Mandibular parametreler ile yaş ve cinsiyet arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılması: Retrospektif çalışma

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 4 , 328 - 334 , 11.11.2019

İmge Sapancı Hüseyin Ozan Şahin Özgür Doğan

https://izlik.org/JA56EE69CW

Abstract

Amaç: Panoramik radyograflarda ölçülen mandibular parametreler (gonial açı,
bigonial genişlik ve ramus yüksekliği) ile bireyin yaşı ve cinsiyeti arasındaki
ilişkinin saptanması hedeflenmektedir.

Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmada 19-69 yaşları arasındaki 230 kadın ve erkeğe ait panoramik
radyograflar üzerinde gonial açı, bigonial genişlik ve ramus yüksekliği olmak
üzere üç parametre ölçülmüştür. Elde edilen veriler istatistiksel olarak
değerlendirilmiştir.

Bulgular: Tüm yaş gruplarında kadın ve erkek arasında gonial açı değerlerinde
istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmazken, ramus yüksekliği ve bigonial
genişlik değerlerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmaktadır.

Sonuç: Bu çalışma adli diş hekimliğinde mandibular parametreler kullanılarak
yaş ve cinsiyet tayini yapılmasında yardımcı olabilir.

ANAHTAR
KELİMELER

Bigonial
genişlik, gonial açı, panoramik radyograf, ramus yüksekliği

Keywords

Bigonial genişlik , gonial açı , panoramik radyograf , ramus yüksekliği

References

• 1. Scheuer L. Application of osteology to forensic medicine. Clin Anat. 2002;15:297–312. 2. Krogman WM. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. Springfield, MO: Charles C. Thomas, 1962. 3. Durić M, Rakocević Z, Donić D. The Reliability of sex determination of skeletons from forensic context in the Balkans. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;147:159–64 4. Mays S, Cox M. Sex determination in skeletal remains. In: Cox M, Mays S, editors. Human osteology in archaeology and forensic science. London: Greenwich Medical Media Ltd. 2000; p 117–130. 5. Ronning O, Barnes SA, Pearson MH, Pledger DM. Juvenile chronic arthritis: a cephalometric analysis of the facial skeleton. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:53–62. 6. Franklin D, O’Higgins P, Oxnard CE, Dadour I. Discriminant function sexing of the mandible of Indigenous South Africans. Forensic Sci Int 2008; 179: 84.e1-5. 7. Humphrey LT, Dean MC, Stringer CB. Morphological variation in great ape and modern human mandibles. J Anat. 1999;195:491–513. 8. Xie, Q., Soikkonen, K., Wolf, J., Mattila, K., Gong, M., & Ainamo, A. Effect of head positioning in panoramic radiography on vertical measurements: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 1996; 25(2), 61-66. 9. Razi, T., Moslemzade, S. H., & Razi, S. Comparison of linear dimensions and angular measurements on panoramic images taken with two machines. Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2009; 3(1), 7. 10. Shahabi M, Ramazanzadeh BA, Mokhber N. Comparison between the external gonial angle in panaromic radiographs and lateral cephalographs of adult patients with class I malocclusion. J Oral Sci. 2009; 51: 425–9 11. Jensen E. and Palling M. The gonial angle: A Survey, Amer. J. Orthod. 40.120-133,1954 12. Zangouei-Booshehri M, Aghili HA, Abasi M, Ezoddini-Ardakani F. Agreement between panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs for measuring the gonial angle. Iran J Radiol. 2012; 9: 178-82. 13. Mattila K, Altonen M, Haavikko K. Determination of the gonial angle from the orthopantogram. Angle orthod. 1997;47(2):107-10. 14. Al-Shamout R, Ammoush M, Alrbata R, AL-Habahbah A. Age and gender differences in gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects. Pak Oral Dental J. 2012; 32: 81–7. 15. Bhardwaj, D., Kumar, J.S., Mohan, V. Radiographic evaluation of mandible topredict the gender and age. J. Clin. Diagn. Res.2014; 8, ZC66–ZC69. 16. Bhuyan, R., Mohanty, S., Bhuyan, S. K., Pati, A., Priyadarshini, S., & Das, P. Panoramic radiograph as a forensic aid in age and gender estimation: Preliminary retrospective study. Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology: JOMFP, 2018, 22(2), 266. 17. Chole, R.H., Patil, R.N., Balsaraf Chole, S., Gondivkar, S., Gadbail, A.R., Yuwanati, M.B.,2013. Association of mandible anatomy with age, gender, and dental status: aradiographic study. ISRN Radiol. 2013; 453763. 18. Gungor, K., Sagir, M., Ozer, I. Evaluation of the gonial angle in the Anatolian populations: from past to present. Coll. Antropol. 2007; 31, 375–378. 19. Larrazabal-Moron, C., & Sanchis-Gimeno, J. A. Gonial angle growth patterns according to age and gender. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger, 2018; 215, 93-96. 20. Leversha, J., McKeough, G., Myrteza, A., Skjellrup-Wakefiled, H., Welsh, J., & Sholapurkar, A. Age and gender correlation of gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects in a dental school in Far North Queensland. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2016; 8(1), e49. 21. Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, Shamal SN, Singh TB, Tripathi SK. Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(Suppl1):S13–6. 22. Dutra, V., Yang, J., Devlin, H., Susin, C. Mandibular bone remodelling in adults:evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2004; 33, 323–328. 23. Upadhyay, R.B., Upadhyay, J., Agrawal, P., Rao, N.N. Analysis of gonial angle inrelation to age, gender, and dentition status by radiological and anthropometricmethods. J. Forensic Dent. Sci. 2012; 4, 29–33. 24. Indira, A. P., Markande, A., & David, M. P. Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex determination-A digital radiographic study. Journal of forensic dental sciences, 2012; 4(2), 58. 25. Damera, A., Mohanalakhsmi, J., Yellarthi, P. K., & Rezwana, B. M. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular ramus for gender estimation: Retrospective study. Journal of forensic dental sciences, 2016;8(2,74).