Research Article
Year 2019,
Volume: 6 Issue: 4, 265 - 268, 11.11.2019
Abstract
References
- 1. Giuseppe L, Gian Andrea P, Gino G, Alessandro F & Claudio M. Radiographic assessment of the mandibular retromolar canal using cone-beam computed tomography, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 2013; 71:3-4, 650-655 2. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, et al. Bifid mandibular canal in Japanese. Implant Dent. 2007;16:24-32. 3. Claeys V, Wackens G. Bifid mandibular canal: literature review and case report. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005; Jan;34(1):55-8. 4. White SC, Pharoah MJ Oral Radiology—principles and interpretation, 5th edn. Mosby, St. Louis 2004 5. Rouas P, Delbos Y, Nancy J. Pseudo multipl and enlarged mandibular canals: the evidence-based response of come beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35:217–218 6. Benediktsdottir IS, Wenzel A, Petersen JK, Hintze H: Mandibular third molar removal: risk indicators for extended operation time, postoperative pain, and complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 97: 438-446. 7. Wadhwani P, Mathur RM, Kohli M et al. Mandibular canal variant: a case report. J Oral Pathol Med 2008;37:122–124 8. Sanchis JM, Pen ̃arrocha M, Soler F. Bifid mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:422–4. 9. Nortje ́ CJ, Farman AG, Grotepass FW. Variations in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental (mandibular) canal: a retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients. Br J Oral Surg. 1977;15:55–63. 10. Langlais RP, Broadus R, Glass BJ. Bifid mandibular canals in panoramic radiographs. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;110:923–6. 11. Klinge B, Petersson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:327–2. 12. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Ariji E. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:155-159.
Gömülü ve sürmüş yirmi yaş dişlerinde bifid mandibular kanal prevalansının dental volumetrik tomografi ile karşılaştırılması
Abstract
Amaç: Çeşitli görüntüleme teknikleri ile yapılan çalışmalarda bifid mandibular
kanal gibi mandibular kanalın değişik varyasyonları bildirilmiştir. Panoramik
radyografi ile yapılan çalışmalarda bildirilen bifid mandibular kanal
varyasyonu % 1’den fazla değildir. Bu çalışmanın amacı konik ışınlı
bilgisayarlı tomografi (KIBT) kullanılarak bifid mandibular kanal insidansını
belirlemektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: 204 yarım çenede KIBT görüntüleri kullanılarak retrospektif olarak
bifid mandibular kanal varlığı değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Değerlendirilen 204 yarım çenenin 87 (% 39.2)’sinde bifid mandibular
kanal görüldü.
Sonuç: Panoramik radyografi kullanılarak yapılmış olan çalışmalara nazaran
KIBT ile yapılan bu çalışmada çok daha yüksek bifid mandibular kanal insidansı
bulunmuştur.
ANAHTAR
KELİMELER
Bifid mandibular kanal, konik ışınlı
bilgisayarlı tomografi, insidans
References
- 1. Giuseppe L, Gian Andrea P, Gino G, Alessandro F & Claudio M. Radiographic assessment of the mandibular retromolar canal using cone-beam computed tomography, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 2013; 71:3-4, 650-655 2. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, et al. Bifid mandibular canal in Japanese. Implant Dent. 2007;16:24-32. 3. Claeys V, Wackens G. Bifid mandibular canal: literature review and case report. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005; Jan;34(1):55-8. 4. White SC, Pharoah MJ Oral Radiology—principles and interpretation, 5th edn. Mosby, St. Louis 2004 5. Rouas P, Delbos Y, Nancy J. Pseudo multipl and enlarged mandibular canals: the evidence-based response of come beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35:217–218 6. Benediktsdottir IS, Wenzel A, Petersen JK, Hintze H: Mandibular third molar removal: risk indicators for extended operation time, postoperative pain, and complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 97: 438-446. 7. Wadhwani P, Mathur RM, Kohli M et al. Mandibular canal variant: a case report. J Oral Pathol Med 2008;37:122–124 8. Sanchis JM, Pen ̃arrocha M, Soler F. Bifid mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:422–4. 9. Nortje ́ CJ, Farman AG, Grotepass FW. Variations in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental (mandibular) canal: a retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients. Br J Oral Surg. 1977;15:55–63. 10. Langlais RP, Broadus R, Glass BJ. Bifid mandibular canals in panoramic radiographs. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;110:923–6. 11. Klinge B, Petersson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:327–2. 12. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Ariji E. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:155-159.
There are 1 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Dentistry |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | November 11, 2019 |
| Submission Date | January 24, 2019 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019 Volume: 6 Issue: 4 |
Selcuk Dental Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC).