Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Maksiller sinüzit ve odontojenik enfeksiyon ilişkisinin dental volümetrik tomografi görüntüleri ile değerlendirilmesi

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 4, 178 - 183, 11.11.2019

Abstract

Amaç: Radyografik olarak sinüzit bulguları bulunan
hastaların maksiller posterior dişlerindeki enfeksiyonlar ile maksiller sinüzit
ilişkisinin, dental volümetrik tomografi (DVT) görüntüleri kullanılarak
değerlendirilmesidir.

Gereç ve Yöntemler: 1000 hastaya ait DVT görüntüsü, maksiller sinüs mukoza kalınlığını
saptamak amacıyla retrospektif olarak tarandı. Sinüs mukozası kalınlığının 2 mm
ve üzerinde olduğu olgular patolojik olarak kabul edildi. Patolojik olgular
içerisinde sinüse komşu molar ve/veya premolar dişlerde apikal lezyonu
bulunanlara, radyografik olarak odontojenik maksiller sinüzit tanısı kondu.
Sinüs mukozası kalınlaşmasına etki edebilecek faktörler; demografik
değişkenler, diş tipi ve apikal lezyona ait parametreler (lezyonlu diş/ kök
sayısı, lezyon çapı, lezyon-sinüs tabanı mesafesi) olmak üzere 3 farklı
başlıkta değerlendirildi. Veriler tanımlayıcı istatistik ve lineer regresyon
analizi ile incelendi (p=0.05). Gözlemci içi uyum değerlendirmesinde Kappa
testinden yararlanıldı (
κ).

Bulgular: Mukozal kalınlaşma saptanan 202 olgunun, % 47,5'inde odontojenik
maksiller sinüzit olduğu saptandı. Odontojenik maksiller sinüzitin en sık
gözlendiği diş tipi 1. molar dişlerdi (p<0.05). Mukozal kalınlaşma miktarı
ile istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki; cinsiyet (erkekler), lezyonlu kök
sayısı, lezyon çapı ve lezyonlu diş sayısı arasında saptandı (p<0.05).

Sonuçlar: Özellikle erkek hastalarda 1.molar dişte birden çok kökü etkileyen geniş
apikal lezyon(lar) varlığında, lezyonun sinüse olan uzaklığından bağımsız
olarak odontojenik maksiller sinüzit gelişme riski artmaktadır. Ayrıca,
iyileşmeyen veya tekrarlayan inatçı sinüzit olgularında dişhekimi konsültasyonu
ve endodontik tedavi opsiyonu mutlaka değerlendirilmelidir.

ANAHTAR KELİMELER











Apikal lezyon, maksiller sinüzit, DVT

References

  • 1. Vidal F. Coutinho TM, Carvalho Ferreira D. Odontogenic sinusitis: a comprehensive review. Acta Odontol Scand 2017;75(8):623-33. 2. Nagar AC, Gautam A. Maxillary sinüsitis of odontogenic origin: a review. IJRS 2015;3:1323- 8. 3. Shahbazian M, Jacobs R. Diagnostic value of 2D and 3D imaging in odontogenic maxillary sinusitis: a review of literature. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39(4):294-300. 4. Kamburoğlu K, Yılmaz F, Gulsahi K, Gulen O. Change in periapical lesion and adjacent mucosal thickening dimensions one year after endodontic treatment: volumetric cone-beam computed tomography assessment. J Endod 2017;43(2):218-24. 5. Nunes CA, Guedes OA, Alencar AH. Evaluation of periapical lesions andtheir association with maxillary sinus abnormalities on cone-beam computed tomographic images.J Endod 2016;42(1):42-6. 6. Maillet M, Bowles WR. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of maxillary sinusitis. J Endod 2011;37(6):753-7. 7. Lu Y, Liu Z. Associations between maxillary sinus mucosal thickening and apical periodontitis using cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a retrospective study. JOE 2012;38(8):1069–74. 8. Janner SF. Characteristics and dimensions of the Schneiderian membrane: a radiographic analysis using cone beam computed tomography in patients referred for dental implant surgery in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22(12):1446-53. 9. Shanbhag S, Karnik P, Shirke P. Association between periapical lesions and maxillary sinus mucosal thickening: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomographic study. J Endod 2013;39(7):853-7. 10. Roque-Torres GD, Ramirez-Sotelo LR. Association between maxillary sinus pathologies and healthy teeth. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2016;82(1):33-8. 11. Vallo J, Suominen-Taipale L, Huumonen S. Prevalence of mucosal abnormalities of the maxillary sinus and their relationship to dental disease in panoramic radiography: results from the Health 2000 Health Examination Survey. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109(3):80-7. 12. Rak KM, Newell JD. Paranasal sinuses on MR images of the brain: significance of mucosal thickening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156(2):381-4. 13. Capelli M, Gatti P. Radiological study of maxillary sinus using CBCT: relationship between mucosal thickening and common anatomic variants in chronic rhinosinusitis. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10(11):7-10. 14. Yıldırım E. Evaluation of the relationship between maxillary sinus floor position and maxillary sinusitis using cone beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol 2016. 15. Shahbazian M, Vandewoude C, Wyatt J, Jacobs R.Comparative assessment of panoramic radiography and CBCT imaging for radiodiagnostics in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Invest 2014;18:293–300. 16. Shahbazian M, Vandewoude C, Wyatt J. Comparative assessment of periapical radiography and CBCT imaging for radiodiagnostics in the posterior maxilla. Odontology 2015;103:97–104. 17. Lavasani SA, Tyler C, Roach SH.Cone-beam Computed Tomography: Anatomic Analysis of Maxillary Posterior Teeth-Impact on Endodontic Microsurgery. J Endod 2016;42(6):890-5. 18. Scarfe WC, Levin MD , Gane D, Farman AG. Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics. International Journal of Dentistry 2009. 19. Guidelines on CBCT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology,Sedentexct 2012. 20. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Azevedo BC. A new periapical index based on cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 2008;34(11):1325-31. 21. Patel NA, Ferguson BJ. Odontogenic sinusitis: an ancient but under-appreciated cause of maxillary sinusitis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;20(1):24-8. 22. Hoskison E, Daniel M.Evidence of an increase in the incidence of odontogenic sinusitis over the last decade in the UK. J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:43-6.
Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 4, 178 - 183, 11.11.2019

Abstract

References

  • 1. Vidal F. Coutinho TM, Carvalho Ferreira D. Odontogenic sinusitis: a comprehensive review. Acta Odontol Scand 2017;75(8):623-33. 2. Nagar AC, Gautam A. Maxillary sinüsitis of odontogenic origin: a review. IJRS 2015;3:1323- 8. 3. Shahbazian M, Jacobs R. Diagnostic value of 2D and 3D imaging in odontogenic maxillary sinusitis: a review of literature. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39(4):294-300. 4. Kamburoğlu K, Yılmaz F, Gulsahi K, Gulen O. Change in periapical lesion and adjacent mucosal thickening dimensions one year after endodontic treatment: volumetric cone-beam computed tomography assessment. J Endod 2017;43(2):218-24. 5. Nunes CA, Guedes OA, Alencar AH. Evaluation of periapical lesions andtheir association with maxillary sinus abnormalities on cone-beam computed tomographic images.J Endod 2016;42(1):42-6. 6. Maillet M, Bowles WR. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of maxillary sinusitis. J Endod 2011;37(6):753-7. 7. Lu Y, Liu Z. Associations between maxillary sinus mucosal thickening and apical periodontitis using cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a retrospective study. JOE 2012;38(8):1069–74. 8. Janner SF. Characteristics and dimensions of the Schneiderian membrane: a radiographic analysis using cone beam computed tomography in patients referred for dental implant surgery in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22(12):1446-53. 9. Shanbhag S, Karnik P, Shirke P. Association between periapical lesions and maxillary sinus mucosal thickening: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomographic study. J Endod 2013;39(7):853-7. 10. Roque-Torres GD, Ramirez-Sotelo LR. Association between maxillary sinus pathologies and healthy teeth. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2016;82(1):33-8. 11. Vallo J, Suominen-Taipale L, Huumonen S. Prevalence of mucosal abnormalities of the maxillary sinus and their relationship to dental disease in panoramic radiography: results from the Health 2000 Health Examination Survey. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109(3):80-7. 12. Rak KM, Newell JD. Paranasal sinuses on MR images of the brain: significance of mucosal thickening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156(2):381-4. 13. Capelli M, Gatti P. Radiological study of maxillary sinus using CBCT: relationship between mucosal thickening and common anatomic variants in chronic rhinosinusitis. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10(11):7-10. 14. Yıldırım E. Evaluation of the relationship between maxillary sinus floor position and maxillary sinusitis using cone beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol 2016. 15. Shahbazian M, Vandewoude C, Wyatt J, Jacobs R.Comparative assessment of panoramic radiography and CBCT imaging for radiodiagnostics in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Invest 2014;18:293–300. 16. Shahbazian M, Vandewoude C, Wyatt J. Comparative assessment of periapical radiography and CBCT imaging for radiodiagnostics in the posterior maxilla. Odontology 2015;103:97–104. 17. Lavasani SA, Tyler C, Roach SH.Cone-beam Computed Tomography: Anatomic Analysis of Maxillary Posterior Teeth-Impact on Endodontic Microsurgery. J Endod 2016;42(6):890-5. 18. Scarfe WC, Levin MD , Gane D, Farman AG. Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics. International Journal of Dentistry 2009. 19. Guidelines on CBCT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology,Sedentexct 2012. 20. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Azevedo BC. A new periapical index based on cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 2008;34(11):1325-31. 21. Patel NA, Ferguson BJ. Odontogenic sinusitis: an ancient but under-appreciated cause of maxillary sinusitis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;20(1):24-8. 22. Hoskison E, Daniel M.Evidence of an increase in the incidence of odontogenic sinusitis over the last decade in the UK. J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:43-6.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ceyda Gürhan This is me 0000-0002-4101-4965

Elif Şener This is me 0000-0003-1402-9392

Ali Mert This is me 0000-0002-6806-935X

Güniz Baksı Şen This is me 0000-0001-5720-2947

Publication Date November 11, 2019
Submission Date December 18, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 6 Issue: 4

Cite

Vancouver Gürhan C, Şener E, Mert A, Baksı Şen G. Maksiller sinüzit ve odontojenik enfeksiyon ilişkisinin dental volümetrik tomografi görüntüleri ile değerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dent J. 2019;6(4):178-83.