Effect of two light activated in-office bleaching agents on microhardness of different esthetic restorative materials

Year 2018, , 142 - 149, 01.08.2018

Özgün Yusuf Özyılmaz , Tuncay Alptekin Filiz Aykent , Haluk Barış Kara

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.344313

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Background: Irradiation sources have
been used to reduce the total in-office bleaching time. However, little is
known about the effects of the light irradiation bleaching systems on the
restorative materials. This in vitro
study evaluated the microhardness of 6 different restorative materials during
office bleaching procedures with blue light emitted diode and diode laser
photoactivation.

Materials and Methods: FiltekTM supreme
(nanofilled), Tetric EvoCeram (nanohybrid), Tescera ATL (ormocer), Clearfill
Majesty Esthetic (nanofilled), Durafill VS (microfilled) and IPS Empress II
(ceramic) restorative materials were selected in this study. Twenty specimens,
10 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick, were fabricated from each material using a
Teflon mold. All specimens were randomly assigned to two groups (n=10). Group 1
received two topical applications of 35% hydrogen peroxide and was
photoactivated using blue light emitted diode (800 mW/cm²) for 20s.
Group 2 received topical application of 46% hydrogen peroxide using diode laser
(wavelength 980 nm, average power 7 watt, energy setting 200 J, continuous
mode) for 30s. Baseline and after bleaching microhardness measurements were
taken with a Vickers hardness tester that was used with a 300 g for the
porcelain and 100 g for the composite and ormocer specimens, the
dwell time was 30 s for all groups. Data were analyzed statistically, with
one-way-analysis of variance (ANOVA), post-hoc Tamhane's T2 and independent t
tests.

Results: After application of both
office bleaching agents, microhardness of all restorative materials tested were
significantly decreased (p<.05). However, Tetric EvoCeram composite resin
material showed the least microhardness value (p<.05).

Conclusion: Blue light emitted diode
and diode laser activation hydrogen peroxide office bleaching agents have
similar effects on the reduction of microhardness of restorative materials. The
data of this study revealed that after bleaching, nanofilled (FS, CME),
microfilled (Df) specimens demonstrated lower changes in microhardness values
than nanohybrid (TEC) composite material.

Keywords

Esthetic materials, office bleaching, photoactivation, diode laser

İki ışıkla aktive olan ofis tipi beyazlatma ajanlarının farklı estetik restoratif materyallerin mikrosertliği üzerine etkisi

Abstract

Amaç: Işın
kaynakları  ofis tipinde toplam beyazlatma
süresini azaltmak için kullanılmıştır. Işık ışınlama beyazlatma
sistemlerinin restoratif materyaller üzerindeki etkileri hakkında çok az şey
bilinmektedir. Bu in vitro çalışmada,
mavi ışık yayan diyot ve diyot lazer fotoaktifleştirme ile ofis beyazlatma prosedürleri
sırasında 6 farklı restoratif malzemenin mikrosertlik değeri değerlendirildi.

Materyal ve Metod: Bu çalışmada, Filtek TM
supreme (nanodolduruculu), Tetric EvoCeram (nanohibrit), Tescera ATL (hibritpolimer),
Clearfill Majesty Esthetic (nanodolduruculu), Durafill VS (mikrodolduruculu) ve
IPS Empress II (seramik) restoratif malzemeler seçildi. Her malzemeden teflon
kalıp yardımıyla çapı 10 mm ve kalınlığı 2 mm olan yirmişer örnek hazırlandı.
Tüm örnekler rastgele ikişer gruba ayrıldı (n=10). Grup 1'e,% 35 hidrojen
peroksitten iki kez topikal uygulama yapıldı ve 20 s boyunca mavi ışık yayan
diyot (800 mW / cm²) kullanılarak fotoaktif hale getirildi. Grup 2,
30 s için diyot lazer (dalga boyu 980 nm, ortalama güç 7 watt, enerji ayarı 200
J, sürekli mod) kullanılarak % 46 hidrojen peroksit topikal uygulaması yapıldı.
Başlangıç ve beyazlatma sonrası değerler Vickers sertlik testi cihazı
yardımıyla porselen için 300 gr; kompozit ve hibritpolimer örnekler için 100
gr’lık ağırlık kullanılarak ölçüldü. Veriler tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA),
Tamhane’s T2 ve bağımsız t testi ile istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi.

Bulgular: Her iki beyazlatma
ajanlarının kullanımdan sonra, tüm restoratif materyallerin mikrosertliğinde
önemli derecede düşüş gözlemlendi (p<.05). Fakat en düşük mikrosertlik
değerini Tetric EvoCeram kompozit rezin materyal gösterdi (p<.05).

Sonuç: Mavi ışık yayan diyot ve
diyot lazer aktivasyonlu hidrojen peroksit ofis tipi beyazlatma ajanları
restoratif materyallerin mikrosertliğinin azalması üzerine benzer etkiler
vardı. Bu çalışmanın verileri; beyazlatma sonrası nanodolduruculu (FS, CME) ve
mikrodolduruculu (Df) örneklerin nanohibrit (TEC) kompozit materyale göre
mikrosertlik değerlerinde daha düşük değişiklikler gösterdiğini  ortaya çıkardı.

Keywords

Key words: Estetik materyaller, ofis beyazlatma, fotoaktivasyon, diyot lazer

References

• 1.Haywood VB, Heymann HO. Nightguard vital bleaching. Quintessence Int 1989; 20:173-76.
• 2.Haywood VB. Achieving, maintaining and recovering successful tooth bleaching. J Esthet Dent 1996;8: 31-8.
• 3.Greenwall L. Bleaching Techniques in Restorative Dentistry: An Illustrated Guide. London: Martin Dunitz. 2001
• 4.Zekonis R, Matis BA, Cochran MA, Al Shetri SE, Eckert GJ, Carlson TJ. Clinical evaluation of in-office and at-home bleaching treatments. Oper Dent 2003;28:114-21.
• 5. Sulieman M, Addy M, Macdonald E, Rees JS. The bleaching depth of a 35% hydrogen peroxide based in-office product: a study in vitro. J Dent 2005;33:33-40.
• 6. Patel A, Louca C, Millar BJ. An in vitro comparison of tooth whitening techniques on natural tooth colour. Br Dent J 2008;10:516-7.
• 7. Joiner A. The bleaching of teeth: a review of the literature. J Dent 2006;34:412-9.
• 8. Giachetti L, Bertini F, Bambi C, Nieri M, Scaminaci Russo D. A randomized clinical trial comparing at-home and in-office tooth whitening techniques: A nine-month follow-up. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:1357-64.
• 9. Matis BA, Mousa HN, Cochran MA, Eckert GJ. Clinical evaluation of bleaching agents of different concentrations. Quintessence Int 2000;31:303-10.
• 10. Sulieman M. An overview of bleaching techniques: 2. Night guard vital bleaching and non-vital bleaching. SADJ 2006;61:352–4.
• 11. Meireles SS, Fontes ST, Coimbra LA, Della Bona Á, Demarco FF. Effectiveness of different carbamide peroxide concentrations used for tooth bleaching: an in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:186-91.
• 12. Moraes RR, Marimon JL, Schneider LF, Correr Sobrinho L, Camacho GB, Bueno M. Carbamide peroxide bleaching agents: effects on surface roughness of enamel, composite and porcelain. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10:23-8.
• 13. Torres CR, Barcellos DC, Batista GR, Borges AB, Cassiano KV, Pucci CR. Assessment of the effectiveness of light-emitting diode and diode laser hybrid light sources to intensify dental bleaching treatment. Acta Odontol Scand 2011;69:176-81.
• 14.Polydorou O, Mönting JS, Hellwig E, Auschill TM. Effect of in-office tooth bleaching on the microhardness of six dental esthetic restorative materials. Dent Mater 2007;23:153-8.
• 15.Karabulut DC, Karabulut B. Influence of activated bleaching on various adhesive restorative systems. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011;23:399-408.
• 16. Walsh LJ. The current status of laser applications in dentistry. Aust Dent J 2003;48:146–55.
• 17. Zhang C, Wang X, Kinoshita J, Zhao B, Toko T, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. Effects of KTP laser irradiation, diode laser, and LED on tooth bleaching: a comparative study. Photomed Laser Surg 2007;25:91-5.
• 18. Liang S, Sa Y, Sun L, Ma X, Wang Z, Xing W, Jiang T, Wang Y. Effect of halogen light irradiation on hydrogen peroxide bleaching: an in vitro study. Aust Dent J 2012;57:277-83.
• 19. Buchalla W, Attin T. External bleaching therapy with activation by heat, light or laser-a systematic review. Dent Mater 2007;23:586–96.
• 20. Domínguez A, García JA, Costela A, Gómez C. Influence of the light source and bleaching gel on the efficacy of the tooth whitening process. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011;29:53-9.
• 21. Lima DA, Aguiar FH, Liporoni PC, Munin E, Ambrosano GM, Lovadino JR. In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of bleaching agents activated by different light sources. J Prosthodont 2009;18:249-54.
• 22. Wetter NU, Barroso MC, Pelino JE. Dental bleaching efficacy with diode laser and LED irradiation: an in vitro study. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;35:254-8.
• 23. Atali PY, Topbasi FB. The effect of different bleaching methods on the surface roughness and hardness of resin composites. JDOH 2011;3:10-7.
• 24. Attin T, Hannig C, Wiegand A, Attin R. Effect of bleaching on restorative materials and restorations:a systematic review. Dent Mater 2004;20:852-61.
• 25. Mujdeci A, Gokay O. Effect of bleaching agents on the microhardness of tooth-colored restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:286-9.
• 26. Anusavice KJ. Reducing the failure potential of ceramic-based restorations. Part 1: Metal-ceramic crowns and bridges. Gen Dent 1996;44:492-4.
• 27. Turker SB, Biskin T. Effect of three bleaching agents on the surface properties of three different esthetic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:466-73.
• 28. Aykent F, Yondem I, Ozyesil AG, Gunal SK, Avunduk MC, Ozkan S. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103:221-7.
• 29. Bailey SJ, Swift EJ Jr. Effects of home bleaching products on composite resins. Quintessence Int 1992;23:489-94.
• 30. Yap AU, Wattanapayungkul P. Effects of in-office tooth whiteners on hardness of tooth-colored restoratives. Oper Dent 2002;27:137-41.
• 31. Campos I, Briso AL, Pimenta LA, Ambrosano G. Effects of bleaching with carbamide peroxide gels on microhardness of restoration materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:175-83.
• 32. Taher NM. The effect of bleaching agents on the surface hardness of tooth colored restorative materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005;15:18-26.
• 33. Hannig C, Duong S, Becker K, Brunner E, Kahler E, Attin T. Effect of bleaching on subsurface micro-hardness of composite and a polyacid modified composite. Dent Mater 2007;23:198-203.
• 34. Yu H, Li Q, Hussain M, Wang Y. Effects of bleaching gels on the surface microhardness of tooth-colored restorative materials in situ. J Dent 2008;36:261-7.
• 35. Briso AL, Tuñas IT, de Almeida LC, Rahal V, Ambrosano GM. Effects of five carbamide peroxide bleaching gels on composite resin microhardness. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2010;23:27-31.
• 36. Sharafeddin F, Jamalipour G. Effects of 35% carbamide peroxide gel on surface roughness and hardness of composite resins. J Dent Tehran 2010;7:6-12.
• 37. Malkondu Ö, Yurdagüven H, Say EC, Kazazoğlu E, Soyman M. Effect of bleaching on microhardness of esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 2011;36:177-86.