• Allison, M. F., Last, P. J., & Bean, K. M. R. (1996). Responses of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) to Foliar Sprays of Copper. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture, 72, 219-225.
• Armin, M., & Asgharipour, M. R. (2011). Effect of Time and Concentration of Boron Foliar Application on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 10, 307-311.
• Anonim, (2017). Resmi İstatistikler. Devlet Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü, Erişim adresi: https://www.mgm.gov.tr/ veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?m=BURD UR
• Barlog, P., & Grzebisz, W. (2001). Effect of magnesium foliar application on the yield and quality of sugar beet roots. Rostlinna Vyroba, 47(9), 418-422. Bonilla, I., Cadahia, C., Carpena, O., & Hernondo V. (1980). Effect of boron on nitrogen metabolizm and Sugar levels of sugar beet. Plant and Soil, 57(1), 3-9.
• Cerny, I., Pacuta, V., & Porubska, M. (2007). Production Parameters of Sugar Beet Yield Depending on The Variety and Foliar Application of Atonik and Polybor 150 Preparations. Agriculture (Poľnohospodárstvo), 53(4), 169-174.
• Çavuşoğlu, S. S., & Altay, H. (2001). Trakya Bölgesi (Malkara) koşullarında yetiştirilen şeker pancarında farklı dozlarda yaprak gübresi kullanımının verim ve kalite parametrelerine etkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(25), 13-27.
• Doğan, A., & Erdal, İ. (2018). Burdur ili tahıl yetiştirilen toprakların verimlilik durumlarının belirlenmesi. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi, 6(1), 34-95.
• El-Shafai, A. M. A (2000). Effect of nitrogen and potassiım fertilization on yield and quality of sugar beet in sohag. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Researsh, 7(2), 759-767.
• Feckova, J., Pacuta, V., & Cerny, I. (2005). Effect of foliar preparations and variety on sugar beet yield and quality. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 6(3), 295-308.
• Gad, N., & Kandil, H. (2009). The Influence of cobalt on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) production. International Journal of Acedemic Research, 1(2), 52-58.
• Hamurcu, M., & Gezgin, S. (2001). Şeker pancarının (Beta vulgaris L.) verim ve kalitesi üzerine çinko ve bor uygulamasının etkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(26), 116-128.
• Hatibu, A. A. (2018). Assessment of Bat guano as source of nutrients for rice production. Erişim adresi: http://www.suaire.suanet.ac.tz:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/2753/ASHA%20ALLY%20HATIBU.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
• Jaskulski, D. (2004). Effectiveness of foliar application of Sonata fertilizers, Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska. Sectio E, Agricultura, 59(1), 431-439.
• Keser, M., Neubaner, B. F., Hutchinson, F. E. 1974. Influence of aluminum ions on developmental morphology of sugarbeet roots. Agronomy Journal, 67(1), 84-88.
• Leilah, A. A. A., & Khan, N. (2021). Interactive effects of gibberelic acid and nitrogen fertilization on the grıwth, yield and qoality of sugar beet. Agronomy, 11(1), 137. https://doi.org//10.3390/agronomy1101013
• Leiva Rivera, A. L. (1990). Respuesta del tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) a la aplicación de aminofol con diferentes niveles de fertilización nitrogenada. Lisans Bitirme Tezi, Pan American Tarım Okulu (Escuela Agricola Panamericana).
• Pacuta, V., Cerny, I., & Pulkrabek, J. (2013). Influence of variety and foliar preparations containing bioactive substances on root yield, sugar content and polarized sugar yield of sugar beet. Listy Cukrovarnické a Řepařské, 129(11), 337-340.
• Tugnoli, V., & Bettini, G. (2003). The use of foliar fertilizer application in sugar beet growing. 1st Joint IIRB-ASSBT Congress, San Antonio, United States of America. Wilczewski, E., Szczepanek, M., & Wenda-Piesik, A. (2018). Response of sugar beet to humic substances and foliar fertilization with potassium. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 19(1), 153-165.
• Zahradníček, J., Nečasová, M., Tyšer, L., Kožnarová, V., & Hosták, V. (2008). Yields and technological quality of sugar beet after application of Samppi foliar fertilizer in 2007. Listy Cukrovarnické a Řepařské, 124(5/6), 170-173.