Abstract
İskeletsel Sınıf II maloklüzyonlar, sıklıkla maksiller prognati, mandibuler retrognati veya ikisinin kombinasyonu ile karakterizedir. Pubertal atılımın başlangıcında üst çene darlığının eşlik ettiği Sınıf II divizyon 1 maloklüzyonu olan çocuklarda hızlı üst çene genişletmesi sonrası fonksiyonel apareyler sıklıkla uygulanır. Bu vaka raporunda amaç, iskeletsel Sınıf II maloklüzyona sahip bir hastanın rapid maksiller ekspansiyon (RME) ve twinblok apareyi ile tedavisini sunmaktır.
Kronolojik yaşı 11 yıl 8 ay olan kadın hasta üst dişlerinin ileride, alt çenesinin geride olması şikayetiyle kliniğimize başvurmuştur. Hastanın tedavisinde RME’li twinblok apareyi uygulanmıştır. Twinblok apareyi ile fonksiyonel tedavi 12 ay sürmüştür. Daha sonra sabit ortodontik tedavisine geçilmiştir. Toplam tedavi süresi 2 yıl 3 aydır.
Tedavi sonunda ideal Angle Sınıf I kapanış elde edilmiştir. Hastanın profilinde çarpıcı bir iyileşme gözlenmiş, ideal dudak kapanışı sağlanmıştır.
References
- 1. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1998;13: 97–106.
- 2. Gelgor IE, Karaman AI, Ercan E. Prevalence of malocclusion among adolescents in central Anatolia. Eur J Dent 2007;1:125-31.
- 3. Arici S, Akan H, Yakubov K, Arici N. Effects of fixed functional appliance treatment on the temporomandibular joint. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:809–14.
- 4. McNamara JA Jr. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981;51:177–202.
- 5. Karacay S, Akin E, Olmez H, Gurton AU, Sagdic D. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2006;76:666–72.
- 6. Frankel R, Frankel C. Orofacial orthopedics with the function regülatör. Munich:S Karger,1989.
- 7. Clark WJ. The Twin Block technique. A functional orthopaedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;93:1-18.
- 8. Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG. Dentofacial Orthopedics with Functional Appliances. USA:Mosby,1997.
- 9. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Post-treatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twinblock appliance. AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:24-33.
- 10. Sharma NS. Management of growing skeletal class II patient: A case report. Int J Clin Paediatr Dent 2013;6:48-54.
- 11. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:15-24.
- 12. Trenouth MJ. A comparison of twin block, Andresen and removable appliances in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Funct Orthod 1992;9:26-31.
- 13. Trenouth MJ. Cephalometric evaluation of the Twin- block appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:54-9.
Abstract
References
- 1. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1998;13: 97–106.
- 2. Gelgor IE, Karaman AI, Ercan E. Prevalence of malocclusion among adolescents in central Anatolia. Eur J Dent 2007;1:125-31.
- 3. Arici S, Akan H, Yakubov K, Arici N. Effects of fixed functional appliance treatment on the temporomandibular joint. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:809–14.
- 4. McNamara JA Jr. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981;51:177–202.
- 5. Karacay S, Akin E, Olmez H, Gurton AU, Sagdic D. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2006;76:666–72.
- 6. Frankel R, Frankel C. Orofacial orthopedics with the function regülatör. Munich:S Karger,1989.
- 7. Clark WJ. The Twin Block technique. A functional orthopaedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;93:1-18.
- 8. Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG. Dentofacial Orthopedics with Functional Appliances. USA:Mosby,1997.
- 9. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Post-treatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twinblock appliance. AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:24-33.
- 10. Sharma NS. Management of growing skeletal class II patient: A case report. Int J Clin Paediatr Dent 2013;6:48-54.
- 11. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:15-24.
- 12. Trenouth MJ. A comparison of twin block, Andresen and removable appliances in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Funct Orthod 1992;9:26-31.
- 13. Trenouth MJ. Cephalometric evaluation of the Twin- block appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:54-9.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Dentistry |
| Journal Section | Case Report |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 15, 2023 |
| Submission Date | January 5, 2023 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2023 |
Selcuk Dental Journal Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.